Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedDec 2013View details →

Fig. 1. A in A molecular phylogeny of nephilid spiders: Evolutionary history of a model lineage

Fig. 1. A pictorial summary of nephilid phenotypic diversity (right, a–h), and a strict consensus of 36 trees resulting from parsimony analyses combining molecular markers (full matrix) with morphology (left). The three sets of squares on branches represent node supports from alternative analyses, as follows: the left set corresponds to the parsimony jackknife support for the full (above branch) and Gblocked (Gb, below) matrices, respectively. The middle bar shows maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support of the full matrix under the full codon partition scheme. The right set indicates the Bremer supports for the different partitions (PBS) on the reference tree: above branches, from left to right, values for morphology + behavior, followed by the Bremer support values for the nuclear genes and below branches for the mitochondrial genes. See legend for support thresholds.Terminals have the first three letters of current taxonomic familial placement (from bottom:NEP = Nephilidae, ARA = Araneidae, TET = Tetragnathidae, NES = Nesticidae, THE = Theridiidae, THS = Theridiosomatidae, PIM = Pimoidae, LIN = Linyphiidae, DEI = Deinopidae, ULO = Uloboridae). The ingroup, nephilid part of the tree is colored in green and the ingroup terminals are colored according to the accepted nomenclature prior to the classification changes in the current study. Terminals with original molecular data end with specimen codes (as in Table 1), those with data from GenBank end with GB, and those for which only morphological (and behavioral) data were used are labeled M.

FIGURE 7 in Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. (Decapoda: Palaemonidae): a freshwater prawn from Thailand based on morphology and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 7. Phylogenetic tree of Macrobrachium reconstructed from mitochondrial COI and nuclear 18S genes using partitioned Bayesian inference with Cryphiops caementarius and Coralliocaris superba constituting an outgroup. The numbers at the nodes represent the posterior probabilities supporting the corresponding clades. Branch lengths and (horizontal) heights of isosceles triangles represent the estimated numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site.

FIGURE 6 in Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. (Decapoda: Palaemonidae): a freshwater prawn from Thailand based on morphology and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 6. Teeth on cutting edge of finger of second pereiopod of male Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov.

FIGURE 3 in Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. (Decapoda: Palaemonidae): a freshwater prawn from Thailand based on morphology and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 3. Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. (male). (A) Entire animal, lateral view; (B) telson and uropod; (C) carapace, top view; (D) scaphocerite; (E) epistome; (F) mandible; (G) maxillula; (H) maxilla; (I) first maxilliped; (J) second maxilliped; (K) third maxilliped; (L) first pereiopod; (M) second pereiopod; (N) third pereiopod; (O) uropodal diaeresis spine. Scales: (A) 5 mm; (B–N) 1 mm, (O) 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. (Decapoda: Palaemonidae): a freshwater prawn from Thailand based on morphology and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 1. Map of Thailand showing the region for collecting Macrobrachium chainatense sp. nov. Adapted from Map of Bangkok and the 76 provinces of Thailand originated by NordNordWest, modified by Paul_012, available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Thailand_provinces_en.svg (2 August 2017).

Fig. 14 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 14 CVA ordination plots derived from analysis of morphometric data for the epipharynx in which yellow stars represent group centroids. a Four groups defined for 20 species of Onthophagini: (1) Phalops, Digitonthophagus, and Kurtops (blue circles); (2) Onthophagus

Fig. 13 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 13 The extreme deformation grids obtained by each axis of the RWs 1–4, that have percent values of explained variance greater than 5 %, namely a RW_1 = 37.08 %, b RW_ 2 = 16.81 %, c RW_3 = 11.92 %, and d RW_4 = 9.43 %

Fig. 11 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 11 Maximum likelihood tree from TN93 method (uniform rates) showing the bootstrap support values on branches. On the tree, Onthophagus s.l. are marked in red, O. depressus in purple, O. interstitialis in yellow, Euonthophagus flavimargo in green, and Phalops, Digitonthophagus, and Kurtops gen.n. in blue. The acronyms are the same as in Table 1: SEN Serrophorus seniculus, GAZ

Fig. 3 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 3 Epipharynx of a Kurtops caffrarius (scale bar = 0.5 mm), b K. quadraticeps (scale bar = 0.5 mm), and c K. signatus (scale bar = 0.2 mm). d Scheme of the various parts of the epipharynx: Ac Acropariae, Co Coripha, Ha Haptomerum, Ch Chaetopariae, Ae anterior epitorma, Pr Proplegmatium, Ap Apotormae, Pt Pternotormae, Cr Crepis, De Dexiotorma, La Laeotorma

