Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 7. Volunteers contribute directly to conservation efforts by helping to remove trees that are obstructing sun penetration to nests or hibernation sites (Fig. 7a), or taking data on snake behavior (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 6 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 6. Volunteers of all ages are involved in our Pine Snake research, and the handling and measuring of snakes contributes to their education, and results in their providing information about conservation to their families, friends, classmates, and others. Following hibernation studies, the children (and adults) put the snakes back into their hibernation chambers.

Fig. 4 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 4. Female Pine Snakes sometimes remain in their nests for several days after egg-laying is complete, perhaps protecting their clutch from being disrupted by other females that lay in the same nest.

Fig. 2 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 2. Female Northern Pine Snakes dig their own nests in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, although in the southern part of their range they do not do so. They bend their neck such that the head forms a scoop capable of bringing sand out the entrance (Fig 2a). While digging their body is hidden below ground, and the dump pile of sand is visible (and serves to attract poachers; Fig 2b).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2012View details →

Fig. 5 in Short-term survival of ammonites in New Jersey after the end-Cretaceous bolide impact

Fig. 5. Ammonite aptychi (= jaws) in the matrix of the Burrowed Unit. A, D. Lower jaws attributed to Eubaculites. A. AMNH 69496, right valve. D. AMNH 69492, view of right valve (D1), close−up of aptychus at the anterior end (D2). B, C. Lower jaws attributed to Discoscaphites. B. AMNH 69497, left valve. C. AMNH 69498, left valve.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2012View details →

Fig. 4 in Short-term survival of ammonites in New Jersey after the end-Cretaceous bolide impact

Fig. 4. Clay pods in the matrix of the Burrowed Unit adjacent to burrows, Monmouth County, New Jersey, probably reworked from the Pinna Layer, and piped down into the Burrowed Unit. A–D. Single pod adjacent to a burrow. A. Overview. B. Eubaculites latecarinatus (Brunnschweiler, 1966), AMNH 66312 in left lateral view (B1); whorl cross−section at adoral end showing a specimen of Eubaculites telescoped inside (B2). C. Heteropora americana Richards, 1962, AMNH 51309; without any sediment in the zooids. D. Eubaculites sp., hollow specimen, AMNH 66313; view of hollow chambers (D1), close−up of septum (D2). E. Eubaculites sp. in another clay pod adjacent to a burrow, AMNH 66314; septal face (E1), close−up of septal neck (E2).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2012View details →

Fig. 1 in Short-term survival of ammonites in New Jersey after the end-Cretaceous bolide impact

Fig. 1. Stratigraphic section in the Manasquan River Basin, Monmouth County, New Jersey. A. The top of the Tinton Formation consists of the Pinna Layer overlain by the Burrowed Unit, which is overlain, in turn, by the Hornerstown Formation. An enriched concentration of iridium occurs at the base of the Pinna Layer (indicated by the stars). The position of the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in this figure is based on the assumption that the enriched concentration of iridium is in place. B. Iridium profile from two sites (represented by the solid and dashed lines) in the Manasquan River Basin (Landman et al. 2007a). C. Map of part of New Jersey showing localities mentioned in the text: 1, Manasquan River Basin; 2, Buck's Pit; 3, Ivanhoe Creek.

Fig. 8 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 8. Lateral view of mesosoma and petiole, as preserved, of holotype worker of †Haidomyrmex cerberus Dlussky (NHML In.20182).

Fig. 9 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 9. Holotype worker of †Myanmyrma gracilis, new genus and species (AMNH Bu014); facial view and general habitus.

Fig. 6 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 6. Two workers of †Sphecomyrma freyi Wilson and Brown preserved in a single piece of New Jersey amber (AMNH NJ943).

Fig. 5 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 5. Holotype worker of †Sphecomyrma mesaki, new species (AMNH NJ1023); lateral habitus and facial view.

