Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4A-K in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 4A-K. Example of searching for placement into a correct genus. A - Disclaimer in original description of Habrocestum kweilinensis Prószyński, 1992 - facsimile, A1 - original drawings of Habrocestum kweilinensis by Prószyński 1992, B - the same species labeled Hasarius kweilinensis: Yin et al., 2012, C - comparison with Habrocestum orientale Zabka, 1985, D - comparison with Habrocestoides dactyloides Peng & Xie, 1995, E - Hasarius adansoni - type species, F - Habrocestoides bengalensis Prószyński, 1992 - type species, G - Habrocestum simoni - representative species, H - facsimile of transfer from Habrocestum to Habrocestoides kweilinensis, I - transfer of H. szechwanensis to Chinattus, I1 - transfer to Hasarius, J - facsimile of argumentation for transfer of Habrocestum kweilinensis, K - key proof for affinity of Habrocestum orientale (by Zabka,1985) and Hasarius adansoni. SOURCES: A-A1 - Prószyński 1992: 96, f. 33-34, B - Yin et al., 2012: 1381, f. 750a-c, C - Zabka, 1985: 228, f. 211-216, D - Peng & Xie, 1995a: 57, f. 1-7, E - Prószyński, 2003: Annales Zoologici 53: 68, f. 256-260, F - Prószyński,1992b: 174, f. 38-42i, G - Prószyński 1987. Atlas ...: 35-36, H - Peng & Xie, 1995a: 58, I - Logunow, 1999: 147, I1-J - Logunow, 1999: 148, K - upper - Zabka,1985: 228, f. 211-216, lower - Prószyński, 2003: f. 260.

