Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,283
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,283 results for “males and females”
FIGURES 1–15. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 1. Habitus, dorsal view. 2. Carapace, dorsal view. 3. Same, lateral view. 4. Same, anterior view. 5. Sternum, ventral view. 6. Chelicerae, anterior view. 7. Same, posterior view. 8. Mouthparts, ventral view. 9 in Got Males?: The Enigmatic Goblin Spider Genus Triaeris (Araneae, Oonopidae)
FIGURES 1–15. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 1. Habitus, dorsal view. 2. Carapace, dorsal view. 3. Same, lateral view. 4. Same, anterior view. 5. Sternum, ventral view. 6. Chelicerae, anterior view. 7. Same, posterior view. 8. Mouthparts, ventral view. 9. Labrum and endites, dorsal view. 10. Serrula, dorsal view. 11. Pedicel area, ventral view. 12. Spinnerets, apical view. 13. Anterior lateral spinneret, same. 14. Posterior median spinneret, same. 15. Posterior lateral spinneret, same.
FIGURES 31–40. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 31. Postepigastric scutum, ventral view. 32. Same, posterior view. 33. Internal female genitalia, dorsal view. 34. Carapace, dorsal view. 35. Abdomen, dorsal view. 36. Sternum, ventral view. 37. Leg I, prolateral view. 38, 39. Genital area, ventral view. 40 in Got Males?: The Enigmatic Goblin Spider Genus Triaeris (Araneae, Oonopidae)
FIGURES 31–40. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 31. Postepigastric scutum, ventral view. 32. Same, posterior view. 33. Internal female genitalia, dorsal view. 34. Carapace, dorsal view. 35. Abdomen, dorsal view. 36. Sternum, ventral view. 37. Leg I, prolateral view. 38, 39. Genital area, ventral view. 40. Same, dorsal view (figs. 37, 38 taken by Cristina Rheims).
FIGURES 16–30. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 16. Leg I, prolateral view. 17. Patella and tibia I, same. 18. Leg II, same. 19 in Got Males?: The Enigmatic Goblin Spider Genus Triaeris (Araneae, Oonopidae)
FIGURES 16–30. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 16. Leg I, prolateral view. 17. Patella and tibia I, same. 18. Leg II, same. 19. Claws of leg I, distal view. 20. Same, leg II. 21. Same, leg III. 22. Same, leg IV. 23. Claws of leg I, lateral view. 24. Same, leg II. 25. Same, leg III. 26. Same, leg IV. 27. Trichobothrial base from metatarsus I, dorsal view. 28. Palp, prolateral view. 29. Same, retrolateral view. 30. Palpal tibia, dorsal view.
Protein preference data for male and female mice
<p>These data are from experiments studying protein preference and plasma FGF21 levels in protein-restricted male and female mice conducted at UiT the Arctic University of Norway. These findings will be published Volcko & McCutcheon (2022) bioRxiv. Detailed methods for the experiment can be found in this paper. Full citation to a peer-reviewed publication is expected to follow. Briefly, data are from sessions licking different solutions (casein and/or maltodextrin) in operant chambers, recorded on Med Associates hardware. Accompanying analysis code as a Jupyter notebook is available on Github (https://github.com/mccutcheonlab/ARP). </p> <p>The data are provided as a compressed zip file containing the following:</p> <ul> <li>Folder with raw datafiles from sessions with a single bottle of either casein or maltodextrin, and two-bottle choice tests</li> <li>Excel file with metadata to accompany each raw datafile (<strong>ARP3 and ARP5 conditioning and preference metafile.xls</strong>)</li> </ul> <p>The raw datafiles are Med Associates files in the stripped format.</p> <p><strong>ARP3 and ARP5 conditioning and preference metafile.xls</strong> contains sheets (<em>metafile_exp1</em> and <em>metafile_exp2</em>) with the following information for each datafile:</p> <ul> <li>filename</li> <li>mouse ID</li> <li>date</li> <li>diet group (NR, non-restricted or PR, protein-restricted)</li> <li>sex</li> <li>cycle stage (for females in the preference test)</li> <li>nutrient in the left bottle</li> <li>nutrient in the right bottle</li> <li>flavor of the solution in the left bottle</li> <li>flavor of the solution in the right bottle</li> <li>number of licks to the left bottle</li> <li>number of licks to the right bottle</li> <li>phase of the experiment (conditioning sessions or preference test)</li> </ul> <p><strong>ARP3 and ARP5 conditioning and preference metafile.xls</strong> also contains sheets (<em>food_intake, BW, female_cycle</em> and <em>FGF21</em>) with data from food intake measurements, body weight measurements, change in food intake and body weight over two cycle in female mice, and plasma FGF21 levels.</p>
