Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
477
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
477 results for “input data”
Input data for running forward simulations of CO2 atmospheric concentrations over Europe for the year 2019.
<p>This dataset provides input data (fluxes, background concentrations, and observations) for running forward simulations of CO2 atmospheric concentrations over Europe for the year 2019 using chemical transport models (CTMs). While some components of the dataset are available in other repositories, this compilation serves to 1) streamline the data collection process for other users and 2) bypass the need to perform data aggregation.</p> <p>Here is a description of each dataset:</p> <p><strong>cams73_latest_co2_conc_surface_inst_2019*.nc</strong></p> <p>CO2 mole fractions from the CAMS global inversion-optimised product v20r2 (Chevallier et al., 2010).</p> <p>The data are provided at a resolution of 3.75° in longitude and 1.9° in latitude, with a 3-hourly temporal resolution. </p> <p><strong>monitor_CO2_CIF_2019.nc</strong></p> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <p>Observed CO2 atmospheric mixing ratios in Europe, compiled in version V8 of the ICOS GlobalView Obspack (ICOS RI et al., 2023), include continuous measurements from 58 stations across Europe, incorporating both ICOS and non-ICOS facilities.</p> <p>The original dataset has been aggregated and adapted to match the format of the monitor files used in the Community Inversion Framework (CIF; Berchet et al., 2021).</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <p><strong>EDGARv4.3_BP2021_CO2_EU2_2019.nc</strong></p> <p>Anthropogenic CO2 fluxes (European, hourly) obtained from EDGAR-v4.2 and BP.</p> <p>The anthropogenic CO2 emissions are based on the spatial distribution from the EDGAR-v4.2 inventory, national and annual budgets from British Petroleum (BP) statistics, and hourly temporal profiles derived using the COFFEE approach (Steinbach et al., 2011, available on the ICOS Carbon Portal). This data is provided at a 0.1° × 0.1° horizontal resolution and hourly temporal resolution.</p> <p><strong>FG2.TRENDY11.ORC3.S3.3H_NBP_resp_2019.nc</strong></p> <p>NBP CO2 fluxes (global, 3-hourly) obtained from ORCHIDEE simulations. </p> <p>The ORCHIDEE-TRENDY simulation is conducted as part of the TRENDY model intercomparison project (e.g., Sitch et al., 2015; Friedlingstein et al., 2022). This simulation uses inputs provided by the project, including the CRUERA atmospheric climate forcing (global, 6-hourly, 0.5-degree resolution), LUH2 land-use change dataset, global atmospheric CO2 concentration data, and nitrogen fertilizer input datasets. All TRENDY simulations adhere to a standardized protocol: a model spin-up phase using recycled forcing data from 1901-1920, with other inputs from 1700, continues until the model's carbon pools reach equilibrium (340 years of spin-up for ORCHIDEE). This is followed by a transient simulation from 1700-1900, varying CO2 and land-use data while recycling climate forcing, and a historical simulation from 1901-2020 with all data inputs varied.</p> <p><strong>FR2.ORC3v7267.CRUERA3.NBP_3H.2019.nc</strong></p> <p>NBP CO2 fluxes (Europe, 3-hourly) obtained from ORCHIDEE simulations. </p> <p>The ORCHIDEE-VERIFY simulation is performed as part of the VERIFY project over the European region. This simulation is driven by the CRUERA dataset, which is derived from the ERA5-Land dataset (originally global, 1-hourly, at 0.1-degree resolution), transformed to the VERIFY region of interest (35°N to 73°N, 25°W to 45°E, 3-hourly, at 0.125-degree resolution), and re-aligned with the CRU observation dataset (for air temperature, shortwave radiation, humidity, and precipitation). The Hilda+ dataset is used for land use, and the EMEP model outputs are used for nitrogen inputs. The VERIFY simulation follows the general protocol used in the TRENDY project.</p> <p><strong>FR2.ORC3v7267.CRUERA3.hetero_resp_3H.2019.nc</strong></p> <p>Heterotrophic respiration CO2 fluxes (Europe, 3-hourly) obtained from ORCHIDEE simulations as described in the previous section.</p> <p><strong>Becker_coastal_fluxes_RF_v2021_2_2019.nc</strong></p> <p>Ocean CO2 fluxes (Europe, daily). </p> <p>The ocean fluxes come from a hybrid product combining the University of Bergen coastal ocean flux estimate and the Rödenbeck global ocean estimate (Rödenbeck et al., 2014). This data is provided at a 0.125° × 0.125° horizontal resolution and at a daily temporal resolution.