Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 2 Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. A Ventro-distal complex of labrum B Outer maxillary lobe C Labial palp DAnt. III organ E Chaetae of labial basis and ventral chaetotaxy of head F Mucro G Distal part of tita III and claw complex H Prelabral and labral chaetae I Mandibles.

Figure 14 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 14 Bayesian tree (BI) of Coecobrya species from Thailand based on the concatenated dataset (COI, 16S, and 28S sequences). Posterior probabilities are provided on the branches, and the four new species are in bold with different colors.

Figure 12 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 12 Coecobrya phitsanulokensis sp. nov., continued A Mandibles B Distal part of tita III and claw complex C Distal part of manubrium ventrally D Trochanteral organ E Anterior side of ventral tube F Posterior side of ventral tube and Lateral flap G Mucro H Manubrium plaque.

Figure 13 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 13 Coecobrya phitsanulokensis sp. nov., continued A Chaetotaxy of dorsal Th. II– III B Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. I– III C Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. VD Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. IV.

Figure 11 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 11 Coecobrya phitsanulokensis sp. nov. A Clypeal chaetae B Labial palp C Prelabral and labral chaetae D Anterior side of ventral tube E Dorsal cephalic chaetotaxy F Outer maxillary lobe.

Figure 1 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 1 The distribution map of the troglomorphic Coecobrya in Thailand and the habitus of the four new species. (1) ACoecobrya whitteni sp. nov. (2) BC. troglobia sp. nov. (3) CC. ellisi sp. nov. (4) DC. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. (5) C. chumphonensis Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 (6) C. sirindhornae Jantarit, Satasook & Deharveng, 2019 (7) C. polychaeta Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 and (8) C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 10 from: Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926

Figure 10 Coecobrya ellisi sp. nov., continued A Chaetotaxy of dorsal Th. II– III B Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. I– III C Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. IVD Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. V.

Figure 5 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Mirghaffari SA, Sharifi M (2017) The description of a new species of Niphargus from Iran based on morphological and molecular data. Subterranean Biology 22: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.11286

Figure 5 - Niphargus hakani sp. n., male 9 mm (holotype, ZCRU Amph.1010). A Pleopod I B Pleopod II C Pleopod III D Uropod I E Uropod II F Uropod III. G Epimeral plates H Telson. Scale bars: 1=0.5 mm (G–H). 2=1 mm (A–E). 3=2mm F.

Figure 4 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Mirghaffari SA, Sharifi M (2017) The description of a new species of Niphargus from Iran based on morphological and molecular data. Subterranean Biology 22: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.11286

Figure 4 - Niphargus hakani sp. n., male 9 mm (holotype, ZCRU Amph.1010). A Pereopod III B Pereopod IV C Pereopod V D Pereopod VI E Pereopod VII. Scale bars: 1mm (A–E).

Figure 3 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Mirghaffari SA, Sharifi M (2017) The description of a new species of Niphargus from Iran based on morphological and molecular data. Subterranean Biology 22: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.11286

Figure 3 - Niphargus hakani sp. n., male 9 mm (holotype, ZCRU Amph.1010). A Gnathopod I B Gnathopod II C Maxilliped D Labium E Maxilla II. Scale bars: 1=0.5 mm (C–E). 2=1 mm (A–B).

Figure 2 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Mirghaffari SA, Sharifi M (2017) The description of a new species of Niphargus from Iran based on morphological and molecular data. Subterranean Biology 22: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.11286

Figure 2 - Niphargus hakani sp. n., male 9 mm (holotype, ZCRU Amph.1010). A Antenna I B Antenna II C Head D–E Maxilla I F Left mandible. G Right mandible. H Mandibular palp. Scale bars: 1=0.25 mm (F–G). 2=0.5 mm (C–E, H). 3=1mm (A–B).

Figure 6 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Mirghaffari SA, Sharifi M (2017) The description of a new species of Niphargus from Iran based on morphological and molecular data. Subterranean Biology 22: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.11286

Figure 6 - Bayesian consensus tree of 49 Niphargus species (48 taxa from Esmaeili-Rineh et al. 2015a, 2016), based on the 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. Species are identified and named according to the valid taxonomic description. Posterior probabilities are indicated on main branches.

Figure 8 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 8 Frequency of ontogenetic stages in the subhemocoelic brood pouches of female Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) (morph B) depending on occurrence in Thailand. Blue dots: mitochondrial clade A; pink dots: mitochondrial clade B. Size classes are assigned different colours in the pie charts (see legend) and rivers are coloured according to drainage systems; numbers at the pie charts refer to the total number of dissected specimens and the number of gravid females (in parentheses). The small letters refer to the stations Chiang Mai (a), Ko Samui (b) and Phuket (c) for which meteorological data representing the different climatic regions of Thailand were analysed (see Fig. 12).

