Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudaliidae (Nematoda) and the origin of associations between lungworms and marine mammals

Fig. 2. Bayesian inference analysis (BI) of the phylogenetic relationships between representatives from all six genera of the Pseudaliidae in relation to the Filaroididae using the concatenated sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) and second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) DNA regions. Angiostrongylus vasorum (Angiostrongylidae), Metastrongylus salmi (Metastrongylidae), and Crenosoma striatum and Otostrongylus cicumlitus (Crenosomatidae) were used as the outgroups. Nodal support is indicated by BI posterior probabilities; posterior probabilities less than 0.7 are not shown. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Host key: green, Marine Pseudaliidae; red, Terrestrial Pseudaliidae; blue, Parafilaroides spp.; black, other species of the Metastrongyloidea.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudaliidae (Nematoda) and the origin of associations between lungworms and marine mammals

Fig. 1. Maximum-Likelihood (ML) analysis of the phylogenetic relationships between representatives from all six genera of the Pseudaliidae in relation to the Filaroididae using the concatenated sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) and second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) DNA regions. Angiostrongylus vasorum (Angiostrongylidae), Metastrongylus salmi (Metastrongylidae), and Crenosoma striatum and Otostrongylus cicumlitus (Crenosomatidae) were used as the outgroups. Nodal support is indicated by bootstrap values; bootstrap values less than 70% are not shown. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Host key: green, Marine Pseudaliidae; red, Terrestrial Pseudaliidae; blue, Parafilaroides spp.; black, other species of the Metastrongyloidea.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudaliidae (Nematoda) and the origin of associations between lungworms and marine mammals

Fig. 3. Associations between marine (green branches) and terrestrial (red branch) species of Pseudaliidae, and Parafilaroides (blue branches), mapped onto a partial phylogeny of their Laurasiatheria hosts at familial level. The associations of other species of the Metastrongyloidea for which phylogenetic information exists (see Table 2) are also included. The host phylogeny is based on Burgin et al. (2018), but an alternative hypothesis for the time of splitting between mysticete and odontocete cetaceans (Springer et al., 2019) is also presented (arrow). Abbreviations: Aelur: Aelurostrogylus abstrusus; Angc: Angiocaulus gubernaculatus; Angt1: Angiostrongylus chabaudi; Angt2: Angiostrongylus vasorum; Angt3: Angiostrongylus daskalovi; Creno1: Crenosoma vulpis; Creno2: Crenosoma mephitidis; Elap: Elaphostrongylus alces; Fil: Filaroides martis; Hal: Halocercus spp.; Metast1: Metastrongylus elongatus; Metast2: Metastrongylus pudendotectus, Metast3: Metastrongylus salmi; Mue: Muellerius capillaris; Osl1: Oslerus rostratus; Osl2: Oslerus osleri; Otost: Otostrongylus circumlitus; Par1: Parelaphostrongylus andersoni; Par2: Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei; Par3: Parelaphostrongylus tenuis; Parafil: Parafilaroides spp.; Pero: Perostrongylus falciformis; Ph: Pharurus spp.; Proto1: Protostrongylus rufescens; Proto2: Protostrongylus rupicaprae; Proto3: Protostrongylus shiozawai; Pse: Pseudalius inflexus; Skrj1: Skrjabingylus chitwoodorum; Skrj2: Skrjabingylus santaceciliae; Ste: Stenurus spp.; Stenuroi: Stenuroides herpestis; Tor: Torynurus convolutus; Trilo: Trilobostrongylus bioccai; Trog1: Troglostrongylus brevior; Trog2: Troglostrongylus wilsoni; Umingm; Umingmakstrongylus pallikuukensis; Var: Varestrongylus alpenae.

Fig 2 in Multigene phylogeny reveals a new Iranian earthworm genus (Lumbricidae: Philomontanus) with three new species

Fig 2. DNA maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. Bootstrap proportions (if P>70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (if P>95%) are shown above and below the branches, respectively. The Philomontanus exemplars from each of the three morphological groups are shown in red.

Fig 4. Capsicum longifolium Barboza & S in Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus

Fig 4. Capsicum longifolium Barboza & S. Leiva. (A) Plant. (B) Internode with lenticels. (C, D) Flower buds. (E) Flower, longitudinal section. (F) Flowers showing corolla yellow with brownish center. (G) Same flower as in F, lateral view. (H, I) Flowers with completely yellow corollas, upper and lateral view, respectively. (J, K) Flowers with yellow corollas with red-brown edges, upper and lateral view, respectively. (L, M) Immature fruits. (N) Mature fruit. Photos by S. Leiva González and G. E. Barboza.

Fig 3. Capsicum longifolium Barboza & S in Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus

Fig 3. Capsicum longifolium Barboza & S. Leiva. (A) Flowering and fruiting branch. (B) Flower. (C) Opened corolla. (D, E, F) Anther, ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively. (G) Gynoecium. (H) Ovary in cross section. (I) Fruit. (J) Seed. Drawn by S. Leiva González.

