Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 4. Skull measurements of Rhombomylus. dbm, Distance between molar rows (between M1s); iid, interinfraorbital distance; iod, interorbital distance; lld, length of the lower diastema; lud, length of the upper diastema; mh, mandibular height (at m1); sh, skull height; sl, skull length; wbs, width between squamosal edges; and wnr, width of the narrowest region of the skull roof.

Fig. 28 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 28. Lateral views of skulls of Rhombomylus. Skulls are in relative ages from the youngest to oldest (IVPP V7585, V5280, V5288, V5289, V5293, V5278).

Fig. 11 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 11. Comparison of M1 (squares)/m1 (triangles) sizes of Matutinia and Rhombomylus. Solid symbols represent M1/m1 of Rhombomylus; empty ones are those of Matutinia. Measurements of Matutinia are from Ting et al. (2002).

Fig. 3 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 3. Measured dimensions of the upper molar, upper premolar, lower molar, and lower premolar of Rhombomylus. ML, upper molar length; mL, lower molar length; PL, upper premolar length; pL, lower premolar length; PW, upper premolar width; pW, lower premolar width; TlW, upper molar talon width; tlW, lower molar talonid width; TrW, upper molar trigon width; and trW, lower molar trigonid width.

Fig. 2. A in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 2. A. Location and geological map of the Xichuan (Liquanqiao) Basin (1, Neogene; 2, Hetaoyuan Fm.; 3, Dacangfang Fm.; 4, Yuhuangding Fm.; 5, Hugang Fm.; 6, stratigraphical boundary; and 7, Dajian fossil localities). B. Section measured between Daao and Pangwan (K2h, Hugang Fm; E2y, Yuhuangding Fm.; E2d, Dacangfang Fm.). Modified from Xu et al. (1979) and D.E. Russell and Zhai (1987).

Fig. 10 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 10. Cheek teeth of Matutinia (IVPP V7442, V7443). A–B, Occlusal and lingual views of P3– M3; C–D, occlusal and lingual views of p3–m3. Images photographically reversed to facilitate comparison with those of Rhombomylus. Modified from Ting et al. (2002).

Fig. 30 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 30. Ventral views of the rostra of Rhombomylus (IVPP V5278, V5293, V5289, V5280, V7585), showing the conditions of the incisive foramen, premaxillamaxillar suture, and shape of the diastema in individuals of different ages.

Fig. 40 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 40. Peeled petrosal showing casts of the inner ear of Rhombomylus (IVPP V5265, V7494). aa, anterior ampulla; asc, anterior semicircular canal; cc, crus commune; fc, fenestra cochleae; fv, fenestra vestibuli; iam, internal acoustic meatus; la, lateral ampulla; lsc, lateral semicircular canal; pa, posterior ampulla; pm, promontorium; psc, posterior semicircular canal; and saf, subarcuate fossa.

Fig. 18 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 18. Enamel distribution and microstructure of a lower incisor from a juvenile individual of Rhombomylus (IVPP V5280), in which deciduous premolars are present and germs of M3/m3 are completely embedded in bones. A, Distribution of the enamel on the labial surface of the incisor; B–C, cross and longitudinal sections showing microstructure of the enamel. See text for description and discussion.

Fig. 1 in The Osteology Of Rhombomylus (Mammalia, Glires): Implications For Phylogeny And Evolution Of Glires

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic hypotheses of basal Glires and the phylogenetic position of Rhombomylus, based on Meng et al. (1994), Averianov (1994), Li et al. (1987), Dashzeveg et al. (1998), and Meng and Wyss (2001).

Fig. 65 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 65. Evolution of carnivory inferred from our optimization of the carnivory character of Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996: table 1; see our table 8) on our strict consensus tree from the character congruence analysis. The ''uncertain'' states for Phyllostomus and Tonatia are due to taxonomic polymorphism.

Fig. 64 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 64. Evolution of different types of nectarivory inferred from our optimization of the nectarivory character of Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996: table 1; see our table 8) on our strict consensus tree from the character congruence analysis. Note that the nectarivory character, as defined by Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996) includes the consumption of pollen and petals. To prevent an equivocal reconstruction for the base of the clade that includes all phyllostomids except desmodontines, we examined trees in which the position of Brachyphylla was resolved and fixed the node at the base of the clade that includes all phyllostomids except desmodontines with the state that occurred under the two alternative placements for this genus.

