Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,025 results for “R&D”
Figure 6 from: Cogălniceanu D, Castilla A, Valdeon A, Gosa A, Al Jaidah N, Alkuwary A, Saifelnasr E, Mas P, Richer R, Al Hemaidi A (2014) A preliminary report on the distribution of lizards in Qatar. ZooKeys 373: 67-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.373.5994
Figure 6 - Distribution of three agamid species (Phrynocephalus arabicus, Trapelus flavimaculatus, Uromastyx aegyptia).
Figure 3 from: Cogălniceanu D, Castilla A, Valdeon A, Gosa A, Al Jaidah N, Alkuwary A, Saifelnasr E, Mas P, Richer R, Al Hemaidi A (2014) A preliminary report on the distribution of lizards in Qatar. ZooKeys 373: 67-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.373.5994
Figure 3 - Species accumulation curve (bold line) reflecting lizard species richness based on presence-absence data for the whole country. The thin lines indicate the estimated error margins (95%).
Figure 2 from: Cogălniceanu D, Castilla A, Valdeon A, Gosa A, Al Jaidah N, Alkuwary A, Saifelnasr E, Mas P, Richer R, Al Hemaidi A (2014) A preliminary report on the distribution of lizards in Qatar. ZooKeys 373: 67-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.373.5994
Figure 2 - Estimates of lizard species abundance based on a the proportion of sightings of a certain species from the total number of sightings (n = 617), and b the presence of a species per day from the total number of fieldwork days (n = 45) (see methods for details).
Figure 1 from: Cox K, Thomaes A, Antonini G, Zilioli M, De Gelas K, Harvey D, Solano E, Audisio P, McKeown N, Shaw P, Minetti R, Bartolozzi L, Mergeay J (2013) Testing the performance of a fragment of the COI gene to identify western Palaearctic stag beetle species (Coleoptera, Lucanidae). ZooKeys 365: 105-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5526
Figure 1 - Bootstrap consensus NJ tree inferred from 10 000 replicates, with a cut off value of 70%, based on K2P-distances between 60 haplotypes of the 3' end of the COI gene.
Figure 5 from: Rozylowicz L, Cogălniceanu D, Székely P, Samoilă C, Ruben I, Tudor M, Plăiaşu R, Stănescu F (2013) Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania. ZooKeys 296: 35-57. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.296.4872
Figure 5 - Altitudinal distribution of amphibian species in Romania (dot – mean, horizontal line – median, vertical bar – range, Ssa – Salamandra salamandra, Tcr – Triturus cristatus, Tdo – Triturus dobrogicus, Ial – Ichtyosaura alpestris, Lvu – Lissotriton vulgaris, Lmo – Lissotriton montandoni, Bob – Bombina bombina, Bov – Bombina variegata, Pef – Pelobates fuscus, Pes – Pelobates syriacus, Bub – Bufo bufo, Buv – Bufo viridis, Hya – Hyla arborea, Rda – Rana dalmatina, Rar – Rana arvalis, Rte – Rana temporaria, Ple – Pelophylax lessonae, Pke – Pelophylax kl. esculentus).
Figure 3 from: Rozylowicz L, Cogălniceanu D, Székely P, Samoilă C, Ruben I, Tudor M, Plăiaşu R, Stănescu F (2013) Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania. ZooKeys 296: 35-57. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.296.4872
Figure 3 - Hotspots of sampling efforts within Romania. The p value is < 0.05 when Z scores take values between 1.65 and 56.44, suggesting a highly clustered pattern in the number of amphibian occurrences per UTM 5 × 5 grid cell.
Figure 2 from: Rozylowicz L, Cogălniceanu D, Székely P, Samoilă C, Ruben I, Tudor M, Plăiaşu R, Stănescu F (2013) Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania. ZooKeys 296: 35-57. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.296.4872
Figure 2 - Amphibian occurrences in Romania. Records reported before 1990 were plotted as old records whereas those reported after 1990 were considered new records.
Figure S1 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure S1 - The only parsimonious tree obtained from the maximum parsimony (MP) analysis. Topology of species groupings is similar to that of the Bayesian tree (see Figure 3). Node supports are reported on the branches; the first value is bootstrap support from MP analysis; the second value in bracket indicates the posterior probability obtained from Bayesian analysis; only moderate to high node support values are indicated; Jujubinus exasperatus is used as outgroup; A-E indicates different possible species-units in the dataset: A (Oxystele tabularis), B (Oxystele variegata), C (Oxystele impervia), D (Oxystele sinensis), E (Oxystele tigrina), as in Figure 3.
Figure S2 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure S2 - Bayesian tree assembled using MrBayes indicating the groupings of specimens and the posterior probability of the nodes.
Figure 4 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure 4 - Patterns of shell colour within the genus Oxystele. A–C Oxystele variegata from Namibia, 5 km north of Swakopmund, diameter 22.2 mm (NMSA E6038) D–F Oxystele impervia from the Western Cape, Groen Rivier, diameter 22.3 mm (NMSA E7353) G–I Oxystele sp. from theEastern Cape, Tsitsikamma National Park, diameter 16.5 mm (HVDBM058-10, NMSA W7371); the colour pattern of these specimens suggests Oxystele variegata, but these specimens group within the unit of Oxystele impervia J–L Oxystele sp. from the Northern Cape, Noup, diameter 18.0 mm (HVDBM185-10, NMSA W7608); the colour pattern suggests Oxystele impervia, but they group with Oxystele variegata (see Figure 4 and Appendix 2 for the phylogenetic groupings of these specimens and node supports; these groupings contradict their morphological identification).