</p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>References</strong></em> </p> <p> </p> <p>Berchet, A., Sollum, E., Pison, I., Thompson, R. L., Thanwerdas, J., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Peet, J. C. A. v., Potier, E., Chevallier, F., Broquet, G., and Berchet, A.: The Community Inversion Framework: codes and documentation, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6304912, 2022</p> <p>Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Aalto, T., Anderson, B. E., Bousquet, P., Brunke, E. G., Ciattaglia, L., Esaki, Y., Fröhlich, M., Gomez, A., Gomez-Pelaez, A. J., Haszpra, L., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Leuenberger, M., Machida, T., Maignan, F., Matsueda, H., Morguí, J. A., Mukai, H., Nakazawa, T., Peylin, P., Ramonet, M., Rivier, L., Sawa, Y., Schmidt, M., Steele, L. P., Vay, S. A., Vermeulen, A. T., Wofsy, S., and Worthy, D.: CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013887, 2010</p> <p>Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P.,Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Alkama, R., Arneth, A., Arora,V. K., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Cronin, M., Evans, W., Falk, S., Feely, R. A., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gkritzalis, T., Gloege, L., Grassi, G., Gruber, N., Gürses, O., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Houghton, R. A.,Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Jersild, A., Kadono, K., Kato, E., Kennedy, D., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken,J. I., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lindsay, K., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGrath, M. J., Metzl, N., Monacci, N. M.,Munro, D. R., Nakaoka, S.-I., Niwa, Y., O’Brien, K., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pan, N., Pierrot, D., Pocock, K., Poulter, B., Resplandy, L.,Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Rodriguez, C., Rosan, T. M., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Shutler, J. D., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Sweeney, C., Takao, S., Tanhua, T., Tans, P. P., Tian, X., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf,G. R., Walker, A. P., Wanninkhof, R., Whitehead, C., Willstrand Wranne, A., Wright, R., Yuan, W., Yue, C., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, J., and Zheng, B.: Global Carbon Budget 2022, Earth System Science Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022,https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/4811/2022/, publisher: Copernicus GmbH, 2022</p> <p>ICOS RI, Bergamaschi, P., Colomb, A., De Mazière, M., Emmenegger, L., Kubistin, D., Lehner, I., Lehtinen, K., Lund Myhre, C., Marek, M., Platt, S. M., Plaß-Dülmer, C., Schmidt, M., Apadula, F., Arnold, S., Blanc, P.-E., Brunner, D., Chen, H., Chmura, L., Conil, S., Couret, C., Cristofanelli, P., Delmotte, M., Forster, G., Frumau, A., Gheusi, F., Hammer, S., Haszpra, L., Heliasz, M., Henne, S., Hoheisel, A., Kneuer, T., Laurila, T., Leskinen, A., Leuenberger, M., Levin, I., Lindauer, M., Lopez, M., Lunder, C., Mammarella, I., Manca, G., Manning, A., Marklund, P., Martin, D., Meinhardt, F., Müller-Williams, J., Necki, J., O’Doherty, S., Ottosson-Löfvenius, M., Philippon, C., Piacentino, S., Pitt, J., Ramonet, M., Rivas-Soriano, P., Scheeren, B., Schumacher, M., Sha, M. K., Spain, G., Steinbacher, M., Sørensen, L. L., Vermeulen, A., Vítková, G., Xueref-Remy, I., di Sarra, A., Conen, F., Kazan, V., Roulet, Y.-A., Biermann, T., Heltai, D., Hensen, A., Hermansen, O., Komínková, K., Laurent, O., Levula, J., Pichon, J.-M., Smith, P., Stanley, K., Trisolino, P., ICOS Carbon Portal, ICOS Atmosphere Thematic Centre, ICOS Flask And Calibration Laboratory, and ICOS Central Radiocarbon Laboratory: European Obspack compilation of atmospheric carbon dioxide data from ICOS and non-ICOS European stations for the period 1972-2023;<br>obspack_co2_466_GLOBALVIEWplus_v8.0_2023-04-26, https://doi.org/10.18160/CEC4-CAGK, 2023</p> <p>Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Metzl, N., Olsen, A., Sabine, C., Cassar, N., Reum, F., Keeling, R. F., and Heimann, M.: Interannual sea–air CO2 flux variability from an observation-driven ocean mixed-layer scheme, Biogeosciences, 11, 4599–4613, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4599-2014, 2014</p> <p>Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Gruber, N., Jones, S. D., Murray-Tortarolo, G., Ahlström, A., Doney, S. C., Graven, H., Heinze, C., Huntingford,C., Levis, S., Levy, P. E., Lomas, M., Poulter, B., Viovy, N., Zaehle, S., Zeng, N., Arneth, A., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Canadell, J. G.,Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Ellis, R., Gloor, M., Peylin, P., Piao, S. L., Le Quéré, C., Smith, B., Zhu, Z., and Myneni, R.: Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, Biogeosciences, 12, 653–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-653-2015, https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/653/2015/, publisher: Copernicus GmbH, 2015.</p> <p>Steinbach, J., Gerbig, C., Rödenbeck, C., Karstens, U., Minejima, C., and Mukai, H.: The CO2 release and Oxygen uptake from Fossil Fuel Emission Estimate (COFFEE) dataset: effects from varying oxidative ratios, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 6855–6870,1160 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6855-2011, 2011</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Climate model and proxy input data for PaleoDA South America reconstruction
