Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Diversity and taxonomy of the Late Triassic sauropodomorphs (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha) stored in the Palaeontological Collection of Tübingen, Germany, historically referred to Plateosaurus

Fig. 7 (see next page). Holotype of Plateosaurus 'quenstedti' described by von Huene (1907) and illustrated on the reconstruction of Plateosaurus 'quenstedti' redrawn from von Huene (1907: pl. 102). A. GPITPV-60168, atlas in ventral view. B. GPIT-PV-60162, axis in left lateral view. C. GPIT-PV-60164, cervical 5 in left lateral view. D. GPIT-PV-60156, centrum of putative cervical 6 in right lateral view. E. GPITPV-60155, partial cervical 8 in left lateral view. F. GPIT-PV-60154, anterior dorsal (presumed dorsal 4) in left lateral view. G. GPIT-PV-60152, left scapula in medial view. H. GPIT-PV-60159, postzygapophyses attached to the prezygapophyses of dorsal vertebra (presumed dorsal 14) in posterior view. I. GPITPV-60153, right pubis in anterior view. J. GPIT-PV-60151, left femur, reconstructed shaft, in posterior view. K. GPIT-PV-60172, right ulna in anterolateral view. L. GPIT-PV-60163, left ulna in anterolateral view. M. GPIT-PV-60150, proximal half of the right femur in posterior view. N. GPIT-PV-60170, left fibula in lateral view. O. GPIT-PV-60165, proximal and distal ends of metatarsal II in posterior view. P. GPIT-PV-60171, proximal and distal ends of metatarsal III in posterior view. Q. GPIT-PV-60161, pedal ungual III with distal end of phalanx III.3 in lateral view. R. GPIT-PV-60157, phalanx, presumed pedal phalanx IV.2 in dorsal view. S. GPIT-PV-60158, phalanx, possibly pedal phalanx IV.3 in dorsal view. The human skeleton represents a height of 1.75 m, as originally drawn by von Huene (1907: pl. 102), the relative size of the reconstructed sauropodomorph is 2 m. Reconstruction and photographs made by the authors, with photos taken on the labelled side or on the side that was illustrated in the past.

Fig. 24 in Diversity and taxonomy of the Late Triassic sauropodomorphs (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha) stored in the Palaeontological Collection of Tübingen, Germany, historically referred to Plateosaurus

Fig. 24 (see next page). Skeletal elements of specimen GPIT-PV-30784 historically known as "GPIT I". A–B. GPIT-PV-111840, skull. A. In left lateral view. B. In right lateral view. C. GPIT-PV-60260, hyoid bones. D. GPIT-PV-60336, sternal plates. E. GPIT-PV-60223, six distal caudals with chevrons. F. GPIT- PV-60256, half of a distal caudal. G. GPIT-PV-60223, four distal caudals with chevrons. H. GPIT- PV-60257, capitulum and tuberculum of left dorsal 15. I. GPIT-PV-60274, manual phalanx. J. GPIT- PV-60275, manual phalanx. K. GPIT-PV-60276, manual phalanx. L. GPIT-PV-60339, ungual I.1. M. GPIT-PV-60254, distal tarsal. N. GPIT-PV-60253, manual phalanx. O. GPIT-PV-60277, manual phalanx. P. GPIT-PV-60278, manual phalanx. Q. GPIT-PV-60337, manual phalanges V.1 and V.2. R. GPIT-PV-60338, distal carpal. S. Mounted skeleton, photograph taken in the ca 1960 (archive photo UAT 678/73); the skull on display is a cast from the skull of specimen SMNS 13200.

Fig. 16 in Diversity and taxonomy of the Late Triassic sauropodomorphs (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha) stored in the Palaeontological Collection of Tübingen, Germany, historically referred to Plateosaurus