Figure 3 in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 3. Misidentified and misplaced nominal species of "Hasarius" pending revision. A - Hasarius pumilio, B - H. mulciber, C - H. inhonestus, D - H. glaucus, E - H. obscurus, F - H. mahensis, G - H. rufociliatus, I - H. cheliceroides, J - H. firmus, K - H. pauciaculeis - maturing palp, still covered by the tegument of previous instar, L - H. "adansoni" - misplaced [true H. adansoni also is documented from Philippines (see Fig. 1G-K)], M - palp of the same, quick sketch by Prószyński, N - H. rusticus - type from "Birmania". SOURCES: A-C, E - Keyserling E, 1881: 1310 T. 111 F. 7; 1312, pl 111, f 8; 1315, T. 112, F. 2,1317, pl. 112, f. 3; D - Hogg, 1915b: 523, f. 9,. F -G - Wanless, 1983[1984] Annales, Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, Sci. zoologiques 241: 54, f. 18a-f; 51, f. 17a-g, I - Borowiec & Wesolowska, 2002 Genus 13: 405, f. 1-7, J - Wisniewski & Wesolowska, 2013 Genus 24(3-4): 504, f. 1-5, K - Prószyński 1987. Atlas ...: 45, L - Barrion & Litsinger, 1995: Riceland Spiders of South and Southeast Asia 92, f. 48a-l, M - the same palp, quick sketch by Prószyński (2016a, b - Internet), N - Prószyński 1984c: 60. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 1N1-Q in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 1N1-Q. Color pattern in other species of Hasarius. N1-O - Hasarius tropicus Jastrzębski Bhutan: Phuntsholing, 200-400 m. (female described as H. adansoni) Genus: 21(2): 321-323, f 6-7, P-Q - Hasarius sp. n. "tadpole-eater", India: Maharastra: W Ghats, near Satara. SOURCES: N-O - Jastrzębski 2010. Genus: 21(2): 321-323, f 6-7, P-Q - Photo by S. Satpute in Ahmed, J. et al. 2017, Peckhamia 159.1: 1-2. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 6A-N in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 6A-N. Genera considered by Maddison (2015) as related to Hasarius - tribe Hasariini (genera shown on this plate contain together 82 recognizable species). A-B - H. adansoni, C - Bristowia heterospinosa Reimoser, 1934 (3 species), D - Cheliceroides longipalpis Zabka, 1985 (single species), E - Curubis erratica Simon, 1902 (2 species), F - Diplocanthopoda marina (Abraham, 1925) (2 species), G - Echeclus concinnus Thorell, 1890 (2 species), H - Hasarina contortospinosa Schenkel, 1963 (single species), I-J - Habrocestum simoni Dalmas, 1920 (44 species), K - Gedea*4 flavogularis Simon, 1902 (6 species), L-M - Meata* zabkai Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2010 (3 species), N - Meata* typica Zabka, 1985, O-P-Q - Habrocestoides bengalensis Prószyński, 1992 (13 species), R - Madhyattus jabalpurensis Prószyński, 1992 (single species), S-T - Imperceptus minutus Prószyński, 1992 (single species), U - Mikrus ugandensis Wesołowska, 2001 (single species), V - Uxuma impudica Simon, 1902 (single species). (In brackets - number of species having similar genitalic characters). SOURCES: A-B - Prószyński, 2003: Annales Zoologici 53: 68, f. 256-260; 143-145, f 583, 587-588, C -Prószyński 1984c. Atlas ... 14, D - Zabka 1985. Annales zoologici, 39, 11: 210, f 79, E - Prószyński 1987:Atlas ... 18, F - Prószyński J. 1984c: Atlas...35, G - Prószyński 1984c. Atlas ...: 36, H - Wesolowska 1981b: Annales Zoologici 36: 132-133, f 10-13, I-J - Prószyński 1987. Atlas: 35-36, K - Prószyński 1987: Atlas...27, L-M - Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2010. Arthropoda selecta 19(3): 174, f 107-110, N - Zabka 1985.Annales Zoologici 39, 11: 239, ff. 279-282, O-Q - Prószyński 1992a. Annales Zoologici,44, 9: 174-176, figs 38-42,, R - Prószyński J. 1992b. Annales Zoologici 44, 9: 184, fig. 76-78, 79, S-T - Prószyński J. 1992b. Annales Zoologici. 44, 9: 181, f 65-66, U - Wesolowska 2001c. Genus 12(4): 585-588, figs 1-7, V - Szuts 2005[2007]. Opuscula zoologica 36: 94, f 38-42.All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 5 in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 5. Genera similar to Hasarius (therefore possibly related) according to "pragmatic classification" of Prószyński (2016a, 2017b) (genera shown on this plate contain together 222 recognizable species). A-B - H. adansoni from Israel - palp and internal structure of epigyne, C - Nandicius mussooriensis Prószyński, 2016 (6 species), D - Nycerella volucripes Galiano, 1982 (16 species), E - Freya regia (Peckham & Peckham, 1896) (24 species), F - Epocilla praetextata Thorell, 1887 (14 species), G - Chrysilla lauta Thorell, 1887 (15 species), H - Phintella versicolor (Koch C.L., 1846) (62 species), I - Bristowia heterospinosa Reimoser, 1934 (3 species), J - Carrhotus viduus (Koch C.L., 1846) (29 species), K - Plexippus paykulli (Audouin, 1826) (20 species), L - Frigga coronigera (Koch C.L., 1846) (9 species), M - Phiale crocea (21 species). (In brackets - number of species having similar genitalic characters). SOURCES: A-B, K - Prószyński, 2003: Annales Zoologici 53: 68, f. 256-260; 143-145, f 583, 587-588, C - Prószyński 1992a Annales Zoologici 44: 101, f. 54-59, D- Galiano 1982b. Physis C, 41, 100: 62-63; f 20-22, E- Galiano 2001. Journal of Arachnology 29: 28, f. 17-18, 46, 52,, F, I, J - Prószyński 1984c. Atlas ...: 39; 14; 16, G - Prószyński 1983c. Acta Arachnologica 31(2): 44, f. 4-6, H - Prószyński 1973b. Annales Zoologici, 30: 107-110, f 25-32, L - Galiano 1981f. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina: 39 (3-4): 283, f. 1-2, M - Galiano M. E. 1981b. Journal of Arachnology 9: 75, 79-82, f 14. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 7–1 in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 7–1. Genera considered by Maddison (2015) as related to Hasarius - his tribe Hasariini. ATTENTION: genera Gedea (males) and Meata (females) considered congeneric by Maddison (2015: without published documentation - see facsimile of description Fig. 7-2 – below). A - Diplocanthopoda s., B - Chinattus, C - Gedea.

Figure 6O-V in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 6O-V. Genera considered by Maddison (2015) as related to Hasarius - tribe Hasariini (genera shown on this plate contain together 82 recognizable species). O-P-Q - Habrocestoides bengalensis Prószyński, 1992 (13 species), R - Madhyattus jabalpurensis Prószyński, 1992 (single species), S-T - Imperceptus minutus Prószyński, 1992 (single species), U - Mikrus ugandensis Wesołowska, 2001 (single species), V - Uxuma impudica Simon, 1902 (single species). (In brackets - number of species having similar genitalic characters). SOURCES: O-Q - Prószyński 1992a. Annales Zoologici,44, 9: 174-176, figs 38-42,, R - Prószyński J. 1992b. Annales Zoologici 44, 9: 184, fig. 76-78, 79, S-T - Prószyński J. 1992b. Annales Zoologici. 44, 9: 181, f 65-66, U - Wesolowska 2001c. Genus 12(4): 585-588, figs 1-7, V - Szuts 2005[2007]. Opuscula zoologica 36: 94, f 38-42.All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 1A-N in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 1A-N. Habitus of Hasarius adansoni and related species from various areas of the World. A-C - Exemplary documentation of H. adansoni from Slovakia (A-B - male habitus and palp, C - female habitus and cleared epigyne), D - H. adansoni male from Singapore, E - H. adansoni from Borneo: Brunei, F - H. adansoni from Japan, G-K - H. adansoni from Philippines: Manila-Park, L-M - H. adansoni from Kenya, N - H. adansoni female from India. SOURCES: A-C - ©Photo A, Sestakova, D - © Photo H.K. Tang, E - ©Photo Koh J. 2013, F - © Ono, Ikeda, Kono. Salticidae of Japan, G-K - ©Photo Freudenschuss, L-M - © Phot J. Holstein, N - ©Photo by Marashetty Seenappa. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

