Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41,236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41,236 results for “Review of reviews”
Fig. 7 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 7 Representative illustrations of Daxia cenomana: a Equatorial section, Arnaud-Vanneau & Prestat in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 1, fig. 2, France); b Axial section, Arnaud-Vanneau & Prestat in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 1, fig.7, France).
Fig. 3 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 3 Cenomanian paleogeography with regions indicating the location of most planispiral LBF in this study. There are a few additional records from, for example, Peru, Afghanistan and Tibet. (Base paleogeographic map courtesy of Halliburton).
Fig. 5 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 5 Representative illustrations of Biconcava bentori: a Equatorial section, Hamaoui & Saint Marc (1970, pl. 21, fig. 1, Israel); b Axial section, Hamaoui in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 13, fig. 3, Lebanon).
Fig. 1 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 1 Anonymised snapshot of a figure caption from a 2016 paper (by a major publisher) with four taxa spelled incorrectly.
Fig. 39 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 39 Representative illustrations of Spirocyclina atlasica: a Equatorial section, Saint Marc and Rahhali (1982, pl. 2, fig. 1, Morocco); b External View, Etachfini (2006, pl. 13, fig. 9, Morocco); c Subaxial section, Saint Marc and Rahhali (1982, pl. 2, fig. 8, Morocco); d Axial section, Charriere et al. (1998, fig. 7(1), Morocco).
Fig. 2 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 2 Some morphological descriptions and visualisations of wall and/or chamber components of planispiral or part-planispiral LBF taxa. (a after Hamaoui & Saint-Marc, 1970; b-f after Hottinger, 2006; G: after Vicedo et al., 2013; h after Consorti et al., 2015; j after Consorti et al., 2018). Other abbreviations shown in image j are bl=basal layer; cs=conical spaces; if=intercameral foramina and sc=socculi crest.
Fig. 27 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 27 Representative illustrations of Moncharmontia compressa: a Equatorial section, Tasli et al. (2006, fig. 7(J), Turkey); b Axial section, Tasli et al. (2006, fig. 7(K), Turkey).
Fig. 35 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 35 Representative illustrations of Hemicyclammina whitei: a Axial view, Whittaker et al. (1998, pl. 12, fig. 1a, Qatar - see also Simmons & Bidgood, 2022, fig. 1a); b Axial section, Whittaker et al. (1998, pl. 59, fig. 8, U.A.E. - see also Simmons & Bidgood, 2022, fig. 3c); c Equatorial section, Simmons & Bidgood (2022, fig. 3a, Abu Dhabi).
Fig. 37 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 37 Representative illustrations of Reissella ramonensis: a Exterior view, (Hamaoui 1963, pl. 1, fig. 3, holotype, Israel); b Exterior view (schematic), (Hamaoui 1963, pl. 1, fig. 11, Israel); c Enlarged cutaway exterior view showing internal features (Hamaoui 1963, text fig. 1, Israel).
Fig. 21 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 21 Representative illustrations of Charentia cuvillieri: a Equatorial section, Neumann (1965, holotype, pl. 2, fig. 1c, France); b Axial section, Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 3, fig. 3, France).
Fig. 29 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 29 Representative illustrations of Buccicrenata ex gr. subgoodlandensis: a Uncoiled equatorial section, Loeblich & Tappan (1985, pl. 2, fig. 7, Texas); b Close up of section through wall and septum, Loeblich & Tappan (1985, pl. 2, fig. 10, Texas); c Equatorial section, Loeblich & Tappan (1985, pl. 2, fig. 5, Texas); d External view, Loeblich & Tappan (1985, pl. 2, fig. 9, Texas).
Fig. 33 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 33 Representative illustrations of Pseudocyclammina sarvakensis: a Equatorial section, Schlagintweit & Yazdi-Moghadam (2023, fig. 4b, Iran, holotype); b Subaxial section, Ibid. (2023, fig. 4d, Iran); c Oblique tangential section, Ibid. (2023, fig. 4f, Iran). Not scale bar change for figs. b & c.
Fig. 23 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 23 Representative illustrations of Fleuryana gediki: a Equatorial section, Solak et al. (2020, fig. 15(R), Turkey); b Axial section, Solak et al. (2020, fig. 15(S), Turkey).
