Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Data for 'Formalizing Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining: a Grand Challenge of the Minamata Convention'

Signatories to the Minamata Convention on Mercury with ‘more than insignificant’ artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) sectors are required to develop and implement National Action Plans (NAPs) to reform their ASGM sectors in line with Annexe C of the Convention. We compiled the budgets of available NAPs for reducing mercury emissions from ASGM sectors. As of 2021-12-31, these were available for 16 countries from: www.mercuryconvention.org/en/parties/national-action-plans. We used these data to estimate the approximate costs of expanding such approaches globally.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

A high-resolution gridded inventory of coal mine methane emissions for India and Australia

The dataset contains the high-resolution gridded coal mine methane emissions file (.csv) for India and Australia. The emissions are estimated for the year 2018 at a resolution of 0.1° × 0.1°. The emission unit is ton/grid/year.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →

Mining Fork-Including Software Development Traces

This dataset relates to the paper: Mining Fork-Including Development Traces (abstract below) Authors: Iris Reinhartz-Berger and Amir Tomer Starting point: readme.txt Open-source software development is a common practice that encourages collaborative development and reuse across projects. Forking is a way to make a copy of an existing project and explore it for different purposes. Two types of forks are commonly mentioned in the literature: contributing forks which continue the development lines of the forked projects and aim at merging the contribution back to the forked projects; and independently developed forks which open new lines of development deviating from the forked projects. In this study, we aim to explore characteristics of fork-involving software development traces. Analyzing 880 Java projects and their related action and observation events, with process mining and statistical techniques, we found that the occurrence of certain event types may predict the fork type, while the creation of certain fork types increase the involvement of users in the forked projects.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Knowledge Graph: tyrolean mining documents 15th and 16th century

The dataset contains a Knowledge Graph (.nq file) of two historical mining documents: “Verleihbuch der Rattenberger Bergrichter” ( Hs. 37, 1460-1463) and “Schwazer Berglehenbuch” (Hs. 1587, approx. 1515) stored by the Tyrolean Regional Archive, Innsbruck (Austria). The user of the KG may explore the montanistic network and relations between people, claims and mines in the late medieval Tyrol. The core regions concern the districts Schwaz and Kufstein (Tyrol, Austria). The ontology used to represent the claims is CIDOC CRM, an ISO certified ontology for Cultural Heritage documentation. Supported by the Karma tool the KG is generated as RDF (Resource Description Framework). The generated RDF data is imported into a Triplestore, in this case GraphDB, and then displayed visually. This puts the data from the early mining texts into a semantically structured context and makes the mutual relationships between people, places and mines visible. Both documents and the Knowledge Graph were processed and generated by the research team of the project “Text Mining Medieval Mining Texts”. The research project (2019-2022) was carried out at the university of Innsbruck and funded by go!digital next generation programme of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Citeable Transcripts of the historical documents are online available: Hs. 37 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6274562 Hs. 1587 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6274928

Figs 40, 41 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 40, 41: 40 — map of distribution of Ophiomyia kireshiensis sp. n.; 41 — map of distribution of Agromyza paralucida sp. n.

Figs 10–17 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 10–17. Ophiomyia kireshiensis sp. n., holotype: 10, 11 — male head; 12 — phallus (ventral view); 13 — phallus (lateral view); 14 — hypandrium (ventral view); 15 — hypandrium (lateral view); 16 — ejaculatory apodeme; 17 — wing.

Figs 31–39 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 31–39. Agromyza paralucida sp. n., holotype: 31, 32 — male head; 33 — wing; paratype: 34 — phallus (ventral view); 35 — phallus (lateral view); 36 — hypandrium (ventral view); 37 — right surstylus and cercus; 38 — ejaculatory apodeme; 39 — spermatheca.

Figs 2–9 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 2–9. Melanagromyza nartshukae Pakalniškis: 2, 3 — male head; 4 — wing; 5 — phallus (ventral view); 6 — phallus (lateral view); 7 — epandrium and hypandrium (ventral view); 8 — hypandrium (lateral view); 9 — ejaculatory apodeme.

Figs 23–30 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 23–30. Ophiomyia mukhorytsa sp. n., holotype: 23, 24 — male head; paratypes: 25 — wing; 26 — phallus (ventral view); 27 — phallus (lateral view); 28 — hypandrium (ventral view); 29 — hypandrium (lateral view); 30 — ejaculatory apodeme.

Figs 18–22 in Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species

Figs 18–22: 18–20. Ophiomyia kireshiensis sp. n., paratype: 18, 19 — female head; 20 — female terminalia proportionally: a — left blade of hypogynium, b — spermathecae; c — proctiger with cerci; d — ventral receptacle. 21–22. Ophiomyia mukhorytsa sp. n., paratype: 21 — female head; 22 — female terminalia proportionally: a — left blade of hypogynium, b — spermathecae, c — proctiger with cerci.

Fig. 15 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 15. Sex ratio in M. daubentonii throughout the year from bats recorded inside Liptsy 1: VIII–V — number of months August to June; n — number of bats.

Fig. 13 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 13. Bat activity (shown by lines) and relative abundance (shown by bars) during autumn swarming and spring departure periods — an example from Liptsy 1: VIII–V = number of months, August to May; IXs — summer period in September; IXa — autumn period in September; N — number of mist-netting nights; n — total number of bats in each period; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Mdas — M. dasycneme; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 14 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 14. Sex ratio in M. daubentonii and P. auritus in winter in three Liptsy mines (L1, L2 and 3–4): n — number of bats; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 16. Sex ratioin M. daubentonii and P in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 16. Sex ratioin M. daubentonii and P. auritus during autumn swarming and spring departure periods — an example from Liptsy 1 mine: VIII–V — number of months, August to May; n — number of bats; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 10 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 10. Bat distribution in galleries of different height. An example from Liptsy 1: Mdau — M. daubentonii; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 11 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 11. Bat distribution in crevices or in the open; and on walls or ceilings. An example from Liptsy 1 mine: n — bat number included in each category; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 7 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 7. Fluctuations in the number of hibernating bats in Liptsy 3–4: n — number of counts; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Mdas — M. dasycneme; Paur — P. auritus. In winter 2004–2005 censuses were not conducted.

Fig. 9 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 9. Annual fluctuations of bat numbers (shown by lines) and relative abundance (shown by bars) in Liptsy 1: VIII–VI — number of months, August to June; XIa — autumn period in November; XIw — winter period in November; IIIw — winter period in March; IIIs — spring period in March; N — number of counts with bats in each period; n — total number of bats in each period; Mdau — M. daubentoni; Mdas — M. dasycneme; Paur — P. auritus.

Fig. 4 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 4. Cumulative number of M. daubentonii (MDA) and P. auritus (PAU) in three Liptsy mines (1, 2 and 3–4), for 10 winter seasons (1999–2009) in period of phenological winter: MDA1 (23 counts); PAU1 (17 counts); MDA2 (16 counts); PAU2 (11 counts); MDA3–4 (19 counts); PAU3–4 (7 counts).

Fig. 6 in Results Of The 10-Year Monitoring Of Bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) Winter Aggregation From The North-Eastern Ukraine (Liptsy Mines, Kharkiv Region)

Fig. 6. Fluctuations in the number of hibernating bats in Liptsy 2: n — number of counts; Mdau — M. daubentonii; Mdas — M. dasycneme; Paur — P. auritus. In winters 2002–2003 and 2004–2005 censuses were not conducted.