Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Fig. 20 in Taxonomy and distribution of recent species of the subfamily Nodosariinae (Foraminifera) in Icelandic waters

Fig. 20. Species distributions based on BIOICE samples (Icelandic waters). A. Nodosaria subsoluta Cushman, 1923. B. Dentalina antennula d'Orbigny, 1846. C. Dentalina antarctica Parr, 1950. D. Grigelis semirugosus? (d'Orbigny, 1846).E. Dentalina obliqua (Linnaeus, 1758). F. Pseudonodosaria subannulata (Cushman, 1923).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy of the genus Antiochtha Meyrick (Lepidoptera, Lecithoceridae) in China, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 2. Wing venations of Antiochtha spp., all paratypes. A. A. erromera sp. nov., slide No. WYS20277. B. A. hainanensis sp. nov., slide No. WYS20058. C. A. miniscula sp. nov., slide No. WYS20261. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →

Fig. 2. Atritomus vicinus Grouvelle, 1908 in West Palaearctic taxa formerly connected to the 'old' genus Atritomus Reitter, 1877 (Coleoptera, Mycetophagidae): taxonomy, distribution, and description of a new genus

Fig. 2. Atritomus vicinus Grouvelle, 1908 (= Typhaeola vicina (Grouvelle, 1908) comb. nov.), holotype (EC12477). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Habitus, ventral view. D. Labels. Scale bar = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in West Palaearctic taxa formerly connected to the 'old' genus Atritomus Reitter, 1877 (Coleoptera, Mycetophagidae): taxonomy, distribution, and description of a new genus

Fig. 1. Stereophilus filicornis (Reitter, 1887) gen. et comb. nov., ♂ from Italy, Tuscany. A. Habitus. B. Aedeagus (dorsal view). C. Aedeagus (lateral view). D. Right hind wing of a male from France, Haute-Garonne. Scale bars: A, D = 1 mm; B–C = 0.5 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →

Data used in the paper A Taxonomy of Testable HTML5 Canvas Issues

<p>This repository contains data used in the paper <code>A Taxonomy of Testable HTML5 Canvas Issues</code>, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.</p> <p><strong>Data description:</strong></p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>file name</th> <th>description</th> <th>fields</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>extracted_projects.csv</td> <td>180 open-source <canvas> projects (extracted from GitHub)</td> <td>nameWithOwner</td> </tr> <tr> <td>extracted_bug_reports.csv</td> <td>2,403 <canvas> issue reports (extracted from the 180 GitHub projects)</td> <td>url</td> </tr> <tr> <td>classified_bug_reports.csv</td> <td>332 classified issue reports (sampled from extracted_bug_reports.csv)</td> <td>url, type</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →

Figs 22–25 in Contribution To The Taxonomy And Phylogeny Of The Genus Polia Ochsenheimer, 1816 (Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Hadenini): Species Groups And Pairs In The Holarctic Subgenus Polia S. Str.

Figs 22–25. Female genitalia of Polia species: 22 = P. hepatica (Clerck, 1759), slide no. RL12394, Austria, 23 = P. vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), slide no. VZ9972, Russia, Transbaikalia, 24 = P. imbrifera (Guenée, 1852), slide no. VZ9969, Canada, 25 = P. lama (Staudinger, 1896), slide no. RL12347, Kirghisia

Figure 4 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 4. Average thorax profile of Lasius ponderosae sp. nov. (a) and members of the Palearctic L. nigercomplex (b). Figures were created by image averaging (L. ponderosae sp. nov n = 35; Palearctic L. niger-complex n = 30 specimens). Frontal view of head and detail of clypeus of the Holotype worker of L. ponderosae sp. nov. (c) and a non-type worker of L. niger (d).

Figure 5. Principal component plot for the 4 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 5. Principal component plot for the 4 most diagnostic morphometric variables (GUHL, dCLAN, MP6 and nSt) to distinguish individual specimens of Lasius ponderosae sp. nov. (n = 39) from those belonging to morphologically similar-looking Palearctic species (n = 49). For a definition of variables see Supplementary Table S3 and Fig. S1.

