Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 9 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 9. Chone sp. SEM analysis. (A) Notochaetae from the second chaetiger; (B, C) thoracic uncini from the second chaetiger; (D) abdominal uncini from the third abdominal chaetiger.

Figure 8 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 8. Chone sp. (A) Entire worm; (B) lateral view of the anterior end; (C) dorsal view of the anterior end; (D) detail of the internal crown structures; (E) radioles showing the development of palmate membrane; (F) thoracic uncinus; (G) abdominal uncini, first chaetigers on the left, last chaetigers on the right; (H) superior thoracic notochaetae; (I) inferior paleate thoracic notochaetae. dl, dorsal lip.

Figure 6 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 6. Euchone (Chiade) sp. (A) Entire worm, dorsal view; (B) entire worm, ventral view; (C) entire worm, lateral view; (D) collar, ventral view; (E) collar, dorsal view; (F) anal depression, dorsal view; (G) anal depression, ventral view; (H) thoracic superior notochaeta and thoracic inferior paleate chaeta; (I) thoracic uncinus; (L) abdominal uncinus from an anterior abdominal chaetiger; (M) abdominal uncinus from chaetigers of the anal depression.

Figure 5 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 5. (A–D, F–H) Euchone rosea: (A) staining pattern of the anterior end, ventral view; (B) ventral view of the anterior end; (C) lateral and ventral views of the anal depression; (D) thoracic uncinus; (F) thoracic inferior paleate chaeta; (G) abdominal uncinus from the anterior abdominal chaetiger chaetiger; (H) abdominal uncinus from the anal depression region. (E) Euchone rubrocincta: thoracic inferior notochaeta.

Figure 4 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 4. Euchone sp. (A) Entire worm without crown; (B) staining pattern of the anterior end, ventral view; (C) collar, dorsal view; (D) lateral view of the anal depression; (E) thoracic superior notochaeta and thoracic inferior paleate chaeta; (F) abdominal uncinus from an anterior abdominal chaetiger; (G) abdominal uncinus from chaetigers of the anal depression.

Figure 2. Euchone pararosea n in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 2. Euchone pararosea n. sp. (A) Staining pattern of the anterior end, ventral view; (B) entire worm; (C) detail of radioles showing the palmate membrane and radiolar tip; (D) collar, dorsal view; (E) frontal view of the anal depression showing lateral wings; (F) lateral view of the anal depression; (G) internal structure of branchial crown after dissection; (H) thoracic uncinus; (I) thoracic superior notochaeta; (L) thoracic inferior paleate chaeta; (M) abdominal uncinus, profile view of anterior abdominal chaetiger; (N) abdominal uncinus from chaetigers of the anal depression. dl, dorsal lip; vl, ventral lip; vpa, ventral pinnular appendage.

Figure 7 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 7. Comparison of thoracic uncini structure in some related sabellin genera having long handle. (A) Type 1 (from Chone duneri); (B) type 2 (from Chone sp.); (C) type 3 (from Chone americana); (D) type 4 (from Amphicorina armandi); (E) scheme of handle orientation found in uncini of types 1–3; (F) scheme of handle orientation found in uncini of types 2–4; (G) SEM photograph of uncini type 1; (H) SEM photograph of uncini type 2.

Figure 10 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 10. One of the equally parsimonious minimum length trees retained. (A) Distribution of character state 53; (B) distribution of character state 6.

Figure 3. Euchone pseudolimnicola n in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 3. Euchone pseudolimnicola n. sp. (A) Staining pattern of the anterior end, ventral view; (B) entire worm; (C) collar, dorsal view; (D) staining pattern of abdominal chaetigers, ventral view; (E) ventral and lateral views of the anal depression; (F) tip of eadioles; (G) internal structure of branchial crown after dissection; (H) abdominal uncini in profile; (I) abdominal uncinus, the first abdominal chaetiger, frontal view; (L) abdominal uncinus from the anal depression region; (M) thoracic uncini; (N) thoracic superior notochaeta; (O) thoracic inferior paleate chaeta. dra, dorsal radiolar appendage; dl, dorsal lip.

