Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 1. – Map of the 12,400 km2 Exclusive Economic Zone of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon (dark blue), most of which is comprised in NAFO Subarea 3Ps (light blue). The land in the upper left is the South of the Newfoundland island; that on the left the West of Nova Scotia. The insert shows the maps' location in North America.

Figure 9 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 9. – Evolution of the population of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. People under 20 years (in black), between 21 and 59 years old (dark grey), and above> 60 years old (light grey). Data are from IEDOM reports (https://www.iedom.fr/saint-pierre-et-miquelon/).

Figure 3 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 3. – Evolution of the number of dories (in black) and artisanal fishers (in grey) between the 1960s to the 1990s (data are from Briand, 1990).

Figure 10 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 10. – Comparison of the evolution of the populations of SPM and close small towns from the Burin Peninsula between 1991 and 2016 (data are from IEDOM, 2021 and https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/censusrecensement/2016/index-eng.cfm)

Figure 2 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 2. – Dories belonging to the association called "Les Zigotos" (http://www.spm-tourisme.fr/nos-iles-dexception/bienvenue-cheznous/les-zigotos/) in the foreground of the picture and the large blue fish plants Interpêche and Interfreeze, with a fishing vessel, in the background.

Figure 8 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 8. – Evolution of the exports (in black) and imports (in grey) for Saint-Pierre and Miquelon since 2002. Data are from IEDOM reports (https://www.iedom.fr/saint-pierre-et-miquelon/).

Fig. 11 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 11. Relation between the oocytes mean diameter with the gonadosomatic index (A) and with the condition factor (B) of Cetengraulis edentulus in Guanabara Bay. Lines represent the generalized additive models selected by the Akaike information criterion.

Fig. 10 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 10. Relation between fecundity with total length (A) and fullness index (B) and between fecundity residuals (after controlling for the length effect) with gonadosomatic index (C) for Cetengraulis edentulus in Guanabara Bay. Lines represent the generalized additive models selected by the Akaike information criterion.

Fig. 7 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 7. Mean values (± standard error) of the condition factor among months and seasons (black square = females; white circle = males) of Cetengraulis edentulus in Guanabara Bay.

Fig. 4 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 4. Mean values (± standard error) of gonadosomatic index (GSI) among months and seasons (black square = females; white circle = males) of Cetengraulis edentulus in Guanabara Bay.

Fig. 6 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 6. Variation of the index of reproductive activity (IRA) for female Cetengraulis edentulus among months and seasons in Guanabara Bay.

Fig. 3 in Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil

Fig. 3. Seasonal variation in percent (%) frequency of occurrence of gonad maturation stages (GMS) for females (white column) and males (black column) of Cetengraulis edentulus in Guanabara Bay.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 14 in Seasonal dynamics of small-scale fisheries in the Adriatic Sea

Fig. 14: Size-frequency distributions of gillnet landings. TL = total length; CL = carapace length; ML = mantle length. Vertical lines: minimum landing size.

Fig. 6 in Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland

Fig. 6. SSU rDNA maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 16 Kudoa spp. Kudoa islandica is robustly and consistently placed with other Kudoa taxa in all analyses, but is not well supported in the clade it is placed in. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap support from 1000 samplings, nodes with a support of <50 are considered not supported (ns).

Fig. 4 in Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland

Fig. 4. Line drawings of Kudoa islandica n. sp. in apical view (A) and lateral view (B). Scanning electron microscope images of K. islandica n. sp. (C–E). Mature spore in lateral view showing extruded polar filaments (arrow) (C). Single spore in apical view (D) showing the sutures of the four valves (broad arrows), the four apical projections (thin arrow) and cytoplasmic projections (arrowhead). Single spore in posterior view (E) showing the suture of the four valves (broad arrows), Scale bars: (A) and (B) = 2 µm; (C), (D) and (E) = 1 µm.

Fig. 3 in Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland

Fig. 3. Fresh mature spores of Kudoa islandica n. sp. as seen in fresh squash preparations from muscular tissue of Atlantic wolffish, Anarhichas lupus. Note the protruding polar filament of one of the spores (arrow). Nomarski differential interference contrast. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Fig. 5 in Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland

Fig. 5. (A) and (B) Muscle section from lumpfish, Cyclopterus lumpus, fixed 24 h post mortem. (A) Ruptured Kudoa plasmodia with subsequent liberation of mature spores causing focal necrosis of the muscle fibre enveloping the plasmodium. (B) Higher magnification showing liberated spores (arrows) and a focal necrosis in the vicinity of the spores (asterisk). (C) Muscle section of an uninfected fish at approx. 48 h p.m. (D) Section of muscle of a heavily infected fish at approximately 48 h p.m. showing extensive myoliquefaction (asterisk). (E) A close up of the affected area showing numerous Kudoa spores (arrowhead) and the associated liquefactive necrosis. Scale bars: (A) = 50 µm, (B) = 10 µm, (C) and (D) = 200 µm, (E) = 10 µm. Abbreviations: MF = Muscle fibres, AC = Adipocytes.

Fig. 2 in Negative effects of Kudoa islandica n. sp. (Myxosporea: Kudoidae) on aquaculture and wild fisheries in Iceland

Fig. 2. (A) Stained histological section of a lumpfish muscle showing a considerable portion of the muscle fibres substituted with Kudoa islandica n. sp. plasmodia. (B) A single infection. (C) A double infection. (D) Multiple infection; numerous plasmodia developing inside a single muscle fibre, separated from each other and the muscle tissue with a thin membrane (arrows). (E) Plasmodial membranes separating two plasmodia (arrows). Inside each plasmodium are numerous mature Kudoa spores. Scale bars: (A) = 300 µm (B) and (C) = 25 µm; (D) = 150 µm; (E) = 5 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →

Figure 6 in Catch composition of trawl fisheries in Mersin Bay with emphasis on catch biodiversity

Figure 6. Cluster analysis based on CPUE (kg/h) and the distance (Bray–Curtis, UPGMA) of the catch during the fishing months.