Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,492
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,492 results for “species delimitation”
Supplementary material 4 from: Zhu X-C, Chen J, Chen R, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 656: 25-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.656.11440
Figure S1 : Explanation note: The analysis results of dataset COI-670.
Supplementary material 10 from: Zhu X-C, Chen J, Chen R, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 656: 25-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.656.11440
Figure S7 : Explanation note: The analysis results of dataset Cytb-338.
Supplementary material 3 from: Zhu X-C, Chen J, Chen R, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 656: 25-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.656.11440
Table S3 : Explanation note: The analysis results with ABGD of all datasets.
Supplementary material 1 from: Zhu X-C, Chen J, Chen R, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 656: 25-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.656.11440
Table S1 : Explanation note: Sample information.
Figure 9 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 9 - Map of distribution of H. anatolicus (circles, dots) and H. sanctus (squares). White symbols represent records from the literature, large circles represent imprecise data for a larger region (country); black symbols represent records of specimens examined by us.
Figure 7 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 7 - Hyphydrus male metatibia, longer metatibial spur and metatarsomere I. a H. anatolicus b H. ovatus c H. sanctus. Scale bar 0.5 mm.
Figure 5 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 5 - Hyphydrus female habitus. a H. aubei (Croatia; 4.7 mm) b H. ovatus (Bohemia; 4.6 mm) c H. anatolicus (Greece; 5.0 mm) d H. sanctus (Turkey; 4.9 mm).
Figure 8 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 8 - Hyphydrus male and female genitalia. a, h, o median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view b, i, p supplementary drawing of apex of median lobe c, j, q median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view d, k, r paramere e, l, s gonocoxa f, m, t gonocoxosternite g, n, u spermatheca. a–g H. anatolicus h–n H. ovatus o–u H. sanctus. Scale bar 0.5 mm.
Figure 4 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 4 - Hyphydrus male habitus. a H. aubei (Corsica; 4.9 mm) b H. ovatus (Sweden; 5.0 mm) c H. anatolicus (Slovakia, specimen post-extraction; 5.1 mm) d H. sanctus (Turkey; 5.2 mm).
Figure 3 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 3 - Clock-rooted ultrametric tree from Bayesian analysis with branches coloured according to the GMYC species delimitation analysis. Posterior probability clade support values >0.9 shown. Black branches=speciation events, red braches=within species coalescence events. Country abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 1 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 1 - Majority-rule consensus tree from the non-clock Bayesian analysis. Posterior probability clade support values >0.9 shown. Country abbreviations: SW=Sweden, GE=Germany, UK=United Kingdom, La=Latvia, RU=Russia, TU=Turkey, IS=Israel, GR=Greece, SL=Slovakia. Rooted (midpoint) with Hyphydrus aubei.
Figure 2 from: Bergsten J, Weingartner E, Hájek J (2017) Species delimitation of the Hyphydrus ovatus complex in western Palaearctic with an update of species distributions (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). ZooKeys 678: 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.12886
Figure 2 - One of 14 most parsimonious trees (L=203, zero-length branches hard-collapsed) with unambiguous characters optimized. Black dots=non-homoplasious characters, white dots=homoplasious characters. Numbers refer to the character's position in the alignment from 1-825. The other 13 cladograms only differed in within-species internal organizations. Rooted with Hyphydrus aubei. Country abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 2 from: Zhu X-C, Chen J, Chen R, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 656: 25-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.656.11440
Figure 2 - The analysis results of some species from the COI-670 dataset. The analysis results based on other genes were almost identical. The NJ tree was constructed based on the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model with a bootstrap value over 50% displayed. The gray blocks behind the tree represent the putative species, which means that the taxa in the tree corresponding to a single block are in one putative species. The number of blocks express the number of putative species using this method. A Chaitophorus saliniger B Laingia psammae.
Figure 5 from: Miralles A, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2016) Species delimitation methods put into taxonomic practice: two new Madascincus species formerly allocated to historical species names (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9945
Figure 5 - Distribution maps for Madascincus species. Colored dots are representing localities sampled in the molecular studies by Miralles and Vences (2013), whereas white dots are representing localities of specimens only identified by morphology, and/or type localities. For Madascincus polleni, another locality has been added based on a recent paper from Rakotoarison et al. (2015), who have collected an additional specimen (ZCMV 14157) in Mitsinjo forest in north-western Madagascar (16°02'54.5"S, 45°47'24.1"E). The identity of this specimen is confirmed by both its morphological characteristics and its phylogenetic position inferred from a segment of the 16S rRNA gene (nested within the Madascincus polleni clade, and closely related to the population of Ankarafanstika, GenBank accession number KR025911). Note that for some species,especially Madascincus mouroundavae, additional verified localities exist but these are here excluded for consistency because no samples were examined in the framework of the present study.
