Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,245
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.8.0
Dataset results
1,245 results for “dating”
Figure 7 in The gill morphology of the date mussel Lithophaga lithophaga (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)
Figure 7. Ostia (arrows) distributed unevenly along the abfrontal surface of the lamellae. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Text-fig. 6. Pollen diagram from Wielki Staw in the Giant Mts (Krkonoše Mts, Poland, Analysed by E. Břízová). Radiocarbon dating: 1 230 ± 66 BP (After Radiocarbon Laboratory). in Quillwort (Isoëtes), A Mysterious Plant From The Czech Republic
Text-fig. 6. Pollen diagram from Wielki Staw in the Giant Mts (Krkonoše Mts, Poland, Analysed by E. Břízová). Radiocarbon dating: 1 230 ± 66 BP (After Radiocarbon Laboratory).
Text-fig. 2. Cave deposits exposed in Section No. 1 and recorded paleomagnetic polarities. 1 – clayey silt, brown with white clasts; 2 – clayey silt to silty clay, brown. Geomagnetic polarity scale: black (N) – normal polarities, grey – intermediate or uninterpretable polarities. For more details see text. in New Updated Results Of Paleomagnetic Dating Of Cave Deposits Exposed In Za Hájovnou Cave, Javoříčko Karst
Text-fig. 2. Cave deposits exposed in Section No. 1 and recorded paleomagnetic polarities. 1 – clayey silt, brown with white clasts; 2 – clayey silt to silty clay, brown. Geomagnetic polarity scale: black (N) – normal polarities, grey – intermediate or uninterpretable polarities. For more details see text.
Text-fig. 9. Alternating field demagnetization - sample No. 230, Section No. 2 (reversed polarity). Top left - DRM vector directions during demagnetization process, white circles - projection of vector directions to the upper hemisphere; top right - Zijderveld diagram, black circles - projection of vector directions into xy plane, white circles - projection of vector directions into xz plane; bottom left - normalised magnetization intensity values during the alternation field demagnetization. in New Updated Results Of Paleomagnetic Dating Of Cave Deposits Exposed In Za Hájovnou Cave, Javoříčko Karst
Text-fig. 9. Alternating field demagnetization - sample No. 230, Section No. 2 (reversed polarity). Top left - DRM vector directions during demagnetization process, white circles - projection of vector directions to the upper hemisphere; top right - Zijderveld diagram, black circles - projection of vector directions into xy plane, white circles - projection of vector directions into xz plane; bottom left - normalised magnetization intensity values during the alternation field demagnetization.
Date
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
miR-30 polymorphism date
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Raw data of Archaeomagnetic Dating of an Early Iron Age archaeological settlement: El Castillar site (Navarra, Northern Spain)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Table 4. Molecular dating and ancestral area reconstruction results for Liphistius using S in Molecular phylogeny, biogeography, and species delimitation of segmented spider genus Liphistius (Araneae: Liphistiidae) in Thailand
<p><b>Table 4.</b> Molecular dating and ancestral area reconstruction results for <i>Liphistius</i> using S-DIVALIKE+J. The letters A–I correspond to geographical locations shown in Figure 4. The notation shows the biogeographic event in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4A) includes →: from the parent node to descendent nodes; ^: Sympatric speciation; |: Vicariance.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Diversification events</b></th><th><b>Dates</b></th><th><b>DIVALIKE+J</b></th><th></th><th></th></tr><tr><th></th><th><b>(Mya)</b></th><th><b>Ancestral areas</b></th><th><b>Process</b></th><th><b>Route and probability</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Liphistiidae</th><td>100</td><td>BCI 13.60</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>BCI→I|BC</td></tr><tr><th>(Fig. 4, number 1)</th><td></td><td>CEI 13.33</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.02</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>BEI 10.96</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Heptathelinae</th><td>58.43</td><td>I 100</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>I→I^I→I| I</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob: 1.00</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of <i>Liphistius</i></th><td>53.61</td><td>BC 14.34</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>BC→C|B</td></tr><tr><th>(Fig. 4, number 2)</th><td></td><td>CE 14.05</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.03</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>C 12.37</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of <i>L. indra</i> + <i>L.