Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,854
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,854 results for “Host plant”
Figure 4 in Effects of different ant species on the attendance of neighbouring hemipteran colonies and the outcomes for the host plant
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of abundance of mealybugs on plants with and without (a) Camponotus crassus and (b) Ectatomma tuberculatum on shrubs of Banisteriopsis campestris in a Brazilian tropical savanna. [T test; * indicates statistical difference; p <0.05; means ± 1 standard error (SE) are presented].
Figure 2 in Effects of different ant species on the attendance of neighbouring hemipteran colonies and the outcomes for the host plant
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of abundance of nymphs attended by (a) Camponotus crassus and (b) Ectatomma tuberculatum on individuals of Banisteriopsis campestris with and without ants over 76 days of monitoring (sampling: 1° – 5 February 2014; 2° – 26 February 2014; 3° – 19 March 2014; 4° – 9 April 2014). A statistical difference was observed for nymphs attended by C. crassus [Friedman test; * indicates statistical difference; p <0.05; means ± 1 standard error (SE) are presented].
Figure 3 in Effects of different ant species on the attendance of neighbouring hemipteran colonies and the outcomes for the host plant
Figure 3. Proportion of fruit production with (a) Camponotus crassus and (b) Ectatomma tuberculatum in the group with both mealybugs and ants, group with only ants, group with only mealybugs, and group without ants or mealybugs. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, p <0.05) with the presence/absence of each group (ants and mealybugs) treated as a separate factor. Means + 1 standard error (SE) are presented. The asterisk (*) in (a) indicates a significant negative interactive effect by C. crassus and mealybugs on proportion of fruit production (p <0.05; see Table 1).
Figure 6 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of first instar (A–F) and fourth (last) instar (G) larvae of Parrhasius polibetes. (A) Dorsolateral view; (B) head and prothorax in lateral view; (C) abdominal segments 3 to 5 in lateral view; (D) perforated cupola organ; (E) spiracle on A2 segment; (F) proleg in ventral view; (G) proleg in ventral view.
Figure 3 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 3. Natural enemies of Parrhasius polibetes. (A) Parasitoid wasp (arrow) emerging from an egg; (B) Pseudomyrmex ant preying on eggs (arrow); (C) second instar parasitized by a braconid wasp (arrow); (D) ichneumonid cocoon under third instar host remains; (E) wasp (Conura sp.; Chalcididae) parasitizing a fourth (last) instar; (F) fourth instar being attacked by a ceratopogonid biting midge (arrow); (G) predatory bug (Podisus nigrispinus; Asopinae) sucking a fourth instar larva; (H) remains of a fourth instar larva preyed by an araneid spider. Figures can be viewed in colour online.
Figure 2 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 2. Larval colour patters of Parrhasius polibetes on different host plants. (A) Third instar on Pyrostegia venusta; (B) third instar "red morph" on Pyrostegia venusta; (C) third instar on Pouteria torta being tended by a worker of Camponotus crassus; (D) fourth (last) instar on Pyrostegia venusta; (E) fourth instar on Styrax ferrugineus being tended by a worker of Camponotus sp.; (F) fourth instar on Banisteriopsis campestris; (G) fourth instar on Eugenia bimarginata being tended by a worker of Camponotus leydigi. Figures can be viewed in colour online.
Figure 1 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 1. Life stages of Parrhasius polibetes on Schefflera vinosa (A–C, F, G) and on Luehea grandiflora (D, E). (A) Adult female; (B) newly-laid egg (arrow); (C) egg after 24 h; (D) eggs (arrow) laid near an aggregation of Guayaquila xiphias treehoppers tended by Camponotus crassus workers; (E) egg accidentally laid on an ant-tended treehopper nymph of Enchenopa sp.; (F) first instar; (G) third instar being tended by a worker of Cephalotes pusillus; (H) fourth (last) instar being tended by a worker of Camponotus crassus; (I) pupa. Figures can be viewed in colour online.
Figure 5 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 5. Chaetotaxy of first instar larva of Parrhasius polibetes. (A) Head in frontal view; (B) head in lateral view; (C) body diagram in lateral view. For chaetotaxy abbreviations see Downey and Allyn (1984b), Duarte et al. (2005) and Ballmer and Wright (2008).
Figure 7 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 7. Scanning electron micrographs of fourth (last) instar (A–F) and pupae (G–I) of Parrhasius polibetes. (A) Head in lateral view; (B) prothoracic shield; (C) detail of the abdominal tegument in dorsal view; (D) spiracle on A2 segment; (E) opening of the dorsal nectar organ with perforated cupola organs (arrow); (F) detail of the perforated cupola organ; (G) spiracle on A5 segment, note the perforated cupola organs (arrow); (H) detail of the abdominal tegument in lateral view; (I) detail of the stridulating area between A5–A6 segments (arrow).
