Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5. a – d in Bathyal Mollusca from the cold-water coral biotope of Santa Maria di Leuca (Apulian margin, southern Italy)

FIGURE 5. a – d: Delectopecten vitreus (Gmelin, 1791); RV (a, c, d) and LV (b), sample BC 72, scale bars: 5 mm (a – b), 1 mm (c, juvenile), 0.1 mm (d, prodissoconch); e – g: Parvamussium fenestratum (Forbes, 1844); LV, samples BC 70 (e – f) and BC 72 (g), scale bars: 5 mm (e – f), 0.1 mm (g, prodissoconch); h – l: Cyclopecten hoskynsi (Forbes, 1844); RV (h, i, l) and LV (j, k), sample BC 72, scale bars: 5 mm (h – k), 0.1 mm (l, prodissoconch); m – o: Similipecten similis (Laskey, 1811); RV (n, o) and LV (m), sample BC 72, scale bars: 1 mm (m – n), 0.05 mm (o, prodissoconch).

FIGURE 4. a – c in Bathyal Mollusca from the cold-water coral biotope of Santa Maria di Leuca (Apulian margin, southern Italy)

FIGURE 4. a – c: Bathyarca pectunculoides (Scacchi, 1835); RV (a, b) and LV (c), sample BC 72, scale bars: 1 mm (a – b), 0.1 mm (c, prodissoconch); d – f: Bathyarca philippiana (Nyst, 1848); LV, sample BC 04, scale bars: 2 mm (d – e), 0.1 mm (f, prodissoconch); g – i: Dacrydium hyalinum (Monterosato, 1875); LV, sample BC 72, scale bars: 1 mm (g – h), 0.1 mm (i, prodissoconch); j – m: Pseudamussium peslutrae? (Linnaeus, 1771); LV, sample BC 67, scale bars: 2 mm (j – k), 0.1 mm (l, prodissoconch), 0.05 mm (m, P – 1 detail); n – q: Karnekampia sulcata (Müller, 1776); RV (o – q) and LV (n), sample BC 72, scale bars: 5 mm (n – p), 0.1 mm (q, prodissoconch).

FIGURE 4 in New molecular phylogeny of Lucinidae: increased taxon base with focus on tropical Western Atlantic species (Mollusca: Bivalvia)

FIGURE 4. Single gene tree for Lucinidae based on cyt b sequences, using Bayesian inference as implemented by MrBayes. Support values are posterior probabilities (PP); branches with PP <50 % were collapsed. Western Atlantic species in red. See Table 1 for sample details. Monitilorinae and Lucininae expanded in Fig. 5.

FIGURE 1 in New molecular phylogeny of Lucinidae: increased taxon base with focus on tropical Western Atlantic species (Mollusca: Bivalvia)

FIGURE 1. Combined gene tree for Lucinidae based on sequences from three genes (18 S rRNA, 28 S rRNA and cyt b), using Bayesian inference as implemented by MrBayes. Support values are posterior probabilities (PP). Codakiinae and Lucininae expanded in Figs 2 and 3. See Table 1 for sample details. Western Atlantic species in red. Scale is number of substitutions per site. Locality codes used on trees. ABD—Abu Dhabi; ANG—Angola; BD—Bermuda; BOC—Bocas, Panama; BR—Broome, Australia; CAL—California; CB – Chesterfield Bank; COSRIC West Costa Rica; CR—Croatia; DMP—Dampier, Australia; DEV—Devon, UK; FK—Florida Keys; FR—France; GD—Guadeloupe; HK—Hong Kong; JPN – Japan; KK—Kungkraben Bay, Thailand; LH—Lord Howe Island; LI – Lizard Island, Australia; MAD—Madagascar; MADANG—Madang, Papua New Guinea; MAUR – Mauritius; MB—Moreton Bay, Australia; MEX—West Mexico; NC—New Caledonia; NIG—Nigeria; OK— Okinawa; PAN – Panglao, Philippines; PNG – Papua New Guinea; ROD—Rodrigues; RUK—Ryukyus, Japan; SAF—Safaga, Red Sea; SGP—Singapore; SOL—Solomon Sea; SYD—Sydney, Australia; TCB—Tin Can Bay, Australia; TIM—East Timor; TJ—Tjärnö, Sweden; TUN—Djerba, Tunisia; VAN—Vanuatu; VEN—Venezuela; UK—England.

FIG. 5 in At the bottom of the deep blue sea: a new wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophaga) from the Cape Verde Abyssal Plain (subtropical Atlantic)

FIG. 5. — Incurrent siphonal opening of Xylophaga alexisi n. sp., SEM. Note absence of cirri. Scale bar: 30 µm.

FIG. 4 in At the bottom of the deep blue sea: a new wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophaga) from the Cape Verde Abyssal Plain (subtropical Atlantic)

FIG. 4. — Excurrent siphonal opening of Xylophaga alexisi n. sp., SEM: A, lateral view; B, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, 100 µm.

