Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 23–29 in New species of Monodontocerus (Collembola: Tomoceridae) from southern China with diagnostic notes on the genus and introduction of new taxonomic characters

FIGURES 23–29. Monodontocerus absens sp. nov.: 23, manubrium ("T" shaped marks: sockets of scales; circle with a slash: pseudopore); 24, disto-external corner of manubrium and corner chaeta; 25, dental spines; 26, feathered dental chaeta; 27, mucro, apical tooth hypothesized; 28, mature female genital plate; 29, immature female genital plate. Scale bar: 23, 25, 100Μm; 24, 26–29, 50Μm.

FIGURES 15–22 in New species of Monodontocerus (Collembola: Tomoceridae) from southern China with diagnostic notes on the genus and introduction of new taxonomic characters

FIGURES 15–22. Monodontocerus absens sp. nov.: 15, labial chaetotaxy; 16, trochanteral-femoral organ; 17, femur and tibiotarsus; 18, dorsal view of tibiotarsal distal chaetae on front leg (TH: tenent hair, the same below); 19, anterior view of tibiotarsal distal chaetae on hind leg; 20, pattern of tibiotarsal distal chaetae (hind leg, distal view); 21, claw; 22, tenaculum. Scale bar: 15, 19, 21, 22, 50Μm; 16, 120Μm; 17, 200Μm; 18, 40Μm.

FIGURES 6–14 in New species of Monodontocerus (Collembola: Tomoceridae) from southern China with diagnostic notes on the genus and introduction of new taxonomic characters

FIGURES 6–14. Monodontocerus absens sp. nov.: 6–9, dorsal side of antenna. 6, one distal subsegment of Ant. III; 7, most distal part of Ant. III; 8, one middle subsegment of Ant. IV; 9, apex of Ant. IV; 10, labrum; 11, mandible; 12, maxillary lamella 5; 13, maxillary outer lobe; 14, labial palp (papillae A–E and H labeled). Scale bar: 6–9, 12, 14, 20Μm; 10, 11, 13, 50Μm.

FIGURES 1–5. 1–3 in New species of Monodontocerus (Collembola: Tomoceridae) from southern China with diagnostic notes on the genus and introduction of new taxonomic characters

FIGURES 1–5. 1–3, Monodontocerus absens sp. nov. 1, habitus; 2, spotted pigmentation on Abd. III; 3, head, arrows pointing to the pigmented sockets of cephalic posterior macrochaetae; 4, habitus of M. mulunensis sp. nov.; 5, habitus of M. trigrandis sp. nov. Scale bar: 1, 200Μm; 2, 3, 25Μm; 4, 5, 100Μm.

FIGURES 37–40 in New species of Monodontocerus (Collembola: Tomoceridae) from southern China with diagnostic notes on the genus and introduction of new taxonomic characters

FIGURES 37–40. Monodontocerus mulunensis sp. nov.: 37, manubrium (circle with a slash: pseudopore); 38, disto-external corner of manubrium and corner chaeta; 39, dental spines; 40, mucro. Scale bar: 37, 39, 40, 100Μm; 38, 50Μm.

FIGURES 91–96. Strongylophthalmyia morphological features. 98. S. oxybeles, n in World review of the genus Strongylophthalmyia Heller (Diptera: Strongylophthalmyiidae). Part I: Introduction, morphology, species groups, and review of the Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup

FIGURES 91–96. Strongylophthalmyia morphological features. 98. S. oxybeles, n. sp., male antenna, left lateral view; 99. S. sichuanica, n. sp. male antenna, left lateral view; 100. S. sichuanica, n. sp., male palpus, left lateral view; 101. S. oxybeles, n. sp., male fore femur, left lateral view; 102. S. sichuanica, n. sp., male fore femur, left lateral view; 103. S. sichuanica, n. sp., male wing showing Wing Interference Pattern.

FIGURE 107 in World review of the genus Strongylophthalmyia Heller (Diptera: Strongylophthalmyiidae). Part I: Introduction, morphology, species groups, and review of the Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup

FIGURE 107. Map showing distribution of species of Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup in SE Asia and adjacent areas.

FIGURES 62–69 in World review of the genus Strongylophthalmyia Heller (Diptera: Strongylophthalmyiidae). Part I: Introduction, morphology, species groups, and review of the Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup

FIGURES 62–69. Male Strongylophthalmyia, fore femur, left lateral view. 62. S. albisternum, n. sp.; 63. S. borneensis, n. sp.; 64. S. hauseri, n. sp.; 65. S. immaculata Hennig, arrow points to tight thorn-like cluster of setae; 66. S. indochinensis, n. sp.; 67. S. inundans, n. sp.; 68. S. lowi, n. sp., arrow points to ventral cluster of setae; 69. S. malayensis, n. sp., arrow points to tight thorn-like cluster of setae.

FIGURES 18–25. Male Strongylophthalmyia, antennae. 18. S. borneensis, n in World review of the genus Strongylophthalmyia Heller (Diptera: Strongylophthalmyiidae). Part I: Introduction, morphology, species groups, and review of the Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup

FIGURES 18–25. Male Strongylophthalmyia, antennae. 18. S. borneensis, n. sp.; 19. S. caestus, n. sp.; 20. S. darlingi, n. sp. 21. S. federeri, n. sp.; 22. S. hauseri, n. sp.; 23. S. immaculata Hennig, arrow points to minute dorsal antennal process; 24. S. indochinensis, n. sp., arrow points to short dorsal antennal process; 25. S. inundans, n. sp.