Fig. 31 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms
Fig. 31 Representative illustrations of Pseudocyclammina rugosa: a Equatorial section, Maync (1952, pl. 12, fig. 9, France); b Equatorial section of uncoiled specimen, Maync (1959b, pl. 1, fig. 14, France); c Axial section, Maync (1952, pl. 12, fig. 8, France).
FIGURE 1 in Review Renewed perspectives on the sedentary-pelagic last common bilaterian ancestor
FIGURE 1 The fossil records of the earliest sedentary and motile multicellular eukaryotes, metazoans and bilaterians. The first appearance of metazoan and bilaterian phyla (where records are present) is indicated by a genus name, a higher-level taxon acronym, and an age estimation (in millions of years). Several taxa with uncertain attribution are included to show diversity. Note that there is no evidence for active mobility of the muticellular eukaryotes over a very long period of time (see text for references and details). Abbrevations: Act = Acanthocephala; Ann = Annelida; Art = Arthropoda; Bil = Bilateria; Cha = Chaetognatha; Cte = Ctenophora; Cni = Cnidaria; Cho = Chordata; Deu = Deuterostomia; Ech = Echinodermata; Ecd = Ecdysozoa; Enp = Enteropneusta; Ent = Entoprocta; Gna = Gnathifera; Loph = Lophophorata; Lphz = Lophotrochozoa; Met = Metazoa; Mol = Mollusca; Pho = Phoronida; Por = Porifera; Pri = Priapulida; Pte = Pterobranchia; Tun = Tunicata. The controversial motile metazoans without evident bilaterian affinities are indicated by an asterisk. ARTWORK AND DESIGN BY TATIANA KORSHUNOVA
FIGURE 5 in Review Renewed perspectives on the sedentary-pelagic last common bilaterian ancestor
FIGURE 5 Reconstructions of the adult states of the sedentary/semi-sedentary stem groups (indicated by asterisks) with well-defined clonal reproduction in the major bilaterian lineages Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa and the semi-sedentary/motile crown groups with reduced clonality (based on recent or fossil taxa, except for the reconstructed stem-chordata). The drawings and text from bottom to top are meant to illustrate the evolutionary changes along these lineages. The cephalic shield and potential derived structures (foot and mantle, see assessment of the potential homology in the text) are indicated by yellow, the oral lobes indicated by green, the stolon and tail by blue, the protoconch-like structures by violet, and the gut by red. ARTWORK BY TATIANA KORSHUNOVA
Fig. 3 in A New Record And А Taxonomic Review With Checklist Of Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) From Iraq
Fig. 3. Epigyne of Evippa amitaii Armiach Steinpress, Alderweireldt, Cohen, Chipman & Gavish-Regev, 2021. Scale bar 0.2 mm.
Fig. 1 in A New Record And А Taxonomic Review With Checklist Of Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) From Iraq
Fig. 1. Map of collection localities: Thi Qar, Ur district (red circle); Basrah, Qarmat Ali, Al Mashab (yellow star); Basrah, Qarmat Ali, Al Khait (green square).
Fig. 5 in A New Record And А Taxonomic Review With Checklist Of Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) From Iraq
Fig. 5. Pardosa roscai (Roewer, 1951): A — dorsal habitus; B — ventral habitus; C— epigyne. Scale bar 1 mm (A–B); scale bar 0.25 mm (C).
FIG. 3 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 3. — Onychocepon harpax Pérez, 1921, ZRC 2023.0258 (A-K): A, female, dorsal view; B, male, dorsal view; C, male, ventral view (arrows indicate attached ciliates); D, left antennule of female; E, left antenna of female; F, left maxilliped and barbular lobes of female; G, left oostegite 1 of female, outer view; H, left oostegite 1 of female, inner view, asterisk shows lobe drawn in close-up; I, close-up of lobe from inner ridge of oostegite 1 of female; J, left pereopod 1 of female; K, left pereopod 7 of female. Scale bars: A, 2 mm; B, C, 1 mm; D, E, I-K, 50 µm; F-H, 200 µm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.