Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,081
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,081 results for “Habitats”
Fig. 5. A in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?
Fig. 5. A non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination of abundance data (log N+1 transformation) for shrimps (a) collected between 12 different months (j = January, f = February, mr = March, ap = April, my = May, j = June, Jl = July, ag = August, s = September, o = October, n = November, d = December) and (b) at five different habitats in Pattani bay (1 = sandy habitat, 2 = mangrove habitat, 3 = shell-deposited habitat, 4 = muddy habitat and 5 = seagrass habitat).
Fig. 1 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?
Fig. 1. Map of study area, Pattani Bay, Thailand, showing habitat characteristics (A1–3 = Sandy habitat, B1–3 = Seagrass habitat, C1–3 = Shell-doposited habitat, D1–3 = Muddy habitat, and E1-3 = Mangrove habitat).
Figures 50–57. Habitats. 50–51 in Natural history, ecology, and conservation of the genus Polyphylla Harris, 1841. 1. New species from the southwestern United States and Baja California, Mexico, with notes on distribution and synonymy (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)
Figures 50–57. Habitats. 50–51) Polyphylla anivallis. Animas Valley Sand Dunes, Hidalgo Co., NM. 52–53) Polyphylla koso. Coso Mountains, Inyo Co., CA. 52) Coso Bridge. 53) Mill Springs Canyon. 54–55) Polyphylla morroensis. Baywood Fine Sands, San Luis Obispo Co., CA. 56–57) Polyphylla socorriana. El Socorro Sand Dunes, Baja California, MX.
Fig. 7 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand
Fig. 7. Results from LDA analysis showing (a) the distribution and overlap of groups of clusters (ellipsoid) and (b) the contribution of parameters to F1 and F2.
Fig. 4 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand
Fig. 4. Boxplots showing (a) abundance (log10-transformed) and (b) diversity index (H′ index) of fish samples in each habitat. Note: The same letter(s) in each box indicates values that are not significantly different when applying the Duncan's post-test, p-value> 0.05.
Fig. 5 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand
Fig. 5. Nodal diagram showing species and sample groups and abundance (log10-transformed) of fish samples per cluster.
Fig. 1 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand
Fig. 1. Location of the sampling habitats at Had Khanom Mu Ko Thale Tai National Park, Thailand. Note: the sampling sites; ▲ seagrass beds; ■ mudflats; ● sandy beaches; ★ mangroves.
Fig. 3. Land use and land cover data for 2014 in Population trends and conservation status of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the face of habitat change in the Klias Peninsula, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia
Fig. 3. Land use and land cover data for 2014/2015 within the 1-km buffer distance from surveyed rivers, overlaid with proboscis monkey sightings from the 2004/2005 and 2014 surveys, Protected Areas, and Production Forest Reserve boundaries.
Fig. 2 in Population trends and conservation status of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the face of habitat change in the Klias Peninsula, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia
Fig. 2. Boxplots illustrating the variation in vegetation variables, with each point representing the values for vegetation plot in each site.
Fig. 1 in Population trends and conservation status of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the face of habitat change in the Klias Peninsula, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia
Fig. 1. Map showing the Klias Peninsula region in western Sabah, in the northern part of Borneo (inset), Malaysia, and the research sampling sites in riverine, mangrove, and mixed mangrove-riverine forests along rivers in Padang Teratak Bird Sanctuary, Padas Damit Forest Reserve, Menumbok Forest Reserve, Binsulok Forest Reserve, Klias Forest Reserve, Kg. Hindian Forest Reserve, and Nabahan Forest Reserve, where the river surveys of the sleeping sites of proboscis monkeys were conducted.
Fig. 1 in Representation Of Threatened Vertebrates By A Protected Area System In Southeast Asia: The Importance Of Non-Forest Habitats
Fig. 1. Percentage of habitat use by amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals and all taxa combined. The habitat types include Evr (evergreen forest), MD (mixed deciduous forest), Dip (dry dipterocarp forest), Mngrv (mangrove forest), Swmp (swamp forest), Bmbo (bamboo forest), Grss (grassland & shrub), Wet (wetland), SltF (salt flat), Strm (freshwater), Wtrf (waterfall), LmCv (limestone cave), and Bch (beach)
Fig. 2 in Representation Of Threatened Vertebrates By A Protected Area System In Southeast Asia: The Importance Of Non-Forest Habitats
Fig. 2. Map showing areas of underrepresented habitats in Thailand still lacking official protection. The light grey areas represent protected areas, while the black areas are underrepresented habitats outside the protected area system.
