Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Figures 18–25. Lucayan Cautethia adults. 18 in Three new species of Cautethia Grote (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from the Lucayan Archipelago and keys to West Indies species

Figures 18–25. Lucayan Cautethia adults. 18) Dorsal view of C. simoni, new species, ♂ holotype, MGCL 236856, Mayaguana Island, 28.vii.2014. 19) Ventral view, same specimen. 20) Dorsal view of C. simoni, new species, ♀ paratype, MGCL 247894, Mayaguana Island, 31.vii–1.viii.2014. 21) Ventral view, same specimen. 22) Dorsal view of C. gossi, new species, ♂ holotype, MGCL 242737, Great Inagua Island, 26.vii.2014. 23) Ventral view, same specimen. 24) Dorsal view of C. gossi, new species, ♀ paratype, Great Inagua, 24.vii.2014. 25) Ventral view, same specimen. Scale bar under names 1 cm.

Fig. 6 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 6. Mimetus yinae sp. nov. A, C–E. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2015-005). B, F–G. Paratype, ♀ (GZ-MIM-2017-001). A–B. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, retrolateral view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. F. Epigyne, ventral view. G. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–B = 1.0 mm; C–G = 0.1 mm

Fig. 3 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 3. Mimetus lingbaoshanensis sp. nov. A, C–E. Holotype, ♂ (YN-MIM-2015-010). B, F–G. One of the paratypes, ♀ (YN-MIM-2015-011). A–B. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, retrolateral view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. F. Epigyne, ventral view. G. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–G = 0.1 mm

Fig. 1 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 1. Mimetus bucerus sp. nov. A–C. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2017-005). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Palp, prolateral view. C. Palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: A = 1.0 mm; B–C = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 4. Mimetus lingbaoshanensis sp. nov. A–B, E. Holotype, ♂ (YN-MIM-2015-010). C–D. Paratype, ♀ (YN-MIM-2015-011). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 2. Mimetus bucerus sp. nov. A–D. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2017-005). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Left chelicerae of male,ventral view. D. Left chelicerae, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 5. Mimetus yinae sp. nov. A–B, E. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2015-005). C–D. Paratype, ♀ (GZ-MIM-2017-001). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 7. Distribution records of Mimetus bucerus sp. nov. (▲), M. lingbaoshanensis sp. nov. (●) and M. yinae sp. nov. (■).

Fig. 6 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 6. Scenario of Osmundea biogeography using frame from Scotese animation (www.scotese.com/) at 100 Ma. South America and Africa are starting to move apart. Hypothetical ancestors (A) of widespread and diverse Osmundea Fora along Tethyan shores of which Osmundea caspica (A.D.Zinova & Zaberzhinskaya) comb. nov. (b) is almost certainly a relic. Since 100 Ma, Osmundea has colonized the Atlantic Ocean (c, e). Brazilian O. sanctarum M.T.Fujii & Cord.-Mar. (c) is likely a relic of the lineage at the origin of the clade that entered the Pacifc (d) and colonized the Americas.

Fig. 5 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 5. Osmundea caspica (A.D.Zinova & Zaberzhinskaya). Sangachal Bay, Azerbaijan, September 2003, dredged. A. Habit of herbarium voucher specimen with epiphytic acrochaetioid red algae. B. Outer cortical cells in surface view, elongated along the thallus axis, lacking secondary pit connections. C. Longitudinal section through outer cortex (scale bar as in B). D. Part of mature spermatangial receptacle, showing spermatangial flaments each terminating in a large rounded sterile cell. E. Spermatangial flament bearing mature spermatia and terminating in a rounded sterile cell.

Fig. 4 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 4. Palisada crustiformans (McDermid). A. Voucher specimen of P. crustiformans (ARS03327/BISH 766726) collected at Hawaii Island (type locality). B. Outer cortical cells in surface view. C. Detail of outermost cortical cell showing small spherical structure similar to 'corps en cerise' and secondary pit connections with adjacent cells.

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 3. Ohelopapa fexilis (Setch.). A. Voucher specimen (01A07 / UPF4223) collected at Tahiti (type locality). B. Transversal section through outer cortex showing a translucent outermost cortical layer lacking secondary pit connections between cells.

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 1. Tree inferred from rbcL using Bayesian analysis (BI) and including 111 specimens of members of the Laurencia complex and six outgroup taxa. The numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp) and below branches indicate bootstrap values (bp) inferred from 1000 ML bootstrap replicates (ML); pp <0.95 and bp <75% are not shown. Taxa for which new sequences were produced are indicated in bold.

Fig. 2. Tree inferred from COI-5P in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 2. Tree inferred from COI-5P + rbcL + LSU using Bayesian analysis (BI) and including 30 specimens of the Laurencia complex and two outgroup taxa. The numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp) and below branches indicate bootstrap values (bp) inferred from 1 000 ML bootstrap replicates (ML); pp <0.95 and bp <75% are not shown.

Fig. 3 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 3. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov. A–B. ♂, holotype (MNHNCL 7946). A. Habitus, dorsal. B. Carapace, dorsal. C–D. ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). C. Carapace, dorsal. D. Left palp, prolateral.

Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Los Choros, La Higuera, Elqui (LEULS). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Bulb, prolateral.

Fig. 8 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 8. Spermathecae, dorsal view (except D, ventral), cleared. A. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Zapahuira, Parinacota, Tarapacá (AMNH). B. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Lomas de Peñuelas, Coquimbo (AMNH). C. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♀, 6 km S of Cruz Grande, Elqui (AMNH). D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). E. Loxosceles vallenar sp. nov., ♀, holotype (AMNH). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 9 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 9. Scanning electron microscopy, ♂ metatarsus I. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Parinacota, 24 km S of Zapahuira (AMNH). C–D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, Taltal, 4 km E of Paposo, Antofagasta (AMNH).

Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B–D. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967. B. ♂, Chusmiza, Huara, Tamarugal, Tarapacá (AMNH). C. Same, bulb, prolateral. D. Same, palp, prolateral. Scale bars A–B = 1 mm.

Fig. 7 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 7. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♂, holotype, La Herradura, Elqui, IV Región de Coquimbo, Chile (AMNH). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Palp, retrolateral. C. Bulb, prolateral. D. Bulb, subventral.