<p>This repository contains input data needed to run the paleoclimate reconstruction code for "A continental reconstruction of hydroclimatic variability in South America during the past 2000 years", submitted to Climate of the Past in February 2024 [https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-545/]. The Github repository is located here: https://github.com/mchoblet/paleoda_sa/tree/main</p> <p><strong>Structure:</strong></p> <p>model_data: One File for each Model (GISS, CCSM (isoGSM), CESM, ECHAM5, iHADCM3) and variable (prec,tsurf,d18O, SPEI). Monthly resolution.</p> <p>proxy_data: One File for each proxy record type (Trees and corals contain a separate file for annual and djf linear regression parameters, the proxy data as such is the same). The data has yearly resolution, and thus also contains NaNs for when a year is not covered by a proxy. Note, that these time series are resampled to a regular resolution in the multi-time scale PaleoDA code.</p> <p><strong>Climate Model Data:</strong></p> <p>The original data can be found in https://zenodo.org/records/6610684. The data in this repository here has been slightly modified and regridded for easier processing by the reconstruction algorithm. When using the data here, please also cite https://zenodo.org/records/6610684 and the publication </p> <p>"Investigating stable oxygen and carbon isotopic variability in speleothem records over the last millennium using multiple isotope-enabled climate models", by </p> <div>Janica C. Bühler, Josefine Axelsson, Franziska A. Lechleitner, Jens Fohlmeister, Allegra N. LeGrande, Madhavan Midhun, Jesper Sjolte, Martin Werner, Kei Yoshimura, and Kira Rehfeld (https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/1625/2022/cp-18-1625-2022.html)</div> <p><strong>Climate Proxy Data:</strong></p> <p>A regional proxy record subselection for South America. See References in Appendix A Choblet et al. (https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-545/). The DOI of each record is stored as Metadata.</p> <p><strong>How were these files created?</strong></p> <p>The steps are documented in the the Github repository https://github.com/mchoblet/paleoda_sa/tree/main (data_preprocessing). The SPEI drought index has ben computed from modeled precipitation and temperature using Thornthwaite's method (using the Climate Indices package, https://github.com/monocongo/climate_indices).</p> <p><strong>Manuscript revision in July 2024:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Added historical documentary indices time series and the Puyehue lake record. For technical reasons in the PaleoDA algorithm, it is kept apart from the other lake records. The reconstruction code on Github has been updated for including these datasets.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
Input data and results of the RECC v2.5 model for the transformation scenarios of the global building stock
<p>This dataset contains the input data and core results of the RECC v2.5 model for the transformation scenarios of the global building stock. For details abou the RECC model, see DOI <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13023" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13023</a> and the RECC model landing page: <a href="https://www.industrialecology.uni-freiburg.de/odym-recc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.industrialecology.uni-freiburg.de/odym-recc</a></p> <p>The following data are included in this dataset:</p> <ul> <li>The entire model input database (120 model parameters)</li> <li>The parameters for the sensitivity analysis (8 parameters)</li> <li>The 70 folders with the core results</li> <li>The master classification file RECC_Classifications_Master_V2.0.xlsx</li> <li>The model config file RECC_Config.xlsx</li> <li>The list of scenario configurations RECC_ModelConfig_List.xlsx</li> <li>The result compilation and exporting configuration file RECCv2.5_EXPORT_Combine_Select.xlsx</li> <li>The main result summary file (extracted from the 70 result folders) Results_Extracted_RECCv2.5_10Regs_sep.xlsx</li> <li>The result summary file for comparison with the CRAFT model timber supply RECCv2.5_10Regs_CRAFT_Coupling_SHARE.xlsx</li> <li>The results of the sensitivity analysis: Results_Extracted_RECCv2.5_10Regs_Sensitivity_sep.xlsx</li> </ul> <p>Note that the result folders of the sensitivity analysis are not archived here (too little information in relation to the data volume). They can be requested from the author. The results can also be recreated by running the RECC model with the sensitivity analysis parameters.</p> <p>The model itself is available as Python code from <a href="https://github.com/IndEcol/RECC-ODYM" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://github.com/IndEcol/RECC-ODYM</a></p>
Glaide.jl input data for the Aletsch setup
