Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
92
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
92 results for “visual perception”
Visual and Acoustic Effects of Human Thermal Comfort and Perception in a Micro-Climatically Steady Environment
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06985940. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Visual Perception in Preterm Infants
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02908113. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Effect of Visual Stimuli on Itch Perception Intensity in Healthy and Atopic Dermatitis Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00660127. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Study of Visual Perception Phenomena: Phosphene Mapping Induced by TMS and Its Relationship With Eye Movements
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07110493. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Data from: The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Medical Dispatchers' Perception of Visual Information in Real Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03721666. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Visual Perception in Schizophrenia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06911931. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Brain Visual Perception Training for Prevention and Control of Premyopia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06585657. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Visual Perception After Virtual Implantation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04967612. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Visual Perception Exploration Using Eye-tracking Technology in a Cannot Intubate/Cannot Oxygenate Simulation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03054272. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Clinical assessment of the TechArm system on visually impaired and blind children during uni- and multi-sensory perception tasks
<p>Introduction</p> <p>This dataset includes the raw data linked with the paper “Clinical assessment of the TechArm system on visually impaired and blind children during uni- and multi-sensory perception tasks ”.</p> <p>In this paper, we validated the TechArm system on a pediatric population of visually impaired (low-vision and blind), and sighted children.</p> <p>Raw data concerning sighted children are collected in the first sheet, while raw data for visually impaired children are in the second sheet. Encoding is available in the third sheet.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>8 blind children (B, mean age 10.50 ± 4.21 y.o.), 23 children with low vision (LV, mean age 92 9.87 ± 3.09 y.o.), and 23 age-matched sighted children (S, mean age 9.83 ± 3.01 y.o.) were enrolled in the study. Four TechArm units were used to deliver uni- (audio or tactile) or multi-sensory stimulation (audio-tactile) on the participant’s arm, and subject was asked to evaluate the number of active units (see Martolini et al, Brain Sciences, 2021 for a presentation of the protocol).</p> <p>Results (in brief)</p> <p>Results showed no significant difference among groups (normal or impaired vision). Overall, we observed the best performance in tactile condition, while auditory accuracy was around chance level. Also, we found that the audio-tactile condition is better than the audio condition alone, suggesting that multisensory stimulation is beneficial when perceptual accuracy and precision are low. Interestingly, we observed that for low-vision children the accuracy in audio condition improved proportionally to the severity of the visual impairment. Our findings confirmed the TechArm system's effectiveness in assessing perceptual competencies in sighted and visually impaired children, and its potential to be used to develop personalized rehabilitation programs for people with visual and sensory impairments.</p>
Dog visual perception of faces, objects and phase-scrambled images, measured with non-invasive electroencephalography
<p>This is the dataset used in the publication of Kujala MV, Kauppi J-P, Törnqvist H, Helle L, Vainio O, Kujala J, Parkkonen L (2020). Time-resolved classification of dog brain signals reveals early processing of faces, species and emotion. Scientific reports 10, 19846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76806-8.</p> <p>The dataset is electroencephalography data, measured non-invasively from the surface of the head from eight different dogs; and its supporting files. The data has been measured with 7-9 EEG electrodes; only the data from 7 EEG channels were used in the analysis. During the measurement, dogs were free to move; they were not restrained in any way. Instead, they were trained with positive operant conditioning to lie down and lean their head on a chin rest for short periods of time, during which they were shown still images from a computer screen. The stimuli were shown, in pseudo-randomized order, in eight different presentation scenarios, within 5 separate stimulus blocks per scenario, 15–20 stimuli per block. Between the stimulus blocks, dogs were always rewarded with a treat; this has caused major movement artifacts on the data between the stimulus blocks. Different presentation scenarios were shown in different days and repeated twice. Please refer to the above publication for further details of the experiment.</p> <p>The trigger is the same across all the stimuli; thus, separate scenario stimulus identifier lists were used in determining the stimulus order; please refer to the README.txt file and PresentationScenarios.xlsx files for further details.</p> <p>The dataset also contains anatomical magnetic resonance images of one dog, which was used in the aforementioned publication for source localization.</p> <p>If you have further questions regarding the data or the acquisition, please do not hesitate to contact the authors of the original publication.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.