Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,453
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,453 results for “Outcome research”
Supplementary material 1 from: Hammond C (2016) Widening the circle of care: An arts-based, participatory dialogue with stakeholders on cancer care for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples in Ontario, Canada. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9115. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9115
The attached file includes the evaluation of the postdoctoral fellowship application from three reviewers. Guidelines for reviewers are available online for more inforamtion (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/33043.html), including the rating scale that is used to score each section of the evaluation.
Supplementary material 1 from: Neylon C, Chan L (2016) Exploring the opportunities and challenges of implementing open research strategies within development institutions. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8880. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8880
A translation of the proposal into French. IDRC operates in both English and French as a Canadian Crown Corporation.
Supplementary material 1 from: Heuer K, Ghosh S, Robinson Sterling A, Toro R (2016) Open Neuroimaging Laboratory. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9113. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9113
Animation showing the different functionalities of BrainBox: opening a Magnetic Resonance Imaging volume, viewing it, and editing it collaboratively online.
Supplementary material 2 from: Martone M, Murray-Rust P, Molloy J, Arrow T, MacGillivray M, Kittel C, Kasberger S, Steel G, Oppenheim C, Ranganathan A, Tennant J, Udell J (2016) ContentMine/Hypothes.is Proposal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8424. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8424
An example of how amanuens.is could combine ContentMine and Hypothes.is technologies to discover information about the Zika vector Aedes aegypti and the symbiont bacterium Wolbachia.
Supplementary material 1 from: Susi T (2015) Heteroatom quantum corrals and nanoplasmonics in graphene (HeQuCoG). Research Ideas and Outcomes 1: e7479. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7479
The attachment contains the original reports given to the FWF by the reviewers of the grant application, published here with their permission.
Supplementary material 7 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Sharing and publishing your data" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 6 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Analyzing your data and handling the outputs" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 4 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Saving and backing up your data" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 3 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Organizing your data" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 5 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Getting your data ready for analysis" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 2 from: Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018) Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e26439. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
A draft guide that corresponds with the "Planning your project" row of the RDM rubric. Suggested points of customization are highlighted in yellow (discipline-specific) and red (institution-specific).
Supplementary material 1 from: Underwood E, Taylor K, Tucker G (2018) The use of biodiversity data in spatial planning and impact assessment in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e28045. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e28045
Biodiversity data sources at the EU level comprise the biodiversity and landuse-related EU reporting and monitoring programmes, and global or regional data portals which include data from European countries. Also gives an overview of spatial planning and data sources for biodiversity impact assessment in a selection of EU Member States: UK, Bulgaria, Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Denmark and the Baltic Sea.
Supplementary material 1 from: Van Tuyl S, Whitmire A (2018) Investigation of Non-Academic Data Management Practices to Inform Academic Research Data Management. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e30829. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e30829
Interview protocol used for the project, "Investigation of Non-Academic Data Management Practices to Inform Academic Research Data Management"
Supplementary material 7 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
This document contains an annotated set of data quality checks that participants report they use when evaluating and cleaning datasets. These items outline how participants are judging if the data suits their purpose.
Supplementary material 3 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
The informed consent request and workshop survey questions given to participants after the workshop each day for 4 consecutive days.
Supplementary material 2 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
This document shows just the questions we asked the applicants who applied to participate in this Georeferencing for Research Use workshop. We used a Google Form to deliver these questions and collect responses. It is both an application and serves as our pre-workshop survey.
Supplementary material 8 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Summary of desired future workshop topics that were listed by participants on the last day of the workshop.
Supplementary material 6 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Summary of topics to be covered in an ideal workshop as identified by workshop applicants in the workshop call for participation. We incorporated as many as possible that also fit our scope.
Supplementary material 5 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Questions we asked in the Georeferencing for Research Follow Up Survey done 3 months after the workshop.
Supplementary material 4 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Three months after the workshop, participants were surveyed to assess what workshop-related knowledge and materials were being used and disseminated to others. This document summarized data collected in this particular survey.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.