Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in Genetic variability and population structure of some Iranian Salvia limbata C. A. Mey. populations

Figure 4. UPGMA tree of the studied populations and their members according to ISSR data (numbers indicated the populations based on Table 1).

Figure 2 in Genetic variability and population structure of some Iranian Salvia limbata C. A. Mey. populations

Figure 2. PCA plot of the evaluated populations and their individuals (numbers indicated populations according to Table 1).

Figure 7 in Genetic variability and population structure of some Iranian Salvia limbata C. A. Mey. populations

Figure 7. Reticulation dendrogram of the studied populations that indicating gene flow among. Abbreviations: Arak (1- 3), Sangak (4-6), Semnan (7-9), Vidar (10-12), Ahovan (13-15), Zarandiyeh (16-18), Ghoochan (19-21) and Lashkarak (22-24).

Figure 1 in Genetic variability and population structure of some Iranian Salvia limbata C. A. Mey. populations

Figure 1. Distribution map of the investigated populations of S. limbata (numbers indicated populations according to Table 1).

Fig. 4 in Drainage Network Morphology Influences Population Structure and Gene Flow of the Andean Water Frog (Anura: Telmatobiidae) of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.

Fig. 4. Results of the Geneland analysis. A: Bar plot of posterior probability density according to the number of clusters; B: posterior probability maps for the delimited clusters.

Fig. 3 in Drainage Network Morphology Influences Population Structure and Gene Flow of the Andean Water Frog (Anura: Telmatobiidae) of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.

Fig. 3. Pairwise FST between localities of Telmatobius pefauri obtained using mitochondrial (A) and microsatellite (B) data. The colour scale corresponding to the values of FST is shown to the right of each matrix. Significant (Bonferroni corrected) comparisons showing p <0.05, p <0.01 and p <0.001 are denoted by *, ** and ***, respectively.

Fig. 2 in Drainage Network Morphology Influences Population Structure and Gene Flow of the Andean Water Frog (Anura: Telmatobiidae) of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.

Fig. 2. Median-joining network based on the fragment of the analysed control region. Table 1. Indices of mitochondrial diversity, nuclear diversity, and inbreeding coefficients (FIS) by locality

Fig. 1 in Drainage Network Morphology Influences Population Structure and Gene Flow of the Andean Water Frog (Anura: Telmatobiidae) of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.

Fig. 1. Study area, distribution of Telmatobius pefauri. Localities, 1: Socoroma (Socoroma River); 2: Murmuntani; 3: Copaquilla; 4: Chapiquiña; 5: Belén; 6: Lupica; 7: Saxamar. Localities 2 and 3 belong to the Seco River drainage; localities 4–7 belong to the Tignamar River drainage. Basin limits are indicated with dashed lines. The inset map shows the study area (highlighted by a red box) in relation to South America. SAAD = South American Arid Diagonal.

Fig. 5 in Drainage Network Morphology Influences Population Structure and Gene Flow of the Andean Water Frog (Anura: Telmatobiidae) of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.

Fig. 5. Scatter plot for the first two principal components obtained in the Principal Components Analysis using SSR data.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →

Fig. 3. The genetic distances among populations. A in Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Bush Cricket (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) in Southern China.

Fig. 3. The genetic distances among populations. A: based on Kimura's 2-parameter; B: based on Tamura 3-parameter.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Fig. 3 in Genetic Structure of the Mangrove Killifish Costa, 2011 (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei) Supports A Wide Connection among its Populations.

Fig. 3. Haplotype network of the Kryptolebias marmoratus species group. Maps represent the distribution of each group.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Fig. 3 in Genetic Structure of the Mangrove Killifish Costa, 2011 (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei) Supports A Wide Connection among its Populations.

Fig. 2. Distribution of K. hermaphroditus: Orange star indicates type locality; and Green circles indicate recorded localities for the species (Costa 2011; 2016; Sarmento-Soares et al. 2014; Lira et al. 2015; Berbel-Filho et al. 2016; Guimarães-Costa et al. 2017; Tatarenkov et al. 2017a; This study).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Fig. 3 in Genetic Structure of the Mangrove Killifish Costa, 2011 (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei) Supports A Wide Connection among its Populations.

Fig. 1. Kryptolebias hermaphroditus from Tutóia, Maranhão State, Delta do Parnaíba, north eastern Brazil; UFRJ12666: A: Hermaphrodite, 35.5 mm SL; B: Male, 20.3 mm SL; C: Male, 28.9 mm SL.

Fig. 5 in Population structure of the soft tick Ornithodoros maritimus and its associated infectious agents within a colony of its seabird host Larus michahellis

Fig. 5. Spatial autocorrelation in the total tick number of counted nests, measured as Moran's I, across three distance classes: a, 1st visit; b, 2nd visit; c, 3rd visit; d, 4th visit; e, 5th visit; f, 6th visit. Circles indicate the autocorrelation coefficients. The same results were obtained with female count numbers.

Fig. 2 in Population structure of the soft tick Ornithodoros maritimus and its associated infectious agents within a colony of its seabird host Larus michahellis

Fig. 2. Histogram presenting the mean number of ticks observed in all nests over time. Bars represent mean standard errors of the total number of ticks.

Fig. 3 in Population structure of the soft tick Ornithodoros maritimus and its associated infectious agents within a colony of its seabird host Larus michahellis

Fig. 3. Boxplot representations of tick numbers in counted and collected nests over time: a, females only; b, males only; c, nymphs. The box shows the median as a line across the middle and the quartiles (25th and 75th percentiles) at either end. Extremities represent the minimal and maximal values and circles represent outliers.

Fig. 1 in Population structure of the soft tick Ornithodoros maritimus and its associated infectious agents within a colony of its seabird host Larus michahellis

Fig. 1. Map showing the position of the 30 tracked nests on Carteau Island, in the Camargue region of France (represented by the red point on the bottom right map). Orange points represent the 15 nests in which ticks were counted and released. The green points are those nests where all ticks were counted and collected. Stars within the points represent the nests in which ticks were used for the screening of infectious agents. Boxes indicate the number of ticks screened and the detected infectious agents: Ana: Anaplasma spp.; Bab: Babesia spp.; Bar: Bartonella spp.; Bor: Borrelia spp.; Cox: Coxiella-like symbiont; Fra: Francisella-like symbiont; Ri: Rickettsia helvetica; Ri-like: Rickettsia-like symbiont. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 4 in Population structure of the soft tick Ornithodoros maritimus and its associated infectious agents within a colony of its seabird host Larus michahellis

Fig. 4. Spatial autocorrelation in total tick number estimated by Moran's I (Sokal and Oden, 1978). Data are from the first visit in the colony and include nests of both treatments. Ten distance classes representing 10 m between marked nests have been defined. No index value was significantly different from zero. The same results were obtained using female count data only (results not shown).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Parasite community structure as a predictor of host population structure: An example using Callorhinchus capensis

Fig. 3. Randomized individual-based species accumulation curve of parasites infecting Callorhinchus capensis (n = 259) caught off the West and South Coasts of South Africa between 2010 and 2015.