Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in New distributional records of the Toad-headed Pitviper Bothrocophias hyoprora (Amaral, 1935) in Brazil

Fig. 1. Known geographic range of Bothrocophias hyoprora in South America: white circles = literature data, red star = type locality, red squares = records from Jardim do Ouro, Itaituba, Pará, Brazil (MPEG 24662) and from Floresta Estadual Canutama, Canutama, Amazonas, Brazil (INPA-H 33106), red triangle = record from Chapleau mining company concession, Altamira, Pará, Brazil (UF 157255).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in New distributional records of the Toad-headed Pitviper Bothrocophias hyoprora (Amaral, 1935) in Brazil

Fig. 2. Adult Bothrocophias hyoprora (INPA-H 33106) from Canutama, Amazonas, Brazil. Photography by Vinícius T. de Carvalho.

Fig. 3 in New distribution records and conservation status of Atelopus seminiferus Cope, 1874: A Critically Endangered harlequin frog from northern Peru

Fig. 3. Updated distribution map of Atelopus seminiferus. Black dots indicate new localities reported in this study. Light green area corresponds the estimated Extent of Occurrence (ca. 2,520 km2) based on the new records presented here and the previously known localities. Numbers correspond to labels in Table 1. Map by Juan C. Cusi.

Fig. 3 in New distribution records and conservation status of Atelopus seminiferus Cope, 1874: A Critically Endangered harlequin frog from northern Peru

Fig. 3. Dorsal and ventral views of the holotype of Atelopus seminifeus (ANSP 11383), deposited in the herpetological collection at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia. Photos courtesy of Ned Gilmore.

Fig. 2 in New distribution records and conservation status of Atelopus seminiferus Cope, 1874: A Critically Endangered harlequin frog from northern Peru

Fig. 2. (A) A pair of Atelopus seminiferus in amplexus, found between El Carmen and La Esperanza [not collected]. Photo by Fredi Sangama and Florencio León. (B) Dorsal coloration pattern of a female MUSM 33328. (C) Ventral coloration pattern in a male MUSM 33327. (D) Ventral coloration pattern in a female MUSM JCM H-24. (D) El Carmen village in Alto Mayo Protected Forest, Rioja province, San Martin (E). Photos B‒E by Juan C. Cusi.

Fig. 1 in New distribution records and conservation status of Atelopus seminiferus Cope, 1874: A Critically Endangered harlequin frog from northern Peru

Fig. 1. Distribution of Atelopus seminiferus in the Mayo River basin, San Martin, Peru. Yellow polygon corresponds to geographic range estimated by IUCN. Compare with Fig. 3, which shows proposed new polygon based on results from this study. Map by Juan C. Cusi.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. Sicista betulina: 1 — Λесная мышовка, пойманная в окрестностях сеΛа КойÀа; 2 — карта распространения виÀа: зеΛеная заΛивка — ареаΛ виÀа по Burgin et al. 2020, синие звезÀочки — точки нахоÀок в национаΛьном парке «Онежское Поморье» и на СоΛовецком архипеΛаге (Черенкова 2014), красный круг — новая нахоÀка в районе Àеревни КойÀа; 3–4 — биотопы, в которых быΛ встречен виÀ в окрестностях сеΛа КойÀа Fig. 1. Sicista betulina: 1 — the northern birch mouse caught in the vicinity of Koida village; 2 — the species distribution map: the green fill — species range according to Burgin et al. 2020; the blue stars — points where the species was found in the Onezhskoye Pomorye National Park and on the Solovetsky Archipelago (Cherenkova 2014); the red circle — a new find in the area of Koida village; 3–4 — biotopes in which the species was encountered in the vicinity of Koida village in A new record of the northern birch mouse Sicista betulina (Pallas, 1779) in the north of the Arkhangelsk Region (Rodentia: Sminthidae)

Рис. 1. Sicista betulina: 1 — Λесная мышовка, пойманная в окрестностях сеΛа КойÀа; 2 — карта распространения виÀа: зеΛеная заΛивка — ареаΛ виÀа по Burgin et al. 2020, синие звезÀочки — точки нахоÀок в национаΛьном парке «Онежское Поморье» и на СоΛовецком архипеΛаге (Черенкова 2014), красный круг — новая нахоÀка в районе Àеревни КойÀа; 3–4 — биотопы, в которых быΛ встречен виÀ в окрестностях сеΛа КойÀа Fig. 1. Sicista betulina: 1 — the northern birch mouse caught in the vicinity of Koida village; 2 — the species distribution map: the green fill — species range according to Burgin et al. 2020; the blue stars — points where the species was found in the Onezhskoye Pomorye National Park and on the Solovetsky Archipelago (Cherenkova 2014); the red circle — a new find in the area of Koida village; 3–4 — biotopes in which the species was encountered in the vicinity of Koida village

Fig. 3 in Distribution range expansion of Salamandra infraimmaculata Martens, 1885 (Caudata: Salamandridae) in Anatolia, Turkey, with a new locality record

Fig. 3. Predicted distribution of Salamandra infraimmaculata under current climatic conditions. Warm colors (red and yellow) show suitable habitats, whereas the blue color represents unsuitable habitats for S. infraimmaculata.