Fig. 16 (see next page). Material from Aixheim referred to as Teratosaurus 'suevicus'. The holotype of T. suevicus Mayer, 1861 is a right maxilla currently stored in the Natural History Museum of London (NHMUK PV OR 38646). Dashed lines refer to elements that cannot be unequivocally linked to the anatomical position suggested in von Huene's (1907) plates. A. GPIT-PV-60394, fragment of a presumed postzygapophyses from a cervical vertebra in left lateral view. B. GPIT-PV-60374, fragment of a diapophysis of the atlas in left lateral view. C. GPIT-PV-60373, centrum of the anterior dorsal vertebra in left lateral view. D. GPIT-PV-60384, centrum of a presumed posterior dorsal vertebra in left lateral view. E. GPIT-PV-60377, sacral vertebra in posterior view. F. GPIT-PV-60378, sacral vertebra in ventral view. G. GPIT-PV-60382, caudosacral vertebra in left lateral view. H. GPIT-PV-60383, anterior caudal vertebra in left lateral view. I. GPIT-PV-60381, deformed anterior caudal vertebra. J. GPIT-PV-60385, caudal vertebra in left lateral view. K. GPIT-PV-60388, centrum of caudal vertebra in right lateral view. L. GPIT-PV-60389, centrum of caudal vertebra in left lateral view. M. GPIT-PV-60387, centrum of caudal vertebra in left lateral view. N. GPIT-PV-60386, centrum of caudal vertebra in left lateral view. O. GPIT-PV-60397, centrum of caudal vertebra in left lateral view. P. GPIT-PV-60376, left metacarpal I in anterior view. Q. GPIT-PV-60395, fragments, possibly of the left fibula in lateral view. R. GPIT- PV-60396, presumed fragment of the distal left tibia in distal view. S. GPIT-PV-60372, distal tarsal in proximal view. T. GPIT-PV-60369, deformed astragalus in anterior view. U. GPIT-PV-60371, distal tarsal in proximal view. V. GPIT-PV-60370, pedal phalanx III.1 in anterior view. W. GPIT-PV-60366, right metatarsal I in anterior view. X. GPIT-PV-60365, right metatarsal II in anterior view. Y. GPIT- PV-60368, right metatarsal III in anterior view. Z. GPIT-PV-60393, presumed fragment of the proximal right tibia in left lateral view. AA. GPIT-PV-60391, fragments of chevrons, possibly from the anterior caudal vertebrae, in lateral view. AB. GPIT-PV-60364, presumed right ungual I.1, stored in the same compartment, unequivocally identified as such by von Huene (1907). The human skeleton represents a height of 1.75 m, as originally drawn by von Huene (1907: pl. 106), the relative size of the reconstructed sauropodomorph is 4.5 m. Reconstruction and photographs made by the authors, with photos taken on the labelled side or on the side that was illustrated in the past.

Fig. 21 in Diversity and taxonomy of the Late Triassic sauropodomorphs (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha) stored in the Palaeontological Collection of Tübingen, Germany, historically referred to Plateosaurus

Fig. 21 (see next page). Specimen "GPIT 18392", the number which represents not a catalogue number but a number given to the finding during the excavation in 1912. A. GPIT-PV-60507, dorsal vertebra 5. B. GPIT-PV-60509, dorsal vertebra 11. C. GPIT-PV-60508, dorsal vertebrae 12 and 13. D. GPIT- PV-60517, dorsal vertebra 10. E. GPIT-PV-60519, dorsal vertebra. F. GPIT-PV-60518, dorsal vertebra. G. GPIT-PV-60510, sacral vertebra. H. GPIT-PV-60511, dorsal vertebra. I. GPIT-PV-60516, caudal vertebra. J. GPIT-PV-60506, anterior caudal vertebra. K. GPIT-PV-60493, chevron from anterior caudal. L. GPIT-PV-60561, chevron from anterior caudal. M. GPIT-PV-60493, chevron from anterior caudal. N. GPIT-PV-60493, chevron from anterior caudal. O. GPIT-PV-60488, one phalanx, possibly pedal phalanx. P. GPIT-PV-60488, pedal ungual. Q. GPIT-PV-60489, indeterminate remains. R. ribs: a = GPIT- PV-60539, left dorsal rib 7; b = GPIT-PV-60541, right dorsal rib 8; c = GPIT-PV-60540, left cervical 10; d = GPIT-PV-60552, right dorsal rib 4, e = GPIT-PV-60553, right dorsal rib 1; f = GPIT-PV-60554, right dorsal rib 2; g = GPIT-PV-60556, right cervical rib 9; h = GPIT-PV-60558, left dorsal rib 9; i = GPIT- PV-60555, left dorsal rib 12; j = GPIT-PV-60557, left dorsal rib 11; k = GPIT-PV-60543, left dorsal rib 6; l = GPIT-PV-60544, left dorsal rib 10; m = GPIT-PV-60545, left dorsal rib 5; n = GPIT-PV-60546, right dorsal rib 10; o = GPIT-PV-60547, right dorsal rib 9; p = GPIT-PV-60551, right dorsal rib 8; q = GPIT- PV-60550, right dorsal rib 5; r - GPIT-PV-60548, right dorsal rib 7; s = GPIT-PV-60549, right dorsal rib 7. S. GPIT-PV-60566, left fibula. T. GPIT-PV-60490, pedal phalanx. U. GPIT-PV-60488, pedal phalanx. V. GPIT-PV-60500, fragmentary bones: t = bone fragment identified as ʻgʼ in Hungerbühler (1998: fig. 4), u = bone fragment identified as ʻfʼ in Hungerbühler (1998: fig. 4), v = bone fragment identified as ʻeʼ in Hungerbühler (1998: fig. 4), w = bone fragment identified as ʻnʼ in Hungerbühler (1998: fig. 4). W. GPIT- PV-60494, pedal phalanx. X. GPIT-PV-60565, right pubis. Y. left femur in two parts, GPIT-PV-60496 (proximal) and GPIT-PV-60495 (distal). Z. GPIT-PV-60563, right ischium. AA. carnivorous teeth that do not belong to sauropodomorphs, GPIT-PV-60491, GPIT-PV-60497, GPIT-PV-60498, GPIT-PV-60499.

