Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

248

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

248 results for “tree of life”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

FIGURE­­ 2. Paraputo blackmani Joshi sp.­­ n., collection site and life stages. A. Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. tree with infested part indicated by arrows; B. A furrow left by a broken branch, with exposed cambium tissue infested by mealybugs; C. Mealybug nymphs, indicated by arrows; D. Adult females; E.­­Ants, Nylanderia sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), attending the mealybugs; F. Spalgis epius (Westwood) larva (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) preying on the mealybugs. in --A--new--species--of--Paraputo--Laing--1929--(Hemiptera:--Coccomorpha:-- Pseudococcidae)--from--India

FIGURE­­ 2. Paraputo blackmani Joshi sp.­­ n., collection site and life stages. A. Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. tree with infested part indicated by arrows; B. A furrow left by a broken branch, with exposed cambium tissue infested by mealybugs; C. Mealybug nymphs, indicated by arrows; D. Adult females; E.­­Ants, Nylanderia sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), attending the mealybugs; F. Spalgis epius (Westwood) larva (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) preying on the mealybugs.

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 60. Part 5 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 60. Part 5 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Thoropidae, Dendrobatidae, and Bufonidae.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 63. Part 8 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 63. Part 8 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Ptychadenidae, Ceratobatrachidae, Micrixalidae, Phrynobatrachidae, Petropedetidae, Pyxicephalidae, and Dicroglossidae.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 53 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 53. Salamander section of general tree (fig. 50 [insert]). See discussion in ''Taxonomy'' for subfamilies of Plethodontidae and Salamandridae. New taxonomy is on right.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 49 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 49. Delorme et al.'s (2005) dendrogram of rhacophorids, based on undisclosed molecular and morphological data (although characters were summarized for some genera and suprageneric groups), redrawn to illuminate the paraphyly of groupings.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 21 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 21. Bayesian tree of anuran exemplars of Biju and Bossuyt (2003), with particular reference to Neobatrachia. Underlying data are two mtDNA fragments, covering part of 12S rRNA, complete t­ RNAVal, and part of 16S rRNA. In addition, one fragment of the nuclear genome: exon 1 of rhodopsin, single exon of RAG­1, and exon 2 of CXCR­4, for a total of 2,325 bp of sequence. Alignment was made using Clustal X (Thompson et al., 1997), alignment costs not disclosed, with ambiguous sections excluded and gaps excluded as evidence. Model of nucleotide substitution assumed for analysis was GTR 1 G1 I.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 8 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 8. Composite tree of hypothesized relationships among Plethodontidae as inferred from 1966– 2004 literature; subfamilies and tribes noted on the right (D.B. Wake, 1966; D.B. Wake and Lynch, 1976; J.F. Lynch and Wake, 1978; D.B. Wake et al., 1978; Maxson et al., 1979; Larson et al., 1981; Maxson and Wake, 1981; Hanken and Wake, 1982; J.F. Lynch et al., 1983; D.B. Wake and Elias, 1983; Lombard and Wake, 1986; D.B. Wake, 1993; Jackman et al., 1997; García­París and Wake, 2000; and Parra­Olea et al., 2004). Quotation marks denote nonmonophyletic taxa.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 55 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 55. Trees of intergeneric relationships within Pipidae (from fig. 19). A, Cannatella and Trueb (1988). B, Báez and Pugener (2003); C, Roelants and Bossuyt (2005); D, De Sá and Hillis (1990; results consistent with B, C, and E); E, This work. (Undirected network on lower right shows rooting points of each result, except for D.)

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 65. Part 9 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 65. Part 9 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Mantellidae, Rhacophoridae, Nyctibatrachidae, Ranidae.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 58. Part 3 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 58. Part 3 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Hemiphractidae, Brachycephalidae, Cryptobatrachidae, Amphignathodontidae, and Hylidae.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 70 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 70. Generic changes suggested for bufonid taxa that we studied. This figure shows our terminals

