Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 6 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 6. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a. Calathus algens Cotype; b. Abacetus guttiger Female Cotype; c. Feronia campania Cotype; d. Amara latithorax Cotype; e. Clivina spatulifera Cotype; f. Dyschirius

FIGURE 2 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 2. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a. Acupalpus horni Cotype; b. Tetragonoderus elegans Cotype; c. Amblops piceus Male Cotype; d. Calleida pallipes Cotype; e. Dromius indicus Cotype; f.

FIGURE 7 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 7. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a. Scarites platyops Cotype; b. Asaphidion ornatum Cotype; c. Bembidion notatum Cotype; d. Tachys haliploides var asthenes Cotype; e. Tachys ochrias Cotype

FIGURE 1 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 1. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a. Brachinus stevensi Cotype; b. Mastax annulatus Cotype; c. Axonya championi Cotype; d. Hexagonia uninotata Cotype; e. Hypolithus lividus Female Cotype;

FIGURE 5 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 5. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a Nebria cinctella Cotype; b. Omophron smaragdus Cotype; c. Lissopogonus glabellus Cotype; d. Agonum viator Cotype; e. Colpodes komala Cotype

FIGURE 4 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 4. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India).a. Taridius stevensi Cotype; b. Pentagonica venusta Cotype; c. Dilonchus bidens Cotype; d. Chlaenius himalayicus Female Cotype; e. Callistomimus dabreui

FIGURE 3 in Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India)

FIGURE 3. Types deposited in the National Forest Insect Collection, Dehradun (India). a. Lebia ocellata Cotype; b. Lebidia bioculata Cotype; c. Lionychus himalayicus Cotype; d. Omophagus artus Cotype; e. Pericalus amplus Cotype; f. Risophilus

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

annual maps of gloabl forest management types from 2001-2020

<p>This dataset provided the annual global fine composition of forests from a management perspective. Based on multi-data sources such as MOD13Q1, human footprint, and DEM, we extracted variables such as vegetation growth characteristics, local texture information, human activities, and terrain property. Using machine learning and change detection methods,  annual global maps of forest management types with a spatial resolution of 250 m were generated for the detailed composition of forests from 2001 to 2020 from a forest management perspective. Forest management types were defined into six categories: natural regeneration forests (both unmanaged and managed), plantation forests (rotation >15 years and ≤15 years), oil palm plantations, and agroforestry. Point-scale validation results indicated an overall accuracy ranging from 75.55% to 96.26%. The annual forest management type data holds significant importance in understanding the fine composition of forests.</p> <div>1:unmanaged naturally regenerated forest</div> <div>2:managed naturally regenerated forest</div> <div>3:planted forest with rotation >15 years </div> <div>4:planted forest with rotation≤15 years</div> <div>5:oil palm plantation</div> <div>6:agroforestry</div> <div>7:Others</div> <p>A research article about this dataset, please cite: <span>Hongtao Xu,</span><span>Bin He, </span><span>Lanlan Guo, </span><span>Xing Yan, </span><span>Jinwei Dong, </span><span>Wenping Yuan, </span><span>Xingming Hao, </span><span>Aifeng Lv, </span><span>Xiangqi He, </span><span>Tiewei Li. </span>Changes in the Fine Composition of Global Forests from 2001 to 2020.<span><em> J Remote Sens. </em></span>2024;4:0119.<span>DOI:<a href="https://doi.org/10.34133/remotesensing.0119">10.34133/remotesensing.0119</a></span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →

Data for 'Careful selection of forest types in afforestation can increase carbon sequestration without compromising sustainability'

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. T.n.napuF.Cuvier,1822—SMyanmar,Thai/MalayPeninsula,islandsoffWMalayPeninsula(Langkawi&Pangkor),Borneo,SSumatra,BangkaI,islandsoffBorneo(Laut&Serasan). T.n.bangue:Chasen&Kloss,1931—BanggiIandBalembanganI,offNBorneo. T.n.bunguranensisMiller,1901—NatunaIs(=Bunguran),oftWBorneo. T.n.neubronneriSody,1931—NSumatra. T.n.nmiasisLyon,1916—NiasI,offWSumatra. T.n.rufulusMiller,1900—TiomanI,offEMalayPeninsula,RiauandLinggaArchipelagos. T. n. terutus Thomas & Wroughton, 1909 — Terutau I, off W Malay Peninsula. The species was recently reconfirmed for Singapore. Maps that include Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the distribution range are based on the earlier assumption that 7. versicolor was a subspecies of 1. napu. Subsequent studies have indicated that 7. versicolor is a distinct species, and that the range of 1. napu therefore does not extend into Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. The northern limit on the Thai-Malay peninsula is not well defined. Specimens of 1. napu have been collected from as far north as Bankachon in southern Myanmar (10° 08" N), but despite fairly intensive camera-trapping in Kui Buri National Park, Thailand (12° N), 7. napu has not been photographed there. At the northern margin ofits range, it is generally rare. It has been reported, for example, that during the flooding of the Chiew Larn Reservoir (Surat Thani Province; about 9° N, 98° 45' E), only six 7. napu were rescued compared with 172 71. kanchil. This area is the transition zone from wetter evergreen forest to drier deciduous types, and it might be that 7° napu is not well adapted to the drier forest types towards the northern limit ofits range. There are unconfirmed reports of the species on Java, where it may have been confused with one of the two color morphs of 7. javanicus. As explained in the Taxonomy section, the subspecific status of the populations of several islands remains unclear. in Tragulidae

