Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2013View details →

Fig. 1 in New records of picture-winged flies (Diptera, Ulidiidae) for Portugal.

Fig. 1.- Detail of the head of Cephalia rufipes Meigen,1826, rare fly in Europe. Photo by Jorge Almeida.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2019View details →

Рис. 1. Bryoxena centralasiae, изменчивость крыΛового рисунка: а, λ — Киргизский хр., нац. парк «АΛа-Арча»; в, г, з — хр. ΔжумгаΛтоо, массив Сары-Кайкы; д, к, м — хр. МоΛΑо-Тоо, пер. Коро-Гоо; б, е — Ферганский хр., пер. Урумбаш; ж, и — АΛайский хр., пер. ТаΛΑык Fig. 1. Bryoxena centralasiae, the wing pattern variability: а, λ — Kirghiz Mts., «Ala-Archa» national park; в, г, з — Dzhumgaltoo Mts., Sary-Kaiky gorge; д, к, м — Moldo-Too Mts., Koro-Goo Pass; б, е — Fergansky Mts., Urumbash Pass; ж, и — Alai Mts., Taldyk Pass in Morphometric Analysis Of The Genitalia Of (Staudinger, 1882) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)

Рис. 1. Bryoxena centralasiae, изменчивость крыΛового рисунка: а, λ — Киргизский хр., нац. парк «АΛа-Арча»; в, г, з — хр. ΔжумгаΛтоо, массив Сары-Кайкы; д, к, м — хр. МоΛΑо-Тоо, пер. Коро-Гоо; б, е — Ферганский хр., пер. Урумбаш; ж, и — АΛайский хр., пер. ТаΛΑык Fig. 1. Bryoxena centralasiae, the wing pattern variability: а, λ — Kirghiz Mts., «Ala-Archa» national park; в, г, з — Dzhumgaltoo Mts., Sary-Kaiky gorge; д, к, м — Moldo-Too Mts., Koro-Goo Pass; б, е — Fergansky Mts., Urumbash Pass; ж, и — Alai Mts., Taldyk Pass

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Рис. 2. 1 — китайский маΛярийный комар Anopheles sinensis; 2 — рисунок крыΛа китайского маΛярийного комара Anopheles sinensis Fig. 2. 1 — Chinese malaria mosquito Anopheles sinensis; 2 — the wing pattern of the Chinese malaria mosquito Anopheles sinensis in Mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) Of The Nature Reserve "Udyl" (Khabarovsk Krai, Russia)

Рис. 2. 1 — китайский маΛярийный комар Anopheles sinensis; 2 — рисунок крыΛа китайского маΛярийного комара Anopheles sinensis Fig. 2. 1 — Chinese malaria mosquito Anopheles sinensis; 2 — the wing pattern of the Chinese malaria mosquito Anopheles sinensis

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Figure 3 in A new wing skeleton of Forfexopterus (Pterosauria: Ctenochasmatidae) from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota reveals a developmental variation

Figure 3. Disparity of Forfexopterus in wing size. (a) SDUST-V1003 (adult); (b) the holotype HM V20 (subadult; reconstructed from Jiang et al., 2016).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Figure 2 in A new wing skeleton of Forfexopterus (Pterosauria: Ctenochasmatidae) from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota reveals a developmental variation

Figure 2. Enlarged images of the new wing skeleton of Forfexopterus (SDUST-V1003) from Jiufotang Formation of Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota in Jianchang, western Liaoning, northeastern China. (a) Glenoid fossa of the co-ossified scapulocoracoid; (b) elbow joint between the well-ossified humerus and ulna and radius; (c) extensor tendon process fused with the first wing phalanx. Abbreviations: co, coracoid portion; et, extensor tendon process; gf, glenoid fossa; hu, humerus; ra, radius; sc, scapular portion; ul, ulna; wmc, wing metacarpal IV; wp1, the first wing phalanx.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Figure 1 in A new wing skeleton of Forfexopterus (Pterosauria: Ctenochasmatidae) from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota reveals a developmental variation

Figure 1. New wing skeleton of Forfexopterus (SDUST-V1003) from Jiufotang Formation of Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota in Jianchang, western Liaoning, northeastern China. Abbreviations: ca, carpus; co, coracoid portion; hu, humerus; mc, metacarpals I–IV; mdI–III, manual digits I–III; pt, pteroid; ra, radius; sc, scapular portion; ul, ulna; wp1–4, wing phalanges 1–4.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →

Fig. 10 – Wings. a in The Ceratocanthinae of Madagascar and Comoro Islands: a revision of the genera Synarmostes and Goudotostes, and of the flightless Philharmostes, with description of 64 new species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea, Hybosoridae)

Fig. 10 – Wings. a, Synarmostes tibialis; b, Synarmostes occidentalis sp. nov.; c, Synarmostes sp. C; d, Philharmostes metallicus sp. nov.; e, Synarmostes makirovanae sp. nov.; f, Goudotostes laevis sp. nov..

