Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 7. Dentition of Gymnothorax pseudokidako sp. nov., FRIP21962, paratype, 757 mm TL, female. Dotted lines represent the sockets of missing teeth. The aberrant distribution of preoperculo-mandibular pores is shown on the right side of lower jaw. Upper jaw (left) and lower jaw (right).

Fig. 2 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Diaphenchelys laimospila sp. nov., lateral view of head marks with cephalic sensory pores: red for supraorbital pores; green for infraorbital pores; blue for preoperculo-mandibular pores; yellow for branchial pores. Photo of NMMB-P26218, holotype, 290 mm TL.

Fig. 5 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Gymnothorax pseudokidako sp. nov., ASIZP0080920, holotype, 801 mm TL, female, fresh coloration.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Distribution of species in the genus Diaphenchelys. Yellow for D. dalmatian; purple for D. laimospila sp. nov.; red for D. pelonates. Star represents the type locality of each species.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Dentition of Diaphenchelys laimospila sp. nov., NMMB-P26218, holotype, 290 mm TL, male. Dotted lines represent the sockets of missing teeth. Upper jaw (left) and lower jaw (right).

Fig. 10 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 10. The maximum likelihood tree of Diaphenchelys laimospila sp. nov. based on partial mitochondrial COI gene sequences (593 bp) and GTR + Γ + I model with Uropterygius macrocephalus as outgroup. Numerals beside the internal branches are bootstrap values.

Fig. 11 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 11. Maximum likelihood trees of Gymnothorax pseudokidako sp. nov. and closely-related species, with Uropterygius macrocephalus as the outgroup. (A) partial mitochondrial COI gene sequences (666 bp) based on the HKY + I model; (B) partial nuclear EGR3 gene sequences (767 bp) based on the GTR + I model. Numerals beside the internal branches are bootstrap values.

Fig. 1 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Diaphenchelys laimospila sp. nov.. (A) NMMB-P26218, holotype, 290 mm TL, male, fresh coloration, photo by HC Ho; (B) preserved coloration of holotype; (C) USNM 407544, paratype, 525 mm TL, sex unknown, fresh coloration, photo by JT Williams.

Fig. 9 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 9. Comparison of coloration patterns between (A, C, E, G) Gymnothorax pseudokidako sp. nov., and (B, D, F, H) G. kidako. (A–B) lateral view; (C–D) lateral view of head; (E–F) dorsal view of head; (G–H) lateral view of tail. Arrows point out the origin of dorsal fin. (A, C, G) ASIZP0080920, holotype, 801 mm TL; (E) ASIZP0080924, paratype, 913 mm TL; (B, D, H) DOS 06258, 631 mm TL; (F) DOS 08048-1, 840 mm TL.

Fig. 8 in Fig. 4 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 8. Gymnothorax pseudokidako sp. nov., variation of coloration patterns of fresh specimens. (A) ASIZP0080924, paratype, 913 mm TL, male; (B) ASIZP0080923, paratype, 648 mm TL, male; (C) DOS 07906, paratype, 725 mm TL, male; (D) NMMB-P34697, paratype, 822 mm TL, female.

Fig. 1 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Growth of the cheliped propodus length (A), cheliped propodus width (B) and pleon width (C) relative to the carapace width in overall specimens of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus, collected from April 2008 to March 2009. Data are shown for females, males and unsexed juveniles.

Fig. 5 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Monthly changes in the intersexual size dimorphisms of the chelipeds and pleons of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus specimens, collected from April 2008 to March 2009. Intersexual size dimorphism was represented by the coefficient estimates for the explanatory variable, including the Sex (lnCW × Sex), in the log-transformed allometric growth equation model: lny ~ lnCW + lnCW × Sex, where CW is carapace width, y is the measurement for another body part (cheliped propodus length and width, and pleon width) and Sex is female or male. The coefficient estimate of lnCW × Sex was the output for males, representing changes in the response variable relative to the baseline category (female) (Tables S1–S3), and thus also representing the degree of difference in the allometric growth coefficient between males and females. Vertical lines indicate standard errors. The dotted bars indicates the estimates that were not significantly different between sexes. The data for October and November were pooled because of the small sample size in November.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Growth in the pleon width relative to the carapace width in specimens of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus, collected monthly from April 2008 (A) to March 2009 (K). Data are shown for females, ovigerous females and males. The data for October and November were pooled because of the small sample size in November.

Fig. 6 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 6. Intrasexual size dimorphisms of the chelipeds and pleons during the breeding and non-breeding seasons of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus, collected from April 2008 to March 2009. Intrasexual size dimorphism was represented by the coefficient estimate of the explanatory variable, including the Season (lnCW × Season), in the log-transformed allometric growth equation model: lny ~ lnCW + lnCW × Season, where CW is carapace width, y is the measurement for another body part (cheliped propodus length (PrL) and width (PrW), and pleon width (PlW)), and Season is the breeding season (May to September) or non-breeding season (October to April). The coefficient estimate of lnCW × Season was the output for the breeding season, representing the change in the response variable relative to the baseline category (non-breeding season) (Table S4), and thus also representing the degree of difference in the allometric growth coefficient between the breeding season and the non-breeding season. Vertical lines indicate standard errors. The dotted bar indicates an estimate that was not significantly different between the breeding season and non-breeding season.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Growth of the cheliped propodus width relative to the carapace width in specimens of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus, collected monthly from April 2008 (A) to March 2009 (K). Data are shown for females, ovigerous females and males. The data for October and November were pooled because of the small sample size in November.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 1 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Growth in the cheliped propodus length relative to the carapace width in specimens of the porcellanid crab Petrolisthes japonicus, collected monthly from April 2008 (A) to March 2009 (K). Data are shown for females, ovigerous females and males. The data for October and November were pooled because of the small sample size in November.

Fig. 11 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 11. Geometric morphometrics variation of Fannia pusio head landmarks based on Canonical Variable Analysis. Individuals from the colony reared under laboratory conditions are compared against wildcaught individuals.

Fig. 10 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 10. Transformation Grid (left) and Wireframe (right) representation of shape variations between a laboratory bred colony versus wild samples of Fannia pusio based on Canonical Variate Analysis. *In the wireframe the turquoise outline characterizes the position of consensus landmarks, while the blue outline represents landmarks configurations.

Fig. 8 in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 8. Geographical differences among Fannia pusio populations based on Canonical Variate Analysis.

Fig. 9. Variation between a in Fig. 10 in Periclimenaeus apomonosi Park & De Grave 2021, sp. nov.

Fig. 9. Variation between a laboratory bred colony versus wild sample of Fannia pusio based on Principal Component Analysis.