Figs. 1–3. Three Cretaceous amber ants. 1 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figs. 1–3. Three Cretaceous amber ants. 1. †Myanmyrma gracilis, new genus and species (AMNH Bu014) in Burmese amber. 2. †Cananeuretus occidentalis, new genus and species (TMP 8.89.7) in Canadian amber. 3. †Sphecomyrmodes orientalis, new genus and species (AMNH Bu351) in Burmese amber.

Fig. 4 in Primitive New Ants in Cretaceous Amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 4. Holotype worker of †Sphecomyrmodes orientalis, new genus and species (AMNH Bu351); general habitus, sting, clypeal margin and mandibles, and antenna.

Fig. 8 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 8. Mandibles of Hypuronector: A, AMNH 2080, left mandible, medial view and associated caudal vertebrae from Granton Quarry; B, close up of mandible in A.; C, YPM 56388, lateral and medial views of negatively prepared specimen. Abbreviations are: d, dentary; ang, angular; ar, articular; sa, surangular;?sp,? splenial. Photograph by P. Olsen.

Fig. 5 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 5. Measured sections at Granton Quarry and the Weehawken quarry at Kings Bluff showing the distribution of various taxa including Hypuronector (modified from Olsen, 1980).

Fig. 9 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 9. Examples of vertebrae of Hypuronector (scale bar 1 mm): A, three associated caudal vertebrae with chevrons (YPM 56390); B, early stages of negative preparation of caudal vertebra and partial chevron (YPM 56389) showing matrix filling notochordal cones (c), shown reversed; C, same vertebra as B, fully prepared; D, negatively prepared, obliquely preserved caudal vertebra and partial chevron (YPM 56391); E, reconstruction of specimen in D; F, three cervical vertebrae in dorsal view (AMNH 7755); G, two successive caudal vertebrae and chevrons from the holotype (AMNH 7759); H, proximal caudal vertebra and chevron in anterior view (YPM 8641); I, isolated caudal vertebra and chevron (YPM 56387); J, isolated sacral vertebra in anterior view (YPM 56392).

Fig. 4 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 4. Weehawken Quarry in Nursery Member of Lockatong Formation. A, Aerial photograph of Kings Bluff area, Weehawken, N.J. showing the location of the Weehawken quarry (box), opened for Lockatong vertebrates; illumination is from the bottom (east) during morning rush hour (photo courtesy William K. Sacco, 1978). B, The Weehawken Quarry in 1979 showing three cycles of the Nursery Member, including cycle W5 that produced abundant disarticulated Hypuronector (arrow) (photo courtesy of Amy R. McCune, 1979); people are, from left to right, Keith Stewart Thomson, Donald Baird, and Paul E. Olsen.

Fig. 1 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 1. Location of Hypuronector limnaios within the Newark Supergroup (A) and within the Newark basin of the Newark Supergroup (B). A, Map of the Newark Supergroup showing the outcropping basins. Major basins other than the Newark basin are: 1, Gettysburg basin; 2, Culpeper basin; 3, Dan River basin; 4, Deep River basin; 5, Richmond basin and associated Taylorsville basin to north; 6, Farmville and associated basins to south; 7, Hartford basin; 8, Fundy basin. Adapted from Olsen et al. (1996). B, Detailed map of Weehawken to Edgewater, New Jersey, area showing bedrock geology at major Hypuronector localities; based on Olsen (1980), Parker (1993), and Drake et al. (1996).

Fig. 12 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 12. Pelvic girdle of Hypuronector; photograph (A) and drawing (B) of AMNH 7159. p, pubioischiatic plate; il, ilium; lf, left femur; rf, right femur. Photograph by Chester Tarka.

Fig. 7 in A New and Unusual Aquatic Reptile from the Lockatong Formation of New Jersey (Late Triassic, Newark Supergroup)

Fig. 7. Additional Granton Quarry specimens of Hypuronector. A, AMNH 1721, ventral view of trunk and left lateral view of crushed pectoral girdle. B, AMNH 7205, partial trunk, pelvic girdle, and proximal caudal vertebrae. C and D, AMNH 1998, unprepared part and counterpart of midcaudal vertebrae. Photographs by Chester Tarka, except for C and D by Julius Weber (courtesy of G. Case).