Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
808
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
808 results for “dogs”
Fig. 2 in First detection and molecular identification of Babesia gibsoni and Hepatozoon canis in an Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus) from Thailand
Fig. 2. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree of the Hepatozoon partial 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene sequence. Hepatozoon canis (MK144332) was amplified from an Asiatic wild dog in Thailand and analyzed for comparison with other Hepatozoon spp. from the GenBank database. The numbers on branches indicate percent bootstrap support based on 1000 bootstrap replications and only bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown.
Fig. 1 in First detection and molecular identification of Babesia gibsoni and Hepatozoon canis in an Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus) from Thailand
Fig. 1. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree of the Babesia partial 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene sequence. Babesia gibsoni (MK144331) was amplified from an Asiatic wild dog in Thailand and analyzed for comparison with other Babesia spp. from the GenBank database. The numbers on branches indicate percent bootstrap support based on 1000 bootstrap replications and only bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown.
Fig. 1 in Estimating parasite infrapopulation size given imperfect detection: Proof-of-concept with ectoparasitic fleas on prairie dogs
Fig. 1. Left: Frequency histogram of raw (field) flea count indices from prairie dogs. Middle and right: Huggins closed captures model estimates for fleas combed from prairie dogs, including a histogram of estimated flea counts (infrapopulation size = ̂N) and a positive correlation between Julian date and individual flea detection probability (here, p from the first combing occasion within primary trapping occasions). In the histograms, counts of 0 fleas (gray bars) are presented for illustration; those data were not analyzed herein, because the Huggins closed captures models 'condition' on primary occasions with at least 1 flea being detected (black bars). Model output is from the top model in Table 1. On the right, dotted lines are 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 1 in Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in invasive wild boars (Sus scrofa) and hunting dogs from Brazil
Fig. 1. Map highlighting the cities where wild boar and hunting dog samples were obtained, Brazil, 2024.
Dog neuroimaging data from: Action observation reveals a network with divergent temporal and parietal cortex engagement in dogs compared to humans
<p>Action observation is a fundamental pillar of social cognition. Neuroimaging research has revealed a human and non-human primate action observation network (AON) encompassing fronto-temporo-parietal areas with links to the species’ imitation tendencies and relative lobe expansion. Dogs (Canis familiaris) have good action perception and imitation skills and a less expanded parietal than temporal cortex, but their AON remains unexplored. We conducted a functional MRI study with 28 dogs and 40 humans and found functionally analogous involvement of somatosensory and temporal brain areas of both species’ AONs and responses to transitive and intransitive action observation in line with their imitative skills. Employing a functional localizer, we also identified functionally analogous agent-responsive areas within both species’ AONs. However, activation and task-based functional connectivity measures suggested significantly less parietal cortex involvement in dogs than in humans. These findings advance our understanding of the neural bases of action understanding and the convergent evolution of social cognition, with analogies and differences resulting from similar social environments and divergent brain expansion, respectively.</p> <p>This data set contains:</p> <ul> <li>raw functional neuroimaging data of <em>N</em> = 28 dogs</li> <li>structural scans of the same dogs including brain masks & skull-stripped versions</li> <li>eventfiles containing the condition names, onsets and durations for each dog and task run</li> </ul> <p>Data of the comparative human neuroimaging sample will be made available by the first author upon reasonable request.</p> <p>Please also visit our Open Science Framework project site for group-level imaging data of both species (https://osf.io/z479k/).</p>
Table 2 in Description Of The Nematode Dirofilaria Repens (Nematoda, Onchocercidae) Parasitic In Dogs In Ukraine
<p><b>Table 2. Metric parameters of</b> ♀ <i>Dirofilaria repens</i>, n = 8 (М ± SD, min–max)</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Present study</th><th>Railliet & Henry, 1911</th><th>Lent & Freitas, 1937</th><th>Sonin, 1975</th><th>Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2011</th><th>Kravchenko & Itin, 2012</th><th>Baisarova, 2021</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Body length, mm</th><td>17.2 ± 0.7 16.2–18.1</td><td>10–17</td><td>14–15</td><td>10.6</td><td>15.4 14.7–16.1</td><td>9.8–17.4</td><td>14.5 9.7–17.6</td></tr><tr><th>Body width, μm</th><td>565.2 ± 19.8 541.3–597.9</td><td>450–650</td><td>447–552</td><td>530</td><td>532 490–570</td><td>800–1000</td><td>1140 900–1700</td></tr><tr><th>Body width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>316.1 ± 19.1 294.1–342.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>290 283–298</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>transition from esophagus to intestine vulva</th><td>452.2 ± 26.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>417</td><td></td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>415.6–486.1</td><td></td><td></td><td>–</td><td>411–422</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>517.1 ± 31.4 463.4–556.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>503 499–508</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>anus</th><td>149.9 ± 9.6 132.2–162.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>145 128–169</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus length, mm</th><td>912.7 ± 48.7 831.7–964.2</td><td>–</td><td>1050– 1053</td><td>910</td><td>966 915–1037</td><td>1110</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>34.6 ± 4.0 30.5–40.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>middle part</th><td>53.8 ± 3.2 50.2–60.1</td><td>–</td><td>49–54</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>the widest part</th><td>71.4 ± 2.8 68.2–77.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>89 77–102</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of mouth opening, μm</th><td>10.9 ± 0.8 9.2–11.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of vulva, μm</th><td>12.3 ± 0.77 11.1–13.4</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to nerve ring, μm</th><td>258.1 ± 17.8 242.0–296.2</td><td>–</td><td>304–368</td><td>270</td><td>295 291–298</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to vulva, mm</th><td>1.4 ± 0.1 1.3–1.6</td><td>1.5–1.9</td><td>1.84–1.92</td><td>–</td><td>1.55 1.45–1.63</td><td>1.6–2.7</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the nerve ring, mm</th><td>1.2 ± 0.1 1.1–1.3</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the tail end, mm</th><td>15.7 ± 0.7 14.7–16.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the anus, mm</th><td>15.7 ± 0.7 14.6–16.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Tail length, μm</th><td>81.1 ± 8.6 70.4–92.2</td><td>105–126</td><td>–</td><td>90</td><td>85 73–102</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>MicroFIlaria length, μm</th><td>208.7 ± 10.2 193.4–224.9</td><td>300–360</td><td>–</td><td>300–360</td><td>329 296–362</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>MicroFIlaria width, μm</th><td>5.8 ± 0.4 5.3–6.4</td><td>6–8</td><td>–</td><td>6–8</td><td>7 5–8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table><p>N o t e. Рarameters were not deFIned.</p>