Fig. 1 in The First Record And Description Of Male Of Paralongidorus Rex (Nematoda, Longidoridae) From Ukraine With Comments On Female Uterine Eggs Morphology
Fig. 1. Paralongidorus rex Andrássy, 1986: A — female anterior region; B — part of female genital branch with egg; C — amphid; D — spicules; E — accessory pieces; F — male posterior region; G — supplements. Scale bar A–G, 10 µm.
Fig. 1 in Sharp Differences In The Timing Of Male And Female Spring Arrival In The European Stonechat, Saxicola Rubicola, And The Whinchat, S. Rubetra (Passeriformes, Muscicapidae), In North-Eastern Ukraine
Fig. 1. Spring arrival schedules of male and female Common Stonechats (Saxicola rubicola) and male and female Whinchats (S. rubetra) at the study plot in the Murom River flood plain (Kharkiv Region, Ukraine). The dates were standardised by assigning 1 Day value for the arrival of first bird in a certain year (the data for years 1994–1995, 2002–2004 are presented).
Gene expression in male and female sticklebacks from populations with convergent and divergent throat coloration
<p class="MsoNormal">Understanding of genetic mechanisms underlying variation in sexual dichromatism remains limited, especially for carotenoid-based colors. We addressed this knowledge gap in a gene expression study with threespine stickleback. We compared male and female throat tissues across five populations, including two in which female red coloration has evolved convergently. We found that the expression of individual genes, gene ontologies, and coexpression networks associated with red female color within a population differed between California and British Columbia populations, suggesting differences in underlying mechanisms. Comparing females from each of these populations to females from populations dominated by dull females, we again found extensive expression differences. For each population, genes and networks associated with female red color showed the same patterns for males only inconsistently. The functional roles of genes showing correlated expression with female color are unclear within populations, whereas genes highlighted through inter-population comparisons include some previously suggested to function in carotenoid pathways. Among these, the most consistent patterns involved <em>TTC39B</em> (Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain 39B), which is within a known red coloration QTL in stickleback and implicated in red coloration in other taxa.</p>
Fig 13. Carrhotus taprobanicus Simon, 1902. A–B. Male habitus. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C–D. Female habitus. C. Dorsal view. D. Ventral view. E–F. Palp. E. Ventral view. F. Retrolateral view. G in Phylogenetic placement of Carrhotus Thorell, 1891 with three new species from Sri Lanka (Araneae: Salticidae)
Fig 13. Carrhotus taprobanicus Simon, 1902. A–B. Male habitus. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C–D. Female habitus. C. Dorsal view. D. Ventral view. E–F. Palp. E. Ventral view. F. Retrolateral view. G. Epigynum, ventral view. Abbreviations: E = embolus; PEB = posterior epigynal border; PLP = posterior lateral protrusion; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis; TE = tegulum. Scale bars: A–D = 2 mm; E–F = 0.2 mm; G = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 11. Carrhotus silanthi Caleb, 2020. A–B. Male habitus. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C–D. Female habitus. C. Dorsal view. D. Ventral view. E–H. Palp. E–F in Phylogenetic placement of Carrhotus Thorell, 1891 with three new species from Sri Lanka (Araneae: Salticidae)