Fig 1 in Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus

Fig 1. Capsicum benoistii Hunz. ex Barboza. (A) Flowering branch. (B) Flower. (C) Calyx. (D) Section of the calyx showing venation in tube and appendages. (E) Trichome of the calyx. (F) Opened corolla. (G, H) Gynoecium, with long and short style, respectively. Drawn by N. de Flury.

Fig 7. Capsicum piuranum Barboza & S in Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus

Fig 7. Capsicum piuranum Barboza & S. Leiva. (A) Flowering branch. (B) Calyx. (C) Flower. (D) Opened corolla. (E, F, G). Anther, ventral, dorsal and lateral view, respectively. (H) Gynoecium. (I) Fruit. (J) Seed. Drawn by S. Leiva González.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

FIGURE 6. 1, Talpidae phylogeny resulting from a in Condylura (Mammalia, Talpidae) reloaded: New insights about the fossil representatives of the genus

FIGURE 6. 1, Talpidae phylogeny resulting from a parsimony analysis based on 157 discrete morphological characters, modified from Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2006, figure 1). 2, Unconstrained Talpidae phylogeny based on a parsimony analysis (DELTRAN optimization) based on 176 discrete morphological characters, modified from Schwermann and Thompson (2015, figure 16A).

Fig. 6 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 6 Bayesian, ultrametric, unrooted circle tree for COI. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown only for nodes relevant to species delimitations (SDs); interior nodes are in gray. Bars in the inner three

Fig. 2 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 2 Type localities of type species of desmosomatid genera. The blue squares reflect the genetic dataset available in this study (compare Fig. 1). 1—Chelantermedia composita Brix, 2007, 2—Chelator insignis (Hansen, 1916), 3—Cryodesma agnari Svavarsson, 1988, 4—Desmosoma lineare G.O. Sars 1864, 5—Disparella valida Hessler, 1970, 6—Echinopleura aculeata (G.O. Sars, 1864), 7—Eugerda tenuimana (G.O. Sars, 1866), 8—Eugerdella coarctata (G.O. Sars, 1899),

Fig. 1 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 1 World map indicating sampling spots for the molecular dataset. White circles indicate nannoniscids in the samples, black squares desmosomatids in the samples. Orange dots with numbers indicate nannoniscid genera where sequences of the type species are available,

Fig. 4 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 4 Prochelator angolensis Brenke, Brix & Knuschke, 2005 as SEM photo to illustrate a typical desmosomatid habitus. In this species, P I is forming a chelate condition using a large composed seta at the carpus (see Fig. 5J) as counterpart to the propodus. Abbrevations: A1, antennula; A2, antenna; Md, mandible; Mxp, maxil- liped; 1–7, pereonites 1 to 7; PI, pereopod I; PII, pereopod II; PIII, pereopod III; PIV, pereopod IV; PV, pereopod V; PVI, pereopod VI; PVII, pereopod VII; Op, operculum; Plt, pleoteson; Ur, uropod; spine, posterolateral spine

Fig.3 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig.3 Type localities of type species of nannoniscid genera. The orange dots reflect the genetic dataset available in this study (compare Fig. 1). 1—Austroniscus ovalis (Vanhöffen, 1914), 2—Exiliniscus clipeatus Siebenaller & Hessler, 1981, 3—Ketosoma ruehlmanni Kaiser & Janssen, 2018, 4—Hebefustis vafer Siebenaller & Hessler, 1981, 5—Nannoniscoides angulatus (Hansen, 1916), 6—Nannoniscus oblon-

Fig. 6 in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 6. Holotype of Eosuchus lerichei Dollo, 1907. IRSNB R 48, Jeumont, France, late Paleocene. A. Axis in left lateral view. B. Nuchal osteoderms in dorsal view. C. Detail of the orbital region of the skull showing the L−shaped deflected postorbital bars and the "step−like" structures characteriszing the antero−medial margin of the orbits. D. Detail of right quadrate showing the extremely enlarged foramen aereum. E. Detail of lower jaw showing the couplets of teeth and the asymmetrical alveolar arrangement.

Fig. 5 in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 5. Holotype of Eosuchus lerichei Dollo, 1907. IRSNB R 48, Jeumont, France, late Paleocene, lower jaw in dorsal view (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B).

Fig. 4 in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 4. Holotype of Eosuchus lerichei Dollo, 1907. IRSNB R 48, Jeumont, France, late Paleocene, skull in occipital view (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B).

Fig. 3 in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 3. Holotype of Eosuchus lerichei Dollo, 1907. IRSNB R 48, Jeumont, France, late Paleocene, skull in ventral view (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B).

Fig. 2 in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 2. Holotype of Eosuchus lerichei Dollo, 1907. IRSNB R 48, Jeumont, France, late Paleocene, skull in dorsal view (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B).

Fig. 1. A in Anatomy and phylogeny of the gavialoid crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the Paleocene of Europe

Fig. 1. A. Geographic location of the Paleocene–Eocene vertebrate localities of Jeumont and Erquelinnes at the French−Belgian border. B. Schematic representation of the section made by de Heinzelin in 1946 and 1954. The remains of Eosuchus lerichei come from the glauconitic sand belonging to the late Paleocene Hannut Formation.