Fig. 1 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast
Fig. 1. Location of study sites. (A) Taiwan, (B) the northern coast of Taiwan, (C) Houcuo fishing port, and (D) Linshanbi fishing port.
Fig. 2 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast
Fig. 2. Mean density (±SE) of mobile molluscs on seawalls, breakwaters, and natural rocky shores, at Houcuo and Linshanbi fishing ports between autumn 2010 and summer 2011. In the same season, means with different letters indicate significant differences according to Student-Newman-Keuls test (p <0.05).
Fig. 5 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast
Fig. 5. Principal component scores for specific taxa at the two ports sampled between autumn 2010 and summer 2011.
Fig. 4. The n in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast
Fig. 4. The n-MDS plots for assemblages at various sampling sites from autumn 2010 to summer 2011. Symbols represent different habitats(: natural rocky shores;:seawalls;:breakwaters) and characters represent different fishing ports (H: Houcuo fishing port; L: Linshanbi fishing port). Shaded shapes represent shaded habitats, and unshaded shapes represent unshaded habitats. Ellipses represent the 60% similarity groups superimposed from the cluster analysis based on the Bray-Curtis resemblance matrix.
Fig. 3 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast
Fig. 3. Mean percentage cover (±SE) of algae and sessile animals on seawalls, breakwaters, and natural rocky shores at the 2 ports sampled from autumn 2010 to summer 2011 (n = 10). In the same season, means with different letters indicate significant differences according to Student-Newman-Keuls test (p <0.05).
Fig. 7 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore
Fig. 7. Box and whisker (a, d) and scatter (b, c) plots showing the relationships between the inquiline species richness of individual pitchers and pitcher type (a), pitcher size (b), canopy cover (c), and location (within or outside of the CCNR; d). The plots show that inquiline species richness was higher in lower than upper pitchers (a), and pitcher size (b) and canopy cover (c) had weak positive effects on inquiline species richness, but there was no significant difference in inquiline species richness between pitchers outside of and within the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR) (d). In (a) and (d), boxes represent interquartile ranges, whiskers represent maxima and minima, and points represent outliers. In (b) and (c), points (green = lower, beige = upper pitchers) represent the species richness of individual pitchers, and lines represent the model predictions of the second (b; ΔAICc = 1.94) and third (c; ΔAICc = 1.99) best models for lower (green) and upper (beige) pitchers.
Fig. 11 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore
Fig. 11. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs exemplifying morphological differences in the chelicerae of Nepenthes histiostomatid mites: (a) Creutzeria sp., (b) Zwickia sp., (c) Nepenthacarus sp. Scale bar = 10 micrometres. (Photographs by: Norman J. Fashing).
Fig. 3 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore
Fig. 3. Two-dimensional NMDS plot of the plant communities co-occurring with Nepenthes rafflesiana in plots located within (brown points) and outside (pink points) of the CCNR (a), and box and whisker plot comparing the log-transformed floristic species richness of these locations (b). Plant communities differed significantly in composition (a; pseudo-F1,11 = 3.80, p-value <0.001) and species richness (b; T11 = 4.74, p-value = 0.001). Each point in the NMDS plot (a) represents the plant communities of a single plot. Colours are translucent, so that overlapping points may be distinguished. Points which are located closer to each other in the NMDS plot share more similar plant communities. Texts represent plant species centroids, with font sizes proportional to the number of plots in which each was found (species which were found in two or less plots are not displayed). A species is more likely to occur in a plot if the plot's point is located close to the species' centroid. Bold lines in the box and whisker plot represent median log-transformed species richness, boxes represent interquartile ranges, whiskers represent maxima/minima and points represent outliers.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.