<p>This repository provides the source data one cannot automatically download needed to generate the input data for the Aletsch glacier setup in the Glaide.jl model.</p> <p>The repository contains following 4 datasets:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>aletsch_fix.dat</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The surface mass balance (SMB) data is provided in the form of annual mass balance per elevation band. The data set covers time period from 1914 to 2022. We extract and use the SMB data for 2016-2017 hydrological year.</p> <p><em>Source: GLAMOS (2023). Swiss Glacier Mass Balance, release 2023, Glacier Monitoring Switzerland, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023</a>.</em></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>aletsch2009.asc</strong></p> <p><strong>aletsch2017.asc</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The surface elevation dataset from <a href="https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/height-model-swissalti3d" target="_blank" rel="noopener">swissALTI3D</a> (swisstopo) provides data to replace the missing points in the bedrock dataset for the years 2009 and 2017. </p> <p><em>Source: swissALTI3D - Das hoch aufgelöste Terrainmodell der Schweiz (2022), Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo, <a href="https://backend.swisstopo.admin.ch/fileservice/sdweb-docs-prod-swisstopoch-files/files/2023/11/14/6d40e558-c3df-483a-bd88-99ab93b88f16.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://backend.swisstopo.admin.ch/fileservice/sdweb-docs-prod-swisstopoch-files/files/2023/11/14/6d40e558-c3df-483a-bd88-99ab93b88f16.pdf</a>.</em></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>ALPES_wFLAG_wKT_ANNUALv2016-2021.nc</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Annual glacier surface flow velocity product from Sentinel-2 data for the European Alps.</p> <p><em>Source: Rabatel, A., Ducasse, E., Millan, R., Mouginot, J. (2023). Annual glacier surface flow velocity product from Sentinel-2 data for the European Alps, <a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/XHQ7TL" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.57745/XHQ7TL</a>, Recherche Data Gouv, V1.</em></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Input data of MaTrace Global model
<p>Complete set of model data for the MaTrace Global model of metal cycles, published in Resources Conservation and Recycling with the DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.029</p>
Annex A to the technical report on the raw primary commodity (RPC) model - Input data
<p><strong>The raw primary commodity model</strong>:</p> <p>Dietary exposure is typically calculated by combining food consumption data with occurrence data. EFSA’s food consumption data are stored in the Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database (Comprehensive Database). Some of these data, however, cannot be used in exposure assessments when the occurrence data are reported for the raw primary commodities (RPCs). The RPC model aims to bridge this gap by transforming the Comprehensive Database into RPC consumption data. Using the RPC model, EFSA successfully developed a new RPC Consumption Database, which contains 51 dietary surveys from 23 different countries. These surveys cover a total of 94,532 subjects and 26,573,088 RPC consumption records. The consumption data generated by the RPC model were manually checked and validated by means of case studies. These case studies demonstrated that the RPC consumption data are suitable for assessing dietary exposure to chemicals where the occurrence data are predominantly available for RPCs.</p> <p><strong>Annex A to the technical report on the raw primary commodity model:</strong></p> <p>Annex A is an excel file which presents input data tables used by the RPC model. The annex contains the following tables:</p> <p>Table A.1 (Survey table) - An overview of the food consumption surveys incorporated in the RPC model</p> <p>Table A.2 (FoodEx table) - An outline of the food classification system used in the RPC model (EFSA's FoodEx classification system with additional codes)</p> <p>Table A.3 (Probability table) - Manages foods coded at food group level (example, breakfast cereals)</p> <p>Table A.4 (Disaggregation table) - Disassembles composite foods into their single components (RPC derivatives and/or RPCs)</p> <p>Table A.5 (Conversion table) - Converts amounts of RPC derivatives into corresponding amounts of RPC</p> <p>Table A.6 (Component table) - Overview of the search strings used for the probability analysis of components</p>
Illustrative Darwin core archive to input data on a citizen science platform from a collection management system
<p>Illustrative DwC archive to send data from a collection management system to a citizen sciences platform. This illustrative archive displays the specimens used for the trans-institutional and trans-platform pilot project held in the frame of ICEDIG.</p> <p>Further description of its content in the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Bahamas National Hazard Analysis. Data Inputs and Outputs for the InVEST Coastal Vulnerability Model.
