Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41,236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41,236 results for “Review of reviews”
FIG. 8. — Rhopalione racemus n in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 8. — Rhopalione racemus n. sp. holotype and allotype specimens (SAM C16386): A, holotype female, dorsal view; B, holotype female, ventral view; C, allotype male, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C, 1 mm.
FIG. 4 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 4. — Rhopalione uromyzon Pérez, 1920, syntype female (MNHN-IU-2024-3187) (8.1 mm): A, dorsal view; B, ventral view; C, right antennule and antenna; D, barbula; E, left oostegite 1, inner view; F, left oostegite 1, outer view; G, left maxilliped, outer view; H, left pereopod 1; I, left pereopod 7; J, close-up view of dactylus, propodus and carpus ending of pereopod 7. Scale bars: A, B, 1 mm; C, G, I, 100 µm; D, 200 µm; E, F, 500 µm; H, 250 µm; J, 50 µm.
FIG. 11. — Rhopalione rusa n in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 11. — Rhopalione rusa n. sp. holotype (ZRC 2023.0259, A-G) and allotype (ZRC 2023.0260, H-M) specimens (ZRC 2019.0534): A, left antennae; B, barbula, left side; C, dorsal view of terminus of pleon showing fifth pleomere with lateral plates on both sides and biramous pleopod shown only on right side and uropods; D, left maxilliped, outer view; inset shows inner view of anterior lobe and spur obscured by lobe of maxilliped (*); E, left oostegite 1 and pereopod 1, outer view; F, left oostegite 1, inner view; G, left pereopod 7; H, ventral view; I, left antennae; J, right pereopod 1; K, right pereopod 1, close-up of dactyl and propodus; L, right pereopod 7; M, pleomere showing pleopod 4 on right side and mid-ventral tubercule. Abbreviations: En, endopod; Ex, exopod; Lp, lateral plate; Uro, uropods. Scale bars: A, G, L, M, 100 µm; B, D-F, 250 µm; C, H, 500 µm; J-K, 50 µm.
FIG. 2 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 2. — Heterocepon marginatum Shiino, 1936, ZRC 2023.0271 (A-I): A, right antenna and antennule of female; B, barbula of female (asterisk shows missing outer lobe); C, left maxilliped of female, outer view with outer barbular lobe attached; D, left oostegite 1 of female, outer view; E, left oostegite 1 of female, inner view; F, left pereopod 1 of female; G, left pereopod 7 of female. Scale bars: A, F, G, 50 µm; B, 250 µm; C-E, 200 µm.
FIG. 7 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 7. — Rhopalione sinensis Markham, 1990 (NHMD-1184775): A, female, dorsal view; B, female, lateral view; C, left oostegite 1, inner view; D, left maxilliped, outer view. Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C, D, 100 µm.
FIG. 6 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 6. — Rhopalione atrinicolae Page, 1985 paratype specimens (A, B: NMNZ Cr. 3090) and non-type specimens (C, D: NIWA 160626): A, female, dorsal view; B, male, dorsal view. C, female, dorsal view; D, female, dorsal view, arrow shows lateral plate with slightly crenulate edge. Scale bars: A, C, D, 2 mm; B, 1 mm.
FIG. 5 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 5. — Rhopalione uromyzon Pérez, 1920:two syntype males (MNHN-IU-2024-3189) (A-C, E-G: 3.45 mm, D: 3.68 mm), one syntype female (MNHN-IU-2024-3196) (H, 3.90 mm), 2 syntype females (I, 4.35 mm, J, 5.55 mm): A, dorsal view; B, lateral view; C, ventral view; D, dorsal view, E, left antennule and antenna; F, left pereopod 1; G, left pereopod 7; H-J, dorsal views. Scale bars: A-D, H, 500 µm; E-G, 100 µm; I, J, 1 mm.
FIG. 1 in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 1. — Heterocepon marginatum Shiino, 1936, ZRC 2023.0264 (A), ZRC 2023.0269 (B), SMF-ZMG948b (C, D): A, female, dorsal view (dashed line shows where oostegites are cut-off in the picture); B, male, dorsal view; C, female in host Arcotheres palaensis (Bürger, 1895); D, female, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, B, D, 1 mm; C, 2.5 mm.
