Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

106

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

106 results for “vertical distribution”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: de Oliveira Dias C, de Araujo AV, Bonecker SLC (2018) Vertical distribution and structure of copepod (Arthropoda: Copepoda) assemblages in two different seasons down to 1,200 m in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic. Zoologia 35: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e13886

Figure 1 Salinity and temperature of the five water masses (0–3260 m) in the Campos Basin, central Brazilian coast, modified from Bonecker et al. (2014). Solid line = temperature; dashed line = salinity; SS, Subsurface Water; SACW, South Atlantic Central Water; AAIW, Antarctic Intermediate Water; UCDW, Upper Circumpolar Deep Water; NADW, North Atlantic Deep Water.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: de Oliveira Dias C, de Araujo AV, Bonecker SLC (2018) Vertical distribution and structure of copepod (Arthropoda: Copepoda) assemblages in two different seasons down to 1,200 m in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic. Zoologia 35: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e13886

Figure 4 Vertical distribution of the mean diversity, species richness, and evenness of total copepods in the Campos Basin: dark blue bars, diversity; cobalt bars, richness; cyan bar, evenness. RS, rainy season; DS, dry season.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 in Abundance, vertical distribution and feeding of chaetognaths in the upper 50 m layer of the eastern Aegean Sea

Figure 1. The area of study in the eastern Aegean Sea and the sampling stations.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 6 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

SIMPER Analysis

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 4 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Richness and abundance of Baraccone Cave invertebrate fauna

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Monthly temperature, relative humidity and light intensity in Baraccone Cave for each sampling area

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Fauna observed in Baraccone Cave

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 5 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Percentage of minerals found in each sampling area

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Figure 5 A trend of Equitability (Pielou's evenness), Dominance (1-Simpson index) and Shannon diversity (H) indices from March 2017 to March 2018 B rarefaction curve (in red). In blue the 95% confidence interval.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Information on the study area

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Figure 3 A one-Way ANOSIM test. Wall in eight sites (A-H, Group 1–8), Ground in seven sites (A-E and G-H, Group 9–15) B similarity between ground (from AG to HG) and wall (from AW to HW) faunal samples (UPGMA clustering based on Jaccard similarity index - bootstrap values are shown under each node) C SIMPER Analysis. Taxa responsible for the observed differences between faunal assemblages in different sampling areas in percentage.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Figure 2 Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Hypogean fauna related to environmental factors and mineral substratum A classes of ground fauna B orders of ground fauna (Arachnida, Entognatha and Insecta) with a number of specimens exceeding 5% of each considered class total C classes of parietal fauna D orders of parietal fauna (Arachnida and Insecta) with a number of specimens exceeding 5% of each considered class total.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Balestra V, Lana E, Carbone C, De Waele J, Manenti R, Galli L (2021) Don't forget the vertical dimension: assessment of distributional dynamics of cave-dwelling invertebrates in both ground and parietal microhabitats. Subterranean Biology 40: 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.71805

Figure 1 A Location of Baraccone Cave, Piedmont, Italy, and the entrance of the cave (photo by E. L.) B baraccone Cave map with monitoring areas. Red quadrats for ground fauna monitoring and blue triangles for parietal fauna monitoring (map by V. B. and R. Sella, photos by E. L. and V. B.).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Cold-water coral assemblages on vertical walls: distribution patterns from the Northeast Atlantic

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Diversity in form and function: vertical distribution of soil fauna mediates multidimensional trait variation

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2019View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: Vertical root distribution of individual species in a mountain grassland community: does it respond to neighbours?

1.Vertical differentiation in root placement is one of the potential mechanisms of plant niche differentiation. It can be due to the remarkable plasticity of roots in response to nutrients and neighbours, but most data on it come from pot or garden experiments. The roles of vertical differentiation and of plasticity in it in the field are thus not well known. 2.We examined species-specific root vertical distribution in a montane grassland using quantitative Real-Time PCR. We asked whether individual species differ in their rooting depths, whether such differences are associated with aboveground functional traits (such as height or specific leaf area), and whether they respond to the presence of a competitor. This response was assessed by comparison of species-specific vertical profiles between control plots and plots where the dominant species, Festuca rubra, had been removed. 3.Vertical profiles of individual species varied considerably, from species with most root biomass concentrated in the uppermost (<2 cm) soil layer, through species with uniform vertical distribution, to a species with roots predominantly below 8 cm (Nardus stricta). Species at the fast end of the plant economy spectrum were more likely to place their roots in the uppermost layers. Grassland species thus exploit different parts of the belowground resources in spite of their short stature, minor differences in height aboveground and shallow soil. 4.While belowground and aboveground biomasses of most species were higher in the removal plots, species rooting patterns did not change in response to the removal. The interspecific differences in vertical profiles were thus due to species' innate differences, not to plastic responses to the presence of the dominant species. 5.Synthesis. The findings imply that vertical root differentiation in the field is strong and can contribute to niche differentiation. However, the role of root plasticity in natural systems may be considerably weaker than in artificial systems with few species and strong nutrient gradients. This absence of the plastic response in the field is likely to be due to a fairly homogeneous distribution of nutrients in the soil and to the predominantly symmetric nature of belowground competition.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo24/100

Vertical distribution and seasonal dynamics of planktonic cyanobacteria communities in a water column of deep mesotrophic Lake Geneva

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

openNov 2023View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 2 from: de Oliveira Dias C, de Araujo AV, Bonecker SLC (2018) Vertical distribution and structure of copepod (Arthropoda: Copepoda) assemblages in two different seasons down to 1,200 m in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic. Zoologia 35: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e13886

Figure 2 Study area showing sampling stations.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 3 in Diurnal vertical distribution of zooplankton in a newly formed reservoir (Tahtalı Reservoir, Kocaeli): the role of abiotic factors and chlorophyll a

Figure 3. Distribution of zooplankton sampled on 22 and 23 May 2010 from the Tahtalı Reservoir.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2013View details →
zenodo24/100

Data from: Global distribution of siphonophores across horizontal and vertical oceanic gradients

<p>This study gives a worldwide view of where siphonophores live in the ocean, using DNA data from samples collected during a global expedition. We looked at 77 samples from different depths and oceans. We found about a quarter of all known siphonophore species, some in places they hadn&rsquo;t been seen before. In total, we identified 42 species. Some species were found to have wider distributions than previously thought. The study also looked at variations within species. Siphonophores with a certain feature (pneumatophores) were less common in shallower waters but more common in deeper waters. This is the first time that this kind of DNA data has been used to study these creatures, showing it&rsquo;s a useful method for studying organisms that are often damaged when collected with nets.</p> <p>This dataset supports the original research published under the same title: Global distribution of siphonophores across horizontal and vertical oceanic gradients.&nbsp;</p>

openJul 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record