Fig. 10 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 10 Distribution map and photos of Kurtops caffrarius (green), K. quadraticeps (red), and K. signatus (blue)

Fig. 1 in Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini)

Fig. 1 Antennal scape, central cavity of a Phalops ardea, b Kurtops signatus, and c Digitonthophagus gazella. d, e Different expansions of the central part are shown in two antennae of Digitonthophagus gazella

Fig. 12 in Tracking the variability of phenotypic traits on a molecular phylogeny: an example from scolopendrid centipedes in peninsular India

Fig. 12 Leg pair exhibiting the transition between two tarsal spurs and one tarsal spur mapped onto phylogeny of Indian Digitipes

Fig. 7 in Tracking the variability of phenotypic traits on a molecular phylogeny: an example from scolopendrid centipedes in peninsular India

Fig. 7 Presence of pore field close to dorsal margin of the coxopleuron mapped onto phylogeny of Indian Digitipes

Fig. 6 in Tracking the variability of phenotypic traits on a molecular phylogeny: an example from scolopendrid centipedes in peninsular India

Fig. 6 Presence of complete longitudinal median ridge on the tergites mapped onto phylogeny of Indian Digitipes

Fig. 1 Digitipes from the Western Ghats, India. a, d, g, h D in Tracking the variability of phenotypic traits on a molecular phylogeny: an example from scolopendrid centipedes in peninsular India

Fig. 1 Digitipes from the Western Ghats, India. a, d, g, h D. coonoorensis; b, c D. barnabasi; e D. jonesii; f D. jangii. a character 1 (number of glabrous antennal articles), scale 0.5 mm; b character 5 (pore field close to dorsal margin of coxopleuron), scale 0.25 mm; c characters 2 (complete paramedian sutures), 3 (complete margination), and 4 (complete longitudinal median ridge on tergites), scale 1 mm; d character 6 (lateral spine on coxopleuron), scale 0.55 mm; e characters 8 (number of VM spines on prefemur) and 9 (number of VL spines on prefemur), scale 1 mm; f character 7 (number of DM spines on prefemur), scale 1 mm; g character 10 (transition from two to one tarsal spur), scale 0.5 mm; h character 11 (tarsal spur on leg 20), scale 1 mm

opennotspecifiedOct 2015View details →

Fig. 4 Afroanthracites males. a A in Topography and climatic fluctuations boosting speciation: biogeography and a molecular phylogeny of the East African genera Afroanthracites Hemp & Ingrisch and Afroagraecia Ingrisch & Hemp (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae, Agraeciini)

Fig. 4 Afroanthracites males. a A. montium from the Mounts Kilimanjaro/Meru area. b A. usambariucs, West Usambara Mountains. c A. lutindi, Lutindi forest reserve, West Usambara Mountains. d A. viridis, East Usambara Mountains. e A. pseudodiscolor, Lutindi reserve. f A. discolor, Mazumbai forest reserve, West Usambara Mountains

opennotspecifiedOct 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Topography and climatic fluctuations boosting speciation: biogeography and a molecular phylogeny of the East African genera Afroanthracites Hemp & Ingrisch and Afroagraecia Ingrisch & Hemp (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae, Agraeciini)

Fig. 2 Relationships among species of Afroanthracites and Afroagraecia inferred from both Bayesian and likelihood analysis based on the 16S rRNA-H3

opennotspecifiedOct 2014View details →

Fig. 3 Bayesian 50 in Recovering the evolutionary history of Africa's most diverse viper genus: morphological and molecular phylogeny of Bitis (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae)

Fig. 3 Bayesian 50 % majority-rule consensus phylogram of Bitis species from combined evidence. Bayesian and parsimony analyses were conducted from a 29 morphological character dataset (Appendix S2) and a partitioned dataset of sequences from four mitochondrial gene

opennotspecifiedOct 2014View details →

Fig. 1 Bayesian 50 in Recovering the evolutionary history of Africa's most diverse viper genus: morphological and molecular phylogeny of Bitis (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae)

Fig. 1 Bayesian 50 % majority-rule consensus phylogram of Bitis species based on 29 morphological characters (Appendix S2). Support values include posterior probabilities (Bayesian, above) and bootstrap values