Figure 1 from: Miralles A, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2016) Species delimitation methods put into taxonomic practice: two new Madascincus species formerly allocated to historical species names (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9945
Figure 1 - Comparison of phylogenetic trees of the genus Madascincus based on nDNA and mtDNA sequences (modified from Miralles and Vences 2013). Nuclear DNA tree inferred from BI analysis of concatenated BDNF, CMOS, PDC and RAG2 sequences compared to the mitochondrial DNA inferred from ND1 and 16S sequences (unpartitioned data set, posterior probabilities indicated for each node, see Miralles and Vences 2013 for details of analysis methods).
Figure 4 from: Miralles A, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2016) Species delimitation methods put into taxonomic practice: two new Madascincus species formerly allocated to historical species names (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9945
Figure 4 - Photographic plate showing most of the recognized species of Madascincus (picture not available for Madascincus macrolepis), highlighting the chromatic polymorphism (red tail and brown tail morphs) for Madascincus miafina sp. n., Madascincus pyrurus sp. n. and Madascincus igneocaudatus. Picture I depicts the sole specimen known from Kirindy that in Glaw and Vences (2007) was assigned to a candidate species M. sp. "vitreus", and O depicts a specimen that these authors assigned to a candidate species M. sp. "baeus".
Figure 3 from: Miralles A, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2016) Species delimitation methods put into taxonomic practice: two new Madascincus species formerly allocated to historical species names (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9945
Figure 3 - Drawings of the lateral and dorsal views of the heads of most of the species of Madascincus, including the holotypes of the two new species described herein. A: Madascincus pyrurus sp. n., holotype ZSM 520/2001 (MV 2001-445), Mont Ibity; B: Madascincus miafina sp. n., holotype ZSM 1562/2008 (FGZC 1658), Ankarana Special Reserve; C: Madascincus arenicola, holotype ZSM 1565/2008 (FGZC 1703), Baie des Sakalava; D: Madascincus polleni, holotype MNHN 1895.210, "Mouroundava" (= Morondava); E: Madascincus stumpffi, holotype SMF 16019, "Nossibé" (=Nosy Be); F: Madascincus igneocaudatus, ZSM 1600/2010 (ZCMV 12888), Anakao; G: Madascincus mouroundavae, ZSM 13/2005 (ZCMV 2254), Andasibe; H: Madascincus ankodabensis, ZSM 355/2006 (ZCMV 2907), Ranomafana; I: Madascincus melanopleura, ZSM 20/2005 (ZCMV 2266), Andasibe; J: Madascincus minutus, ZSM 400/2005 (ZCMV 2166), Nosy Mangabe. Dwarf species of Madascincus, namely Madascincus nanus and Madascincus macrolepis, not represented. Scale bars = 2 mm. Abbreviations used for indication of scales (A, B) follow those defined by Miralles et al. (2011b).
Figure 2 from: Miralles A, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2016) Species delimitation methods put into taxonomic practice: two new Madascincus species formerly allocated to historical species names (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9945
Figure 2 - Haplotype network reconstructions for the four nuclear genes (BDNF, PDC, CMOS and RAG2). For each marker, circles represent haplotypes (size proportional to the number of individuals), black lines represent mutational steps and black dots missing haplotypes, white curves represent connections between haplotypes found co-occurring in heterozygous individuals, and white numbers represent the number of individuals in which the respective haplotypes were found co-occurring. Single locus fields of recombination (pools of co-occurring haplotypes) are represented by grey rectangles (redrawn from Miralles and Vences 2013).
FIGURE 5 in Exploring the utility of DNA barcoding in species delimitation of Polypedilum (Tripodura) non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)
FIGURE 5. Maximum likelihood tree based on the PTP model, scale represents K2P genetic distance.
FIGURE 1 in Exploring the utility of DNA barcoding in species delimitation of Polypedilum (Tripodura) non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)
FIGURE 1. Map of sampling sites in China.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.