Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Morphological and molecular description of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. (Ixodidae) with consideration for co-extinction with its critically endangered marsupial host

Fig. 6 Scanncng electron mccrographs of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. Nsmph. a Idcosoma, unengorged speccmen, dorsal vcew. b Idcosoma, unengorged speccmen, ventral vcew. c Scutum, showcng lateral carcnae. d Anal groove. Scale-bars: a-c, 200 μm; d, 40 μm

Fig. 5 in Morphological and molecular description of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. (Ixodidae) with consideration for co-extinction with its critically endangered marsupial host

Fig. 5 Lcne drawcng of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. Female. a Capctulum, ventral vcew. b Capctulum, dorsal vcew. c Scutum. d Tarscs I. e Tarscs IV. f Coxae. Scale-bars: 200 μm

Fig. 10 in Morphological and molecular description of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. (Ixodidae) with consideration for co-extinction with its critically endangered marsupial host

Fig. 10 Phslogenetcc relatconshcps of csolates of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. wcth other Australascan Ixodes spp. as estcmated uscng cstochrome c oxcdase subunct 1 (cox1) gene sequences. Sequences wcth accesscon numbers were obtacned from GenBank, all others were generated cn thcs studs. Evolutconars hcstors was cnferred uscng the necghbour-jocncng method supported wcth bootstrap test of 1,000 replccates (values> 50% shown). Rhipicephalus sanguineus cs used as the outgroup

Fig. 2 in Morphological and molecular description of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. (Ixodidae) with consideration for co-extinction with its critically endangered marsupial host

Fig. 2 Scanncng electron mccrographs of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. Female. a Idcosoma, unengorged speccmen, dorsal vcew. b Idcosoma, unengorged speccmen, ventral vcew. c Scutum, showcng lateral carcnae. d Anal groove. Scale-bars: a-c, 500 μm; d, 100 μm

Fig. 3 in Morphological and molecular description of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. (Ixodidae) with consideration for co-extinction with its critically endangered marsupial host

Fig. 3 Scanncng electron mccrographs of Ixodes woyliei n. sp. Female. a Gnathosoma, dorsal vcew. b Gnathosoma, ventral vcew. c Hspostome. Scale-bars: a-b, 100 μm; c, 20 μm

Figure 4 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 4. Comparison of ulnae of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops: a, right ulna of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57706) in cranial view; b, right ulna of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637) in cranial view; c, QM F57706 in medial view; d, SAM M637 in medial view; e, QMF 57706 in lateral view; f, SAM M637 in lateral view. Abbreviations: anp, anconeal process; cop, coronoid process; fls, flexor sulcus; ol, olecranon; rn, radial notch; sp, styloid process; trn, trochlear notch.

Figure 3 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 3. Comparison of radii of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops: a, left radius of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57679) in cranial view; b, right radius (reversed) of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637) in cranial view; c, QM F57679 in lateral view; d, SAM M637 (reversed) in lateral view. Abbreviations: gr, groove for interosseous membrane (tendinous sheet binding shafts of radius and ulna together); sp, styloid process.

Figure 7 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 7. Plot of first two canonical axes from quadratic discriminant analysis of degree of fossoriality (non-burrowing versus fossorial versus subterranean) in mammals based on an expanded version of the "limbs only" dataset of Hopkins and Davis (2009). Non-burrowing species are represented by green circles, fossorial species by pink squares and subterranean species by blue asterisks. Inner ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals for the means for each class, whilst the outer ellipses represent the 50% prediction intervals.Naraboryctes philcreaseri is represented by a black triangle and was treated as unknown, but falls among subterranean species and is predicted to be subterranean with very high probability (p = 1.0). Abbreviations: F, fossorial; N, non-burrowing; S, subterranean.

Figure 9 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 9. Part of the dated total evidence phylogeny shown in Figure 8, restricted to the clade Agreodontia (which includes Notoryctemorphia), with divergence dates compared to global temperatures and environmental change in Australia. The estimated time of inactivation of the RBP3 gene in the Notoryctes lineage is indicated: the black bar represents the point estimate (5.4 MYA), whilst the grey bars represent 95% HPDs (4.5-6.3 MYA). The global temperature curve is modified from Zachos et al. (2001). The date for the major increase in grass pollen is taken from Martin and McMinn (1994: fig. 2) whilst the date for the onset of major aridity in Australia (~1.4-1.5 MYA) is taken from McLaren and Wallace (2010).

