Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 6. Male genitalia and associated structures of Epimetopidae. A–H – Eupotemus Ji & Jäch, 1998 (A–F – E. smithi sp. nov.; G – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; H – E. carinaticollis (Basilewsky, 1956)). I–R – Epimetopus Lacordaire, 1854 (I–N – E. mendeli Fikáček et al., 2011; O – E. cf. burruyacu Oliva, 1986; P – E. multiporus Perkins, 2012; Q – E. clandestinus Perkins, 2012; R – E. thermarum Schwarz & Barber, 1917). S–Z – Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949 (S–Y – E. acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; Z – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875)). A, I, S – sternite VIII; B, J, T – tergite VIII; C, K, U – sternite IX; D, L, V – aedeagus dorsally; E, M, W – aedeagus laterally; F, N, X – aedeagus ventrally (basal part omitted in X); Y – sperm pump. Color coding: green – ventral projections of the median lobe; red – median lobe; blue – paramere (pale blue – dorsal lobe; dark blue – ventral lobe). Not to scale.

Fig. 5 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 5. Morphology of Epimetopidae. A–B – ventral morphology: A – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; B – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Perkins & Barclay, 2011. C–F – hind wings: C – Eumetopus schulkei Jäch, 2002; D – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; E – Epimetopus mendeli, adopted from Fංκගඹൾκ et al. (2011); F – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. G – dorsal part of the metathorax. H – scutellum. I–K – abdominal ventrites (I – Eumetopus schuelkei; J – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; K – Epimetopus mendeli). L–M – ovipositor (L – Eumetopus schuelkei; M – Eupotemus smithi). O – elytral punctation, slide-mounted elytra of Epimetopus costaricensis. P – female of Eumetopus acutimontis in ventral view, with the egg cases carried under the abdomen. Not to scale.

Fig. 15 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 15. Elytral sculpture and male genitalia of Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949. A–H – elytral sculpture, same specimens as in Fig. 14: A – E. acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; B – E. asperatus (Champion, 1919); C – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875); D – E. flavidulus (Sharp, 1890); E – E. maindroni (Régimbart, 1903); F – E. schuelkei Jäch, 2002; G – E. tibialis Ji & Jäch, 1998; H – E. weigeli Skale & Jäch, 2003. I–L – male genitalia of examined specimens, large basal portion of the phallobase omitted (dorsal and lateral view): I – E. acutimontis from Vietnam; J – E. flavidulus from India: Andhra Pradesh; K – E. maindroni from India: Gujarat; L – E. weigeli from India: Uttarakhand.

Fig. 3 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 3. Thoracic morphology of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–B, J, Q – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; C–D, L–O – Eumetopus schuelkei Jäch, 2002; E–F – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2012; G–I, P – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. A–I – prothorax in ventral view (B, D, F, H – detail of ventral sculpture of the pronotal hood; I – detail of closed procoxal cavity. J–L – meso- and metathorax in ventral view. M–N – elytron in ventral view (M – general view; N – detail of the ventral ridge, notice the spiny surface on inner face of the ridge (in) and on the elytral plectrum posteriorly of it (pl)). O – mesotrochanter. P–Q – details of pretarsus with the leaf-like empodial seta. Not to scale.

Fig. 9 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 9. Habitus photographs of the species of the Eupotemus limicola species group, holotypes: A–C – E. bilobatus sp. nov.; D–F – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; G–I – E. limicola (Delève, 1967).

Fig. 12 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 12. Habitus photographs of the species of the Eupotemus carinaticollis species group, holotypes: A–C – E. carinaticollis (Basilewsky, 1956); D–F – E. uluguru sp. nov.; G–I – E. taianus sp. nov.

Fig. 1 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 1. Distribution and phylogenetic relationships of Epimetopidae genera. A – summary of all known records of Epimetopidae, mapped by genera. Records for American Epimetopus adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ (2012). B–E – phylogenetic relationship among genera based on morphological characters (B–C) and DNA data (D–E): B–C – strict consensus tree of the morphology-based maximum parsimony analysis (B – complete tree with bootstrap supports; C – Georissidae + Epimetopidae subtree with characters mapped). D – Bayesian maximum credibility tree based on cox1, 16S, 18S and 28S sequences, with posterior probability of particular clades. E – morphological characters mapped on the molecular topology of Epimetopidae constrained as sister to all other hydrophilid families following the topology by Lඳ et al. (2020).

Fig. 2 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 2. Morphology of mouthparts and head appendages of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–I – Eupotemus Ji & Jäch, 1998: A, C, E, F, H – E. smithi sp. nov., B, D, G – E. limicola (Delève, 1967), I – E. cameroonensis sp. nov. J–Q – Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949: J, L, M, N, P – E. schuelkei Jäch, 2002, Q – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875), K, L*, O – E. sp. from Sri Lanka. R–Z, a–l – Epimetopus Lacordaire, 1854: R–W – E. mendeli Fikáček et al., 2011, X–Z, a–c – E. costaricensis Perkins, 1979, g, j – E. thermarum Schwarz & Barber, 1917, e, k – E. trogoides (Sharp, 1874), h – E. costatus group, f, i, l – E. punctipennis Perkins, 1979. Body parts: A–B, J–K, R, X, g–i – labrum; C, L, S, Y – mandibles; D, L*, e–f – mandibular apex; E, M, T, Z – maxilla; U – detail of basal part of ultimate palpomere; F–G, N–O, V, a–b, j–l – mentum and prementum; H–I, P–Q, W, c – antenna. Not to scale.