FIG. 10. — Rhopalione rusa n in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 10. — Rhopalione rusa n. sp. holotype (ZRC 2023.0259) and allotype (ZRC 2023.0260) specimens: A, ventral view of host pinnotherid Arcotheres similis (Bürger, 1895) with Rhopalione sp. in situ on left side of pleon (posterior end of male shown by arrow); B, holotype female, dorsal view; C, holotype female, ventral view; D, allotype male, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, 2 mm; B-D, 1 mm.
FIG. 9. — Rhopalione racemus n in New records of bopyrid parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Epicaridea) of pea crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) with descriptions of two new species of Rhopalione Pérez, 1921 and a review of the genus
FIG. 9. — Rhopalione racemus n. sp. holotype (A-H) and allotype (I-L) specimens (SAM C16386): A, left antennae; B, barbula; C, left maxilliped, with base of barbular lobes shown; D, left oostegite 1, outer view; E, left oostegite 1, inner view; F, pereomere 7 and pleon, ventral view; G, left pereopod 1 and coxal plate; H, left pereopod 7; I, ventral view; J, right antennae, oral cone and maxilliped; K, right pereopod 1; L, left pereopod 7. Abbreviations: CP, coxal plate; IL, inner barbular lobe; Max, maxilliped; OL, outer barbular lobe; Or, oral cone. Scale bars: A, G, H, 100 µm; B, D, E, I, 500 µm; C, 250 µm; F, 1 mm; J-L, 50 µm.
3D printed biomedical devices and their applications: A review on state-of-the-art technologies, existing challenges, and future perspectives
<p>This repository consists of the data that have been utilized to imagine and subsequently construct Fig. 1, Fig. 3 , Fig. 5 , Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 of the article " H. B. Mamo, M. Adamiak and A. Kunwar. 3D printed biomedical devices and their applications: A review on state-of-the-art technologies, existing challenges, and future perspectives, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 143 (2023) 105930. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105930 ".</p> <p> Brief introduction of the files contained in this repository</p> <ol> <li> acronyms.csv: This file consists of the list of acronyms associated with materials and techniques used in 3D printing of biomedical devices.</li> <li>fig1a-data.csv: The csv file provides a relative ranking of different types of 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications based upon merits and limitations (wherever applicable). The technique listed as Rank 1 is considered as the most commonly used 3D printing procedure.</li> <li> fig1b-data.csv: The csv file enlists the benfits of the 3D printing techniques in biomedical applications as compared to subtractive manufacturing methods.</li> <li> fig3-data.csv: The file contains a comparison between conventional and customized tablet printing methods. The illustration is made through the manufacturing or printing of pharmaceutical tablets or pills. This illustation also applies to the production of pharmaceutical capsules. It thus illustrates that customized medicine is enabled using 3D printing technology.</li> <li> fig5-data.csv: This file enumerates the major challenges associated with 3D printing of biomedical devices.</li> <li> fig6-data.csv: The file enlists the roles of wearable smarts, cloud-based platforms and physicians in context of the hospitals implementing IoMT.</li> <li> fig7-data.csv: The aspects of IoMT Sensors,IoMT Platforms,3D Printers,Design and Prototypes within the integrated 3D printing-IoMT ecosystem are listed in the file.</li> </ol>
User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: reviewing methods and objectives
<p><span>Although laws and standardization bodies promote user participation in digital accessibility evaluations, people with disabilities still consider themselves excluded from this process. One reason could be the lack of systematized knowledge about evaluation methods involving users. This article seeks to understand how and for what purpose digital accessibility evaluations with user participation were conducted in the scientific literature from 2018 to 2021. Three types of user participation emerged: 1) user-based usability testing to evaluate task accomplishment, user reactions and interface qualities; 2) interviewing users to assess the local and social factors impacting digital service accessibility; 3) using questionnaires or crowdsourcing to check the compliance of certain interfaces with accessibility standards. Participants are primarily chosen based on their functional impairments and, to a lesser degree, their project-related skills, biographical information, technology habits, among other criteria. The comprehensive user insights gained with these methods are judged to be positive whereas the lack of representativeness of the selected user samples is found to be regrettable. The article finally discusses the definitions of accessibility and disability that underpin these methodologies.</span></p>
Figure 5 in A new aetosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the upper Blue Mesa Member (Adamanian: Early-Mid Norian) of the Late Triassic Chinle Formation, northern Arizona, USA, and a review of the paratypothoracin Tecovasuchus across the southwestern USA
Figure 5. Revised regional occurrences of Tecovasuchus chatterjeei across the Chinle Formation and Dockum Group of the southwestern United States (modified from Martz 2008 and Heckert et al. 2007). Abbreviations: AZ=Arizona, NM=New Mexico, TX=Texas.