Figure 1 in The genus Euchone (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) in the Mediterranean Sea, addition of two new species and discussion on some closely related taxa

Figure 1. Euchone analis. (A) Staining pattern of the anterior end, ventral view; (B) collar, dorsal view; (C) internal structure of branchial crown after dissection; (D) tip of radioles; (E) staining pattern of abdominal chaetigers, ventral view; (F) anal depression; (G) abdominal uncinus from the first abdominal chaetiger; (H) abdominal uncinus from the anal depression region. dl, dorsal lip; vl, ventral lip; dra, dorsal radiolar appendage; vra, ventral radiolar appendages.

Fig. 31 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 31 ff.: Morphological differences between males of A. portosanctana (N = 4) and A. maderensis (N = 13): (e) labrum process width; (f) stigma length; (g) propodeum length.

Fig. 30 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 30 ff.: Morphological differences between females of A. portosanctana (N = 19) and A. maderensis (N = 30): (g) stigma length; (h) propodeum length.

Figs. 25-29 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Figs. 25-29: Male of Andrena maderensis, collected by A. Kratochwil (MA05/38: Madeira, Ponta de São Lourenço, coastal rock, partly ruderalized, 100 m, 32°44'44.01''N, -16°43'20.74''E, Leontodon taraxacoides subsp. longirostris, 26.03.2005); (25) lateral view; (26) dorsal view; (27) head frontal view; genital (28) front view, (29) sideview; photos: L. Haitzinger.

Figs. 1-4 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Figs. 1-4: Syntype of Andrena portosanctana (female) deposited in the California Academy of Science, California, San Francisco, USA (CAS TYPE 15373); (1) lateral view; (2) dorsal view; (3) head frontal view; (4) labels; photos: V. Smith.

Fig. 30 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 30: Morphological differences between females of A. portosanctana (N = 19) and A. maderensis (N = 30): (a) body length; (b) wing length; (c) head length/width index; (d) facial fovea index; (e) clypeal length; (f) labrum process width.

Figure 5 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 5. Box plots of Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distance of 672 bp cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences within and between Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes. Boxes indicate interquartile range (upper line, quartile 3; lower line, quartile 1). Horizontal lines with boxes indicate median and whiskers the minimum and the maximum values. Outliers are shown as individual circles.

Figure 4 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 4. Genetic structure analyses of Camponotus renggeri (yellow) and Camponotus rufipes (red) workers from Mogi- Guaçu (Brazil), using microsatellites. A, model-based assignment of individuals to the most likely number of clusters (K = 2) using STRUCTURE software. B, model-based assignment of individuals to different classes of hybrids or 'pure' species. Each individual is represented by a vertical line and the colours indicate the probability of the individual being assigned to a group in (A), or a hybrid or 'pure species' class in (B). C, scatterplot of the model-free principal coordinates analysis considering the two first principal coordinates (PCo1 and 2).

Figure 2 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 2. Main vegetation physiognomies of the cerrado reserve at Mogi-Guaçu, Brazil. Cerrado sensu stricto consists of a dense scrub of shrubs and trees and a fair amount of herbaceous vegetation, whereas the cerradão is a closed woodland with a reduced ground layer. Nests of Camponotus renggeri (N = 46) were found in cerrado sensu stricto (22%) and cerradão (78%), whereas Camponotus rufipes (N = 40) occurred only in cerrado sensu stricto. Drawing by L. Mota.

Figure 1 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 1. Workers of (A) Camponotus renggeri and (B) Camponotus rufipes. The two species are usually differentiated in the field by nuances in the integument colour (C. renggeri is shiny; C. rufipes is matte), and colour of the legs (yellowish in C. renggeri; reddish in C. rufipes). Photographs courtesy of L. Mota.

Figure 6 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 6. Analyses of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I haplotypes of Camponotus renggeri (yellow) and Camponotus rufipes (red). A, neighbour-joining tree constructed with Kimura two-parameter distances between C. renggeri and C. rufipes with bootstrap support values based on 10 000 replications indicated on each branch. B, median-joining network amongst the obtained haplotypes. Values on the branches represent the numbers of mutational steps distinguishing the haplotypes, represented as circles whose areas are proportional to the number of individuals with that haplotype.