<p>The following folders contain the model inputs and outputs for the InVEST Coastal Vulnerability model that were used in the analysis discussed in:</p> <p>Silver JM, Arkema KK, Griffin RM, Lashley B, Lemay M, Maldonado S,<br> Moultrie SH, Ruckelshaus M, Schill S, Thomas A, Wyatt K and Verutes G<br> (2019) Advancing Coastal Risk Reduction Science and Implementation by<br> Accounting for Climate, Ecosystems, and People. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:556.<br> doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00556</p> <p>The readme.txt file contains information about data layers.</p>
Annexes to the external scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system using MCRA software - Input and output data sets
<p>Retrospective dietary exposure assessments were conducted for two groups of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system: </p> <ol> <li>brain and/or erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase inhibition (CAG-NAN);</li> <li>functional alterations of the motor division (CAG-NAM).</li> </ol> <p>The pesticides considered in this assessment were identified and characterised in the scientific report on the establishment of cumulative assessment groups of pesticides for their effects on the nervous system (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5800">here</a>).</p> <p>The exposure calculations used monitoring data collected by Member States under their official pesticide monitoring programmes in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and individual food consumption data from ten populations of consumers from different countries and from different age groups. Regarding the selection of relevant food commodities, the assessment included water, foods for infants and young children and 30 raw primary commodities of plant origin that are widely consumed within Europe.</p> <p>Exposure estimates were obtained with Monte Carlo Risk Assessment (MCRA) software using a 2-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation, which is composed of an inner-loop execution and an outer-loop execution. Variability within the population is modelled through the inner-loop execution and is expressed as a percentile of the exposure distribution. The outer-loop execution is used to derive 95% confidence intervals around those percentiles (reflecting the sampling uncertainty of the input data).</p> <p>Furthermore, calculations were carried out according to a tiered approach. While the first-tier calculations (Tier I) use very conservative assumptions for an efficient screening of the exposure with low risk for underestimation, the second-tier assessment (Tier II) includes assumptions that are more refined but still conservative. For each scenario, exposure estimates were obtained for different percentiles of the exposure distribution and the total margin of exposure (MOET, i.e. the ratio of the toxicological reference dose to the estimated exposure) was calculated at each percentile.</p> <p>The input and output data for the exposure assessment are reported in the following annexes:</p> <ul> <li>Annex A.1 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-NAN</li> <li>Annex A.2 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-NAM</li> <li>Annex B.1 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-NAN</li> <li>Annex B.2 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-NAM</li> </ul> <p>Further information on the data, methodologies and interpretation of the results are provided in the external scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system using MCRA software (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1708">here</a>).</p> <p>The results reported in this assessment only refer to the exposure and are not an estimation of the actual risks. These exposure estimates should therefore be considered as documentation for the final scientific report on the cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides for their effects on the nervous system (<a href="https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/public-consultation-scientific-report-cumulative">here</a>). The latter combines the hazard assessment and exposure assessment into a consolidated risk characterisation, including all related uncertainties.</p>
Annexes to the external scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid using MCRA software - Input and output data sets
<p>Retrospective dietary exposure assessments were conducted for two groups of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid: </p> <ol> <li>hypertrophy, hyperplasia and neoplasia of C-cells, i.e. affecting the parafollicular cells or the calcitonin system of the thyroid (CAG-TCP);</li> <li>hypothyroidism, i.e. affecting the follicular cells and/or the hormone system of the thyroid (CAG-TCF).</li> </ol> <p>The pesticides considered in this assessment were identified and characterised in the scientific report on the establishment of cumulative assessment groups of pesticides for their effects on the thyroid (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5801">here</a>).</p> <p>The exposure calculations used monitoring data collected by Member States under their official pesticide monitoring programmes in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and individual food consumption data from ten populations of consumers from different countries and from different age groups. Regarding the selection of relevant food commodities, the assessment included water, foods for infants and young children and 30 raw primary commodities of plant origin that are widely consumed within Europe.