Fig. 31 in Diversity and taxonomy of the Late Triassic sauropodomorphs (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha) stored in the Palaeontological Collection of Tübingen, Germany, historically referred to Plateosaurus

Fig. 31 (see next page). Uncatalogued material separated as "Weishampel 1983" in the collection, presumably from the expedition led by von Huene between 1922–1923 to Obere Mühle. A. GPITPV-60210, fragment of a right mandible in medial view. B. GPIT-PV-60225, left maxilla in lateral view. C. GPIT-PV-60224, right maxilla in lateral view. D. GPIT-PV-60214, dorsal vertebra in right lateral view. E. GPIT-PV-60215, dorsal vertebra in right lateral view. F–G. GPIT-PV-60220, anterior caudal vertebra in right lateral view (F) and in dorsal view (G). H. GPIT-PV-60221, anterior caudal vertebra in anterior view and associated fragment. I. GPIT-PV-60222, anterior caudal vertebra in left lateral view and associated fragments. J. GPIT-PV-60219, middle caudal vertebra in right lateral view. K. GPIT-PV-60228, middle caudal vertebra in right ventrolateral view. L. GPIT-PV-60229, middle caudal vertebra in right lateral view. M. GPIT-PV-60233, posterior caudal vertebra in right lateral view. N. GPIT-PV-60232, posterior caudal vertebra in right lateral view. O. GPIT-PV-60231, distal caudal vertebra in left lateral view. P. GPIT-PV-60226, left metacarpals I to IV in anterior view. Q. GPIT-PV-60227, right metacarpal II. R. GPIT-PV-60212, left metatarsal IV. S. GPIT-PV-60213, left metatarsal IV. T. GPIT-PV-60217, left metatarsal I. U. GPIT-PV-60265, chevron in lateral view. V. GPIT-PV-60264, chevron in lateral view. W. GPIT-PV-60261, chevron in anterior view. X. GPIT-PV-60262, chevron in anterior view. Y. GPITPV-60261, chevron in lateral view. Z. GPIT-PV-60211, right pubis in anterior view. AA. GPIT-PV-60216, right ilium in lateral view.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

Heterogeneous selectivity and morphological evolution of marine clades during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction

<p>This is a supplementary repository, including the dataset and codes we used in this manuscript. we developed a new method, called DeepMorph to analyze the morphological evolution of six marine clades (i.e., ammonoids, bivalves, brachiopods, gastropods, ostracods, and conodonts  ) during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction events. The taxonomy dataset was uploaded and contains 599 genera and 656 images, spanning from the latest Permian (Changhsingian) to the earliest Triassic (Induan). </p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Fig. 1. A in The first ornithosuchid from Brazil and its macroevolutionary and phylogenetic implications for Late Triassic faunas in Gondwana

Fig. 1. A. Location map of the Janner site and the surface distribution of the geologic units in the area (modified from Müller et al. 2017). B. Stratigraphic column of the Janner site (modified from Da-Rosa 2015) depicting its fossiliferous content: 1, Exaeretodon; 2, Hyperodapedon; 3, Pampadromaeus; 4, Trucidocynodon; 5, Bagualosaurus; and 6, the new ornithosuchid.