Fig. 11. Carrhotus silanthi Caleb, 2020. A–B. Male habitus. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C–D. Female habitus. C. Dorsal view. D. Ventral view. E–H. Palp. E–F. Ventral view; the arrows showing the embolus tip directed in clockwise (11E) or directed in apical (11F). G–H. Retrolateral view. Abbreviations: PLP = posterior lateral protrusion; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis; TE = tegulum. Scale bars: A–D = 2 mm; E–H = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 9. Myrmeleon tenuipennis Rambur, 1842. A. Female genitalia, lateral view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Male genitalia, lateral view. D. Same, ventral view. E in Taxonomic notes on the antlion tribe Myrmeleontini Latreille (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae, Myrmeleontinae) from Pakistan, with description of a new species
Fig. 9. Myrmeleon tenuipennis Rambur, 1842. A. Female genitalia, lateral view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Male genitalia, lateral view. D. Same, ventral view. E. Complex of gonocoxites 9 + gonocoxites 11, dorsal view. F. Same, ventral view. G. Same, lateral view. A–B: ♀ (CAUPK000011); C–G: ♂ (CAUPK000010). Abbreviations: ag8 = anterior gonocoxites 8; ect = ectoproct; gst11 = gonostylus 11; gx9 = gonocoxites 9; gx11 = gonocoxites 11; pg8 = posterior gonocoxites 8; pp = pregenital plate; S = sternites; T = tergites. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 19. Myrmeleon trivialis Gerstaecker, 1885. A. Female genitalia, lateral view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Male genitalia, lateral view. D. Same, ventral view. E in Taxonomic notes on the antlion tribe Myrmeleontini Latreille (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae, Myrmeleontinae) from Pakistan, with description of a new species
Fig. 19. Myrmeleon trivialis Gerstaecker, 1885. A. Female genitalia, lateral view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Male genitalia, lateral view. D. Same, ventral view. E. Complex of gonocoxites 9 + gonocoxites 11, dorsal view. F. Same, ventral view. G. Same, lateral view. A–B: ♀ (CAUPK000026); C–G: ♂ (CAUPK000025). Abbreviations: ag8 = anterior gonocoxites 8; ect = ectoproct; gst11 = gonostylus 11; gx9 = gonocoxites 9; gx11 = gonocoxites 11; pg8 = posterior gonocoxites 8; pp = pregenital plate; S = sternites; T = tergites. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 6. Right antennae, dorsal view. A–K. Males. L–U. Females. A, L in A revision of Discodon tricolor (Guérin-Méneville) and its mimics from the Atlantic forests of Brazil (Coleoptera: Cantharidae)
Fig. 6. Right antennae, dorsal view. A–K. Males. L–U. Females. A, L. Discodon tricolor (GuérinMéneville, 1832). B, M. Discodon neoteutonum sp. nov. C, N. Discodon vanini sp. nov. D, O. Discodon obscurior Pic, 1906 stat. nov. E, P. Discodon lineaticorne sp. nov. F, Q. Discodon aurimaculatum sp. nov. G, R. Discodon marginicolle sp. nov. H, S. Discodon tenuecostatum sp. nov. I, T. Discodon tamoio sp. nov. J, U. Discodon viridimontanum sp. nov. K. Discodon crassipes Wittmer, 1952. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Data from: The evolution of sex similarities in social signals: Climatic seasonality is associated with lower sexual dimorphism and greater elaboration of female and male signals in antbirds (Thamnophilidae)
<p>Selection on signals that mediate social competition varies with resource availability. Climate regulates resource availability, which may affect the strength of competition and selection on signals. Traditionally, this meant that more seasonal, colder, or dryer – overall harsher – environments should favor the elaboration of male signals under stronger male-male competition, increasing sexual dimorphism. However, females also use signals to compete; thus, harsher environments could strengthen competition and favor elaboration of signals in both sexes, decreasing sexual dimorphism. Alternatively, harsher environments could decrease sexual dimorphism due to scarcer resources to invest in signal elaboration in both sexes. We evaluated these contrasting hypotheses in antbirds, a family of Neotropical passerines that varies in female and male signals and occurs across diverse climatic regimes. We tested the association of sexual dimorphism of plumage coloration and songs with temperature, precipitation and their seasonality. We found that greater seasonality is associated with lower sexual dimorphism in plumage coloration and greater elaboration of visual signals in both sexes, but not acoustic signals. Our results suggest that greater seasonality may be associated with convergent elaboration of female and male visual signals, highlighting the role of signals of both sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism.</p>