Table 1 in Description Of The Nematode Dirofilaria Repens (Nematoda, Onchocercidae) Parasitic In Dogs In Ukraine
<p><b>Table 1. Metric parameters of</b> Ơ <i>Dirofilaria repens</i>, n = 5 (М ± SD, min–max)</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Present study</th><th>Railliet & Henry, 1911</th><th>Lent & Freitas, 1937</th><th>Sonin, 1975</th><th>Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2011</th><th>Kravchenko & 2012</th><th>Baisarova, 2021</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Body length, mm</th><td>57.1 ± 6.5</td><td>48–70</td><td>27.75</td><td>51</td><td>63</td><td>58–71</td><td>87.3 ± 9.6</td></tr><tr><td>48.0–66.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>56–70</td><td></td><td>71–110</td></tr><tr><th>Body width, μm</th><td>406.7 ± 16.6</td><td>370–450</td><td>–</td><td>320</td><td>325</td><td>800–1000</td><td>1100 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>390.1–432.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>298–379</td><td></td><td>900–1700</td></tr><tr><th>Body width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>238.5 ± 11.9</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>224.1–251.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>junction between esophagus and intestine – cloaca</th><td>382.7 ± 16.3</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>293</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>359.4–402.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>269–317</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>118.8 ± 15.0</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>99</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>98.6–137.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>95–104</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus length, mm</th><td>761.9 ± 39.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>750</td><td>713</td><td>до 1400</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>698.2–797.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>696–730</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>42.2 ± 2.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>39.8–44.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>middle part</th><td>56.3 ± 4.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>48.2–59.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>the widest part</th><td>62.1 ± 2.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>40</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>59.8–64.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>36–45</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of mouth</th><td>9.2 ± 0.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>(8.2–10.4)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>opening, μm</th></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to nerve ring, μm</th><td>227.9 ± 10.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>240</td><td>162</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>211.8–241.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>160–165</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to cloaca, mm</th><td>57.1 ± 6.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>47.9–66.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the nerve ring to cloaca, mm</th><td>56.8 ± 6.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>47.6–66.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Tail length, μm</th><td>72.9 ± 7.1</td><td>66–85</td><td>72</td><td>80</td><td>77</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>62.2–80.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>73–82</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Long spicule, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>length</th><td>432.9 ± 24.0</td><td>465–590</td><td>430</td><td>300</td><td>541</td><td>160–270</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>392.1–450.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>537–547</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of proximal end</th><td>37.2 ± 1.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>22</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>35.2 – 39.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>20–27</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of distal end</th><td>3.1 ± 0.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>2.9–3.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width in middle part</th><td>18.2 ± 0.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>17.1–18.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of widening part</th><td>25.2 ± 1.4</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>23.6–27.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>– handle length</th><td>250.3 ± 10.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>237.1–261.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>– lamina length</th><td>182.5 ± 32.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>130.7–209.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Ratio of handle to lamina length</th><td>1.42:1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>1.15:1–2.00:1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Short spicule, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>length</th><td>178.7 ± 9.4</td><td>185–206</td><td>175</td><td>130</td><td>185</td><td>180–200</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>170.9–194.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>181–189</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>proximal end width</th><td>21.9 ± 4.0</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>27</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>14.9–25.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>23–35</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>distal end width</th><td>14.4 ± 0.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>13.2–15.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>middle part width</th><td>31.4 ± 1.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>30.1–33.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Ratio of spicules’ lengths</th><td>2.43:1</td><td>2.5: 1</td><td>2.5: 1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>2.23:1–2.58:1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><p>N o t e. Рarameters were not deFIned.</p>
Fig. 12 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 12. Locations of Cerberus schneiderii individuals with PIT tags: a, #680A445; b, #680A2C9; c, #680A377; and d, #680CAD9. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded from each capture. Number denotes the month of capture (i.e., 1=Jan., 2=Feb., 3=Mar., etc.).