Figure 2 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 2. Comparison of humeri of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops: a, left humerus of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57719) in cranial view; b, right humerus (reversed) of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637) in cranial view; c, QM F57719 in caudal view; d, SAM M637 (reversed) in caudal view. Abbreviations: bg, bicipital groove; cap, capitulum; dpc, deltopectoral crest; gtu, greater tuberosity; hh, humeral head; lsr, lateral supracondylar ridge; ltu, lesser tuberosity; mep, medial epicondyle; stf, supratrochlear foramen; tro, trochlea.

Figure 6 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 6. Comparison of tibiae of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops: a, left femur of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57686) in medial view; b, left femur of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637) in medial view; c, QM F57686 in lateral view; d, SAM M637 in lateral view. Abbreviations: mma, medial malleolus; pltp, posterolateral tibial process for articulation with lateral femoral condyle and fibula; sup, sulcus for patella; tc, tibial crest.

Figure 5 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 5. Comparison of femora of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops: a, right femur of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57678) in cranial view; b, right femur of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637) in cranial view; c, QM F57678 in caudal view; d, SAM M637 in caudal view. Abbreviations: fh, femoral head; gtr, greater trochanter; icg, intercondylar groove; ltr, lesser trochanter; trf, trochanteric fossa; ttr, third trochanter.

Figure 8 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 8. Dated total evidence phylogeny based on 259 morphological characters and 9012 bp of sequence data from five nuclear genes (APOB, BRCA1, RBP3, RAG1, and VWF) analysed using MrBayes 3.2.2 assuming the Independent Gamma Rates (IGR) clock model, with topological and temporal constraints applied to selected internal nodes (see supplementary information). Notoryctes and Naraboryctes are indicated in bold. Blue bars represent 95% highest posterior density intervals (HPDs) on the divergence times. Nodes without Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) were constrained a priori.

Figure 1 in Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early Miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians

Figure 1. Comparison of scapulae of Naraboryctes philcreaseri and Notoryctes typhlops in lateral view: a, left scapula of Naraboryctes philcreaseri (QM F57716); b, right scapula (reversed) of Notoryctes typhlops (SAM M637). Abbreviations: acr, acromion process; cau, "caudal" angle; cor, coracoid process; cra, "cranial" angle; inf, infraspinous fossa; psf, postscapular fossa; ssf, supraspinous fossa; ssp, scapular spine; sssp, secondary scapular spine.

Figure 2 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 2. Three-dimensional reconstructions of Diprotodon optatum (A), Zygomaturus trilobus (B), Neohelos stirtoni (C) and Propalorchestes sp. (D) showing the extent of the auditory, squamosal, parietal and frontal sinuses in blue, and brain endocast in red. Skulls are shown in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views. Scale bars represent 10 cm. Bone is 70% transparent.

Figure 3 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 3. Three-dimensional reconstructions of Vombatus ursinus (A), Lasiorhinus latifrons (B) and Phascolarctos cinereus (C) showing the extent of the frontal sinuses in blue and brain endocast in red. Skulls are shown in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views. Scale bars represent 10 cm. Bone is 70% transparent.

Figure 1 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 1. Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of Zygomaturus trilobus cranium, QVM1992 GFV73 from CT scans. Each fragment of the specimen was scanned separately and reconstructed to form the complete cranium on the right.

Figure 5 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 5. Frontal CT slices showing the braincase (BC), diploe (DIP) and parietal sinuses (PAS) inDiprotodon (A),Neohelos (B),Lasiorhinus (C) and Phascolarctos (D). Scale bars are 3 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig. 11 in Trypanosomes genetic diversity, polyparasitism and the population decline of the critically endangered Australian marsupial, the brush tailed bettong or woylie (Bettongia penicillata)

Fig. 11. Transmission electron micrograph of an epimastigote and an amastigote of G2 (Clade A). (A) Epimastigote in culture; Ax: Axoneme showing nine doublets of microtubules surrounding a central pair; Ac: Acidocalcisomes; Arrow: Subpellicular microtubules. (B) Amastigote inside a VERO cell. Scale bars = 0.5 µm (A), 1 µm (B).