Figure 2 in Review of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae) - a taxonomic fiasco *

Figure 2. Diagnostic characters of representatives of genus Hasarius. A - Attus adansoni from Egypt, original drawing of 1826, B-E - H. adansoni from Israel - habitus, palp, internal structure of epigyne (spermatheca developed vertically to surface of epigyne, here lies in horizontal position), cheliceral dentition, F - H. adansoni from Jaffa-Rehovot, G - H. adansoni - Thorell's specimen from "Birmanie", H - H. adansoni from Seychelles Isl., I - "H". tropicus [?] - palp mismatched, apparently Chinattus sp.(compare Fig. 1N), J - H. adansoni (mistake!) - possibly H. tropicus, K - H. kulczynskii, L - H. albocircumdatus (note white palpal tibia and patella), M - H. insularis. SOURCES: A - Audouin, 1826: 404, pl. 7, f. 8 1826, B -E - Prószyński, 2003: Annales Zoologici 53: 68, f. 256-260, F-G - Prószyński,1984: 58,107, H - Wanless, 1983[1984]: 49, f. 16a-d, I-J - Jastrzębski 2010: Genus: 21(2): 321-323, f 6-7, K -Zabka 1985. Annales zoologici, 39, 11: 227-228, ff. 208-210, L - L. Koch 1881. Die Arachniden Australiens: 1250, T. 107, F. 4, M- Wesołowska, van Harten, 2002 Fauna of Arabia 19: 377-378, figs 26-29. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used here by their courtesy.

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

Figures 12–13 in Taxonomic review of the Teulisna pallida (Moore) species-group with descriptions of two new species from the Himalayas (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae: Lithosiini)

Figures 12–13. Teulisna spp.: male genitalia. Depositories of the specimens dissected: 12 in MWM/ZSM; 13 in MfN.

Fig. 18 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 18. Synopeas curvicauda (Förster, 1856), ♀♀. A. Lectotype of Sactogaster curvicauda (NHMW- HYM#0005303); anterior head. B. Lateral habitus. C. Dorsal habitus. D. Lectotype of Sactogaster pisi (NHMW-HYM#0005309); lateral habitus.

Fig. 16 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 16. Platygaster corvina Förster, 1861, lectotype, ♀ (NHMW-HYM#0005296). A. Anterior head. B. Dorsal habitus. C. Lateral habitus. D. Lateral metasoma. E. Labels.

Fig. 12 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 12. Metaclisis areolata (Haliday, 1835), lectotype, ♀ (NMINH_2018_11_05). A. Dorsal habitus. B. Dorsolateral habitus.

Fig. 9 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 9. Isostasius punctiger (Nees 1834), original exemplar (NHMW-HYM#0005325). A. Anterolateral head. B. Lateral habitus. C. Dorsolateral habitus. D. Ventrolateral habitus.

Fig. 5. Anopedias obscurus Thomson, 1859 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 5. Anopedias obscurus Thomson, 1859, lectotype, ♀ (MZLU TYPE 2858:1). A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal habitus. C. Labels. Images courtesy of Biological Museum, Lund University (MZLU).

Fig. 7 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 7. Isocybus grandis (Nees, 1834), original exemplars (NHMW-HYM#0005320). A. Dorsal head. B. Anterior head. C. Dorsal mesosoma and metasoma. D. Lateral head and mesosoma.

Fig. 15 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 15. Piestopleura catilla (Walker, 1835), lectotype, ♀ (B.M. TYPE HYM. 9.568). A. Dorsolateral habitus. B. Dorsal habitus.

Fig. 17. Platygaster striolata Nees, 1834 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 17. Platygaster striolata Nees, 1834, neotype, ♀ (NHMW-HYM#0005313). A. Dorsal mesosoma and dorsolateral head. B. Anterolateral head. C. Lateral habitus. D. Ventral metasoma. E. Labels.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 6. Synopeas craterum (Walker, 1835), original exemplar (NHMW-HYM#0005311). A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal habitus. C. Labels.

Fig. 8 in Taxonomic history and review of the Förster genera of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)

Fig. 8. Leptacis orchymonti (Debauche, 1947) (NHMW-HYM#0005312). A. Lateral habitus. B. Anterior head. C. Labels.