Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Houseflies speaking for the conservation of natural areas: a broad sampling of Muscidae (Diptera) on coastal plains of the Pampa biome, Southern Brazil

Fig. 3. Compositional differences between Muscidae (Insecta, Diptera) assemblages of all five regions of the Coastal Plain of Pampa Biome (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) shown by the unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) cluster analysis.

Fig. 4 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 4. Ventral views of live adults: (A) male of Amolops formosus, (B) female of Amolops formosus, (C) male of Nanorana liebigii, and (D) female of Nanorana liebigii. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

Fig. 6 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 6. Habitat varieties of the three sympatric frogs: (A) rapidly flowing stream, (B) series of waterfalls inhabited by Amolops formosus, (C) slow flowing shallow stream, and (D) irrigation ditch. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

Fig. 2 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 2. Dorsal view of live adults: (A) Ombrana sikimensis, (B) Amolops formosus, and (C) Nanorana liebigii. (D) Dorso-lateral view of Nanorana liebigii. Photos: Biraj Shrestha and Min Bahadur Gurung.

Fig. 5 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 5. Life stages of Nanorana liebigii: (A) eggs deposition underneath a stone, (B) egg clutch, (C) embryo development, and (D) tadpole with metamorphosed legs. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of reduced-risk insecticides to control chilli thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and conserve natural enemies on ornamental plants

Fig. 1. Mean percentage (± SEM) of Rhaphiolepsis indica foliage with Scirtothrips dorsalis feeding damage 42 days afer insecticide treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments using Tukey-Kramer HSD means comparison (P <0.05). Cyantraniliprole low (59.1 mL per 378.5 L) and cyantraniliprole high (236.6 mL per378.5 L).

Fig. 6 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 6. Nymphargus balionotus breeding behavior. (A) Calling male; (B) Male and female in amplexus; (C) Egg mass deposited on the bottom surface on a leaf. Photos by Ross J. Maynard (A) and Jaime Culebras (B–C).

Fig 5 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig 5. Iris variation in Nymphargus balionotus. Photos by Jaime Culebras (A–C) and Scott Trageser (D).

Fig. 4 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Metamorphic life stage of Nymphargus balionotus; dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views (ZSFQ 3895). Photos by Ross J. Maynard.

Fig. 3 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Pattern and color variation in adult Nymphargus balionotus. (A) Male, uncollected; (B) Male, ZSFQ 0531; (C) Male, uncollected; (D) Male, uncollected; (E–F) Male, ZSFQ 0532; (G–H) Gravid female, uncollected. Photos by Ross J. Maynard.

Fig. 2 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 2. Audio spectrogram (top), oscillogram (middle), and power spectrum (bottom) graphs of a single male Nymphargus balionotus advertisement call.

Fig. 1 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Distribution map of known localities for Nymphargus balionotus. Information tags to the left summarize data reported for each locality, including (in order): name of collection site, department/province, number of specimens reported, elevation, and year specimens were collected or observed. Blue circle represents the Río Manduriacu Reserve; red circle marks the type locality; yellow and gray circles represent remaining localities reported in the literature, with the gray (Campamento Chancos) population believed to be a distinct lineage by Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid (2006). Note: the "El Tambo" locality in the department of Cauca, Colombia, has been placed as accurately as possible based on available information (see Discussion).

Figures 33–41. Polyphylla uteana Tanner. 33–36 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)

Figures 33–41. Polyphylla uteana Tanner. 33–36) Holotype male. 37) Holotype labels. 38–40) Male variation. 41) Female.

Figures 28–32. Polyphylla avittata 28 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)

Figures 28–32. Polyphylla avittata 28) Distribution of P. avittata Hardy and Andrews (solid circles) and P. uteana Tanner (black vertical lines). 29–32) Variation of male. 29) Hurricane Sand Dunes, Washington Co., UT (topotype). 30) Goblin Valley State Park, Emory Co., UT. 31) Grand Staircase- Escalante National Monument, Garfield Co., UT. 32) 3 miles N of Moab, Grand Co., UT.

Figures 48–49. Polyphylla. Males. 48 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)

Figures 48–49. Polyphylla. Males. 48) Polyphylla mescalerensis Young [topotype]. Mescalero Sand Dunes, Chaves County, New Mexico. 49) Polyphylla sp. incertae. Cerro San Luis, Chihuahua, Mexico.

Figures 50–57. Habitats. 50–51 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)

Figures 50–57. Habitats. 50–51) Polyphylla anivallis. Animas Valley Sand Dunes, Hidalgo Co., NM. 52–53) Polyphylla koso. Coso Mountains, Inyo Co., CA. 52) Coso Bridge. 53) Mill Springs Canyon. 54–55) Polyphylla morroensis. Baywood Fine Sands, San Luis Obispo Co., CA. 56–57) Polyphylla socorriana. El Socorro Sand Dunes, Baja California, MX.

Figures 42–47 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)

Figures 42–47. Described females and comparative male. Polyphylla monahansensis Hardy and Andrews. 42) Male. 43–44) Female. Polyphylla stellata Young. 45) Male. 46–47) Female.

opencc-zeroJan 2023View details →

FIG. 2 in Natural history and conservation of the wolf spider Vesubia jugorum (Simon, 1881) (Araneae, Lycosidae), assessed as Endangered in the IUCN Red List

FIG. 2. –– Long-term monitoring programme of Vesubia jugorum (Simon, 1881): A, a typical high-altitude rocky area colonized by Vesubia jugorum; B, a female with its cocoon; C, measurement of the cocoon diameter with a digital calliper; D, removal of leg IV from a female; E, measurement of leg IV through Leica M80 stereoscopic microscope; F, a female with cocoon found in its retreat.

opencc-zeroJan 2023View details →

FIG. 4 in Natural history and conservation of the wolf spider Vesubia jugorum (Simon, 1881) (Araneae, Lycosidae), assessed as Endangered in the IUCN Red List

FIG. 4. –– Predicted relationship (blue line) and 95% confidence intervals (gray stripe) between length of femur IV and habitat suitability of each monitoring site derived from the Ecological Niche Model presented in Mammola et al. (2019) (see Material and Methods for further details).