Fig. 11 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 11. Locations of Cerberus schneiderii individuals with PIT tags: a, #6899BFE; b, #6328212; c, #682D1CF; and d, #680C298. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded from each capture. Number denotes the month of capture (i.e., 1=Jan., 2=Feb.,
Fig. 10 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 10. Cerberus schneiderii. Percentage frequency of displacement distance, which was calculated as the shortest distance between two locations that an individual was captured and recaptured.
Fig. 6 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 6. Cerberus schneiderii. Scatterplots and fitted regression lines of: a, body mass; b, tail length; and c, head width against snout-vent length (SVL) for males (O, solid line) and females (+, dashed line). Variables were log10-transformed.
Fig. 5 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 5. Percentage frequency distribution of snout-vent length (SVL) of Cerberus schneiderii for each month between Jan.–Oct.2006.
Fig. 9 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 9. Map showing the spatial distribution of Cerberus schneiderii in four brackish ponds ('A3-4', 'A6', 'C2-3' and 'C4-5') at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded for each snake captured (n = 2258).
Fig. 3 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 3. Percentage frequency distribution of the number of times that tagged individuals of Cerberus schneiderii were recaptured.
Fig. 2 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 2. Physical conditions (rainfall, air temperature) in relation to relative abundance of Cerberus schneiderii at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve between Jan.–Dec.2006: a, total rainfall and mean dry bulb temperature at the Changi Meteorological Station, Singapore; b, relative abundance of snakes represented by the relative number of individuals captured (i.e., # captures (# hours × # observers) –1) to standardise for sampling effort, which differed between months.
Fig. 1 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 1. Map of Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve showing the locations of the four brackish ponds (A3-4, A6, C2-3 and C4-5) where Cerberus schneiderii individuals were collected.
Fig. 7 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 7. Cerberus schneiderii.. Scatterplots and fitted regression lines of initial snout-vent length (SVL0) against 'SVL after one month' (SVL1) for males (O, solid line) and females (+, dashed line).
Fig. 8 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore
Fig. 8. Cerberus schneiderii. Percentage frequency distribution of microhabitat types utilised by: a, all snakes (n = 2262); b, males (n = 1206); and c, females (n = 1056).
FIG. 15 in Dog burials associated with Human burials in the West Indies during the early pre-Columbian Ceramic Age (500 BC-600 AD)
FIG. 15. — Dog mandibles from: (a) Cathédrale Basse Terre US5002 I2 right mandible, lingual and occlusal views, (a) Cathédrale Basse Terre US5002 I2 left mandible, lingual and occlusal views, (c) Gare Maritime US 1008 H2 right mandible, labial and occlusal views, (d) Morel F90-01-03 left mandible, lingual view, (e) Morel F90-01-02 right mandible, vestibular view, (f) Morel F90-01-02 left mandible, vestibular view,(g) Morel F91-11-02 left mandible, vestibular view, (h) Morel F90-16 left mandibule,vestibular view, (i) Hope Estate US2512B square C, right mandible, vestibular view, (j) Seaview US857 left mandible, occlusal and vestibular views, (k) Seaview BAO16BAO16 left mandible, occlusal and vestibular views, (l) Historic Sainte Rose la Ramée US1078 left mandible, occlusal and vestibular views, (m) modern Dog from Aruba left mandible, occlusal and vestibular views (© K. Debue CNRS and S. Grouard).
FIG. 14 in Dog burials associated with Human burials in the West Indies during the early pre-Columbian Ceramic Age (500 BC-600 AD)
FIG. 14. — Length and width of M 1 (log, mm) for the dogs from Sainte-Rose la Ramée de Basse-Terre (SRLR), Gare Maritime de Basse-Terre (GMBT) Cathédrale de Basse-Terre CBT), Morel (MOR) de Grande-Terre, Seaview (Barbuda), Hope Estate from Saint- Martin,Dominican Republic (after Lawrence 1977) and the Whippet reference collection (Anatomie comparée MNHN n° 1996-2468).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.