Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 59 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 59. SEM photographs, enlarged views of conical projections of posterior palatal fold shown in fig. 58. Left scale line spans 100 µm, right 20 µm.

Fig. 58 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 58. SEM photograph of palatal folds of Liophryne rhododactyla BPBM 9793, anterior to top of figure. Scale line spans 2 mm.

Fig. 50 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 50. SEM photographs of lower surface of disc of third finger of Austrochaperina derongo AMNH A145507. Left scale line spans 20 µm, right 4 µm.

Fig. 55 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 55. Lower surfaces of feet and hands of Austrochaperina. A. A. derongo, AMNH A79975. B. A. guttata, MCZ A92812. C. A. archboldi, AMNH A66719. D. A. hooglandi, AMNH A77592. E. A. adamantina, AMNH A78185. F. A. aquilonia, AMNH A78186. Scale bars marked in 1-mm intervals.

Fig. 41 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 41. Distribution of three Oxydactyla species in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Open circles, O. stenodactyla; solid circles, O. alpestris; half-darkened circle, sympatry; triangles, O. coggeri. Vertical hatching, 1800–2400 m; diagonal hatching, above 2400 m.

Fig. 65 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 65. Outline drawings of left vomers of Oxydactyla, Liophryne, Austrochaperina, and Sphenophryne in ventral aspect; scale lines marked in mm. Curved line at right of each figure marks the lingual border of the maxillary shelf. A. O. stenodactyla, AMNH A92800. B. O. alpestris, AMNH A65299. C. O. coggeri, AMS R22822. D. A. brevipes, AMNH A130527. E. L. allisoni, BPBM 9631. F. L. rhododactyla, BPBM 9793. G. L. dentata, UPNG 2641. H. L. schlaginhaufeni, AMNH A78183. I. A. gracilipes, AMNH A90407. J. A. novaebritanniae, AMNH A88569. K. A. blumi, UPNG 9559. L. A. derongo, AMNH A145507. M. A. basipalmata, AMNH A129495. N. A. rivularis, AMNH A84445. O. A. palmipes, AMNH A92805. P. S. cornuta, AMNH A92803.

Fig. 54 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 54. Lower surfaces of feet and hands of Liophryne. A. L. rubra, UPNG 9290. B. L. allisoni, AMNH A81221. C. L. similis, AMNH A130577. D. L. schlaginhaufeni, AMNH A77589. E. L. dentata, AMNH A87205. Scale bars marked in 1-mm intervals.

Fig. 21 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 21. Head of Austrochaperina hooglandi, AMNH A77597 (holotype) in profile; note projecting snout.

Fig. 16 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 16. Comparison of third finger disc widths in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data, see table 3.

Fig. 14 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 14. Comparison of tibia lengths in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data, see table 3.

Fig. 1 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 1. Comparison of relative tibia length and eye diameter in Austrochaperina gracilipes (solid squares) and A. novaebritanniae.

Fig. 2 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 2. Comparison of relative eye–naris distance and tibia length in Austrochaperina brevipes (circles), A. mehelyi (squares), and A. aquilonia. Adult individuals only plotted.

Fig. 8 in Partition Of The Australopapuan Microhylid Frog Genus Sphenophryne With Descriptions Of New Species

Fig. 8. Comparison of relative hand length and third finger disc width in Austrochaperina basipalmata (solid squares) and A. derongo (Idenburg River sample, open squares).

Fig. 7 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 7. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling plot of the activity budget of the juvenile and adult Ocypode gaudichaudii from Culebra Beach superimposed with Bray-Curtis cluster analysis using 60% and 80% similarity. 2D stress = 0.15.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 3. Boxplots of the median carapace width and interquartile range of Ocypode gaudichaudii during the day and night at Culebra Beach. Dark bands represent medians, boxes represent interquartile range and whiskers represent 1.5 times the interquartile range.

Fig. 6 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 6. Mean proportion of time (± S.E.) that Ocypode gaudichaudii from Culebra Beach were engaged in seven behaviors after burrow emergence. ScF, scavenging; DepF, deposit-feeding; Probe, probing for food; BurM, burrow maintenance; Walk, walking; In bur, staying within the burrow; Rest, resting at the burrow entrance.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 2. Location of Culebra Beach with the inset showing a 30 × 30 m plot marked out as the sampling area across six five-metre zones (zone 1 to zone 6). The area was divided into 36 (5 × 5 m) quadrats.

Fig. 5 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 5. Burrow densities of the juvenile and adult Ocypode gaudichaudii in zones 1 to 3 of Culebra Beach during the night with respect to the high and low tide levels from 9 June to 29 November, 2012.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 7 in Coexistence of Juvenile with Adult at Culebra Beach, Panama: A Temporal-spatial Partitioning Compromise.

Fig. 4. Burrow densities of the juvenile and adult Ocypode gaudichaudii at zones 1 to 5 of Culebra Beach during the day with respect to the high and low tide levels from 9 June to 29 November, 2012.