Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedApr 2021View details →

FIGURE 3 in Ainsliaea polystachya (Asteraceae), a new species from Fujian, China based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 3. Illustration of Ainsliaea polystachya. A, Habitat. B, Living plants in the field. C, Rosulate leaves. D, Fruiting plant. E, Inflorescence. F, Part of the raceme. G, Leaves. H, Capitulum. I, Flower. J, Style and stigma with synantherous stamen. K, Juvenile fruit. L, Mature fruit.

opennotspecifiedApr 2021View details →

FIGURE 1 in Ainsliaea polystachya (Asteraceae), a new species from Fujian, China based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on three concatenated loci (ITS+ETS+ndhF). The posterior probability (PP) values are listed above the branches, the maximum likelihood bootstrap supports (MLBS) and the maximum parsimony bootstrap supports (MPBS) below the branches.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular and morphological evidence of Onobrychis avanakensis, a new species from Iran

FIGURE 3. Fifty percent majority rule consensus tree resulting from Bayesian inference of the nrDNA ITS dataset. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of nucleotide changes as indicated above branches. Numbers below branches are posterior probability and parsimony bootstrap values, respectively, Values<50 % are not shown.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular and morphological evidence of Onobrychis avanakensis, a new species from Iran

FIGURE 2. Onobrychis avanakensis (from the holotype). A—calyx, B—standard, C—wings, D—keel, E—androecium, F—gynoecium, G—pod.

FIGURE 2. Cymbidium xichouense. A. Habit. B in Cymbidium xichouense (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae), a new species from China: evidence from morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 2. Cymbidium xichouense. A. Habit. B. Base of inflorescence. C. Floral morphology. D. Flower, front view. E. Flower, side view. F. Lip and column, side view. G. Flower of C. qiubeiense.

FIGURE 1 in Cymbidium xichouense (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae), a new species from China: evidence from morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree for selected species of Cymbidium from combined analysis of nrITS and plastid matK. Analysis of selected species of Cymbidium based on separate plastid matK (a) and nrITS (b) in the top left corner. Numbers near the nodes are bootstrap percentages and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, BP, BP). "-" indicates that the node is incongruent between the topology of the ML MP Bayesian tree and the MP/ML trees. PP 1 = 1.00.

FIGURE 3. Cymbidium xichouense. A. Flowering plant. B. Flower, front view. C. Perianth. D. Column, side view. E in Cymbidium xichouense (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae), a new species from China: evidence from morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 3. Cymbidium xichouense. A. Flowering plant. B. Flower, front view. C. Perianth. D. Column, side view. E. Pollinarium, front view and back view. Drawn by Wenqi Hu.

FIGURE 3 in Pluteus anatolicus (Pluteaceae, Agaricales): a new species of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma from Turkey based on both morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 3. Microcharacters of Pluteus anatolicus (OKA-TR202; holotype): a. Basidiospores. b. Basidia and basidioles. c. Pleurocystidia. Scale bars: a = 5 μm; b, c = 10 μm.

FIGURE 4 in Pluteus anatolicus (Pluteaceae, Agaricales): a new species of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma from Turkey based on both morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 4. Microcharacters of Pluteus anatolicus (OKA-TR202; holotype): a. Cheilocystidia. b. Pileipellis elements. Scale bars = 10 μm.

FIGURE 1 in Pluteus anatolicus (Pluteaceae, Agaricales): a new species of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma from Turkey based on both morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma inferred from Bayesian analysis of the ITS-rDNA dataset. Volvopluteus earlei (MK204989) and V. gloiocephalus (MK616345) were used as outgroup. BPP ≥ 0.80 and MLB ≥ 80% are shown above individual branches. Bold branches represent BPP ≥ 0.95 and MLB ≥ 90%. GenBank or UNITE accession numbers, taxon names, collection (voucher, strain or herbarium) numbers, and geographic origins of used sequences are provided. Sequences of new species from Turkey are highlighted in bold.

FIGURE 2 in Pluteus anatolicus (Pluteaceae, Agaricales): a new species of Pluteus sect. Celluloderma from Turkey based on both morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 2. Fresh basidioma of Pluteus anatolicus (OKA-TR202; holotype) on natural habitat. a, c. Basidioma in side view. b. Close-up of the pileus surface. d. Lamellae view. Scale bars: a, c = 10 mm; b, d = 5 mm.

FIGURE 4 in A new species of Potentilla (Potentilleae, Rosaceae) from central China, with reference to molecular and morphological evidence

FIGURE 4. Illustration of the holotype of Potentilla sunhangii. A. Habit (perennial herb); B. Flower in front view; C. Sepal; D. Episepal; E. Anther with two thecae; F. Oval with lateral style; G. Cauline leaves with ventral stipular auricles.

FIGURE 5 in A new species of Potentilla (Potentilleae, Rosaceae) from central China, with reference to molecular and morphological evidence

FIGURE 5. Geographical distribution of Potentilla sunhangii in Shen-nong-jia Forest District, different colors represent different elevations of this region, orange represent region with elevation above 3800 meters, yellow represent region with elevation between 1800 and 3800 meters, green represent region with elevation below 1800 meters.

FIGURE 3. Potentilla sunhangii. A in A new species of Potentilla (Potentilleae, Rosaceae) from central China, with reference to molecular and morphological evidence

FIGURE 3. Potentilla sunhangii. A. habit in the Jin-hou-ling Mountains, Shennongjia; B. habit in rocks in Jin-hou-ling Mountains; C. flowers (in June); D. flower in front view; E. upper surface of basal leaves, showing leaflet number and teeth; F. stigma and style; G. flower in side view showing dense pubescence on the pedicel; H. part of stamens; I. root.