Fig. 5 in A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration

Fig. 5. Hind wing shape variation (CV1: 50.41%; CV2: 15.49%). The colored circles in the image above represent the average discrete point center of populations; the number is the population ID. Thin-plate spline analysis results are shown by colored grid, which represents wing shape deformation. The numbers on the grid are landmarks of wings. Blue color denotes contraction between landmarks, and red color indicates expansion between landmarks. The North group and South group correspond to the boundary of Qinling Mountains as the boundary between northern and southern China.

Fig. 4 in A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration

Fig. 4. Forewing shape variation (CV1: 46.68%; CV2: 14.88%). The colored circles in the image above represent the average discrete point centers of populations; the number is the population ID. Thin-plate spline analysis results are shown by colored grid, which represents wing shape deformation. The numbers on the grid are landmarks of wings. Blue colored notes contraction between landmarks, and red color indicates expansion between landmarks. The North group and South group correspond to the boundary of Qinling Mountains as the boundary between northern and southern China.

Fig. 1 in A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration

Fig. 1. Distribution map of the P. rapae populations studied and the integrated physical regionalization (diverse environments) in the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions. Note: The numbers represent the IDs of the populations; the circles and groups represent the populations divided by the cluster analysis from Fig. 6.

Fig. 3 in A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration

Fig. 3. Boxplot of P. rapae centroid size (CS) with the mean, standard error, and standard deviation illustrating variations in wing size across geographical populations.

Fig. 6 in A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration

Fig. 6. UPGMA tree of P. rapae forewing and hind wing among different populations, based on Euclidian distances between mean wing shapes. The cluster numbers are population IDs (see Table 1).The groups are divided by Euclidian distances, i.e., the forewing divided by a linkage distance at 0.0027 and the hind wing by a linkage distance at 0.0038.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Survey for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the five-county nursery production region of middle Tennessee, USA

Fig. 1. Average trap captures of Drosophila suzukii males (gray triangles) and females (black circles) by week in 2013 and 2014. Weeks with an asterisk above them indicate significant differences (P <0.05) between the sexes by pair-wise LSMeans comparison in the negative binomial regression analysis (PROC GENMOD).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Survey for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the five-county nursery production region of middle Tennessee, USA

Fig. 2. Average trap captures of Drosophila suzukii in red (black circles) and yellow traps (gray triangles) by week in 2013 and 2014. No significant differences (P> 0.05) were found between the colors by pair-wise LSMeans comparison in the negative binomial regression analysis (PROC GENMOD).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Survey for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the five-county nursery production region of middle Tennessee, USA

Fig. 3. Adult Drosophila suzukii males (gray triangles) and females (black circles) captured from a yeast-baited deli cup trap in a plot of mixed Cornus species at the Otis L. Floyd Nursery Research Center during 2014 and 2015.

Fig. 2 in A mysterious wing spine in male coffee berry borers (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)

Fig. 2. Low temperature-scanning electron microscope photographs showing the wing spine in three lef wings (a, b, c), and a detail of the spine (d).

Fig. 24. A in Phylogeny of Eulithis Hübner and Related Genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), with an Implication of Wing Pattern Evolution

Fig. 24. A reconstruction of wing pattern element. White branches: bandshaped; black branches: lines.

Fig. 16 in Phylogeny of Eulithis Hübner and Related Genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), with an Implication of Wing Pattern Evolution

Fig. 16. Female genitalia. Scale bar = 1 mm. A. Chartographa (= Callabraxas) ludovicaria; B. C. (= Callabraxas) fabiolaria; C. Callabraxas (= Gandaritis) maculata; D. Gandaritis fixseni; E. Chartographa (= Callabraxas) compositata.

Fig. 21 in Phylogeny of Eulithis Hübner and Related Genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), with an Implication of Wing Pattern Evolution

Fig. 21. Character reconstruction over the preferred cladogram of Eulithis and related genera (continued). Presence of marking on the tornus of hindwing (character 14). White branches: without marking; hatched branches: tinged with blackish waved lines; black branches: yellowish marking. See fig. 19 for abbreviations.

Fig. 17 in Phylogeny of Eulithis Hübner and Related Genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), with an Implication of Wing Pattern Evolution

Fig. 17. Strict consensus of 38 equally most parsimonious trees with length of 353, derived from the data matrix shown in Table 2. Abbreviations for genera, see Table 2.