</p> <p>Exposure estimates were obtained with Monte Carlo Risk Assessment (MCRA) software using a 2-dimensional probabilistic method, which is composed of an inner-loop execution and an outer-loop execution. Variability within the population is modelled through the inner-loop execution and is expressed as a percentile of the exposure distribution. The outer-loop execution is used to derive 95% confidence intervals around those percentiles (reflecting the sampling uncertainty of the input data).</p> <p>Furthermore, calculations were carried out according to a tiered approach. While the first-tier calculations (Tier I) use very conservative assumptions for an efficient screening of the exposure with low risk for underestimation, the second-tier assessment (Tier II) includes assumptions that are more refined but still conservative. For each scenario, exposure estimates were obtained for different percentiles of the exposure distribution and the total margin of exposure (MOET, i.e. the ratio of the toxicological reference dose to the estimated exposure) was calculated at each percentile.</p> <p>The input and output data for the exposure assessment are reported in the following annexes:</p> <ul> <li>Annex A.1 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-TCP</li> <li>Annex A.2 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-TCF</li> <li>Annex B.1 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-TCP</li> <li>Annex B.2 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-TCF</li> </ul> <p>Further information on the data, methodologies and interpretation of the results are provided in the external scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid using MCRA software (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1707">here</a>).</p> <p>The results reported in this assessment only refer to the exposure and are not an estimation of the actual risks. These exposure estimates should therefore be considered as documentation for the final scientific report on the cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides for their effects on the thyroid (<a href="https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/public-consultation-scientific-report-cumulative">here</a>). The latter combines the hazard assessment and exposure assessment into a consolidated risk characterisation, including all related uncertainties.</p>
Annexes to the scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid using SAS® software - Input and output data sets
<p>Retrospective dietary exposure assessments were conducted for two groups of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid: </p> <ol> <li>hypertrophy, hyperplasia and neoplasia of C-cells, i.e. affecting the parafollicular cells or the calcitonin system of the thyroid (CAG-TCP);</li> <li>hypothyroidism, i.e. affecting the follicular cells and/or the hormone system of the thyroid (CAG-TCF).</li> </ol> <p>The pesticides considered in this assessment were identified and characterised in the scientific report on the establishment of cumulative assessment groups of pesticides for their effects on the thyroid (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5801">here</a>).</p> <p>The exposure calculations used monitoring data collected by Member States under their official pesticide monitoring programmes in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and individual food consumption data from ten populations of consumers from different countries and from different age groups. Regarding the selection of relevant food commodities, the assessment included water, foods for infants and young children and 30 raw primary commodities of plant origin that are widely consumed within Europe.</p> <p>Exposure estimates were obtained with SAS<sup>®</sup> software using a 2-dimensional probabilistic method, which is composed of an inner-loop execution and an outer-loop execution. Variability within the population is modelled through the inner-loop execution and is expressed as a percentile of the exposure distribution. The outer-loop execution is used to derive 95% confidence intervals around those percentiles (reflecting the sampling uncertainty of the input data).</p> <p>Furthermore, calculations were carried out according to a tiered approach. While the first-tier calculations (Tier I) use very conservative assumptions for an efficient screening of the exposure with low risk for underestimation, the second-tier assessment (Tier II) includes assumptions that are more refined but still conservative. For each scenario, exposure estimates were obtained for different percentiles of the exposure distribution and the total margin of exposure (MOET, i.e. the ratio of the toxicological reference dose to the estimated exposure) was calculated at each percentile.</p> <p>The input and output data for the exposure assessment are reported in the following annexes:</p> <ul> <li>Annex A.1 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-TCP</li> <li>Annex A.2 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-TCF</li> <li>Annex B.1 – Output data from the Tier I exposure assessment of CAG-TCP</li> <li>Annex B.2 – Output data from the Tier I exposure assessment of CAG-TCF</li> <li>Annex C.1 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-TCP</li> <li>Annex C.2 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-TCF</li> </ul> <p>Further information on the data, methodologies and interpretation of the results are provided in the scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid using SAS<sup>®</sup> software (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5763">here</a>).