FIGURE 2. a in A new species of Potentilla (Potentilleae, Rosaceae) from central China, with reference to molecular and morphological evidence

FIGURE 2. a. Bayesian consensus tree of Potentilla based on nuclear ITS data; b. Bayesian consensus tree of Potentilla based on plastid trnL + trnL-F data. Numbers following names are the last two digits of accession numbers (Table S2), numbers in branches indicate Bayesian posterior probability (PP).

FIGURE 1 in A new species of Potentilla (Potentilleae, Rosaceae) from central China, with reference to molecular and morphological evidence

FIGURE 1. SEM images of Potentilla sunhangii (A–F) and Potentilla saundersiana (G–I). A. Glandular dots and glands in upper surface of leaves; B. Glands in lower surface of leaves; C. Glands in sepal; D. Glands in stipule; E. Glands in stem; F. Morphology of Gland; G. Upper surface of leaves; H. Lower surface of leaves; I. Stipule.

FIGURE 4 in Transfer of the monospecific genus Nienburgella (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) to Phycodrys, based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 4. Phycodrys radicosa (Okamura) Yamada & Inagaki from Korean coast. Vegetative morphology. A–E. Habits of female gametophyte (A, JN13102600045), tetrasprophyte (B, JN15012100001), and vegetative thalli (C, JN14091000006; D, JN14091000001; E, JN14091000003). F. Basal part of thallus. G. Multicellular rhizoids (arrowheads) along the margins of lower part of blade. H–I. Surface views of middle (H) and upper (H) parts of blade. J. Cortical cells with discoid chloroplasts. K–M. Cross-sections through lower (K), middle (L), and interveinal (M, arrow) portions of blade. N–O. Cells arrangement of blade apex with growing pattern (numbers: orders of cell rows, i: cells produced by intercalary cell division). Scale bars: C–E = 2 cm; A, B = 1 cm; F = 3 mm; I = 2 mm; H = 300 µm; G = 200 µm; K–M = 100 µm; J, N = 50 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Transfer of the monospecific genus Nienburgella (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) to Phycodrys, based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 5. Phycodrys radicosa (Okamura) Yamada & Inagaki from Korean coast. Female (A–M) and tetrasporic (O–P) reproductive structures. A. Apex of marginal proliferation with procarps (arrowheads). B–G. Development process of immature procarp (cb1–3: cell numbers of carpogonial branch; cbi: carpogonial branch initial; cc: central cell; sc: supporting cell; st1: first sterile-cell group; st1i: first sterile-cell group initial; st2i: second sterile-cell group initial). H–I. Inferior (H) and superior (I) surface views of same point of mature procarp (cp: carpogonium; st2: second sterile-cell group; tr: trichogyne). J–K. Inferior (J) and superior (K) surface views of same point of post-fertilized stage (au: auxiliary cell; cbs: cells in carpogonial branch). L. Cross-section through an immature cystocarp (fu: fusion cell; gi: gonimoblast initial). M. Cross-section through a mature cystocarp. N–O. Surface views of tetrasporangial sori (t: tetrasporangia; ts: tetrasporangial sori). P. Cross-section through a tetrasporangium (ti: tetrasporangial initial). Scale bars: N = 1 mm; M, O = 100 µm; A, L, P = 50 µm; B–20 µm.

FIGURE 2 in Transfer of the monospecific genus Nienburgella (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) to Phycodrys, based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 2. Nienburgella angusta (A.D. Zinova) Perestenko from the eastern coast of South Korea. Vegetative morphology. A–B Habits of tetrasporophyte (A, JN13102600046) and female gametophyte (B, JN13102600045). C. Multi-cellular rhizoids (arrowheads) along the margins of lower part of thallus. D. Surface view of middle part of main branch showing marginal rhizoids (arrowheads) and proliferation. E. Cortical cells with discoid chloroplasts. F–H. Cross-sections through apical (F), middle (G), and lower (H) part of blade. I–J. Cells arrangement of young blade with apical growing pattern (numbers: orders of cell rows, i: cells produced by intercalary cell division). Scale bars: A, B = 1 cm; C, D = 200 µm; G, H = 40 µm; E, F, I = 20 µm.

FIGURE 3 in Transfer of the monospecific genus Nienburgella (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) to Phycodrys, based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 3. Nienburgella angusta (A.D. Zinova) Perestenko from the eastern coast of South Korea. Female (A–N) and tetrasporic (O–Q) reproductive structures. A–G. Development process of immature procarp (cb1–3: cell numbers of carpogonial branch; cbi: carpogonial branch initial; cbs: cells in carpogonial branch; cp: carpogonium; sc: supporting cell; st1: first sterile-cell group; st1i: first sterile-cell group initial; st2i: second sterile-cell group initial; tr: trichogyne). H. Mature procarp (st2: second sterile-cell group). I–J. Superior (I) and inferior (J) surface views of same point of post-fertilized stage (au: auxiliary cell). K–L. Cross-section through an immature cystocarp (fu: fusion cell; g: gonimoblast cell; gi: gonimoblast initial). M. Cross-section through a mature cystocarp (ca: caposporangia). N. Surface view of mature cystocarp (cs). O–P. Surface views of tetrasporangial sori (t: tetrasporangia; ts: tetrasporangial sori). Q. Cross-section through a tetrasporangium (ti: tetrasporangial initial). Scale bars: N, O = 2 mm; P = 500 µm; M, Q = 200 µm; K, L = 50 µm; A–J = 30 µm.