Figure 3 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure 3 - Summary of both Bayesian and parsimonious trees. Values above branches indicate bootstrap supports; values under branches indicate posterior probability. All distinguished species are indicated at the tip of the tree. Branches without values indicate non-supported nodes; the small circle indicates a specimen of Oxystele impervia (HVDBM028-10) that was misidentified based on morphology; large circle indicates four specimens morphologically indistinguishable from Oxystele variegata (HVDBM070-10; DQ061092; HVDBM058-10; HVDBM059-10), but that are, based on both barcoding analysis of species delimitation (see Table 1) and phylogenetic tree analysis identified as Oxystele impervia (see also Appendices 1 and 2).
Figure 2 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure 2 - Determination of the threshold genetic distance for species identification. The density plot indicates transition between intra- and interspecific distances; the genetic distance corresponding to this transition (dip in the density graph, here approximately 0.05) indicates the suitable threshold to the dataset. This method does not require prior knowledge of species identity to get an indication of potential threshold values.
Figure 1 from: Yessoufou K, Van Der Bank H, Herbert D, Greenfield R (2013) Revisiting species delimitation within the genus Oxystele using DNA barcoding approach. ZooKeys 365: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5356
Figure 1 - Evaluation of barcode gap in the dataset. A Boxplot of the interspecific (inter) and intraspecific genetic (intra) distances, indicating the existence of a barcode gap i.e. intraspecific distance is longer than intraspecific distance. The bottom and top of the boxes show the first and third quartiles respectively, the median is indicated by the horizontal line, the range of the data by the vertical dashed line and outliers (points outside 1.5 times the interquartile range) by Bold vertical lines B Lineplot of the barcode gap for the 56 Oxsystele specimens. For each specimen in the dataset, the grey lines indicate where the smallest interspecific distance (top of line value) is longer than the longest intraspecific distance (bottom of line value), therefore indicating existence of barcode gap; the red lines show where this pattern is reversed, and the closest non-conspecific is closer to the query than its nearest conspecific, i.e., the situation where there is no barcoding gap.
Figures 9-10 from: Davidson R, Ward R, Brzoska D (2011) Tetracha Hope 1838 of the Turks and Caicos Islands (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae). ZooKeys 147: 85-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2104
Figures 9-10 - Dorsal habitus of Tetracha sobrina caicosensis; male, length 14.5 mm 9 female, length 16.0 mm 10.
Figure 2 from: Figueira R, Monteiro M, Reino L, Beja P, Mills M, Bastos-Silveira C, Ramos M, Rodrigues D, Queirós Neves I, Consciência S (2014) The collection and database of Birds of Angola hosted at IICT (Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical), Lisboa, Portugal. ZooKeys 387: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.387.6412
Figure 2 - Number of specimens per family. The families pictured represent 80% of the number of specimens in the collection.
Figure 3 from: Figueira R, Monteiro M, Reino L, Beja P, Mills M, Bastos-Silveira C, Ramos M, Rodrigues D, Queirós Neves I, Consciência S (2014) The collection and database of Birds of Angola hosted at IICT (Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical), Lisboa, Portugal. ZooKeys 387: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.387.6412
Figure 3 - Distribution of occurrence records with indication of number of records indicated on a half a minute grid system.
Figure 1 from: Figueira R, Monteiro M, Reino L, Beja P, Mills M, Bastos-Silveira C, Ramos M, Rodrigues D, Queirós Neves I, Consciência S (2014) The collection and database of Birds of Angola hosted at IICT (Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical), Lisboa, Portugal. ZooKeys 387: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.387.6412
Figure 1 - Number and percentage of specimens per orders. Only the categories of orders having 20 or more specimens are labeled.
Figure 4 from: Figueira R, Monteiro M, Reino L, Beja P, Mills M, Bastos-Silveira C, Ramos M, Rodrigues D, Queirós Neves I, Consciência S (2014) The collection and database of Birds of Angola hosted at IICT (Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical), Lisboa, Portugal. ZooKeys 387: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.387.6412
Figure 4 - Temporal profile of the specimens in the collection. The time range for each order is represented by the horizontal bars.
Figure 1 from: Lin R, Wang J, Huang D, Zheng X (2013) A new species of Austrodecus Hodgson, 1907 (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida, Austrodecidae) from the Southwest Indian Ridge. ZooKeys 349: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.349.6170
Figure 1 - Austrodec us bamberi sp. n., TVG0201, male holotype: A trunk, lateral view B trunk, dorsal view C palp D terminal articles of palp, enlarged E oviger F leg 1 G cement gland tube of leg 1, enlarged H tarsus, propodus, and claws of leg 1, enlarged I leg 3 J cement gland tube of leg 3, enlarged K propodus, and claws of leg 3, enlarged. Scale bars (A, B, F, I = 1.0 mm; C = 0.5 mm; D, E, H, K = 0.25 mm).
Figure 2 from: Novo M, Fernández R, Fernández Marchán D, Gutiérrez M, Diaz Cosin D (2012) Compilation of morphological and molecular data, a necessity for taxonomy: The case of Hormogaster abbatissae sp. n. (Annelida, Clitellata, Hormogastridae). ZooKeys 242: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.242.3996
Figure 2 - Top, part of the parsimony tree recovered by Novo et al. (2011), showing the clade where Hormogaster abbatissae was placed (in that work it is named sp n.). Bottom, network representation for 16S-tRNA and COI recovered by SplitsTree4 of the closest species (surrounded by a black square in the tree above) and Hormogaster elisae and Aporrectodea trapezoides as distant references.The number of specimens used is indicated in parenthesis.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.