Figure 1 in A new aetosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the upper Blue Mesa Member (Adamanian: Early-Mid Norian) of the Late Triassic Chinle Formation, northern Arizona, USA, and a review of the paratypothoracin Tecovasuchus across the southwestern USA
Figure 1. Stratigraphic position in the Chinle Formation (A) of PFV 456 and the Placerias and Downs Quarries in Arizona (modified from Reyes et al. 2020 and Kligman et al. 2023), and their geographic occurrence (B). U-Pb ages based on Ramezani et al. (2014) and Rasmussen et al. (2020). Abbreviations: AZ=Arizona; PEFO=Petrified Forest National Park; Tr.=Triassic.
Figure 3. A in A new aetosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the upper Blue Mesa Member (Adamanian: Early-Mid Norian) of the Late Triassic Chinle Formation, northern Arizona, USA, and a review of the paratypothoracin Tecovasuchus across the southwestern USA
Figure 3. A. Holotype paramedian osteoderm of Kryphioparma caerula gen. et sp. nov. in comparison to that of other stagonolepidoid taxa documented within the Placerias Quarry and PFV 456, UCMP 165173. B. Desmatosuchus, PEFO 49568. C. Calypotosuchus wellesi, PEFO 46222. Orientation: All in dorsal view. Abbreviations: Ant.=Anterior, Ant. bar=Anterior bar, Ant. lam.=Anterior lamina, Dors. em.=Dorsal eminence. Small, unlabeled arrows indicate lateral direction.
Extended Data for "A Scoping Review of Infertility Research conducted in the Republic of Ireland"
<p><span>This dataset contains the following files:</span></p> <p><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><span>Extended Data 1: Changes to Methodology from Protocol</span></p> <p><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><span>Extended Data 2: List of Included Documents (n=105); List of Potentially Relevant Studies that were not Located (n=8)</span></p> <p><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><span>Extended Data 3: Data Extraction Table</span></p> <p><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><span>Extended Data 4: Completed PRISMA ScR Checklist</span></p> <p><span>These files comprise extended data for the paper: </span></p> <p><span><span>Earley, A., O’Dea, A., Madden, C., O’Connor, P., Byrne, D., Murphy, AW., & Lydon, S (2024). </span><span>A Scoping Review of Infertility Research conducted in the Republic Of Ireland. <em>Under review</em>.</span></span></p> <p> </p>
Figs 1–3 in REVIEW OF LEAF BEETLES OF THE SUBGENUS HYPERICIA BEDEL, 1899 (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: CHRYSOLINA) FROM EAST ASIA
Figs 1–3. Habitus in dorsal view. 1 – Chrysolina hyperici Forster, male (Groissenbrunn, Austria); 2 – Ch. geminata Paykull, male (Achit district, Sverdlovsk region, Russia); 3 – Ch.
Figs 13–16 in REVIEW OF LEAF BEETLES OF THE SUBGENUS HYPERICIA BEDEL, 1899 (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: CHRYSOLINA) FROM EAST ASIA
Figs 13–16. Habitus in dorsal view of Chrysolina nikkoensis Jacoby. 13, 14 – male and female from Shikotan Island, South Kurile Islands; 15, 16 – syntypes, males from Japan. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figures 8–15. Ophthalmothrips elongatus Li in Review of the genus Ophthalmothrips Hood (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) from China, with a new species
Figures 8–15. Ophthalmothrips elongatus Li & Dang, sp. nov. 8. Head and prosternum, female; 9. Head and prosternum, male; 10. Antenna; 11. Pelta and tergites II; 12. Pronotum and mesopresternum; 13. Tergites IX–X, female; 14. Tergites IX–X, male; 15. Habitat, from Poaceae grasses of Dupangling National Nature Reserve, Hunan. Scale bars: 8–14 = 100 μm.
Figures 1–7 in Review of the genus Ophthalmothrips Hood (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) from China, with a new species
Figures 1–7. Dorsal view of Ophthalmothrips elongates Li & Dang, sp. nov. 1. Head, pronotum and forelegs of female; 2. Antenna; 3. Sub-basal setae; 4. Mesopresternum; 5. Pelta; 6. Tergites IX–X of male; 7. Tergites IX–X of female.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.