Figure 4 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 4 Bayesiam 50% majority-rule consensus tree showing two major mitochondrial clades in Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816). Numbers at the nodes correspond to posterior probabilities (left), maximum likelihood (middle) and maximum parsimony (right) bootstrap values. At the tips of the tree voucher numbers (see material list in the main part of the text), country codes (THA: Thailand; TIM: Timor Leste; IDN: Indonesia) and the river where specimens were collected are indicated. The inset map shows the distribution of mitochondrial clades in Thailand (clade A: blue dots; clade B: magenta dots) and major river systems. The letters a–c in the map refer to localities, for which climatic data were available (see also Fig. 12). The inset with box plots shows the altitudinal distribution of mitochondrial caldes A and B, respectively.

Figure 6 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 6 Results of biometric (a–d) and geometric morphometrics study (e), for four different morphs (A,B,C,Timor) of Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816). Boxplots of (a) shell height, (b) shell width, (c) height of the last three whorls and (d) index of height of last three whorls agaianst shell width. Significant differences between groups are indicated by bars above the boxplots (e) Relative variance in shell shape along PC1 and PC2. Colour corresponding planes indicate the spread of each morph in the data set.

Figure 2 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 2 Shells of Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) from Timor and Thailand. a. Syntypes (MHNG 1093/72/1-4) from Timor. b–g. Morph A, i.e. specimens from Thailand corresponding to T.granifera (SUT 0514044, SUT 0516123, SUT 0515088, SUT 0515068, SUT 0515059, SUT 0516144). h–m. Morph B, i.e. specimens from Thailand corresponding to named T.lineata (Gray, 1828) (SUT 0515081, SUT 0514046, SUT 0516129, SUT 0515092, SUT 0515095, SUT 0516143). n–s. Morph C from Thailand (SUT 0515079, SUT 0516126, SUT 0515055, SUT 0515091, SUT 0516147, SUT0516142). t–y. Shells of T.granifera from Timor Leste (ZMH 119364, ZMH 119359, ZMH 119357, ZMH 119353, ZMH 119363, ZMH 119361). For locality data, see the material list in the main part of the text. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Figure 12 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 12 Proportions of gravid vs. non-gravid specimens of Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) collected in different months within a given year, plotted on climate charts for localities that are representative for different climatic regimes in Thailand. (a) Chiang Mai for inland locations; (b) Ko Samui for the Gulf of Thailand; (c) Phuket for the Andaman Sea (see also Fig. 8). For colour coding, see the inset legend.

Figure 10 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 10 Composition of contents of the subhemocoelic brood pouches of female Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) (a, c) and proportions of gravid animals, i.e. those with filled brood pouch, versus non-gravid specimens (b, d) from Thailand and Timor Leste. a. Composition of contents of the brood pouches for morph A, B and C from Thailand (THA) and specimens from Timor Leste (see Figs 1, 8 and 9). b. Proportion of gravid vs. non-gravid specimens for morph A, B and C from Thailand and specimens from Timor Leste. c. Composition of contents of the brood pouches for mitochondrial clades A and B, respectively (see also Figs 4, 8, 9). d. Proportion of gravid vs. non-gravid specimens for mitochondrial clades A and B, respectively. For colour coding, see the inset legends.

Figure 1 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 1 Distribution of the freshwater thiarid snail Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) across its range in Southeast Asia, with the focus on occurrences in Thailand, contrasted with type and topotypical material from the island of Timor. Asteriks: type locality of "Melania" granifera Lamarck, 1816, reconstructed to originate from near Kupang in western Timor (see text for more details); black dots: sequenced material used in this study; white dots: shell material from museum collections analysed and literature records; white dots with black dot inside: wet material preserved in ethanol.

Figure 9 from: Veeravechsukij N, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Molecular phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 461-493. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981

Figure 9 Frequency of ontogenetic stages in the subhemocoelic brood pouches of female Tarebiagranifera (Lamarck, 1816) depending on occurrence in Thailand and Timor Leste. a. Morph A in Thailand; b. Morph C in Thailand; c. Timor Leste. Blue dots: mitochondrial clade A; pink dots: mitochondrial clade B. Size classes are assigned different colours in the pie charts (see legend) and rivers are coloured according to drainage systems; numbers at the pie charts refer to the total number of dissected specimens and the number of gravid females (in parentheses).