</p> <p>The results reported in this assessment only refer to the exposure and are not an estimation of the actual risks. These exposure estimates should therefore be considered as documentation for the final scientific report on the cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides for their effects on the thyroid (<a href="https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/public-consultation-scientific-report-cumulative">here</a>). The latter combines the hazard assessment and exposure assessment into a consolidated risk characterisation, including all related uncertainties.</p>
Annexes to the scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system using SAS® software - Input and output data sets
<p>Retrospective dietary exposure assessments were conducted for two groups of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system: </p> <ol> <li>brain and/or erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase inhibition (CAG-NAN);</li> <li>functional alterations of the motor division (CAG-NAM).</li> </ol> <p>The pesticides considered in this assessment were identified and characterised in the scientific report on the establishment of cumulative assessment groups of pesticides for their effects on the nervous system (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5800">here</a>).</p> <p>The exposure calculations used monitoring data collected by Member States under their official pesticide monitoring programmes in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and individual food consumption data from ten populations of consumers from different countries and from different age groups. Regarding the selection of relevant food commodities, the assessment included water, foods for infants and young children and 30 raw primary commodities of plant origin that are widely consumed within Europe.</p> <p>Exposure estimates were obtained with SAS<sup>®</sup> software using a 2-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation, which is composed of an inner-loop execution and an outer-loop execution. Variability within the population is modelled through the inner-loop execution and is expressed as a percentile of the exposure distribution. The outer-loop execution is used to derive 95% confidence intervals around those percentiles (reflecting the sampling uncertainty of the input data).</p> <p>Furthermore, calculations were carried out according to a tiered approach. While the first-tier calculations (Tier I) use very conservative assumptions for an efficient screening of the exposure with low risk for underestimation, the second-tier assessment (Tier II) includes assumptions that are more refined but still conservative. For each scenario, exposure estimates were obtained for different percentiles of the exposure distribution and the total margin of exposure (MOET, i.e. the ratio of the toxicological reference dose to the estimated exposure) was calculated at each percentile.</p> <p>The input and output data for the exposure assessment are reported in the following annexes:</p> <ul> <li>Annex A.1 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-NAN</li> <li>Annex A.2 – Input data for the exposure assessment of CAG-NAM</li> <li>Annex B.1 – Output data from the Tier I exposure assessment of CAG-NAN</li> <li>Annex B.2 – Output data from the Tier I exposure assessment of CAG-NAM</li> <li>Annex C.1 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-NAN</li> <li>Annex C.2 – Output data from the Tier II exposure assessment of CAG-NAM</li> </ul> <p>Further information on the data, methodologies and interpretation of the results are provided in the scientific report on the cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system using SAS<sup>®</sup> software (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5764">here</a>).</p> <p>The results reported in this assessment only refer to the exposure and are not an estimation of the actual risks. These exposure estimates should therefore be considered as documentation for the final scientific report on the cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides for their effects on the nervous system (<a href="https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/public-consultation-scientific-report-cumulative">here</a>). The latter combines the hazard assessment and exposure assessment into a consolidated risk characterisation, including all related uncertainties.</p>
CESM FKESSLER input data for running CESM in docker container
This dataset contains input data for running CESM 2.1.1 with FKESSLER compset and resolution T31_g37. <pre>create_newcase --case /home/cesm/cases/fkessler --compset FKESSLER \ --res T31_g37 --compset FKESSLER --machine espresso --run-unsupported </pre>
CESM F1850 input data for running CESM in docker container
<p>This dataset contains input data for running CESM 2.1.1 with F1850 compset and resolution f09_g17.</p> <p> </p> <pre>create_newcase --case /home/cesm/cases/B1850 --compset B1850 \ --res f09_g17 --machine espresso --run-unsupported && \ cd /home/cesm/cases/B1850 </pre> <p>The case uses <a href="https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/cesm/README.html">cesm from bioconda</a>.</p>
CESM input data for running CESM historic with CAM6 and CLM5 (no ocean) in docker container