FIGURE 5 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 5 Histological growth of the aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae on the example of the humerus UOPB 00120 (A-H). Pictures A, C, E and H were taken under normal transmitted light and pictures B, D, and F-G were taken under polarized light. Scale bars represent 1 cm for specimen A, 100 micrometres for specimens B-C, and 500 micrometres for specimens D-H. Abbreviations: eb = endosteal bone, ec = erosion cavity, hpfb = higher organized parallel-fibered bone, lpfb = lower organized parallelfibered bone, mc = medullary cavity, mr = medullary region, pos = primary osteon, sos = secondary osteon, subc = sub cycles, svc = simple vascular canal.

FIGURE 2 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 2 Morphology of the studied humeri of the phytosaurs Parasuchus cf. arenaceus UOPB 00145 (A-D), and the aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae UOBS 01906 (E-H). A and E in ventral view; B and F in dorsal view; C and G in proximal view; D and H in distal view. The arrows point to the histological plane of sectioning. Scale bars represent 5 cm for each specimen.

FIGURE 1 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 1 Morphology of the studied femora of the phytosaurs Parasuchus cf. arenaceus UOPB 00143 (A-D), and Nicrosaurus sp. SMNS 4381/2 (E-G), and the aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae UOPB 00122 (H-K). A, E and H in lateral view; B, F and I in medial view; C, G and J in proximal view; D and K in distal view. The arrows point to the histological plane of sectioning. Scale bars represent 5 cm for each specimen.

FIGURE 4 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 4 Histological growth of the phytosaurs Parasuchus cf. arenaceus on the example of the humerus UOPB 00145 (A-D) and the Nicrosaurus sp. femur SMNS 4381/2. Pictures A, C, E-F and H were taken under normal transmitted light and pictures B, D and G were taken under polarized light. Scale bars represent 1 cm for specimens A and E, 500 micrometres for specimens B-C, F-H and 100 micrometres for specimen D. Abbreviations: eb = endosteal bone, ec = erosion cavity, hpfb = higher organized parallel-fibered bone, LAG = Line of Arrested Growth, lpfb = lower organized parallel-fibered bone, mc = medullary cavity, mrl = multiple resting lines, pos = primary osteon, sos = secondary osteon, svc = simple vascular canal, tr = trabecular region.

FIGURE 7 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 7 Growth pattern of the sectioned aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae humeri (A: UOPB 00135, B: UOPB 00120, C: UOBS 02496, D: UOBS 02363, E: UOBS 01906, F: UOPB 00136, G: UOPB 00142, H: UOPB 00121, I: UOBS 02828, and J: UOPB 00137). Half of the picture is taken under normal transmitted light and the other picture half is taken under polarized light. Please note, that the normally transmitted picture does not show informative histological features. The coloured bars show preserved and counted cycles (zone and annulus). Specimen A-B and H preserve four growth cycles, specimen C, E, G, and I preserve three growth cycles, specimen D and J preserve two growth cycles and specimen F preserved six growth cycles. The arrows in specimens A-C, E, and H-J indicate sub-cycles. Humeri are arranged accordingly to their bone length. Scale bar represents 1 cm for each specimen.

FIGURE 3 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 3 Mid-diaphyseal cross-sections of all sectioned specimens showing the bone microanatomy of the phytosaurs Parasuchus cf. arenaceus femora (A: UOPB 00143, B: UOPB 01026, C: UOBS 03370 and humerus (D: UOPB 00145), and Nicrosaurus sp. femur (E: SMNS 4381/2), the aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae femora (F: UOPB 00122, G: UOPB 00123) and humeri (H: UOPB 00135, I: UOPB 00120, J: UOBS 02496, K: UOBS 02363, L: UOBS 01906, M: UOPB 00136, N: UOPB 00142, O: UOPB 00121, P: UOBS 02828, and Q: UOPB 00137). Taxa are arranged accordingly to their bone length. Scale bar represents 1 cm for each specimen.

