Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 5. The body weight of giant mottled eel reared in different light spectra for 12 weeks. W: white light; Black: dark; B: blue light; G: green light; R: red light. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups of the same week (p <0.05).

Fig. 3 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 3. The body weight of Japanese eel reared in different light spectra for 12 weeks. W: white light; Black: dark; B: blue light; G: green light; R: red light.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 2. The total length of Japanese eel reared in different light spectra for 12 weeks. W: white light; Black: dark; B: blue light; G: green light; R: red light.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 4. The total length of giant mottled eel reared in different light spectra for 12 weeks. W: white light; Black: dark; B: blue light; G: green light; R: red light. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups of the same week (p <0.05).

Fig. 1 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 1. Graph of a set of recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) used in this study. The five tanks were each 40 L in volume and covered by a black board. W: white light; R: red light (622 nm); G: green light (517 nm); B: blue light (467 nm).

Fig. 9 in Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 9. The POD expression levels of Japanese eel and giant mottled eel reared in different spectra. W: white light; B: blue light; G: green light; R: red light; black: dark. Different letters indicate significant differences between different spectra groups of the same eel species (p <0.05).

Fig. 4 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 4. Comparisons of ΔCT values of LOC111853410, kera, and dcn between the "S-Female" (n = 7, four repeats) and "S-Male" (n = 5, four repeats) groups for assessing the threshold for sex typing. (A) LOC111853410, (B) kera, (C) dcn. A solid black circle represented one ΔCT value. The "S-Female" meant the female silver eels, and the "S-Male" meant the male silver eels. For each gene, there were 28 and 20 solid black circles in the "S-Female" group and the "S-Male" group, respectively. The solid red line meant the inferred threshold of ΔCT for sex typing.

Fig. 3 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 3. Comparisons of relative expression levels of four genes possibly higher expressed in the pectoral fins of male silver eels between the "S-Female" (n = 7, four repeats) and "S-Male" (n = 5, four repeats) groups. (A) kera, (B) dcn, (C) cited1, (D) LOC104575574. The arp was a housekeeping gene, and two female samples (F1 and F2) were used as the internal control for calculating relative expression levels. The y-axis was in log2 scale. The "S-Female" meant the female silver eels, and the "S-Male" meant the male silver eels. The solid black line represented the median value, and the solid black circle represented the outliers. Asterisks indicated significant differences (**P <0.01, ***P <0.001) in relative expression levels between two groups.

Fig. 2 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 2. Comparisons of relative expression levels of six genes possibly higher expressed in the pectoral fins of female silver eels between the "S-Female" (n = 7, four repeats) and "S-Male" (n = 5, four repeats) groups. (A) LOC108249696, (B) LOC110515957, (C) egr3, (D) cipc, (E) LOC111853410, (F) cttn. The arp was a housekeeping gene, and two female samples (F1 and F2) were used as the internal control for calculating relative expression levels. The y-axis was in log2 scale. The "S-Female" meant the female silver eels, and the "S-Male" meant the male silver eels. The solid black line represented the median value, and the solid black circle represented the outliers. Asterisks indicated significant differences (**P <0.01, ***P <0.001) in relative expression levels between two groups.

Fig. 1 in Identification of Sexually Dimorphic Genes in Pectoral Fin as Molecular Markers for Assessing the Sex of Japanese Silver Eels ().

Fig. 1. Scheme of the MOLAS database for the Japanese eel. Annotated information of the assembled transcripts, including DNA sequence, amino acids sequence, open reading frames, signal peptides, transmembrane domains, gene ontology, hit KEGG pathway, and FPKM values, can be searched by the names of genes or the transcript ID in the Full-text search. A sequence of DNA can also be used to find the transcript with high similarity through the Sequence Search/BLAST. Moreover, the Pairwise Comparison can compare the differences in expression levels of the transcripts between two different libraries or two library groups, and then the differentially expressed genes can be summarized to a gene list. Furthermore, the Import Genelist can analyze the protein function, gene ontology enrichment, heatmap of expression, and hit terms on a KEGG pathway for a gene list. Additionally, the Clustering can be used to categorize the expressional patterns of transcripts between two different libraries or two library groups. Finally, the KEGG GlobalView and Gene List Analysis can see the hit terms of transcripts on the map of KEGG pathway and compare the different gene lists by Venn diagrams, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Рис. 3. Изменение ΔΛины теΛа у Bufo sachalinensis с возрастом: A — самки; B — самцы Fig. 3. The von Bertalanffy growth models for Bufo sachalinensis: A — females; B — males in Age structure and sexual dimorphism of the Far Eastern toad, Bufo sachalinensis Nikolsky, 1905 in the Ussurisky Nature Reserve