</i></th><td>45.51</td><td>C 45.23</td><td>Dispersal:1</td><td>C→CE→C|E</td></tr><tr><th><i>lahu</i> (Fig. 4, number 3)</th><td></td><td>E 38.20</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.45</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>CE 16.50</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of <i>trang</i> species</th><td>49.61</td><td>B 39.38</td><td>Dispersal:1</td><td>B→DB→D|B</td></tr><tr><th>group + <i>bristowei</i> species group (Fig. 3, number 4)</th><td></td><td>D 30.43</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.30</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>BD 14.72</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of <i>bristowei</i> spe-</th><td>32.86</td><td>D 75.76</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>D→D^D→D|D</td></tr><tr><th>cies group (Fig. 4, number 5)</th><td></td><td>C 21.28</td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob:.55</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>A 2.02</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of <i>trang</i> species</th><td>46.54</td><td>B 99.88</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>B→B^B→B| B</td></tr><tr><th>group (Fig. 4, number 6)</th><td></td><td>A 0.08</td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob: 1.00</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>H 0.01</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Sibumasu I</th><td>41.39</td><td>B 100</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>B→B^B→B|B</td></tr><tr><th>clade (Fig. 4, number 7)</th><td></td><td></td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob: 1.00</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Sinbumasu II–</th><td>42.48</td><td>B 99.76</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>B→B^B→B|B</td></tr><tr><th>IV and Indochina clades (Fig. 4, number 8)</th><td></td><td>A 0.18</td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob:.96</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>G 0.03</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Shibumasu II</th><td>30.56</td><td>B 99.91</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>B→B^B→B|B</td></tr><tr><th>(Fig. 4, number 9)</th><td></td><td>A 0.09</td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob:.97</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Shibumasu</th><td>38.89</td><td>B 96.03</td><td>Dispersal:1</td><td>B→AB→A|B</td></tr><tr><th>III–IV and Indochina clade (Fig. 4, number 10)</th><td></td><td>A 2.65</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.48</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>G 0.67</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Shibumasu III</th><td>31.69</td><td>A 51.95</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>A→A^A→A| A</td></tr><tr><th>(Fig. 4, number 11)</th><td></td><td>B 48.05</td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob:.26</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Shibumasu</th><td>34.81</td><td>B 96.15</td><td>Dispersal:1</td><td>B→BG→B| G</td></tr><tr><th>IV + Indochina clade (Fig. 4, number 12)</th><td></td><td>G 1.94</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.48</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>H 1.90</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Shibumasu IV</th><td>17.02</td><td>B 100</td><td>Dispersal:0</td><td>B→B^B→B|B</td></tr><tr><th>(Fig. 4, number 13)</th><td></td><td></td><td>Vicariance:0</td><td>prob: 1.00</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>The most recent common ancestor of Indochina</th><td>31.15</td><td>G 50.43</td><td>Dispersal:1</td><td>G→GH→G|H</td></tr><tr><th>clade (Fig. 4, number 14)</th><td></td><td>H 49.38</td><td>Vicariance:1</td><td>prob:.50</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>D 0.20</td><td>Extinction:0</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Names and publication dates of the Brachyura in F. É. Guérin (Guérin-Méneville) (Crustacea: Decapoda)
<p><b>TABLE 1</b>. Dates of publication of the Brachyura plates in Guérin’s <i>Iconographie du Règne Animal</i> (1829–1837).</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Plate</th><th>Cuvier a</th><th>Cowan b</th><th>Holthuis & Manning c</th><th>Earliest verifiable date d</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>21 Mar 1829</td><td>21 Mar 1829</td><td>21 Mar 1829</td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>23 Jan 1830</td><td>18 Jul 1829e</td><td>23 Jan 1830</td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1832</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1837</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>2 Jun 1832</td><td>2 Jun 1832</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1833</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1834</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1832</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>8 <i>bis</i></th><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1833</td><td>1833</td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td>6 Feb 1832</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1833</td><td>6 Feb 1832</td></tr><tr><th>10</th><td>-</td><td>2 Jun 1832</td><td>2 Jun 1832</td><td>2 Jun 1832</td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1833</td><td>1833</td></tr><tr><th>12</th><td>-</td><td>14 Jul 1832</td><td>14 Jul 1832</td><td>9 July 1832f</td></tr><tr><th>13</th><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1831?