Subspecies and Distribution. T.n.napuF.Cuvier,1822—SMyanmar,Thai/MalayPeninsula,islandsoffWMalayPeninsula(Langkawi&Pangkor),Borneo,SSumatra,BangkaI,islandsoffBorneo(Laut&Serasan). T.n.bangue:Chasen&Kloss,1931—BanggiIandBalembanganI,offNBorneo. T.n.bunguranensisMiller,1901—NatunaIs(=Bunguran),oftWBorneo. T.n.neubronneriSody,1931—NSumatra. T.n.nmiasisLyon,1916—NiasI,offWSumatra. T.n.rufulusMiller,1900—TiomanI,offEMalayPeninsula,RiauandLinggaArchipelagos. T. n. terutus Thomas & Wroughton, 1909 — Terutau I, off W Malay Peninsula. The species was recently reconfirmed for Singapore. Maps that include Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the distribution range are based on the earlier assumption that 7. versicolor was a subspecies of 1. napu. Subsequent studies have indicated that 7. versicolor is a distinct species, and that the range of 1. napu therefore does not extend into Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. The northern limit on the Thai-Malay peninsula is not well defined. Specimens of 1. napu have been collected from as far north as Bankachon in southern Myanmar (10° 08" N), but despite fairly intensive camera-trapping in Kui Buri National Park, Thailand (12° N), 7. napu has not been photographed there. At the northern margin ofits range, it is generally rare. It has been reported, for example, that during the flooding of the Chiew Larn Reservoir (Surat Thani Province; about 9° N, 98° 45' E), only six 7. napu were rescued compared with 172 71. kanchil. This area is the transition zone from wetter evergreen forest to drier deciduous types, and it might be that 7° napu is not well adapted to the drier forest types towards the northern limit ofits range. There are unconfirmed reports of the species on Java, where it may have been confused with one of the two color morphs of 7. javanicus. As explained in the Taxonomy section, the subspecific status of the populations of several islands remains unclear.

opennotspecifiedOct 2019View details →

Distribution. Known only from four localities, including type locality and Buea in SW Cameroon, Dzanga-Sangha Special Reserve in SW Central African Republic, and Budongo Forest in W Uganda. in Vespertilionidae

Distribution. Known only from four localities, including type locality and Buea in SW Cameroon, Dzanga-Sangha Special Reserve in SW Central African Republic, and Budongo Forest in W Uganda.

dryad32/100

Data from: Plant functional types broadly describe water use strategies in the Caatinga, a seasonally dry tropical forest in northeast Brazil

<ol> <li><span>In seasonally dry tropical forests, plant functional type can be classified as deciduous low wood density, deciduous high wood density, or evergreen high wood density species. While deciduousness is often associated with drought-avoidance and low wood density is often associated with tissue water storage, the degree to which these functional types may correspond to diverging and unique water use strategies has not been extensively tested. </span></li> <li><span>We examined (1) tolerance to water stress, measured by pre-dawn and mid-day leaf water potential; (2) water use efficiency, measured via foliar δ<sup>13</sup>C; and (3) access to soil water,<i> </i>measured via stem water δ<sup>18</sup>O.</span></li> <li><span>We found that deciduous low wood density species maintain high leaf water potential and low water use efficiency. Deciduous high wood density species have lower leaf water potential and variable water use efficiency. Both groups rely on shallow soil water. Evergreen high wood density species have low<i> </i>leaf water potential, higher water use efficiency, and access alternative water sources. These findings indicate that deciduous low wood density species are drought avoiders, with a specialized strategy for storing root and stem water. Deciduous high wood density species are moderately drought tolerant, and evergreen high wood density species are the most drought tolerant group. </span></li> <li><span><i>Synthesis. </i>Our results broadly support the plant functional type framework as a way to understand water use strategies, but also highlight species-level differences. </span></li> </ol>

opencc-zeroMay 2022View details →

Distribution. CW Madagascar, known from the type locality, Andramasay, two larger forest fragments N and E of Andramasay, as well as Tsingy de Bemaraha National Park and the adjacent Strict Nature Reserve; it probably occurs throughout the entire area between the Tsiribihina River in the S and the Manambolo Riverin the N, although more research is needed to confirm the limits of its distribution. in Lepilemuridae

Distribution. CW Madagascar, known from the type locality, Andramasay, two larger forest fragments N and E of Andramasay, as well as Tsingy de Bemaraha National Park and the adjacent Strict Nature Reserve; it probably occurs throughout the entire area between the Tsiribihina River in the S and the Manambolo Riverin the N, although more research is needed to confirm the limits of its distribution.

