Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 7 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 7. Orthophotomosaic of the Molfetta tracksite produced by the aerial survey performed with the hexacopter.

FIGURE 6 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 6. Comparison of the products generated for the sector including the "L-shaped trace". 1, orthophoto raster map; 2, hillshade raster map; 3, slope raster map; 4, contour lines vector map.

FIGURE 4 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 4. Comparison of the results obtained on a sample area. 1, orthophoto; 2, DEM; 3, slope raster map produced by the quadcopter at flight height of 30 m; 4, orthophoto; 5, DEM; 6, slope raster map produced by the quadcopter at a flight height of 10 m; 7, orthophoto; 8, DEM; 9, slope raster map produced by the hexacopter at a flight height of 15 m.

FIGURE 3 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 3. The UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) used for aerial survey of the tracksite. 1, quadcopter SZ DJI Phantom 4; 2, hexacopter Tarot FY680 Pro.

FIGURE 5 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the products generated for one of the most trampled sector. 1, orthophoto raster map; 2, hillshade raster map; 3, slope raster map; 4, contour lines vector map.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →

Fig. 5 in New information on ornithopod dinosaurs from the Late Jurassic of Portugal

Fig. 5. Cranial material of Ankylopollexia indet. from the Lourinhã municipality, Portugal, Lourinhã Formation, Kimmeridgian–Tithonian. Dentary ML 818, in medial (A1, A5), lateral (A2, A6), and dorsal (A3, A7) views, detail of the dentary/surangular contact (A4, A8).

FIGURE 1 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 1. Locality map showing the San Leonardo quarry tracksite, Apulia, southern Italy. Image obtained using Google Earth Pro.

Figure 4. CMN 59667 in An ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Cenomanian Dunvegan Formation of northeastern British Columbia, Canada

Figure 4. CMN 59667 compared to other ankylosaur dorsal vertebrae. (a) Right lateral view of isolated neural arch of CMN 59667, Ankylosauria indet. (b) Left lateral view of third dorsal vertebra from AMNH 5337, Euoplocephalus tutus. (c) Left lateral view of seventh dorsal vertebra of AMNH 5895, Ankylosaurus magniventris. Abbreviations are as follows: c – centrum; d – diapophysis; ns – neural spine; p – parapophysis; poz – postzygapophysis; prz – prezygapophysis; tp – transverse process.

Figure 2. CMN 59667 in An ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Cenomanian Dunvegan Formation of northeastern British Columbia, Canada

Figure 2. CMN 59667, block including portions of two ankylosaur dorsal vertebrae and two probable ankylosaur ribs. (a) Photograph and (b) interpretive illustration of isolated centrum (lateral view) and isolated neural arch (oblique dorsolateral view). (c) Reverse side of block, showing remains of two ribs and parts of the vertebrae, and (d) interpretive illustration of the same. Abbreviations are as follows: c – centrum; d – diapophysis; ns – neural spine; pz – postzygapophysis; tp – transverse process; r1 – rib 1; r2 – rib 2; ri1 – impression of rib 1.

Figure 1. CMN 59667 in An ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Cenomanian Dunvegan Formation of northeastern British Columbia, Canada

Figure 1. CMN 59667 was collected along the Pine River in northeastern British Columbia, approximately 1.6 km downstream of its junction with the Murray River. Sedimentological and palaeontological features in this area suggest these are outcrops of the upper two-thirds of allomember E of the Dunvegan Formation. (a) Location of the collection site for CMN 59667 in British Columbia, Canada, indicated by a red star (inset map shows location in western Canada). (b) Tetrapodosaurus pes natural cast (RBCM P1473) discovered at this site; anterior is to the right. (c) RBCM P1028, sample with Metasequoia leaf and obovate or elliptical angiosperm leaf with entire margin (leaf morphotype 122; Ash et al., 1999). (d) RBCM P1030, palmately lobed angiosperm leaf (leaf morphotypes 140–143; Ash et al., 1999). (e) Cliff-forming outcrops on the eastern bank of the Pine River, 1.6 km from its junction with the Murray River, as viewed from the west bank. (f) Gymnosperm cone in cross section (not collected), observed on the west bank of the Pine River.

