Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

95

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

95 results for “pitfall traps”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Matalin A, Makarov M (2011) Using demographic data to better interpret pitfall trap catches. ZooKeys 100: 223-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1530

Figure 5 - Seasonal variation in abundance curves and reproduction aspects in four resident carabid species coupled with abundance of a migrant-species Harpalus rufipes from reedbeds, combined data for 2006/07 (R and L right and left Y axis, respectively; N (ex.) – number of specimens).

opencc-by-4.0May 2011View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Szinwelski N, Fialho V, Yotoko K, Seleme L, Sperber C (2012) Ethanol fuel improves arthropod capture in pitfall traps and preserves DNA. ZooKeys 196: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.196.3130

Figure 1 - Boxplot showing sampling efficiency of different kinds of pitfall traps' killing solution. Traps with Solution 1 (100% ethanol fuel) captured more species and individuals than Solution 2 (80% commercial alcohol (80°GL) + 10% glycerin (P.A) + 10% formaldehyde (P.A)) and Solution 3 (90% commercial alcohol (80°GL) + 10% glycerin (P.A)). A Total number of species per pitfalls' set. B Total number of individuals per pitfalls' set. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences between killing solution levels, evaluated through contrast analyses.

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Szinwelski N, Fialho V, Yotoko K, Seleme L, Sperber C (2012) Ethanol fuel improves arthropod capture in pitfall traps and preserves DNA. ZooKeys 196: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.196.3130

Figure 2 - Electrophoresis of all 24 analyzed individuals. M represents the lambda DNA marker (100 ng/ul) and F represents the control extraction made using fresh tissue. A) Lanes 01 – 06, individuals killed in C.A. (undiluted commercial alcohol), maintained in the killing solution for 48 hours and then transferred to closed vials containing C.A. (01 – 03) and E.F. (03 – 06) and maintained in these storage solutions for 30 days. Lanes 07 – 12, individuals killed in Solution 1 (= E.F.), maintained in the killing solution for 48 hours and transferred to C.A. (07 – 09) and E.F. (10 – 12) and maintained in these storage solutions for 30 days. B) Lanes 13 – 18, individuals killed in the Solution 2 and maintained in this solution for 24 hours. Lanes 19 – 24, individuals killed in Solution 3, maintained in this solution for 48 hours, than transferred to C.A. (19 – 21) and E.F. (22 – 24) and maintained in these solutions for 30 days. All DNA extractions where successful, but those of crickets killed in solution 2 (lanes 13 – 18).

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 4 - The mound of the free-living Formica polyctena colony built on the outlet of the ventilation pipe; the source of the bunker 'colony'. Photo taken on 24.07.2015 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 8 - View from the bunker corridor over the space with the Formica polyctena 'colony'; in the foreground, a vast ant 'cemetery'. Photo taken on 19.01.2016 after reopening the repaired mound for a second search of offspring (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 7 - Formica polyctena workers active on their mound surface in winter, keeping nest entrances open. Photo taken on 11.01.2015 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 1 - Partly blocked entrance to the bunker system. In the background, pine-spruce forest overgrowing the hillock built to camouflage the structure. Photo taken on 17.07.2014 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 6 - The mound of Formica polyctena's bunker 'colony' in close-up. In the background, against the wall, an ant 'cemetery' is visible. Photo taken on 24.07.2015 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 5 - Bottom sight of the ventilation pipe outlet. Photo taken on 21.02.2016 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 2 - The earthen mound inhabited by the Formica polyctena 'colony' in the bunker. Photo taken on 11.01.2015 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Czechowski W, Rutkowski T, Stephan W, Vepsäläinen K (2016) Living beyond the limits of survival: wood ants trapped in a gigantic pitfall. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9096

Figure 3 - The upper part of the bunker space with the Formica polyctena 'nest'. In the middle of the ceiling, the input of the ventilation pipe. Ants climbing walls (and hardly reaching the ceiling) en masse within and outside the room are visible (especially well on the door frame). Photo taken on 24.07.2015 (Wojciech Stephan).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo24/100

Which pitfall traps and sampling effort to choose to evaluate cropping system effects on spider and carabid assemblages?

<p>Dataset and example of the script (R) used in the simulation approach.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →
zenodo20/100

Fig. 3 in A Baited Time Sorting Pitfall Trap Allowing More Temporal Fidelity of Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Activity

Fig. 3. Diel activity of Onthophagus binodis (dashed line) and Labarrus lividus (solid line) individuals caught across multiple sites and multiple sampling opportunities.

opennotspecifiedMar 2023View details →
zenodo20/100

Fig. 4. Violin plots for height experiment 1 in A Baited Time Sorting Pitfall Trap Allowing More Temporal Fidelity of Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Activity

Fig. 4. Violin plots for height experiment 1 comparing: A) Abundance per trap type, B) Species richness per trap type, C) Shannon index for each trap type, D) Pielou evenness per trap type.

opennotspecifiedMar 2023View details →
zenodo16/100

Fig. 1. Pitfall traps. A in A Modified Pitfall Trap for Capturing Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Fig. 1. Pitfall traps. A) Traditional, B) Modified with a plastic funnel.

opennotspecifiedDec 2013View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record