FIGURE 6 in Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental inFluence on growth pattern

FIGURE 6 Growth pattern of the sectioned phytosaurs Parasuchus cf. arenaceus femora (A: UOPB 00143, B: UOPB 01026, C: UOBS 03370) and humerus (D: UOPB 00145) and Nicrosaurus sp. (E: SMNS 4381/2). Half of the picture is taken under normal transmitted light and the other picture half is taken under polarized light. Please note, that the normally transmitted picture does not show informative histological features. The coloured bars show preserved and counted cycles (zone and annulus). Specimen A preserves five growth cycles, specimen B, C and D preserve six growth cycles, and specimen E preserves four growth cycles. Taxa are arranged accordingly to their bone length. Scale bar represents 1 cm for each specimen.

Fig. 4 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 4 - Paleogeographic distribution of the conodont Chiosella timorensis around the Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic boundary (based on Map 48 from Scotese, 2014): Numbers of figured occurrences are those from Fig. 3. A – Tethys occurrences; B – Panthalassa occurrences; C – Arctic occurrences, uncertain; D and E – primary location of allochthonous occurrences in Japanese Islands and Far East Russia, and their tectonic transport pathways. 1 - Chios, Greece; 2 - Perşani Mountains; 3 - Capelluzzo, Southern Apennines; 4 - Sosio Valley, Sicilia; 5 - Kçira, Albania; 6 - Deşli Caira, Romania; 7 - Gebze, Turkey; 8 - Wadi Alwa, Oman; 9 - Salt Range, Pakistan; 10 - Dolpo, Nepal; 11- Spiti, India; 12 - Kashmir, India; 13 - Southeastern Pamirs, Tajikistan; 14 – Tulong and Dibucuo, Tibet; 15 - South China, Guandao, Ganheqiao, Qingyan; 16 -South China, Wantou and Youping; 17 - Kodiang, Malaysia; 18 - Western Thailand; 19 - Kamura and Taho-attol carbonates; 20 - Honshu Island-pelagic chert; 21 - Koryak Upland; 22 - Zyryanka, Kolyma river; 23 - Dalnegorsk, Sikhote-Alin; 24 - Chernaya River, South Primorye; 25 - Mount Lilu, Timor-Leste; 26 - Nifukoko, West Timor; 27 - Western Australia, Carnarvon, Perth & Canning basins; 28 - Northwestern Nevada; 29 - Great Valley, California; 30 - Sheep Creek, Idaho; 31 - Ursula Creek and Subsurface British Columbia; 32 - Quesnellia; 33 - Stikinia; 34 - Brooks Range, Alaska; 35 - Svalbard.

Fig. 3 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 3 - Present-day geographic distribution of the conodont Chiosella timorensis occurrences and basic references. A – Tethys-originating occurrences (1-18, 25-27); B – Panthalassa-originating occurrences (19-24, 28-33; C – Arctic occurrences, uncertain (34-35). Europe: 1 - Chios, Greece (Nicora, 1977; Assereto et al., 1980); 2 - Perşani Mountains, Romania (Mirăuţă & Gheorghian, 1978); 3 - Capelluzzo, Southern Apennines, Italy (Mietto et al., 1991); 4 - Sosio Valley, Sicilia, Italy (Kozur et al.,1995); 5 - Kçira, Albania (Muttoni et al., 1996, 2019); 6 - Deşli Caira, Romania (Grădinaru et al., 2007; Orchard et al., 2007a); Southwest Asia: 7 - Gebze, Turkey (Kiliç, 2021); 8 - Wadi Alwa, Oman (Orchard, 1994a); Himalayas: 9 - Salt Range, Pakistan (Sweet 1970a, 1973); 10 - Dolpo, west Nepal (Kovács & Kozur, 1980); 11 - Spiti, India (Krystyn et al., 2007; Sue et al., 2021); Garzanti et al., 1995); 12 - Kashmir, India (Chhabra, 1981; Matsuda, 1983); Central Asia: 13 - Southeastern Pamirs, Tajikistan (Bragin et al., 2016); Eastern Asia: 14 – Tulong and Dibucuo, Tibet (Tian 1982; Chen A-F et al., 2021; Wu G C. et al., 2007); 15 - South China, Guandao (Orchard et al., 2007b), Ganheqiao and Qingyan (Yao et al., 2011); 16 - South China, Wantou and Youping (Chen Y et al., 2020); Southeast Asia: 17 - Kodiang, Malaysia (Koike, 1973, 1982); 18 - Western Thailand (Kemper et al., 1976); Japanese Islands: 19 - Kamura and Taho attol carbonates, Kyushu Island and Shikoku Island (Hirsch & Ishida, 2002; Zhang L et al., 2019a; Ha et al., 2021); 20 - Honshu Island-pelagic chert (Muto et al., 2018; Muto, 2021); Far East Russia: 21 - Koryak Upland (Bragin, 1991); 22 - Zyryanka, Kolyma river; Klets (1998); 23 – Dalnegorsk, Sikhote-Alin (Buryi, 1989, 1997; Klets, 1995); 24 - Chernaya River, South Primorye (Buryi, 1979); Timor-Leste: 25 - Mount Lilu (Nogami, 1968); West Timor: 26 - Nifukoko (Orchard, 1994a); Western Australia: 27 - Carnarvon, Perth & Canning basins (McTavish, 1973; Nicoll et al., 2007; Gorter et al., 2019); Western United States: 28 - Northwestern Nevada (Collinson & Hasenmueller, 1978; Orchard, 1994a; Paull & Paull, 1998; Goudemand et al., 2012); 29 - Great Valley, California (Wardlaw & Jones, 1980); 30 - Sheep Creek, Idaho (Paull, 1988); Western Canada: 31 - Ursula Creek, British Columbia (Orchard & Tozer, 1997a); Subsurface British Columbia (Golding, 2014, 2021b); 32 - Quesnellia (Orchard & Tozer, 1997a); 33 - Stikinia (Orchard & Tozer, 1997a); Arctic North America: 34 - Brooks Range, Alaska (Wardlaw & Jones, 1980). Arctic Europe: 35 - Svalbard (Nakrem et al., 2008).