Figure 3 in An ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Cenomanian Dunvegan Formation of northeastern British Columbia, Canada

Figure 3. Details of vertebrae of CMN 59667. (a) Right lateral view of isolated neural arch (with oblique ventrolateral view of adhering isolated centrum), showing the diapophyseal sulcus on the transverse process. (b) Axial view of the isolated centrum, broken at its approximate mid-length, showing strong constriction of the centrum. (c) Ventral view of the transverse process of the isolated neural arch, showing the diapophyseal sulcus. Abbreviations are as follows: c – centrum; d – diapophysis; ns – neural spine; pz – postzygapophysis; tp – transverse process.

FIG. 7 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 7. — Batrachopus deweyi (Hitchcock, 1843) Hitchcock, 1845: A-C, trackway ULB-04C10_E, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, pes/manus set 04C10_A_1 (holotype of "B. gilberti" that is here invalidated), photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F); G-I, pes/manus set 04C14_C, photograph (G), DEM and false-colour depth map (H) and interpretative sketch (I); J-L, pes/manus set 04C14_C, photograph (J), DEM and false-colour depth map (K) and interpretative sketch (L). Scale bars represent: A-C, 10 cm; D-L, 1 cm.

FIG. 8 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 8. — Tracks ascribed to Dahutherium sp. by Lapparent & Montenat (1967) and that are here reinterpreted: A-C, two superimposed tridactyl grallatorid footprints, ULB-04C18_B, photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (B), and our interpretation (C), showing a small footprint (dark grey) and larger footprint (light grey); D-F, Batrachopus isp., ULB-04C15_A, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (E), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: A-C, 5 cm; D-F, 2 cm.

FIG. 11 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 11. — Plaster cast of one footprint from the type trackway of "Saltopoides igalensis", that is here invalidated: A-C, track ULB-04C01_B, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 5 cm.

FIG. 3 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 3. — Grallator olonensis Lapparent & Montenat, 1967: A, B, slab ULB-04D19 bearing the trackway T1-Go, as well as T2-Go; photograph (A) and interpretative sketch (B); C-E, track 04D19_A_4 (syntype) of the trackway T1-Go, photograph (C), DEM and false-colour depth map (D) and interpretative sketch (E); F-H, ULB- 04C11_A_6, photograph (F), DEM and false-colour depth map (G) and interpretative sketch (H). Scale bars: A, B, 20 cm; C-H, 2 cm.

FIG. 6 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 6. — "Anatopus palmatus" Lapparent & Montenat, 1967, that is here invalidated: A-C, ULB-04C15_B (holotype of "A. palmatus"), photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967: fig. 16A and pl.XII.3) (B), and our interpretation (C); D-F, ULB-04C15_C, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967: fig. 16B1) (E), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: 5 cm.

FIG. 13 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 13. — Other problematic tracks in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: A-C, Batrachopus isp., ULB-04C14_I, photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (B) ("Unnamed track n°1" in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: fig. 18), and our interpretation (C); D-F, Grallator cf. variabilis, ULB-04D22_A, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (E) ("Unnamed track n°2" in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: fig. 18 and pl. XIII.5), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: A-C, 1 cm; D-F, 5 cm.

FIG. 4 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 4. — Footprints from Le Veillon compared to tridactyl tracks from the Early Jurassic of the Causses Basin (based on data from Demathieu et al. 2002; Moreau et al. 2021) and the Early Jurassic of the eastern United States (based on data from Weems 1992, 2019; Gand et al. 2018): A, bivariate diagram L vs (L–D)/D; B, bivariate diagram L vs L/W. L in metres.

FIG. 2 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 2. — Measurements taken on tracks from the Lapparent collection: A, for crocodylomorph manus imprint; B, for crocodylomorph pes track; C, for dinosaur footprint. Abbreviations: L, length of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); LM, LP, length of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); W, width of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); WM, WP, width of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, lengths of digits I, II, III, IV and V, respectively; D, length of the free part of digit III; I-V, I-IV, II-IV, divarication angles between digits I and V, digits I and IV, then digits II and IV, respectively.

FIG. 12 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 12. — Kayentapus isp.: A-C, track ULB-04C02_A (holotype of "Talmontopus tersi" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 10 cm.