Fig. 19. Dicranopalpus pyrenaeus Dresco, 1948. Right pedipalp. A–C. Male. D–E. Female. A, D. Median view. B. Claw. C, E in Revision of the genus Dicranopalpus from northern Spain and Corsica, with descriptions of two new species (Arachnida, Opiliones, Phalangioidea)
Fig. 19. Dicranopalpus pyrenaeus Dresco, 1948. Right pedipalp. A–C. Male. D–E. Female. A, D. Median view. B. Claw. C, E. Dorsal view of patella and tibia. Scale bars: A, C–D = 0.5 mm; B = 50 μm.
Fig. 9. Phaedon concinus Stephens, 1834. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, lateral view. D. Aedeagus, dorsal view. E in Revision of Phaedon Latreille from China (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fig. 9. Phaedon concinus Stephens, 1834. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, lateral view. D. Aedeagus, dorsal view. E. Spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm; E = 0.1 mm.
Figs 1–6. Glaucopterum gobicum Kerzhner. 1–2. Habitus, dorsal view. 1. Male. 2. Female. 3–6. Male genitalia. 3. Vesica. 4. Left paramere. 5. Right paramere. 6 in The genus Glaucopterum Wagner (Hemiptera: Miridae: Phylinae) from China, with description of two new species
Figs 1–6. Glaucopterum gobicum Kerzhner. 1–2. Habitus, dorsal view. 1. Male. 2. Female. 3–6. Male genitalia. 3. Vesica. 4. Left paramere. 5. Right paramere. 6. Phallotheca. Scale bar: 3–6 = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 4. Phaedon alticola Chen, 1974. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E in Revision of Phaedon Latreille from China (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fig. 4. Phaedon alticola Chen, 1974. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E. Spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm; E = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 7. Phaedon brassicae Baly, 1874. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E in Revision of Phaedon Latreille from China (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fig. 7. Phaedon brassicae Baly, 1874. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E. Spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm; E = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 10. Phaedon flavotibialis Lopatin, 2005. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E in Revision of Phaedon Latreille from China (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fig. 10. Phaedon flavotibialis Lopatin, 2005. A. Antenna, male. B. Antenna, female. C. Aedeagus, dorsal view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. E. Spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm; E = 0.1 mm.
Рис. 1. Рисуночный кΛюч ΑΛя опреΑеΛения виΑов роΑа Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880: A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W — гоΛова самца; B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X — заΑний конец теΛа самца; Y — гоΛова самки; Z — заΑний конец теΛа самки Fig. 1. Pictorial key to the species of the genus Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880: A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W — head of male; B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X — posterior body end of male; Y — head of female; Z — posterior body end of female in Morphological review of the genus Ethmolaimus de Man 1880 (Nematoda, Chromadorida)
Рис. 1. Рисуночный кΛюч ΑΛя опреΑеΛения виΑов роΑа Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880: A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W — гоΛова самца; B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X — заΑний конец теΛа самца; Y — гоΛова самки; Z — заΑний конец теΛа самки Fig. 1. Pictorial key to the species of the genus Ethmolaimus de Man, 1880: A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W — head of male; B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X — posterior body end of male; Y — head of female; Z — posterior body end of female
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.