Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
609
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
609 results for “Morphometric analysis”
Figure. Comparison of longest primary feather, tail length, and chest circumference in male and female common snipe (* = p <0.05; **= p <0.01). Table 3. Weight of gut variables in male and female common snipe. in Revision of common snipe, Gallinago gallinago in morphometric analysis and building the standard reference haematological values for further studies
Figure. Comparison of longest primary feather, tail length, and chest circumference in male and female common snipe (* = p <0.05; **= p <0.01). Table 3. Weight of gut variables in male and female common snipe.
Fig. 1 in Differentiation of Trichuris species eggs from non-human primates by geometric morphometric analysis
Fig. 1. Trichuris sp. eggs collected from the samples. A. Macaque (Macaca sylvanus) B. Colobus (Colobus guereza kikuyensis). C. Grivet (Chlorocebus aethiops. D. Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus). The bar represents 20 μm.
Fig. 2 in Differentiation of Trichuris species eggs from non-human primates by geometric morphometric analysis
Fig. 2. Trichuris sp. egg lineal measurements. L1: maximum width of polar opercula, L2: minimum width of polar opercula, L3: base width of polar opercula, L4: length of polar opercula, measured from exterior midpoint to the narrow midpoint, L5: total length of polar opercula, measured from the exterior midpoint to the base midpoint, L6: wall thickness at its midpoint, L7: wall thickness in contact with polar opercula, L8: interior length of the egg.
Fig. 16. Conodont P1 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 16. Conodont P1 elements of Idiognathodus luganicus (Kozitskaya, 1978) from the Heebner Shale (Gzhelian, Late Pennsylvanian). A. SUI 141094 TT0200); Sedan 11. B. SUI 141095 (TT0209); Clinton 12. C. SUI 141098 (TT0285); Clinton 12. D. SUI 141096 (TT0284); Clinton 12. E. SUI 141097 TT0141); Clinton 28. F. SUI 141099 (TT0018); Clinton 15. G. SUI 141100 (TT0026); I229-83. H. SUI14101 (TT0016); Clinton 14. I. SUI 14102 TT0119); Sedan 20. J. SUI 141103 (TT0118); Sedan 20. K. SUI 141104 (TT0102); Sedan 12.
Fig. 15. Conodont P1 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 15. Conodont P1 elements of Idiognathodus lateralis sp. nov. (A–M) and Idiognathodus praenuntius (Chernykh, 2005) (N–T) from the Heebner Shale, Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian). A. SUI 141062 (TT0228); Sedan 11. B. SUI 141063 (TT0233); Sedan 11. C. SUI 141064 (TT0050); Clinton 20. D., SUI 141065 (TT0019); Clinton 22. E. SUI 141066 (TT0168); Sedan 23. F. SUI 141067 (TT0261); Sedan 11. G. SUI 141068 (TT0260); Sedan 11. →
Fig. 14. Conodont P1 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 14. Conodont P1 elements of Idiognathodus auritus (Chernykh, 2005) from the Heebner Shale, Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian). A. SUI 141042 (TT0314); Sedan 17. B. SUI 141043 (TT0311); Sedan 24. C. SUI 141044 (TT0251); Sedan 11. D. SUI 141045 (TT0222); Clinton 12. E. SUI 141046 (TT0251); Sedan 11. F. SUI 141047 (TT0235); Sedan 11. G. SUI 141048 (TT0256); Sedan 11. H. SUI 141049 (TT0095); I229-83. I. SUI 141050 (TT0093); Clinton 21. J . SUI 141051 (TT0094); I229-83. K. SUI 141052 (TT0221); Clinton 12. L. SUI 141053 (TT0169); Sedan 23. M. SUI 141054 (TT0167); Sedan 23.
Fig. 12 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 12. Canonical variation (CV) cross-plots and wireframes for all grooved sinistral (A) and dextral (B) elements, using locality (red, Clinton; green, I-229; blue, Sedan) as the group-defining criterion. Gray wireframes, mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit; black wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate.
Fig. 11 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 11. Cross-plot of morphotype membership for each grooved sinistral (A) and dextral (B) specimen on the x-axis and their centroid size along the y-axis. Centroid size is not a measure of length, because the outwards movement of any landmark from the centroid will cause it to increase, but for the sake of providing reference, specimens with a platform length less than 0.4 mm generally had a centroid size below 900.
Fig. 8 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 8. Cross-plot of the first two principal components (labeled with their corresponding eigenvalues) and wireframes (A) and canonical variation plot (using chirality membership as the group defining criterion) and wireframes (B) for Idiognathodus luganicus. Black wireframes, form with values of the corresponding principal component values; gray wireframes, mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit; blue/red wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate; blue, sinistral; red, dextral.
Fig. 10 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 10. Principal component cross-plots of the first two principal components (labeled with their corresponding eigenvalues) and wireframes (A, B) and canonical variation plots (using chirality membership as the group defining criterion) and wireframes (C, D) for Idiognathodus simulator (A, C) and Idiognathodus auritus (B, D). Black wireframes, form with values of the corresponding principal component values; gray wireframes, mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit; blue/red wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate; blue, sinistral; red, dextral.