Fig. 2 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 2 - Suggested Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic chronostratigraphy and the presumed OAB, marked in blue, are added to the Chinese Wantou section (Chen Y et al., 2020, fig. 3), based on the re-interpretation of conodont events.

Fig. 5 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 5 - Chronostratigraphic calibration and the Spathian-Aegean/Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic boundary in the Deşli Caira section, Romania. Conodont biochronology - (A) after Orchard et al. (2007a), and (B) after Golding (2021). The boundary is constrained by the ammonoid biochronology – (C) after Grădinaru, in Grădinaru & Gaetani (2019). Legend: 1 - thick-bedded limestone; 2 - ammonoid occurrence.

Fig. 4 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 4 - Paleogeographic distribution of the conodont Chiosella timorensis around the Olenekian-Anisian/ Numbers of figured occurrences are those from Fig. 3. A – Tethys occurrences; B – Panthalassa occurrences; C – Arctic occurrences, uncertain; D and E – primary East Russia, and their tectonic transport pathways. 1 - Chios, Greece; 2 - Perşani Mountains; 3 - Capelluzzo, Southern Apennines; 4 - Sosio Valley, Sicilia; 5 - Alwa, Oman; 9 - Salt Range, Pakistan; 10 - Dolpo, Nepal; 11- Spiti, India; 12 - Kashmir, India; 13 - Southeastern China, Guandao, Ganheqiao, Qingyan; 16 -South China, Wantou and Youping; 17 - Kodiang, Malaysia; 18 shu Island-pelagic chert; 21 - Koryak Upland; 22 - Zyryanka, Kolyma river; 23 - Dalnegorsk, Sikhote-Alin 26 - Nifukoko, West Timor; 27 - Western Australia, Carnarvon, Perth & Canning basins; 28 - Northwestern Ursula Creek and Subsurface British Columbia; 32 - Quesnellia; 33 - Stikinia; 34 - Brooks Range, Alaska;

Fig. 1 in The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic Boundary, And Assessment Of The Potential Of Conodonts For Chronostratigraphic Calibration Of The Triassic Timescale

Fig. 1 - Revised Lower-Middle Triassic chronostratigraphy in the Albanian Kçira-A section, marked ord. 1 – ammonoid record in fig. 5 of Muttoni et al. (2019); 2 – conodont record in fig. 4 of Muttoni et fig. 8 of Muttoni et al. (2019). Line A - The Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic boundary in Muttoni et al. (2019), based on proxy for the nominated boundary; Line B - the herein assumed base of the Aegean Substage (AEG), Procarnites kokeni (Arthaber, 1908), with the FO of Ch. timorensis positioned well below the Line B; indicated by Germani et al. (1997); Line D - Bithynian-Pelsonian boundary, as indicated by Germani