Fig. 2 in Distribution range expansion of Salamandra infraimmaculata Martens, 1885 (Caudata: Salamandridae) in Anatolia, Turkey, with a new locality record

Fig. 2. Distribution patterns of Salamandra infraimmaculata throughout southern Anatolia together with the new locality record.

Fig. 1 in Distribution range expansion of Salamandra infraimmaculata Martens, 1885 (Caudata: Salamandridae) in Anatolia, Turkey, with a new locality record

Fig. 1. Samples of Salamandra infraimmaculata captured from the new locality: (A) male and (B) female.

Fig. 4 in Distribution range expansion of Salamandra infraimmaculata Martens, 1885 (Caudata: Salamandridae) in Anatolia, Turkey, with a new locality record

Fig. 4. The marginal response curves of S. infraimmaculata to (A) Minimum Temperature of Coldest Month (Bio6), (B) Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter (Bio8), and (C) Precipitation of Warmest Quarter (Bio18). The red lines and blue shading respectively show the mean responses of the 30 replicate MaxEnt runs and the mean plus/minus one standard deviation.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Figure 1 Micromegistus bakerion Scarites subterraneus.a in New records of Micromegistus bakeri, Trägårdh 1948 (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parantennulidae), a mite symbiotic on carabid beetles, and notes on the species' distribution and host specificity

Figure 1 Micromegistus bakerion Scarites subterraneus.a – Dorsal and ventral view of infested S. subterraneus. b – The anterior ventral side of M. bakeriinfestedS. subterraneus. c – Adult and larvalM. bakeri.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Figure 3 in New records of Micromegistus bakeri, Trägårdh 1948 (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parantennulidae), a mite symbiotic on carabid beetles, and notes on the species' distribution and host specificity

Figure 3 Distribution map of Micromegistus bakeriand Scarites spp. in North America. The star indicates the location of the specimens collected in the present study. Squares indicate localities ofM. bakeridocumented in the literature (Trägårdh 1948; Nickel and Elzinga 1970; McDaniel and Bolen

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Figure 2 in New records of Micromegistus bakeri, Trägårdh 1948 (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parantennulidae), a mite symbiotic on carabid beetles, and notes on the species' distribution and host specificity

Figure 2 Examples of photographic records of mites (putatively identified as M. bakeri) on Scarites spp., available on the citizen science websites BugGuide and iNaturalist. Note how only one or no mites are visible in the dorsal images, while one to many are visible in the lateral and ventral images. 2a – by lazarus via iNaturalist, used under a CC BY 4.0 license. 2b–2c by Bert Harris and Breanna Couey, respectively, via iNaturalist, used under CC BY-NC 4.0 licenses.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in The longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Tennessee: distribution of species, seasonal adult activity, and new state records

Fig. 1. Longhorned beetle species tallied within each of the 95 Tennessee counties from collection records compiled for 230 species. Collection distribution is presented across ecoregions occurring within the western, middle, and eastern Grand Divisions of Tennessee (bold black lines). Across the Grand Divisions, county names presented in pale gray text are those from which no longhorned beetle species were collected or reported. Species tallies presented do not include county records reported in Jamerson (1973) that could not be substantiated with a specimen. Roman numerals (west to east) designate the ecoregions of Tennessee, where I corresponds with the Mississippi Alluvial Plain (ecoregion 73), II are the Mississippi Valley Loess Plains (ecoregion 74), III are the Southeastern Plains (ecoregion 65), IV is the Interior Plateau (ecoregion 71), V are the Southwestern Appalachians (ecoregion 68), VI are the Central Appalachians (ecoregion 69), VII are Ridges and Valleys (ecoregion 67), and VIII are the Blue Ridge Mountains (ecoregion 66) (afer Griffith et al. 1997). Full descriptions of the Tennessee ecoregions are available at: https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregion-download-files-state-region-3.

Figure 4 in Distribution of Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in Chihuahua, Mexico: new records and environmental characterisation

Figure 4. GAM regression showing relationship between environmental suitability index (ESI) against elevation (m).

Figure 2 in Distribution of Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in Chihuahua, Mexico: new records and environmental characterisation

Figure 2. Sampling bias file generated using the Gaussian kernel density of sampling localities tool (spatially rarefied records as input).

Figure 1 in Distribution of Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in Chihuahua, Mexico: new records and environmental characterisation

Figure 1. Cluster analysis showing correlation between bioclimatic and topographic layers supported by AU (approximately unbiased) P-value (left) and bootstrap values (right).

Figure 3 in Distribution of Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in Chihuahua, Mexico: new records and environmental characterisation

Figure 3. Tenfold cross-validation MaxEnt 'year-round' distribution model in a scale of maximum–minimum values showing the potential distribution for Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in our study area and plotting the spatially rarefied records and the new Chihuahuan record.