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 68 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 68. Maximum­likelihood tree of predominantly New World Bufonidae suggested by Pauly et al. (2004) on the basis of 2,370 bp (730 informative sites) of mitochondrial DNA (12S, tRNAVal, and 16S). Alignment was done under Clustal (Thompson et al., 1997; cost functions not disclosed) then modified manually. Gaps were considered to be missing data and the substitution model assumed for the maximum­likelihood analysis was GTR 1 G1 I.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 64. A in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 64. A, Original tree of Jiang et al. (2005; from fig. 42) of Paini and (on right) its equivalent undirected network; B, Tree rerooted and with augmented resolution as implied by our general results,

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 56. Part 2 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 56. Part 2 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Heleophrynidae and basal hyloids

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 44 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 44. Maximum­likelihood tree of Holarctic Rana of Hillis and Wilcox (2005). The underlying data are ca. 2kb of mtDNA of the 12S–16S region (spanning the tRNAVal gene). Sequence alignment was done initially using Clustal W (Thompson et al., 1994), costs not disclosed, and manually adjusted, guided by assumed secondary structure, ambiguously aligned sequences discarded. It was not stated whether gaps were treated as data, but we presume not. Substitution model GTR 1 G1 PINVAR was assumed for the maximum­likelihood analysis. On the basis of previous research, the root was assumed

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 41 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 41. Consensus of two parsimony trees of Chinese ranids from Jiang and Zhou (2005). Data were 1,005 bp of the mtDNA sequences of the 12S and 16S rRNA gene fragments (tree length 5 1485, ci 5 0.449). Sequences were aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997), with manual modifications made subsequently. Gaps and ambiguously aligned sequences excluded from analysis. Generic names in parentheses reflect alternative usages. Generic taxonomy is updated to recognize Quasipaa (Jiang et al., 2005).

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 37 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 37. Consensus of two equally parsimonious trees from Marmayou et al. (2000) of exemplars of Ranidae and Rhacophoridae (Ranidae: Rhacophorinae in their usage) based on 305 bp (151 informative sites) of 12S mtDNA, aligned using the program MUST (Philippe, 1993) and subsequently manually modified with reference to secondary structure models. Cost functions for alignment were not stated, nor whether gaps were treated as missing data or as evidence (ci 5 0.382, ri 5 0.429). Tree rooted on Eleutherodactylus cuneatus (5 Euhyas cuneata).

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 36 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 36. Maximum likelihood tree of exemplars of Ranoidea, with a focus on African taxa, by Van der Meijden et al. (2005), based on mt DNA (12S and 16S rRNA) and nu DNA (RAG­1, RAG­2, rhodopsin), for 2,995 bp of sequence. Alignment was made using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1994), with costs not disclosed and gaps and highly variable sites excluded from analysis. The model assumed for maximum­likelihood analysis was TrN 1 I 1 G. The tree was rooted on an hierarchical outgroups (not shown in original) composed of Latimeria, Homo, Gallus, Lyciasalamandra, Alytes (2 spp.), Agalychnis, and Litoria. The ''southern African clade'' represents Pyxicephalinae as subsequently redelimited by Dubois (2005).

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 31 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 31. Maximum­likelihood tree of various ranoids constructed by Van der Meijden et al. (2004) on the basis of 1,566 bp of the nuclear gene RAG­1. Sequence alignment was not reported. Cost functions of analysis were not provided nor which model of nucleotide evolution (as suggested by ModelTest; Posada and Crandall, 1998) was employed in the analysis. The tree was rooted on Xenopus laevis. We inserted the higher taxonomy on the right to allow easier comparison to other studies discussed in this section.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 48 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 48. Consensus of weighted parsimony trees of Rhacophoridae suggested by J.A. Wilkinson et al. (2002), with their subfamily taxonomy on right. (This is Mantellidae and Rhacophoridae of other authors.) The tree was based on 2kb (of 12S and 16S mt rRNA as well as tRNAVal). Alignment was manual, guided by models of secondary structure with ambiguously aligned segments discarded. In analysis, transversions were weighted twice transitions. Whether reatment of gaps were treated as evidence of relationship or as missing data was not stated. Chirixalus eiffingeri was placed in Kurixalus by Ye, Fei, and Dubois (In Fei, 1999), and Chirixalus idiootocus was transferred into an explicitly polyphyletic/paraphyletic Aquixalus by Delorme et al. (2005). The tree was rooted on Nidirana adenopleura and Aquarana catesbeiana.

opennotspecifiedMar 2006View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record