–1833</td><td>1833</td></tr><tr><th>14</th><td>-</td><td>14 Jul 1832</td><td>14 Jul 1832</td><td>9 July 1832f</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Names and publication dates of the Brachyura in F. É. Guérin (Guérin-Méneville) (Crustacea: Decapoda)
<p><b>TABLE 2.</b> (Continued)</p><table><tbody><tr><th><i>rhumphii</i>, <i>Cancer</i></th><th>Guérin (1830, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 2, fig. 2, caption to figure)</th><th><i>Lophozozymus pictor</i> (Fabricius, 1798)</th><th>See text</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>rouxii</i>, <i>Caphyra</i></th><td>Guérin (1832a: 287–289, pl. 8, figs. a, 1–5)</td><td><i>Caphyra rouxii</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>Davie (2002: 447, 448)</td></tr><tr><th><i>serpulifera</i>, <i>Pisa</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 8, fig. 2, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Paranaxia serpulifera</i> (Guérin, 1832)</td><td>Davie (2002: 317, 318)</td></tr><tr><th><i>simplicipes</i>, <i>Macrophthalmus</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1838b: 3, 4, pl. 24, fig. 1)</td><td><i>Venitus dentipes</i> (Lucas, <i>in</i> Guérin-Méneville, 1836)</td><td>Holthuis (1995: 401–403) and discussion in text</td></tr><tr><th><i>spinosa</i>, <i>Libinia</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 9, fig. 2, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Libinia spinosa</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>See text; not H. Milne- Edwards (1834)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thalamites</i></th><td>Guérin (1829, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 1, fig. 4, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Thalamita</i> Latreille, 1829</td><td>See text</td></tr><tr><th><i>tuberculosa</i>, <i>Calappa</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 12, fig. 2, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Calappa hepatica</i> (Linnaeus, 1758)</td><td>Galil (1997: 296); Ng <i>et al</i>. (2002: 343)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ucea</i> [<i>sic</i>]</th><td>Guérin (1844: 8)</td><td><i>Ucides</i> Rathbun, 1897</td><td>Incorrect subsequent spelling, also see text</td></tr><tr><th><i>urvillii</i>, <i>Ocypode</i></th><td>Guérin (1829, in Guérin 1829– 1830: pl. 1, fig. 1)</td><td><i>Ocypode</i> <i>ceratophthalmus</i> (Pallas, 1772)</td><td>Davie (2002: 357); Castro (2011: 123, 124)</td></tr><tr><th><i>urvillei</i> [<i>sic</i>], <i>Ocipode</i> [<i>sic</i>]</th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1838a: 9, 10)</td><td><i>Ocypode</i> <i>ceratophthalmus</i> (Pallas, 1772)</td><td>Incorrect subsequent spellings, also see text</td></tr><tr><th><i>villosulus</i>, <i>Pinnotheres</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 4, fig. 6, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Nepinnotheres villosulus</i> (Guérin, 1832)</td><td>Ahyong & Ng (2007: 218)</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Names and publication dates of the Brachyura in F. É. Guérin (Guérin-Méneville) (Crustacea: Decapoda)
<p><b>TABLE 2</b>. The genus- and species-group names of Brachyura established by Guérin (and Guérin-Méneville). References to the original descriptions of the senior synonyms cited in the third column will be found in the references cited in the fourth column. Names in bold are currently considered to be valid (see Ng <i>et al</i>. 2008 and discussion in text).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><i>Aethusa</i> [<i>sic</i>]</th><th>Guérin (<i>in</i> Brullé 1832: 32)</th><th><i>Ethusa</i> Roux, 1830</th><th>Incorrect spelling, also see text</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>affinis</i>, <i>Gelasimus</i></th><td>Guérin (1829, in Guérin 1829– 1830: pl. 1, fig. 2)</td><td><i>Uca</i> (<i>Gelasimus</i>) <i>tetragonon</i> (Herbst, 1790)</td><td>Crane (1975: 171, 172, 322)</td></tr><tr><th><i>affinis</i>, <i>Macrophthalmus</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1838b: 4, pl. 24, fig. 2)</td><td><i>Macrophthalmus</i> (<i>Mareotis</i>) <i>depressus</i> Rüppell, 1830</td><td>Barnes (1970: 226)</td></tr><tr><th><i>aries</i>, <i>Halimus</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 9, fig. 3, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Halimus