Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5. Heatmap with a in Fig. 2. 60 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 5. Heatmap with a dendogram showing dietary plant abundance at the genus level for adult, subadult, and juvenile Asian elephants. Gradient heatmap shows the 20 most abundant genera.

Fig. 4. Heatmap with a in Fig. 2. 60 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 4. Heatmap with a dendogram showing dietary plant abundance at the genus level for male and female Asian elephants. Gradient heatmap shows the 20 most abundant genera.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 2. 60 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 3. Distribution (%) of plants consumed by adult, subadult, and juvenile Asian elephants in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP) at the genus level (20 most abundant genera).

Fig. 2 in Fig. 2. 60 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 2. Distribution (%) of plants consumed by male and female Asian elephants in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP) at the genus level (20 most abundant genera).

Fig. 1 in Fig. 2. 60 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 1. Distribution (%) of plants consumed by wild Asian elephants in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP) at the genus level (> 1% abundance).

Fig. 3 in Fig. 12 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 3. Ecological niche models (in gray) of the summer seasons and their projection into winter (which result as null projection); from winter with its projection to summer, we show the projected area from winter to summer in an enlarged box.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 12 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 2. Frequency of records in the different geographic segments (A-K from north to south) during the year. The dashed line corresponds to segment I.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 12 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 4. Niche comparison based on the first two principal components between summer (orange) and winter (blue) seasons. The colored cells indicate the niche area with the highest density presence records, the overlap between the two environments is shown in blue. The polygon represents the availability of the environment for each season. Histograms show the observed overlap between the two environments (red line) and the overlap of simulated niches (gray bars). In both cases, the p-value was significant; that is, the null hypothesis that the niches are different in both directions (summer to winter and vice versa) cannot be rejected.

Fig. 1 in Fig. 12 in Identification and Distribution of Wedge Clams (Donacidae: Bivalvia) in Thailand by Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis.

Fig. 1. Geographical space of the records of Selasphorus platycercus, showing the 11 segments with letters from A to K. The graphs represent the records by segment along the months of the year.

Fig. 8 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 8. PCA. Principal component scatter plot (PCA) conducted on the elliptic Fourier descriptions of denticles shapes using the first 10 harmonics; this figure shows the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2 are on the x and y-axes, respectively).

Fig. 9 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 9. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of Trichodina spp. using normalized elliptical Fourier descriptors. Percentages indicate the proportion of the trace captured in each LD component.

Fig. 4. Tree derived from a in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 4. Tree derived from a Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis. The bootstrap consensus tree bases on ML inferred from 500 replicates. Bootstrap values for ML are given above nodes.

Fig. 2 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic drawings of denticles of trichodinids. (A and B) Denticle of Trichodina bellotti n. sp. from Austrolebias bellottii. (C) Trichodina hypsilepis redrawn from Wellborn (1967). (D) Trichodina heterodentata redrawn from Duncan (1977). (E) Trichodina paraheterodentata redrawn from Tang and Zhao (2013). (F) Trichodina pseudoheterodentata redrawn from Tang et al. (2017).

Fig. 3 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on 18S rDNA sequences by Bayesian Inference, with the model Trn + I + G applied in Mrbayes v.3.2.1. The new sequenced forms are in bold. Numbers given at nodes of branches are the posterior probability value.

Fig. 5 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 5. Denticles silhouettes utilized on Fourier analysis. Trichodina bellottii n. sp., Trichodina heterodentata redrawn from Duncan (1977); Albaladejo and Arthur, 1989; Bondad-Reantaso and Arthur, 1989; Van As and Basson, 1989; Basson and Van As, 1994; Al Rasheid et al., 2000; Asmat, 2004; Dove and O'Donoghue, 2005; Dias et al., 2009; Martins et al., 2010; Benites de Pádua et al., 2012; Miranda et al., 2012; Valladão et al., 2014. Trichodina paraheterodentata redrawn from Tang and Zhao (2013). Trichodina pseudoheterodentata redrawn from Tang et al. (2017).

Fig. 1 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 1. Microphotographs of Trichodina bellottii n. sp. from Austrolebias bellottii. (A–D) Adhesive disc after dry silver impregnation. E) Ciliature. (F) Macronucleus with methylene-blue staining. Scale bars: 20 μm.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in Does size matter for horny beetles? A geometric morphometric analysis of interspecific and intersexual size and shape variation in Colophon haughtoni Barnard, 1929, and C. kawaii Mizukami, 1997 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae)

Fig. 2 Landmarks used for geometric morphometric analysis of Colophon specimens: a male C. haughtoni mandible; b male C. kawaii mandible; c male C. haughtoni head; d female head; e pronotum; f elytron. Scale bars represent 2 mm

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Fig. 1 Adult Colophon beetles. a Colophon haughtoni. b in Does size matter for horny beetles? A geometric morphometric analysis of interspecific and intersexual size and shape variation in Colophon haughtoni Barnard, 1929, and C. kawaii Mizukami, 1997 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae)

Fig. 1 Adult Colophon beetles. a Colophon haughtoni. b Ventral photograph of C. haughtoni head showing (1) gena, (2) mandible base, (3) ventral process, (4) dorsal process and (5) apex of the mandible. c Ventral view of C. kawaii head. Scale bars represent 4 mm (a) and 2 mm (b, c). Photographs by H.J. de Klerk

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →

Figure 2 in Life cycle and morphometric analysis of nymphs of Cynodonmiris corpoicanus Ferreira & Barreto, 2013 (Hemiptera: Miridae)

Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) scores for the nymphae of C. corpoicanus. / Valores del análisis de componentes principales (ACP) de ninfas de C. corpoicanus.