FIGURES 8–9 in World review of the genus Strongylophthalmyia Heller (Diptera: Strongylophthalmyiidae). Part I: Introduction, morphology, species groups, and review of the Strongylophthalmyia punctata subgroup

FIGURES 8–9. Strongylophthalmyia heads, frontal view, undescribed new species from Sumatra (S. fascipennis group). 8. Male. 9. Female. Arrow points to clypeus.

FIGURE 4 in An introduction to the systematics of Akodon orophilus Osgood, 1913 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 4. Selected morphological traits of the Peruvian Akodon aerosus group members. (A: A. surdus, MUSM 36600; B: A. aerosus, MUSM 8981; C: A. torques, MUSM 9045; D: A. orophilus, MUSM 37019; E: A. mollis, MUSM 23645). First row: rostrum in dorsal view (note the posterior borders of nasals and the configuration of premaxilar and nasal sutures); second row: dorsal view of the antorbital bridge region (note the size of the lacrimals); third row: zygomatic plate in ventrolateral view (note the anterior border and the thickness of the malar process of maxillary); fourth row: mesopterygoid region (note the size of foramen oval and the shape of parapterygoid fossa); fifth row: ascending ramus of the mandible in labial view (note size of the capsular projection).

FIGURE 3 in An introduction to the systematics of Akodon orophilus Osgood, 1913 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 3. Standard Giemsa-stained karyotype of Akodon orophilus (2n = 26 FN = 40) from Huiquilla, Luya, Amazonas Department. Bar = 10 μm.

FIGURE 2 in An introduction to the systematics of Akodon orophilus Osgood, 1913 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 2. Dorsal, ventral and lateral views of cranium and mandible of Akodon orophilus s.s. (MUSM 37019). Bar = 10 mm.

FIGURE 1 in An introduction to the systematics of Akodon orophilus Osgood, 1913 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 1. Map showing the collection localities of Akodon orophilus (●) 1: Hierba Buena, 2: Leymebamba, 3: San Antonio, 4: Huiquilla, 5: Añazco pueblo, 6: Estación biológica Laurel, 7 Puca Tambo; and Akodon josemariarguedasi sp. nov. (․) 1: Palmapampa, 2: Galloganán, 3: Hatuncucho, 4: Ichocán. Inset: Outline map of Peru, indicating the boundaries of the area shown.

FIGURE 6 in An introduction to the systematics of Akodon orophilus Osgood, 1913 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 6. Some anatomical differences between Akodon josemariarguedasi sp. nov. (MUSM 22754; left) and A. orophilus (MUSM 37021; right): A: Posterior border of nasals [na] is blunt, its contour is serrated and the nasal [na] projects distinctly behind the premaxilla [pre] in Akodon josemariarguedasi. B: Zygomatic plate [zp] with anterior margin less slanting in Akodon josemariarguedasi. C: Condylar process [cp] is large and the lunar notch [ln] is deep in Akodon josemariarguedasi.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: {"en": "Salata S, Fisher BL (2020) Pheidole Westwood, 1839 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Madagascar – an introduction and a taxonomic revision of eleven species groups. ZooKeys 905: 1-235. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.905.39592"}

Supplementary material 1 from: {"en": "Salata S, Fisher BL (2020) Pheidole Westwood, 1839 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Madagascar – an introduction and a taxonomic revision of eleven species groups. ZooKeys 905: 1-235. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.905.39592"}

opennotspecifiedJul 2022View details →

FIGURES 28–31. male genitalia, a in Taxonomic studies on Afrotropical Nolinae: review of the Afrotropical taxa of the genus Hampsonola László, Ronkay & Ronkay, 2015, descriptions of five new genera and five new species and introduction of a new synonymy (Lepidoptera, Nolidae)

FIGURES 28–31. male genitalia, a: clasping apparatus, b: aedeagus (coll. ANHRT). 28, Bellanola gen. n. mikongo sp. n., holotype, Gabon, LGNA 1294; 29, Brunneonola gen. n. nimba sp. n., holotype, Liberia, LGNA 1158; 30, Ivindonola gen. n. ipassa sp. n., holotype, Gabon, LGNA 590; 31, Cryptonola gen. n. confundata sp. n., holotype, Ivory Coast, LGNA 1179.

opennotspecifiedJul 2022View details →

FIGURES 22–27. male genitalia, a in Taxonomic studies on Afrotropical Nolinae: review of the Afrotropical taxa of the genus Hampsonola László, Ronkay & Ronkay, 2015, descriptions of five new genera and five new species and introduction of a new synonymy (Lepidoptera, Nolidae)

FIGURES 22–27. male genitalia, a: clasping apparatus, b: aedeagus (coll. ANHRT, unless otherwise indicated). 22, Hampsonola elachistomorpha, Zambia, LGNA 1062; 23, H. aulombardiella, Kenya, LGNA 1298 (coll. A. Kingston); 24, H. argyropasta, Liberia, LGNA 1229; 25, H. nanographa, Gabon, LGNA 1227; 26, H. transecta, syntype of Nola transecta, Sierra Leone, NHMUK 010317594 (prepared by László) (©NHMUK); 27, Gabonola gen. n. smithi sp. n., holotype, Gabon, LGNA 1171.