FIG. 2. — A in At the bottom of the deep blue sea: a new wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophaga) from the Cape Verde Abyssal Plain (subtropical Atlantic)

FIG. 2. — A, lateral view of an intact specimen of Xylophaga alexisi n. sp.; B, dorsal view of intact, larger specimen of X. alexisi n. sp. (note anteriorly directed mesoplax); C, dorsal view of smaller specimen of X. alexisi n. sp., mesoplax in erect stage, not readily seen from dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 1. — A in At the bottom of the deep blue sea: a new wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophaga) from the Cape Verde Abyssal Plain (subtropical Atlantic)

FIG. 1. — A, collection locality of Xylophaga alexisi n. sp. at 21°N, 30°W; R, collection locality of Xylophaga ricei Harvey, 1996 at 31°N, 20°W. (From Ryan et al. 2009, modified by Y. Lagabrielle.)

FIG. 6. — A, Xylophaga alexisi n in At the bottom of the deep blue sea: a new wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophaga) from the Cape Verde Abyssal Plain (subtropical Atlantic)

FIG. 6. — A, Xylophaga alexisi n. sp., lateral view to define "incomplete siphon" in which the excurrent siphon is considerably shorter than the incurrent siphon; B, Xylophaga pacifica Voight, 2009, lateral view to define "complete siphon", in which both siphonal openings are roughly equal in length. Scale bars: 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2011View details →

Fig. 3. A–B in A New Subspecies Of Amphidromus (Amphidromus) Atricallosus From Singapore (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Fig. 3. A–B, Live animal colouration: A, Amphidromus atricallosus temasek, new subspecies, holotype (ZRC.MOL.3058); B, Amphidromus atricallosus perakensis (Fulton, 1901), Pulau Tulai, West Malaysia. (Photographs by Tan Heok Hui)

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2011View details →

Fig. 1. A in A New Subspecies Of Amphidromus (Amphidromus) Atricallosus From Singapore (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Fig. 1. A, Amphidromus atricallosus temasek, new subspecies: Holotype, SH 44 x SD 25.6 (ZRC.MOL.3058), Nee Soon Swamp Forest, Singapore; B–E Amphidromus atricallosus perakensis (Fulton, 1901): B, SH 45 x SD 26.4 (TSK 11041), Bukit Serdam, Pahang, West Malaysia; C, SH 47.1 x SD 25.3 (CBB), Tapah Hill, Perak, West Malaysia; D, SH 47.2 x SD 27.6 (ZRC.MOL.3064), Pulau Tulai, near Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia; E, SH 46.4 x SD 24.2 (ZRC.MOL.3062), Gunung Genting, Perak, West Malaysia; F, Amphidromus atricallosus atricallosus (Gould, 1843): SH 45 x SD 25.7 (CSY 409.4.4.16), Ranong, Thailand; G, Amphidromus atricallosus leucoxanthus (von Martens, 1864): SH 51 x SD 28.5 (CSY 409.3.49.1), Chantaburi, East Thailand.

opencc-zeroJun 2011View details →

FIG. 2 in Early Eocene Caenogastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Haymana-Polatl Basin, Central Anatolia (Turkey): taxonomy and palaeoecology

FIG. 2. — Correlation table between the time scales, stages and biozones for the Upper Paleocene-Lower Eocene chronostratigraphy (compiled from Berggren et al. 1985, 1995; Serra-Kiel et al. 1998; Berggren & Aubry 1998; Aubry 2000; Luterbacher et al. 2004; Pujalte et al. 2009a, b).

Figure 51 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 51. Arbitrarily selected tree to trace the character evolution within the cryptobran dorids. Numbers refer to characters listed in the text. Characters printed in bold and italic face presented at least one instance of reversal.

Figure 50 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 50. Majority rule (50%) consensus tree of the phylogenetic relationships of the cryptobranch dorids with the percentage level of consensus.

Figure 48 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 48. Morphology of the caecum. A, Doris verrucosa (CASIZ 082119); scale bar = 1 mm. B, Calycidoris guntheri (CASIZ 086915); scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 49 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 49. Strict consensus tree of the phylogenetic relationships of the cryptobranch dorids with the Bremer support values in terms of steps.

Figure 47 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 47. SEM images of dorsal tubercles. A, Onchidoris bilamellata (CASIZ 070511); scale bar = 430 Mm. B, Actinocyclus verrucosus (CASIZ 099250), scale bar = 600 Mm. C, Discodoris boholiensis (CASIZ 083654); scale bar = 150 Mm. D, Diaulula sandiegensis (CASIZ 068277); scale bar = 250 Mm.

Figure 46 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 46. Conualevia marcusi (CASIZ 071531). A, general view of the anatomy; scale bar = 1 mm. B, reproductive system; scale bar = 1 mm. C, lateral view of the buccal bulb; scale bar = 0.5 mm. D, central nervous system; scale bar = 0.5 mm. E, ventral view of the mouth area; scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 45 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 45. Conualevia marcusi (CASIZ 071531), SEM images of a rhinophore and the penis. A, rhinophore; scale bar = 150 Mm. B, penis; scale bar = 150 Mm.

Figure 43 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)

Figure 43. Sebadoris nubilosa (CASIZ 071727). A, general view of the anatomy; scale bar = 1 mm. B, reproductive system; scale bar = 1 mm. C, detail of several reproductive organs; scale bar = 1 mm. D, central nervous system; scale bar = 1 mm. E, lateral view of the buccal bulb; scale bar = 1 mm. F, ventral view of the mouth area; scale bar = 1 mm.