aries</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>Davie (2002: 306); not H. Milne-Edwards (1834)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Caphyra</i></th><td>Guérin (1832a: 286, 287</td><td><i>Caphyra</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>Davie (2002: 447)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cyclocarcinus</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville, 1838a: 11– 13)</td><td><i>Hapalonotus</i> Rathbun, 1897</td><td>See text</td></tr><tr><th><i>distincta</i>, <i>Libinia</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (<i>in</i> de la Sagra, 1857a: xxix, xxx)</td><td><i>Libinia dubia</i> H. Milne Edwards, 1834</td><td>Miers (1886: 76); Rathbun (1925: 313)</td></tr><tr><th><i>duperreyi</i>, <i>Gelasimus</i></th><td>Guérin (1829, in Guérin 1829– 1830: pl. 1, fig. 3)</td><td><i>Uca</i> (<i>Gelasimus</i>) <i>tetragonon</i> (Herbst, 1790)</td><td>Crane (1975: 80, 81)</td></tr><tr><th><i>espinosa</i> [<i>sic</i>], <i>Libinia</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (<i>in</i> de la Sagra, 1857b: xii)</td><td><i>Libinia spinosa</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>Incorrect spelling, also see text</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eurypodius</i></th><td>Guérin (1828: 345–359, pl. 14)</td><td><i>Eurypodius</i> Guérin, 1828</td><td>See text</td></tr><tr><th><i>gaudichaudii</i>, <i>Hymenosoma</i></th><td>Guérin (1829, in Guérin 1829– 1830: pl. 3, figs. 13–18)</td><td><i>Hymenosoma gaudichaudii</i> Guerin, 1829</td><td>Ng <i>et al</i>. (2008: 109)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hypoconcha</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1854: 333– 343, pl. 5, figs. 1–6</td><td><i>Hypoconcha</i> Guérin- Méneville, 1854</td><td>Guinot & Tavares (2003: 97, 99, 100)</td></tr><tr><th><i>laevimana</i>, <i>Eriphia</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 3, fig. 1, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Eriphia sebana</i> (Shaw & Nodder, 1803)</td><td>Davie (2002: 175); Koh & Ng (2008: 341); Castro (2011: 43)</td></tr><tr><th><i>lateralis</i>, <i>Gecarcinus</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 5, fig. 1, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Gecarcinus lateralis</i> Guérin, 1832</td><td>See text; not Fréminville (1835)</td></tr><tr><th><i>latreillii</i>, <i>Eurypodius</i></th><td>Guérin (1828a: 345–359, pl. 14)</td><td><i>Eurypodius latreillii</i> Guérin, 1828</td><td>See text</td></tr><tr><th><i>leachii</i>, <i>Hymenosoma</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 10, fig. 1, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Halicarcinus planatus</i> (Fabricius, 1775)</td><td>Melrose (1975: 34)</td></tr><tr><th><i>makarone</i> [<i>sic</i>], <i>Aethusa</i></th><td>Guérin (<i>in</i> Brullé 1832: 32)</td><td><i>Ethusa mascarone</i> (Herbst, 1785)</td><td>Incorrect spelling, also see text</td></tr><tr><th><i>nodipes</i>, <i>Dromia</i></th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 14, fig. 1, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Fultodromia nodipes</i> (Guérin, 1832)</td><td>Davie (2002: 164); Guinot & Tavares (2003: 66)</td></tr><tr><th><i>parvimanus</i>, <i>Macrophtalmus</i> [<i>sic</i>]</th><td>Guérin (1832, in Guérin- Méneville 1829–1837: pl. 4, fig. 1, caption to figure)</td><td><i>Macrophthalmus</i> (<i>Macrophthalmus</i>) <i>parvimanus</i> (Guérin, 1832)</td><td>Barnes (1970: 211–214)</td></tr><tr><th><i>pectinipes</i>, <i>Macrophthalmus</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1838b: 1, 2, pl. 23)</td><td><i>Venitus dentipes</i> (Lucas, <i>in</i> Guérin-Méneville, 1836)</td><td>Holthuis (1995: 401–403) and discussion in text</td></tr><tr><th><i>pinnotheroides</i>, <i>Cyclocarcinus</i></th><td>Guérin-Méneville (1838a: 11– 13)</td><td><i>Hapalonotus pinnotheroides</i> (Guérin-Méneville, 1838)</td><td>See text</td></tr></tbody></table>
Supplementary Information to Defining the Evolution of the Cocos-North America-Caribbean Triple Junction from Detrital Zircon Analysis - Zircons Dating
<p>Zircon Dating Dataset</p>
Paper date_CATENA
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
case date
<p>该文件是论文中的案例数据。</p>
Data from: An expansion of age constraints for microbial clades that lack a conventional fossil record using phylogenomic dating
