Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
138
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
138 results for “PROMs”
Providing Standardized Consented PROMs (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) for Improving Pain Treatment
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03834922. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Multimedia Informed Consent & PROMs in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02810860. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
PGE2 Followed by Oxytocin vs Oxytocin in Term PROM (POXY-PROM)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07366359. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02098421. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
PROMs Comparing Digital & Conventional Workflows
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04986761. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
PECUNIA PROM-MH Compendium
<p>The PECUNIA Patient-Reported-Outcome-Measure-Mental Health Compendium (<strong>PECUNIA PROM-MH Compendium</strong>) is a Microsoft Excel©-based electronic library of non-disease specific PROMs used in MH research. The PECUNIA PROM-MH Compendium provides <strong>meta-data information of existing, publicly available generic PROMs</strong> suitable for use in <strong>(mental) health research</strong> and their applicability in <strong>multi-sectoral, multi-national and multi-person (economic) evaluations</strong>. It was developed by the Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna as part of the Horizon 2020 research project PECUNIA (ProgrammE in Costing, resource use measurement and outcome valuation for Use in multi-sectoral National and International health economic evaluAtions - GA No 779292). In terms of outcome assessment, the project aimed for harmonization in multi-national, multi-sectoral and (where relevant) multi-person economic evaluations by addressing cross-country variations in utility measurement and harmonising methods for broader wellbeing measurement among others.</p> <p>The <strong>methodology</strong> of deriving PROMs and their meta-data included in the PROM-MH Compendium library followed a two-step process. Firstly, a <strong>systematic literature review</strong> was conducted in five bibliographic databases from 2008 until February 2020 to identify relevant <strong>non- disease specific PROMs used in mental health research</strong> for the measurement of quality of life/well-being, or recovery. Secondly, <strong>secondary searches</strong> in PubMed and Google were conducted to acquire most up-to-date PROM meta-data information. Meta-data information was searched in scientific articles, instrument manuals, and web-based sources (e.g. questionnaire websites).</p> <p>The PECUNIA PROM-MH Compendium Version 1.0 consists of <strong>204 unique instruments (PROMs)</strong> alongside their comprehensive meta-data and is browseable according to main PROM characteristics. Information about each instrument is organised in five sections:</p> <ol> <li><strong>BASIC CHARACTERISTICS</strong> (information on the year of publication, country (language) of origin, number of items, administration mode, other language versions, etc.);</li> <li><strong>SCORING</strong> (information on the level-sum scoring, standardised scoring, weighted preference-based scoring, availability of preference-based value sets, availability of mapping studies, etc.);</li> <li><strong>VALIDATION IN THE MENTAL HEALTH FIELD</strong> (information about validation studies for different mental disorders);</li> <li><strong>APPLICATION IN MULTI-SECTORAL, MULTI-NATIONAL, MULTI-PERSON (ECONOMIC) EVALUATIONS</strong> (information whether an instrument: i) has separate adult and child/adolescent versions available, ii) has a proxy-completion option available, iii) assesses outcomes beyond health, i.e. capabilities, iv) has multiple language versions available, v) has a preference-based value set available, and vi) has a preference-based value set available in more than one country);</li> <li><strong>OTHER</strong> (link to the manual and terms of use if available for the specific instrument).</li> </ol>
Propess Versus Prostin for Induction of Labour in Women With Term PROM
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04743297. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 10.
An environment with strong gravitational and magnetic field alterations synergizes to promote variations in Arabidopsis thaliana callus global transcriptional state
Using diamagnetic levitation we have exposed A. thaliana in vitro callus cultures to five environments with different levels of effective gravity (from levitation i.e. simulated mg* to 2g*) and magnetic fields (10.1 to 16.5 Tesla) and we have compared the results with those of similar experiments done in a Random Position Machine (simulated micro g) and a Large Diameter Centrifuge (2g) free of high magnetic fields. Microarray analysis indicates that there are changes in overall gene expression of the cultured cells exposed to these unusual environments but also that gravitational and magnetic field produce synergic variations in the steady state of the transcriptional profile of A. thaliana. Significant changes in the expression of structural abiotic stress and secondary metabolism genes were observed into the magnet field. These results confirm that the strong magnetic field both at micro g* or 2g* has a significant effect on the expression of these genes but subtle gravitational effects are still observable. These subtle responses to microgravity environments are opposite to the ones observed in a hypergravity one. seven-condition experiment MM2D Arabidopsis culture callus control vs. Treatment (altered gravity simulation GBF). Three GBF were used (LDC (2g) + control RPM (mg) + control and Magnet (mg* 0.1g* 1g* 1.9g* 2g*) + control). Biological replicates: 3 replicates in all conditions and controls except 1.9g* (2 replicates)
RNA-Seq of STAR-PROM Barcodes
GEO Series GSE81271. Homo sapiens. 5 samples. Type: Other.
Compliance With PROMs Detection Through Digital Support and Correlation Compared Standard to Outpatient Detection in Knee Prosthetics
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04752761. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Using Clinical Process Indicators, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) to Improve the Quality and Continuity of Care for Psychiatric Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04314154. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Validation of Swedish Short PROM för Venous Insufficiency
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04304937. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Insulin Delivery Using the DBLG1 Closed-loop on Glycemic Control and PROMs in Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06154135. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
PROM Collected Via a WebApp Versus a Touch Screen Solution Among Patients With SLE
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04411407. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
An Integrated Digital PROM-platform for Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04816656. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Immediate Versus Delayed Induction in Term-PROM Using or Not Antibiotic Prophylaxis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02985086. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Prospective PROM and PREM Analysis Demonstrating Specification Advantage and Language Barriers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06457594. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Prospective, Pre-market, Multi-center Study of Insignia Hip Stem in THA to Determine Implant Survivorship and PROMS.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06108934. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
PROM Project Urology
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06397287. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04776434. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 8. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.