<p>CESM docker container for HIST_CAM60_CLM50%BGC_CICE%PRES_DOCN%DOM_MOSART_CISM2%NOEVOLVE_SWAV compset and resolution f19_g17 using <a href="https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/cesm/README.html">bioconda cesm docker</a> as a base image.</p>
Aurora Subglacial Basin GlaDs inputs, outputs and geophysical data
<p>The GlaDS_ASB_outputs.txt file includes the following:</p> <p>Glacier Drainage System (GlaDS) model inputs: node easting (m), node northing (m), bed elevation (m), ice thickness (m), basal velocity (m/year) and basal water production (m/year). GlaDS model results for water pressure as a fraction of overburden (Pw/Pi) and water depth (m):base line model, high conductivity, low conductivity, static water and static velocity model runs. </p> <p>Specularity content data for Aurora Subglacial Basin as an xyz file called: filtered.spec.asb.xyz with easting (m), northing (m) and specularity content. </p> <p>The ICECAP basal interface specularity content profiles can also be found at the U.S Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601371">https://doi.org/10.15784/601371</a></p>
Can green hydrogen drive economic transformation in Saudi Arabia? - An input-output analysis of different Power-to-X configurations. Supplementary Data
<p>Supplementary material for peer review</p> <ul> <li>Modelling Data (input & results)</li> <li>Literature Review</li> </ul>
Complementary data for Iqbal et al. (2024): Slopes along Apollo EVAs: Astronaut experience as input for future mission planning
<p>Complementary data for Iqbal et al. (2024): Slopes along Apollo EVAs: Astronaut experience as input for future mission planning</p> <p>Data contains shapefiles that can be used in any geoinformation system (GIS).</p> <p><strong>If you use these data, please cite BOTH the <em>JOURNAL NAME</em> publication and the Zenodo dataset.</strong></p> <p>Iqbal, W., Head III, J. W., van der Bogert, C. H., Frueh, T., Henriksen, M., Bickel, V., Kring, D., Hiesinger, H., Scott, D. R., & Heyer, T. (2024). Slopes along Apollo EVAs: Astronaut experience as input for future mission planning. Acta Astronautica, 223, 184-196. <a title="Persistent link using digital object identifier" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.006" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.006</a></p> <p>Iqbal, W., Head, J. W., van der Bogert, C., Frueh, T., Henriksen, M., Bickel, V., Kring, D., Hiesinger, H., Scott, D. R., & Heyer, T. (2024). Complementary data for Iqbal et al. (2024): Slopes along Apollo EVAs: Astronaut experience as input for future mission planning [Data set]. In Acta Astronautica (Bd. 223, S. 184–196). Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13790204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13790204</a></p> <p>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Structure</p> <p>-> File "Apollo_Traverses_Iqbal_24" - It includes six subfolders for each landing site that contain the shapefiles of traverses.</p> <p>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>For further questions contact <a href="mailto:lwueller@uni-muenster.de" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">iqbalw@uni-muenster.de</a></p> <p>Wajiha Iqbal, Institut für Planetologie, Universität Münster, Germany.</p>
Inputs (forcing, observations and config file) for the experiments included in "Spatio-temporal snow data assimilation with the ICESat-2 laser altimeter".
<p>Inputs or the experiments included in the manuscript <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1404">Spatio-temporal snow data assimilation with the ICESat-2 laser altimeter</a>. </p> <p>Three experiment's inputs (forcing, observations and config file) for the Multiple Snow data Assimilation system (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11147258">MuSA</a>, v2.1) for the experimental catchment of Izas in the Spanish Pyrenees. All the experiments use ERA5 data downscaled to 20 m spatial resolution with the statistical downscaling tool <a href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05059">TopoPySCALE</a>. The experiments assimilate different variables. </p> <p> C) assimilation of fSCA retrieved from Sentinel-2;</p> <p> D) assimilation of snow depth profiles retrieved with ICESat-2;</p> <p> J) joint assimilation of variables in C) and D).</p> <p> </p> <p>All the experiments assimilate the observations with the deterministic ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (DES-MDA) scheme.</p>
Data input for the RegMex model experiment on the power system and flexible sector coupling
<p>This file provides the input data used in the power system flexibility model experiment performed within the RegMex project. Comprehensive information about the project can be found in the project report [Lechtenböhmer2018] (in German, see link in the file). In the experiment performed with the data documented here, three scenarios were considered, labelled "Import", "Decentralized" and "Offshore". This file contains the input for all scenarios. All further information on the model and scenario configuration is available from the project report. Many technology parameter have been derived as own assumptions within previous projects, relying on different sources. Details can be found in the cited PhD and masters theses. In the experiment, Germany was modelled with 18 regions reflecting the transmission grid operator zones (see map in the file).</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.