Figure 6 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 6. Projected occurrence probability from ecological niche modeling for the Palearctic ant Lasius niger which has been introduced to Canada, based on 19 climatic and one land use variable. The intensity of blue colour indicates the probability of occurrence on a 0–1 scale based on 180 presences (black circles) and 182 absences (white circles) in the native range in the Old World (a). The model was then projected to North America to estimate areas of suitable habitat for this introduced species (b). These maps have been created using the free R-package "ggplot2" v3.3.5 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org) in R v4.1.1.

Figure 2. Mitotype tree and distribution maps for 98 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 2. Mitotype tree and distribution maps for 98 DNA-barcodes belonging to 7 mitotypes of the ant Lasius niger (blue, n = 70) and 15 mitotypes of L. ponderosae sp. nov. (red, n = 28). The red dashed line delimits the expected natural range of L. ponderosae sp. nov.53 Maps have been created using the free R-package "ggmap" v3.0.0 (https://github.com/dkahle/ggmap) in R v4.1.1. Map tiles by Stamen Design, under CC BY 3.0.

Figure 3 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 3. Frontal, lateral and dorsal view of the holotype worker (a–c), a paratype gyne (d–f) and a paratype male of Lasius ponderosae sp. nov. (g–i).

Figure 1 in Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic diversity in North American Lasius ants, and an overlooked introduced species

Figure 1. Molecular phylogeny of 26 Holarctic ant taxa belonging to the subgenus Lasius sensu Wilson (1955) and two outgroup taxa (L. pallitarsis and L. mixtus). The phylogeny was calculated under the coalescent model and incorporates data from 9 genes (mtDNA: COI, COII, 16S, nuDNA: Defensin, H3, LR, Wg, Top1 & 28S). Names of species native to the Nearctic are shown in red and those of species native to the Palearctic in blue. Node labels show posterior probability (Bayesian inference) followed by bootstrap support (Maximum likelihood). The scale bar indicates the length of 0.01 substitutions/site.

Fig. 64. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 64. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 (MNHN collection-Paris).A. Habitus. B. Labels.C. Distribution. Squares = P. Germain itinerary; circles = new records.

Fig. 61. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 61. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956, ♂♂ (CELC). A–B. Abdomen. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Ventrite 1. D. Tergite VIII. E. Terminalia. F. Tergite IX. G. Sternite VIII. Specimens collected at Mata da Biologia, Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars: A, C–G = 0.2 mm; B = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 60. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 60. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956, ♂♂ (CELC). A–B. Metendosternite. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C–D. Elytron. C. Entire. D. Apex. E. Hind wing. F–H. Legs. F. Fore. G. Middle. H. Hind. Specimens collected at Mata da Biologia, Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 57. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 57. Cyparium oberthueri Pic, 1956 (CELC). A. Frontal view. B. Male antenna. C. Female antenna. D. Labrum. E. Left mandible. F. Right mandible. G. Maxilla. Specimens collected at Mata da Biologia, Viçosa (MG, Brazil) (CELC). Scale bars: A–C = 0.2 mm; D–G = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 54. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 54. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920, ♀ (CELC). A. Tergite VIII. B. Sternite VIII. C. Terminalia. D. Sclerite of vaginal plate. E. Ovipositor. Specimen collected at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars: A–B, D–E = 0.1 mm; C = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 52. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 52. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920, ♂♂ (CELC). A–B. Abdomen. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Ventrite 1. D. Tergite VIII. E. Terminalia. F. Tergite IX. G. Sternite VIII. Specimens collected at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 49. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920 in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 49. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920, ♂♂ (CELC). A. Labium. B. Hypopharynx. C. Head, ventral view. D–E. Pronotum, dorsal view. F–G. Prothorax. F. Ventral view. G. Inner view. Specimens collected at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars: A–C = 0.1 mm; D–G = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 47. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920. A–C in Contributions to the taxonomy of Neotropical Cyparium Erichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae), with the description of five new species

Fig. 47. Cyparium collare Pic, 1920. A–C. ♂ (CELC). A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Lateral view. D–F. ♀ (CELC). D. Dorsal view. E. Lateral view. F. Dorsal view. Specimens collected at Mata do Paraíso (A–C) and Mata da Biologia (D–F), Viçosa (MG, Brazil). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.