Рис. 3. Изменение ΔΛины теΛа у Bufo sachalinensis с возрастом: A — самки; B — самцы Fig. 3. The von Bertalanffy growth models for Bufo sachalinensis: A — females; B — males

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Рис. 4. Поперечные срезы фаΛанг паΛьцев особей Bufo sachalinensis максимаΛьного возраста: A — шестиΛетний самец (L = 69.0 мм); B — семиΛетняя самка (L = 90.6 мм) Fig. 4. Cross-section image of phalanges of Bufo sachalinensis individuals of maximum age: A — six year old male (SVL = 69.0 mm); B — seven year old female (SVL = 90.6 mm) in Age structure and sexual dimorphism of the Far Eastern toad, Bufo sachalinensis Nikolsky, 1905 in the Ussurisky Nature Reserve

Рис. 4. Поперечные срезы фаΛанг паΛьцев особей Bufo sachalinensis максимаΛьного возраста: A — шестиΛетний самец (L = 69.0 мм); B — семиΛетняя самка (L = 90.6 мм) Fig. 4. Cross-section image of phalanges of Bufo sachalinensis individuals of maximum age: A — six year old male (SVL = 69.0 mm); B — seven year old female (SVL = 90.6 mm)

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Growth, sexual maturity and sexual dimorphism of (Decapoda: Anomura: Aeglidae) in a tributary of the Ibicuí River in southern Brazil

Figure 3. Absolute frequency distribution of cephalothoracic length (CL) (mm) classes of Aegla georginae females, Perau Creek, Ibicuí Basin, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Sexual dimorphism in Diabrotica speciosa and Diabrotica viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fig. 2. Prothoracic, mesothoracic and metathoracic legs of male and female of Diabrotica speciosa, showing the sexual dimorphism in the basal tarsomere of the pro- and mesothoracic legs. Setae: D, discoid; F, filamentous; L, lanceolate; S, spatulate.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Sexual dimorphism in Diabrotica speciosa and Diabrotica viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fig. 1. Prothoracic, mesothoracic and metathoracic legs of male and female of Diabrotica viridula, showing the sexual dimorphism in the basal tarsomere of the pro- and mesothoracic legs. Setae: D, discoid; F, filamentous; L, lanceolate; S, spatulate.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →

Figure 4. A in A new species of Entomobrya (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from southwestern France exhibiting conspicuous sexual dimorphism

Figure 4. A comparison in macrochaetotaxy of ThII, AbdII and Abd III between E. schoetti and E. fourcesensis spec. nov.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2015View details →

Figure 2 in Sexual dimorphism in Trachylepis vittata (Olivier, 1804) (Sauria: Scincidae) in the Zagros Mountains, western Iran

Figure 2. Ordination of male and female specimens of Trachylepis vittata on the first 2 principal components. Note the relatively high degree of separation along PC1.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Figure 4 in Sexual dimorphism in two catfish species, Mystus pelusius (Solander, 1794) and Glyptothorax silviae Coad, 1981 (Teleostei: Siluriformes)

Figure 4. Sexual dimorphism in coloration in Glyptothorax silviae. Male: ZM-CBSU H935, 73 mm SL; Female: ZM-CBSU H968, 74 mm SL.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Sexual dimorphism in two catfish species, Mystus pelusius (Solander, 1794) and Glyptothorax silviae Coad, 1981 (Teleostei: Siluriformes)

Figure 3. Sexual dimorphism in genital papilla in Glyptothorax silviae. Female: ZM-CBSU H922, 63 mm SL; H924, 54 mm SL; Male: ZM-CBSU H918, 81 mm SL; H969, 65 mm SL; H921, 75.5 mm SL; H919, 78.5 mm SL (from up to down in each column).