Fig. 63 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 63. Evolution of different types of frugivory inferred from our optimization of the frugivory character of Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996: table 1; see our table 8) on our strict consensus tree from the character congruence analysis. To prevent an equivocal reconstruction for the base of the clade that includes all phyllostomids except desmodontines, we examined trees in which the position of Brachyphylla was resolved and fixed the node at the base of the clade that includes all phyllostomids except desmodontines with the state that occurred under the two alternative placements for this genus.

Fig. 62 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 62. Evolution of different types of insectivory (see text for description of character states) inferred from our optimization of the insectivory character of Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996: table 1; see our table 8) on our strict consensus tree from the character congruence analysis. We inferred the state at the root with reference to a phylogeny of Microchiroptera (Simmons, 1998). The equivocal optimizations for Phyllostomidae and Vampyrini are due to differences in interpretation of the character under ACCTRAN or DELTRAN. The ''uncertain'' state for Noctilio is due to taxonomic polymorphism (see table 8).

Fig. 61 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 61. Tree used by Ferrarezi and Gimenez (1996; redrawn from fig. 4) with their feedinghabits character optimized on the topology. This character was ordered such that predominant insectivory evolved from strict insectivory; predominant carnivory, predominant frugivory, or sanguivory evolved from predominant insectivory; and predominant nectarivory or strict frugivory evolved from predominant frugivory.

Fig. 60 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 60. Evolution of the labial horseshoe inferred from optimization of character 25 on the strict consensus tree from our character congruence analysis. The morphology of the thickened labial horseshoe (character 27) is also indicated: asterisks indicate taxa with a Vshaped labial projection; a single cross indicates taxa in which all individuals have a Vshaped notch; a double cross indicates taxa in which some individuals have a Vshaped notch. The state for Centurio is not indicated because we scored this taxon ''?'' for all characters related to the noseleaf (see character 18).

Fig. 59 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 59. Evolution of the lateral horseshoe inferred from optimization of character 24 on the strict consensus tree from our character congruence analysis. The equivocal reconstruction for the evolution of a ''partly free edge'' is due to the missing data for Scleronycteris.

Fig. 58 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 58. Evolution of the internarial structures inferred from optimization of character 24 on the strict consensus tree from our character congruence analysis. The equivocal reconstruction within Hirsutaglossa is due to alternative interpretations under ACCTRAN and DELTRAN. Note that ''polymorphic'' indicates that some individuals in a species have a ridge or papillae, whereas others do not.

Fig. 57 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 57. Evolution of length of the central rib inferred from optimization of character 21 on the strict consensus tree from our character congruence analysis. The equivocal reconstruction for the base of the clade including phyllostomines and nullicaudans is due to alternative interpretations under ACCT RAN and DELTRAN. The reconstruction for Centurio is equivocal due to missing data (see character 18). See text for discussion.

Fig. 56 in Phylogeny Of Phyllostomid Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Data From Diverse Morphological Systems, Sex Chromosomes, And Restriction Sites

Fig. 56. Evolution of spear length and spear tip shape inferred from the optimization of characters 19 and 20, respectively, on the strict consensus tree from our character congruence analysis. Optimization of spear length A. with Brachyphylla as the sister taxon of Hirsutaglossa, Phyllostominae, and Nullicauda. The equivocal reconstruction beginning with the last common ancestor the clade including Hirsutaglossa, Phyllostominae, and Nullicauda is due to alternative optimizations under ACCTRAN and DELTRAN. B. with Brachyphylla as the sister taxon of Phyllostominae and Nullicauda. Optimizations of spear tip shape C. with Brachyphylla as the sister taxon of Hirsutaglossa, Phyllostominae, and Nullicauda, and D. with Brachyphylla as the sister taxon of Phyllostominae and Nullicauda. The equivocal reconstruction beginning with the last common ancestor of Phyllostomidae is due to alternative reconstructions under ACCTRAN and DELTRAN.