Most microbial taxa lack a conventional microfossil or biomarker record, and so we currently have little information regarding how old most microbial clades and their associated traits are. Building on the previously published oxygen age constraint, two new age constraints are proposed based on the ability of microbial clades to metabolize chitin and aromatic compounds derived from lignin. Using the archaeal domain of life as a test case, phylogenetic analyses, along with published metabolic and genetic data, showed that members of the Halobacteriales and Thermococcales are able to metabolize chitin. Ancestral state reconstruction combined with phylogenetic analysis of the genes underlying chitin degradation predicted that the ancestors of these two groups were also likely able to metabolize chitin or chitin-related compounds. These two clades were therefore assigned a maximum age of 1.0 Ga (when chitin likely first appeared). Similar analyses also predicted that the ancestor to the Sulfolobus solfataricus-Sulfolobus islandicus clade was able to metabolize phenol using catechol dioxygenase, so this clade was assigned a maximum age of 475 Ma. Inferred ages of archaeal clades using relaxed molecular clocks with the new age constraints were consistent with those inferred with the oxygen age constraints. This work expands our current toolkit to include Paleoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic, and Paleozoic age constraints, and should aid in our ability to phylogenetically reconstruct the antiquity of a wide array of microbial clades and their associated morphological and biogeochemical traits, spanning deep geologic time. Such hypotheses-although built upon evolutionary inferences-are fundamentally testable.
Data from: Comparison of the genetic determinism of two key phenological traits, flowering and maturity dates, in three Prunus species: peach, apricot and sweet cherry
The present study investigates the genetic determinism of flowering and maturity dates, two traits highly affected by global climate change. Flowering and maturity dates were evaluated on five progenies from three Prunus species, peach, apricot and sweet cherry, during three to eight years. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) detection was performed separately for each year and also by integrating data from all years together. High heritability estimates were obtained for flowering and maturity dates. Several QTLs for flowering and maturity dates were highly stable, detected each year of evaluation, suggesting that they were not affected by climatic variations. For flowering date, major QTLs were detected on linkage groups (LG) 4 for apricot and sweet cherry and on LG6 for peach. QTLs were identified on LG2, LG3, LG4 and LG7 for the three species. For maturity date, a major QTL was detected on LG4 in the three species. Using the peach genome sequence data, candidate genes underlying the major QTLs on LG4 and LG6 were investigated and key genes were identified. Our results provide a basis for the identification of genes involved in flowering and maturity dates that could be used to develop cultivar ideotypes adapted to future climatic conditions.
FIGURE 1 in Dating and publication of the Encyclopédie Méthodique (1782- 1832), with special reference to the parts of the Histoire Naturelle and details on the Histoire Naturelle des Insectes
FIGURE 1. Portrait of CharlesJoseph Panckoucke.
Figure 9 in Phytoseiidae from date palms in Israel with descriptions of two new taxa and a key to the species found on date palms worldwide (Acari: Mesostigmata)
Figure 9. Typhlodromus shoshae. (A) Dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) spermatheca; (D) leg IV.
Figure 3 in Field application of six commercial essential oils against Date Palm mite, Phyllotetranychus aegypticus (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) in Egypt
Figure 3. Regression linear modeling of the relationship across temperature, untreated mite population (control), and treatments of commercial oils during season of 2018.
Dataset: Timing the emergence and development of arable farming in Southeastern Norway by using summed probability distribution of radiocarbon dates and a Bayesian age model
<p>The repository contains radiocarbon data and code for the paper</p> <p>TIMING THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ARABLE FARMING IN 7 SOUTHEASTERN NORWAY BY USING SUMMED PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION 8 OF RADIOCARBON DATES AND A BAYESIAN AGE MODEL</p> <p>Published in Radiocarbon 2021 (DOI:10.1017/RDC.2021.80) </p> <p>ABSTRACT. The paper explores the emergence and development of arable farming in southeastern Norway by 12 compiling and analyzing directly dated cereals from archaeological contexts. By using summed probability 13 distributions of radiocarbon dates and Bayesian modeling, the paper presents the first comprehensive analysis of 14 the directly dated evidence for farming in the region. The models provide a more precise temporal resolution to 15 the development than hitherto presented. The results demonstrate that the introduction of arable farming to 16 southeastern Norway was a long-term development including several steps. Three different stages are pointed out 17 as important in the process of establishing arable farming: the Early and Middle Neolithic, the Late Neolithic, and 18 the Early Iron Age.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.