Fig. 6 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 6. Canonical variation plot and wireframes for all grooved specimens, using chirality membership as the group-defining criterion. Gray wireframe, the mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit, and blue/ red wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate; blue, sinistral; red dextral.
Fig. 7 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 7. Canonical variation (CV) cross-plots and wireframes for all grooved sinistral (A) and dextral (B) elements, using lobe membership (red, 0 lobes; blue, 1 lobe; green, 2 lobes; purple, dicconnected ridge) as the group-defining criterion. Gray wireframes, mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit; black wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate.
Fig. 9 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 9. Principal component cross-plots of the first two principal components (labeled with their corresponding eigenvalues) and wireframes (A, B) and canonical variation plots (using chirality membership as the group defining criterion) and wireframes (C, D) for Idiognathodus lateralis (A, C) and Idiognathodus praenuntius (B, D). Black wireframes, form with values of the corresponding principal component values; gray wireframes, mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit; blue/red wireframes, form achieved with values of the corresponding canonical variate; blue, sinistral; red, dextral.
Fig. 2. A in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 2. A. Composite stratigraphic section of the lithologic members of the Oread Megacylothem and relative sea level curve; modified from Heckel 1999, 2013). B. Detailed measured stratigraphic sections of the Heebner Shale at each locality. Darkness of the shale intervals corresponds to the darkness of the shale in hand sample. See SOM 1 for exact locations.
Fig. 5 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 5. Principal component (PC) cross-plot and wireframes for all grooved specimens. A. Principal component cross plot of the first two principal components, labeled with their corresponding eigenvalues (blue, sinistral; red dextral). B. Black wireframes, the resulting form with values of the corresponding principal component values; gray outline, the mean form provided by the preliminary Procrustes fit.
Fig. 1 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 1. Paleogeographic map of Laurentia (A) and the Midcontinent sea (B) during Late Pennsylvanian time. Terrestrial/marine environments represent regions dependent on glacio-eustatic and basin controls. Modern day state outlines for reference to sample locations: 1, Sedan spillway; 2, Clinton Dam; 3, interstate I-229 roadcut. A.W.A., Ancestral-Wichita-Amarillo mountains. A, based on Heckel (1999); B, modified from Algeo and Heckel (2008).
Fig. 3 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 3. Transformation of a conodont P1 element into morphometric coordinate points: 1, specimen is photographed; 2, coordinates are placed on the image using the software TspUtil; 3, wireframe outline is created by linking landmarks to each other; 4, image is removed to illustrate that all analyses beyond this point are performed on the landmarks only, and all other biological criteria are no longer considered. Open circles, location of Type 1 landmarks, and black ovals, location of Type 2 landmarks.
Fig. 4 in Geometric morphometric analysis and taxonomic revision of the Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) conodont Idiognathodus simulator from North America
Fig. 4. Wireframe created by connecting landmarks chosen for the Idiognathodus simulator morphometric analysis. Numbers represent the landmark number designations used for the morphometric analysis: 1, ventral termination of the rostral adcarinal ridge; 2, dorsal termination of the carina; 3, ventral termination of the caudal adcarinal ridge; 4, rostral termination of the most ventral transverse ridge on the rostral side; 5, caudal termination of the most ventral transverse ridge on the rostral side; 6, rostral termination of the most ventral transverse ridge on the caudal side; 7, caudal termination of the most ventral transverse ridge on the caudal side; 8, rostral termination of the transverse ridge closest to the point of maximum curvature along the rostral platform margin on the rostral side. 9, caudal termination of the transverse ridge closest to the point of maximum curvature along the rostral platform margin on the rostral side; 10, rostral termination of the transverse ridge closest to the point of maximum curvature along the caudal platform margin on the caudal side; 11, caudal termination of the transverse ridge closest to the point of maximum curvature along the caudal platform margin on the caudal side; 12, rostral termination of the most dorsal transverse ridge on the rostral side; 13, caudal termination of the most dorsal transverse ridge on the rostral side; 14, rostral termination of the most dorsal transverse ridge on the caudal side; 15, caudal termination of the most dorsal transverse ridge on the caudal side; 16, dorsal tip of the element; 17, midpoint along the rostral adcarinal ridge; 18, midpoint along the caudal adcarinal ridge.
Fig. 7. Geometric morphometric analyses. A. Principal Component Analysis. B in Early steps in the radiation of notoungulate mammals in southern South America: A new henricosborniid from the Eocene of Patagonia
Fig. 7. Geometric morphometric analyses. A. Principal Component Analysis. B. Canonical Variate Analysis.
Fig. 4 in Taxonomic implications of morphometric analysis of earless seal limb bones
Fig. 4. Results of PCA for the femur measurement data, including extant and fossil earless seal taxa. A. PC1 vs. PC2. B. PC3 vs. PC4.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.