Distribution. EC Madagascar, known only from the type locality of Ambositra, north of Fianarantsoa; its continuing survival in the forest fragments of that region remains to be confirmed. Reports from the Bongolava Massif to the NW appear to be erroneous. in Cheirogaleidae

Distribution. EC Madagascar, known only from the type locality of Ambositra, north of Fianarantsoa; its continuing survival in the forest fragments of that region remains to be confirmed. Reports from the Bongolava Massif to the NW appear to be erroneous.

Distribution. CE Madagascar, but the geographic distribution is poorly known; at present known only from its type locality of Andasibe (= Périnet) and neighboring areas (e.g. Maromizaha Forest), Analamazaotra Special Reserve, Anjozorobe-Angavo Protected Area, and Mantadia National Park. in Cheirogaleidae

Distribution. CE Madagascar, but the geographic distribution is poorly known; at present known only from its type locality of Andasibe (= Périnet) and neighboring areas (e.g. Maromizaha Forest), Analamazaotra Special Reserve, Anjozorobe-Angavo Protected Area, and Mantadia National Park.

Distribution. CE Madagascar, known only from its type locality, the Sahafina Forest (29-230 m above sea level), a lowland rainforest fragment of 15-6 km2, and its surrounding "savoka" (fallow farmland with cultivated trees), about 58 km E of Andasibe-Mantadia National Park and 18 km W of the Indian Ocean. The geographic range is presumably limited to the lowland areas (below 700 m) between the Mangoro River to the S and the Rianila River to the N, an area of about 7600 km?2. in Cheirogaleidae

Distribution. CE Madagascar, known only from its type locality, the Sahafina Forest (29-230 m above sea level), a lowland rainforest fragment of 15-6 km2, and its surrounding "savoka" (fallow farmland with cultivated trees), about 58 km E of Andasibe-Mantadia National Park and 18 km W of the Indian Ocean. The geographic range is presumably limited to the lowland areas (below 700 m) between the Mangoro River to the S and the Rianila River to the N, an area of about 7600 km?2.

Distribution. NW Madagascar, known only from its type locality, the Antafondro Classified Forest N of the Andranomalaza River and W of the Manongarivo Special Reserve. in Cheirogaleidae

Distribution. NW Madagascar, known only from its type locality, the Antafondro Classified Forest N of the Andranomalaza River and W of the Manongarivo Special Reserve.

Distribution. NW Madagascar; the range is still incompletely known, but it is believed to be restricted to the Ankarafantsika region; the type specimen was collected adjacent to Lac Ravelobe in Ankarafantsika National Park, and the species is also known to occur in the Mariarano Classified Forest, just N of Mahajanga. in Cheirogaleidae

Distribution. NW Madagascar; the range is still incompletely known, but it is believed to be restricted to the Ankarafantsika region; the type specimen was collected adjacent to Lac Ravelobe in Ankarafantsika National Park, and the species is also known to occur in the Mariarano Classified Forest, just N of Mahajanga.

Subspecies and Distribution. H.g.griseusLink,1795—CEMadagascar,roughlyfromtheOnibeRiverStotheOniveRiver(whichmayseparateitfromthesubspeciesgilberti). H.g.gilbert:Rabarivolaetal.,2007—ECMadagascar,knownonlyfromitstypelocalityofBeanamalaoandpresumablyasmallareaNoftheNosivoloRiverandSoftheMangoroandOniverivers. H. g. ranomafanensis Rabarivola et al., 2007 — CW & CE Madagascar, occurs in two, widely separated population pockets, one in the W in the forests of Tsingy de Bemaraha, probably as far as the Betsiboka River, and the other in the E in forests to the S of the Mangoro and Onive rivers (except Beanamalao, the type locality of gilberti). in Lemuridae

Subspecies and Distribution. H.g.griseusLink,1795—CEMadagascar,roughlyfromtheOnibeRiverStotheOniveRiver(whichmayseparateitfromthesubspeciesgilberti). H.g.gilbert:Rabarivolaetal.,2007—ECMadagascar,knownonlyfromitstypelocalityofBeanamalaoandpresumablyasmallareaNoftheNosivoloRiverandSoftheMangoroandOniverivers. H. g. ranomafanensis Rabarivola et al., 2007 — CW & CE Madagascar, occurs in two, widely separated population pockets, one in the W in the forests of Tsingy de Bemaraha, probably as far as the Betsiboka River, and the other in the E in forests to the S of the Mangoro and Onive rivers (except Beanamalao, the type locality of gilberti).