Figure 4 in Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, tending ants, natural enemies and morphology
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of Parrhasius polibetes egg. (A) Anterior and lateral view of two eggs; (B) micropylar area; (C) detail of an aeropyle on a rib intersection.
Figure 6 in Nesting habits of the Japanese foliage spider, Cheiracanthium japonicum (Araneae: Miturgidae): host plant preference based on the physical traits of plant leaves
Figure 6. Differences in the nest size among all types examined by the Tukey test. A solid line indicates a range of 95% confidence intervals. If the interval crosses zero, the difference between the nest types is not significant. On the contrary, if the interval does not cross zero, the difference is significant. The nest types are abbreviated as follows: S1, season's first nest; S2, season's second nest; S3, season's third nest; S4, season's fourth nest; S5, season's fifth nest; M, mating nest; B, breeding nest.
Figure 5 in Nesting habits of the Japanese foliage spider, Cheiracanthium japonicum (Araneae: Miturgidae): host plant preference based on the physical traits of plant leaves
Figure 5. Relationship between the nest size and the nest type (n = 167). The nest types are abbreviated as follows: S1, season's first nest; S2, season's second nest; S3, season's third nest; S4, season's fourth nest; S5, season's fifth nest; M, mating nest; B, breeding nest.
Figure 4 in Nesting habits of the Japanese foliage spider, Cheiracanthium japonicum (Araneae: Miturgidae): host plant preference based on the physical traits of plant leaves
Figure 4. Principal component analysis bi-plot of relationships between the four physical traits of a leaf and the nest type (n = 133). Physical traits are shown by vectors. Each plot represents a nest type: square: season's first nest; diamond: season's second nest; solid square: season's third nest; circle: season's fourth nest; solid circle: season's fifth nest; triangle: mating nest; solid triangle: breeding nest. Plots with similar physical traits are formed into three groups (A, B and C) surrounded by lines.
Figure 2 in Multi-scale patterns in the host specificity of plant-dwelling arthropods: the influence of host plant and temporal variation on species richness and assemblage composition of true bugs (Hemiptera)
Figure 2. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) ordination showing hemipteran composition for all sampling periods with selected plant species superimposed.
Figure 5 in Multi-scale patterns in the host specificity of plant-dwelling arthropods: the influence of host plant and temporal variation on species richness and assemblage composition of true bugs (Hemiptera)
Figure 5. Annual cyclic pattern of the proportion of the effectively specialized fauna (squares) and singleton species (circles) for the total number of hemipteran species from each sampling period.
Figure 3 in Multi-scale patterns in the host specificity of plant-dwelling arthropods: the influence of host plant and temporal variation on species richness and assemblage composition of true bugs (Hemiptera)
Figure 3. Mean number of individuals (from SIMPER analysis) of dominant hemipteran species, during each sampling period, for most plant species.
Figure 1 in Multi-scale patterns in the host specificity of plant-dwelling arthropods: the influence of host plant and temporal variation on species richness and assemblage composition of true bugs (Hemiptera)
Figure 1. Interactions between plant species sampled and sampling period for (A) abundance (number of individuals) per plant and (B) species richness per plant (standard error bars are shown).
Figure 6 in Multi-scale patterns in the host specificity of plant-dwelling arthropods: the influence of host plant and temporal variation on species richness and assemblage composition of true bugs (Hemiptera)
Figure 6. Relationship between the effectively specialized fauna (squares) and singleton species (circles) for the number of hemipteran species from each sampling period and for the entire collection. An exponential decay equation is fitted for effectively specialized fauna, y = 2.973∗ exp (−0.00575∗ x) + (−1.478), R2 = 0.7598, and for singleton species, y = 22.53∗exp (−0.08466∗x) + 0.2614, R2 = 0.9873.
Figure 5 in The host-plant range of twig-girdling beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Onciderini) of the Atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil
Figure 5. (A) Distribution of frequencies (%) of host-plant species girdled by Psyllotoxus griseocinctus from 2002 to 2006 in Serra do Japi. Asterisks indicate significant differences of the frequencies between girdled and available plant species (Bonferroni 95% confidence interval). (B) The preference for host plants was evaluated using the Manly's index. Values to the right of the dotted line indicate a preference for host plants; values to the left of the line indicate a preference for the alternate host.
Figure 2 in The host-plant range of twig-girdling beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Onciderini) of the Atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil
Figure 2. Host specificity of Onciderini beetles based on the percentage of girdled plant species from all taxa. (n = 35 native plant species). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (Tukey-type multiple comparison test for the analysis of proportions, p <0.05)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.