Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,928
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,928 results for “M 4”
Table 4 for the Study: "Observation of correlation between earthquake triggering of M>4.3 and specific Sun-Moon-Planets positions in the Solar System, from 1600 in Italy."
<p><strong>Video explaining the determination of the Resulting Gravitational Force sigma for the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake.</strong></p> <p>For subtitles in English: <a href="https://youtu.be/-OVk2r8U8QA?t=563">https://youtu.be/-OVk2r8U8QA?t=563</a> --> URL of the video explaining the determination of the Resulting Gravitational Force sigma for the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, for the article "Correlation observation between the triggering of M>4.3 earthquakes and specific Sun-Moon-Planet positions in the Solar System since 1600 in Italy" , SUBTITLES IN EN, paragraph 2.16.</p>
FIGURES 1–4 in Megarthrus of China. Part 1. Description of a new species resembling M. antennalis Cameron, 1941 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Proteininae)
FIGURES 1–4. Megarthrus, habitus, male; Megarthrus antennalis: dorsal (1) and ventral (2) views; Megarthrus chujiao sp. n.: dorsal (3) and ventral (4) views. Scale bar=0.5 mm.
FIGURE 4 in A catalogue of Eudóxia M. Froehlich's collection of planarians (Platyhelminthes) with emphasis on type specimens on histological slides
FIGURE 4. Picture of a detail of a drawer showing five histological glass slides of Froehlich's collection. Note labels partially eaten by insects.
Supplementary material 2 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889
Use cases were collected using a number of methods to maximise responses. Lead authors of papers published using data accessed via the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) were contacted and asked to contribute their research data use cases, and a number of papers describing fitness for use determination were sent to the ALA Data Quality group. Fitness for use and quality check information from these papers were extracted and transferred to the use case library. These are the results of those surveys.
Supplementary material 4 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889
Description and specifications for the tests following the conventions of the Fitness For Use Framework. This supplement is a copy of https://github.com/tdwg/bdq/blob/master/tg2/core/TG2_tests.csv as of commit 941e774 2019-Aug-20.
Supplementary material 3 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889
Counts of occurrence records in 2019-04-15 snapshot of GBIF-mediated data that fit the three categories of expected responses for each of the event date-related validation tests.
Supplementary material 1 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889
Vocabulary of Terms used for the TDWG Task Group on Data Quality Tests and Assertions, plus key additional terms from the Use Case Study. Ther terms are consistent with the terms used in the Fitness for Use Framework (Veiga et al. 2017)
Supplementary material 4 from: Augustinus BA, Lommen STE, Fogliatto S, Vidotto F, Smith T, Horvath D, Bonini M, Gentili RF, Citterio S, Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U (2020) In-season leaf damage by a biocontrol agent explains reproductive output of an invasive plant species. NeoBiota 55: 117-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.55.46874
Figure S1. Mean plant volume ± se of A. artemisiifolia plants measured during the experiment in the four experimental sites
Supplementary material 4 from: Grunewald K, Schweppe-Kraft B, Syrbe R-U, Meier S, Krüger T, Schorcht M, Walz U (2020) Hierarchical classification system of Germany's ecosystems as basis for an ecosystem accounting – methods and first results. One Ecosystem 5: e50648. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e50648
Tab. D: Detailed matrix of pre- and post-use of settlement and transportation areas in Germany in the period 2013-2018 in hectare per day (ha/d). (Data source: IOER)
Supplementary material 4 from: Wiemers M, Chazot N, Wheat CW, Schweiger O, Wahlberg N (2020) A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies. ZooKeys 938: 97-124. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.938.50878
Figure S2. Time-calibrated tree of European butterflies Section I: Papilionidae, Hesperiidae & Pieridae
Supplementary material 4 from: Bieberich J, Feldhaar H, Lauerer M (2020) Micro-habitat and season dependent impact of the invasive Impatiens glandulifera on native vegetation. NeoBiota 57: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.57.51331
Table S1. Result of the automated model selection approach identifying environmental variables that affected the cover of Impatiens glandulifera in summer 2016 and spring 2017
Supplementary material 6 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S6. Average nucleotide diversity for all four datasets of shared OTUs seperated according to sample sites and EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and PR ('Pollution Resistant') taxa
Supplementary material 5 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S5. Average haplotype diversity for all four datasets of shared OTUs seperated according to sample sites and EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and PR ('Pollution Resistant') taxa
Supplementary material 7 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S7 – part 1. Haplotype network of the two most frequent EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and PR ('Pollution Resistant') taxa
Supplementary material 4 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S4. Average haplotype number per OTU for the four different datasets of shared OTUs. Datasets are split into EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and PR ('Pollution Resistant') taxa
Supplementary material 3 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S3. Average haplotype number per OTU for the four different datasets of shared OTUs. Values are illustrated for all sample sites including all shared OTUs
Supplementary material 2 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S2. Four different datasets including shared OTUs between the different river systems (Emscher-Ennepe-Sieg, Emscher-Ennepe, Emscher-Sieg, Sieg-Ennepe). Number of OTUs is illustrated with taxonomic assignment on order level
Supplementary material 1 from: Zizka VMA, Weiss M, Leese F (2020) Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51925. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51925
Figure S1. Total number of aquatic macroinvertebrate individuals per sample and season plotted against the average haplotype number per OTU. Different colours indicate the three river systems
Supplementary material 2 from: Macher J-N, Drakou K, Papatheodoulou A, Hoorn B, Vasquez M (2020) The mitochondrial genomes of 11 aquatic macroinvertebrate species from Cyprus. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e58259. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.58259
Supplementary tables showing reads numbers, coverage and length of mitochondrial genomes, and length and blast results of 18S and 28S rRNAs
Supplementary material 1 from: Zermoglio PF, Plos A, Acosta N, Amaya L, Escobar DA, Grattarola F, Mancina CA, Nuñez F, Plata CA, Quintero E, Vargas M (2020) Latin American Plea for Incorporation of Other, Non-English Languages in TDWG Standards Documentation. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e58973. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.58973
Signatories to the petition for incorporation of other languages to the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) standards and documentation
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.