Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 2. Photosynthetic rate – A in Does silicon help to alleviate water deficit stress and in the recovery of Dipteryx alata seedlings?

Figure 2. Photosynthetic rate – A (a), intracellular CO concentration – C (b), transpiration – E (c), stomatal conductance – gs (d), intrinsic 2 i Rubisco A/C i carboxylation efficiency (e) and efficiency of water use – WUE (f) in D. alata seedlings produced under different water regimes (I: Irrigated; II: combined intermittent irrigation without and with 0.75 and 1. Si) in different evaluation periods (T0: zero time; P0: photosynthesis close to zero; REC: recovery: END: end of evaluations). Capital letters compare water regimes within each assessment period (Tukey; p <0.05); Lowercase letters compare the evaluation periods within each water regime. (Tukey; p <0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 2 in Root deformation affects mineral nutrition but not leaf gas exchange and growth of Genipa americana seedlings during the recovery phase after soil flooding

Figure 2. Concentrations of P in leaves for G. americana seedlings without or with root deformation (RD) after 28 days of soil drainage (recovery). N = 3. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey's test (p <0.05). Capital letters represent comparisons water effects within root conditions and lower case letters represent comparisons of roots effects within water conditions.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 1 in Root deformation affects mineral nutrition but not leaf gas exchange and growth of Genipa americana seedlings during the recovery phase after soil flooding

Figure 1. Four months old seedlings of G. americana without (A) and with (B) root deformation (RD) caused by errors in the pricking out process, and a detail of the RD (C).

Figure 8 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 8. Results for the long-term approach to future status. Equilibrium abundance relative to carrying capacity is shown for Sobs ¼ 10 and a range of multipliers of current levels of 2013 vessels. The model was projected forward 100 yr for each posterior sample under a constant multiplier (x-axis value). Model trajectories are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles. The probability that the population is depleted (i.e., below 60% of K) is shown as a curved line. The solid vertical line denotes the median ratio of vessels in 2050 to 2013, i.e., the multiplier in 2050 estimated by our vessel model.

Figure 7 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 7. Results of the short-term approach to future status. Future ship strikes, abundances, and abundances relative to carrying capacity for Sobs ¼ 10 are shown for three mitiga2013 tion cases (columns). Model trajectories are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles. "Status quo" means no additional mitigation, "mitigation" refers to halving the ship strikes after 2013, and "none" is a complete elimination of future ship strikes. The horizontal lines at 0.6 denote the level below which the population is considered depleted.

Figure 4 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 4. Posterior densities for the abundance relative to carrying capacity in 2013 for Sobs ¼ 10 (top) and Sobs ¼ 35 (bottom) and the two priors for r. The vertical line at 0.6 2013 2013 denotes the level below which the population is considered depleted.

Figure 6 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 6. Absolute abundance, the abundance estimates and anthropogenic mortalities for Sobs ¼ 10 and the two priors for r. The rectangles at the bottom denote total estimated mor2013 talities (median catches + median strikes) for each year. The five abundance estimates (points) are shown with their 95% confidence intervals (bars). Model trajectories are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles.

Figure 2 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 2. Results of the vessel model. The points are data from worldwide statistics for vessels over 100 gross tons from Lloyd's of London, as used in Laist et al. (2001). Model trajectories are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles.

Figure 1 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 1. Prior and marginal posterior probability distributions for the parameters of the theta-logistic population dynamics model for Sobs ¼ 10 and both priors for r (columns).

Figure 3 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 3. Results of the ship strike model. Predicted ship strikes for the uninformative prior for r and observed ship strikes in 2013 as 10 or 35. Annual trajectories (panels A and B) are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles. Panels C and D show the posterior distributions of strikes in 2013 (histogram) as well as the Poisson likelihood (line).

Figure 5 in Do ship strikes threaten the recovery of endangered eastern North Pacific blue whales?

Figure 5. Trajectories for Abundance relative to carrying capacity for Sobs ¼ 10 and both 2013 priors for r. Model trajectories are shown as filled gray areas representing the 0.95, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 posterior percentiles. The horizontal lines at 0.6 denote the level below which the population is considered depleted.

Fig. 12 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 12. Representatives of Wuchiapingian ammonoids from the Hambast Formation of Abadeh, Central Iran. A. Pseudogastrioceras abichianum (Möller, 1879), DVGI, no. 10/850 (most likely Clarkina leveni Zone). B. Paraceltitites sp., DVGI, no. 1/850 (most likely Clarkina transcaucasica Zone): right lateral (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. Paratirolites waageni (Stoyanov, 1910), DVGI no. 11/850 (Hambast Formation, upper Member 7), late Dorashamian Paratirolites kittli Zone.

Fig. 10 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 10. Ammonoids suture lines from lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, south Primorye. A. Ceratitid Inyoites sedini sp. nov., DVGI 1/851 (holotype). Suture line, height 21.2 mm (A1); whorl cross−section, height 21.1 mm (A2). B. Suture line of phylloceratid Subbalhaeceras shigetai gen. and sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype). Abbreviations: L, lateral lobe; U, umbilical lobe; V, ventral lobe.

Fig. 7 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 7. Mangyshlak, Kazakhstan: temporal ranges of ammonoid genera of the upper Olenekian. Abbreviation: Reg. Series, Regional Series.

Fig. 1 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 1. Study areas: 1, Iran−Transcaucasia area; 2, Siberia and northern Russian Far East; 3, southern Russian Far East (South Primorye and Amur River); 4, Mangyshlak, Kazakhstan.

Fig. 2 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 2. View of the Permian–Triassic sequences of the section from the Wuchiapingian–Changhsingian Hambast (H) Formation to latest Changhsigian– Induan Elikah (E) Formation at the Hambast region, 28 km to south−western of the village of Abaraku, Abadeh, Central Iran.

Fig. 8 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 8. Suture lines of some Prolecanitida. A. Mesohedenstroemia olgae sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), height 18.4 mm; Lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, south Primorye. B, C. Hedenstroemia tscherskii (Popov, 1961). Lower Olenekian, Lepiskites kolymensis Zone; Kenyelichi River, Kolyma River basin. B. DVGI 256−3b, height 60.0 mm (B1) and 73.0 mm (B2). C. DVGI 255−19c, height 73.0 mm. Abbreviations: D, dorsal lobe; I, inner lateral lobe; L, lateral lobe; U, umbilical lobe; V, ventral lobe.

Fig. 11 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 11. Suggested phylogenetic relationships in the Changhsingian–Olenekian goniatitid, prolecanitid, ceratitid, and phylloceratid ammonoid superfamilies and families.

Fig. 9 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 9. Some Early Olenekian Prolecanitida, Ceratitida, and Phylloceratida from Lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, South Primorye. A. Prolecantid Mesohedenstroemia olgae sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), right lateral (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. Ceratitid Inyoites sedini sp. nov., DVGI 1/851 (holotype). C. Phylloceratid Subbalhaeceras shigetai gen. and sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), right lateral (C1), left lateral (C2), ventral (C3) views.