Fig. 8 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 8. Male genitalia of the species of the Eupotemus limicola species group, holotypes. A–C, R–S – E. bilobatus sp. nov.; D–F, T–U – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; G–I, V–W – E. ophioglossus sp. nov.; J–L, X–Y – E. smithi sp. nov.; M–Q – E. limicola (Delève, 1967). A, D, G, J, M – dorsal view; B, E, H, K, N – lateral view; C, F, I, L – ventral view; O – apex of the median lobe, dorsal view; P, R, T, V, X – fork of the median lobe; Q, S, U, W, Y – apex of parameres in lateral view.

Fig. 4 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 4. Head and leg morphology of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–B, H, L – Eumetopus acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; D, M – Eumetopus schuelkei Jäch, 2002; C, K–L, Q – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; F–G – Epimetopus punctipennis Perkins, 1979 (adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ 2012); E, I–J, R – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2011; N–O – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. A – head in dorsolateral view (can – clypeal canthus causing the eye emargination); B–C – head in dorsal view (arrow – the ridge dividing anterior declined part of clypeus); D – mentum and maxilla; E – head in ventral view; F–G – occipital part of the head with median raised tubercle, dorsolateral view (arrows: parallel impressions corresponding to ventral ridges of pronotal hood); H–I – antenna, scapus largely omitted; J – labial palp; K – apical tibial armature, ventral view, mesothoracic leg; L – apical tibial armature and tarsus, ventral view, metathoracic leg; M – mesotibia; N–O – tarsus (N – posterior; O – anterior); P–R – metatibia, dorsal view. Not to scale.

Figs. 10–12. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000 in Discovery of the Male of Parabuthus muelleri, and Implications for the Phylogeny of Parabuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figs. 10–12. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000, male (AMNH [AH 3991]), distribution of trichobothria and macrosetae on the dextral pedipalpal patella and femur. 10. Dorsal aspect of patella. 11. External aspect of patella. 12. Dorsal aspect of femur. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Discovery of the Male of Parabuthus muelleri, and Implications for the Phylogeny of Parabuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Fig. 1. The optimal tree obtained by analysis under weighting regimes that maximized fit and minimized length. This topology was retrieved by analyses with equal weights, successive weights, and implied weights under k = 3–6 (table 2). Zerolength branches are collapsed. This topology also corresponds to the majority rule (>50%) consensus of MPTs obtained by the eight analyses in which weighting regime and multistate character transformation were varied (table 2). Solid bars indicate uniquely derived apomorphic character states, whereas empty bars indicate parallel derivations of apomorphic states under ACCTRAN optimization. The number above each bar gives the character number, whereas the number below gives the character state. Branchsupport values of nodes are provided below branches. Refer to appendix 2 for character descriptions.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →

Figs. 9–14 in Cranial Anatomy in Tenrecid Insectivorans: Character Evolution Across Competing Phylogenies

Figs. 9–14. Coronal sections through middle ear of tenrecid genera, as follows. 9. Potamogale velox (ZIUT HL17 mm), anterior to jugular foramen, slice 43.3.4. 10. Potamogale velox (ZIUT HL 17 mm), posterior to anterior carotid foramen, slice 37.2.5. 11. Micropotamogale lamottei (IZEA 939), anterior to jugular foramen, slice 181.2.2. 12. Micropotamogale lamottei (IZEA 939), posterior to anterior carotid foramen, slice 177.2.1. 13. Geogale aurita (MCZ 45504), anterior to jugular foramen, slice 105.3.1. 14. Geogale aurita (MCZ 45504), anterior to anterior carotid foramen, slice 96.1.2.

Fig. 14 in Discovery of the Male of Parabuthus muelleri, and Implications for the Phylogeny of Parabuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Fig. 14. The known distribution of Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000 (-), which is endemic to Namibia. Contour interval = 600 m.

Fig. 13. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000 in Discovery of the Male of Parabuthus muelleri, and Implications for the Phylogeny of Parabuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Fig. 13. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000, male (AMNH [AH 3991]), hemispermatophore, ental aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figs. 4–6. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000 in Discovery of the Male of Parabuthus muelleri, and Implications for the Phylogeny of Parabuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figs. 4–6. Parabuthus muelleri Prendini, 2000, male (AMNH [AH 3991]), diagnostic characters. 4. Carapace. 5. Dorsal aspect of segments I and II, showing dorsomedian stridulatory region and subtriangular Vshape curvature at posterodorsal edge. 6. Lateral aspect of segments IV, V and telson. Scale bars = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2009View details →

Fig. 2 in Termites (Isoptera): Their Phylogeny, Classification, and Rise to Ecological Dominance

Fig. 2. Continuation of figure 1 focusing on Hodotermitidae s.s., ''Termopsidae'' s.s., Archotermopsidae, n. fam., Stolotermitidae, stat. n., and various stem-group lineages. Branch ''B'' (Kalotermitidae + Neoisoptera) is depicted in fig. 4.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2009View details →

Fig. 3 in Termites (Isoptera): Their Phylogeny, Classification, and Rise to Ecological Dominance

Fig. 3. Strict consensus cladogram of all termite species studied superimposed on geological time scale, with graph of termite abundance

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2009View details →

Fig. 1 in Termites (Isoptera): Their Phylogeny, Classification, and Rise to Ecological Dominance

Fig. 1. Strict consensus cladogram with unambiguous character-state changes mapped. Character numbers appear above the branch, with the corresponding state beneath the branch. Branch ''A'' continued in figs. 2, 4, and 5. Chaeteessa (Mantodea), Panchlora (Blattaria), Periplaneta (Blattaria), and Cryptocercus (Blattaria) are the outgroup taxa.