Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →

Table 2 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species

<p><b>Table 2.</b> Summary of measurements (range [n], in mm) of species of <i>Ophiophagus</i> Günther, 1864 recognised in this study. See ‘Terminology for character analysis’ for details. Abbreviations: BW = Midbody diameter; ED = Eye width; EYEN = Eye to nostril distance; EYES = Eye to snout distance; FL = Fang length from base; FW = Maximum fang width; HD = Head depth; HL = Head length; HW = Head width; IORB = Interorbital width; NOD = Nostril diameter; OCCL = Occipital length; ROSL = Rostral length; ROSW = Rostral width; SVL = Snout-vent length; TL = Tail length (if entire).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Characters</b></th><th><i>O. hannah</i> s. str.</th><th><i>O. bungarus</i> comb. nov.</th><th><i>O. kaalinga</i> sp. nov.</th><th><i>O. salvatana</i> sp. nov.</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>SVL</th><td>233.0–3276.0 (37)</td><td>330.0–3790.0 (65)</td><td>496.0–2660.0 (4)</td><td>1490.0–2565.0 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>TL</th><td>84.0–875 (37)</td><td>111.0–845.0 (61)</td><td>109.0–542.0 (3)</td><td>343.0–770.0 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>RTL range (mean)</th><td>21.7–26.4% (24.05%)</td><td>19.3–25.1% (22.20%)</td><td>18.0–19.9% (18.95%)</td><td>18.7–23.0% (20.85%)</td></tr><tr><th>BW</th><td>6.7–45.9 (55)</td><td>12.5–64.5 (36)</td><td>11.7–60.0 (4)</td><td>28.1–45.9 (3)</td></tr><tr><th>HL</th><td>13.3–79.2 (61)</td><td>16.0–76.6 (68)</td><td>50.9–74.6 (4)</td><td>36.2–70.8 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>HW</th><td>10.9–53.5 (59)</td><td>7.1–60.4 (70)</td><td>10.5–54.7 (5)</td><td>22.9–57.2 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>HD</th><td>6.6–48.4 (54)</td><td>6.7–76.0 (70)</td><td>22.8–37.2 (4)</td><td>14.8–36.7 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>ED</th><td>3.7–10.5 (57)</td><td>4.1–9.8 (73)</td><td>4.2–9.7 (5)</td><td>6.3–11.1 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>EYES</th><td>4.4–27.6 (62)</td><td>5.2–26.3 (71)</td><td>18.5–25.2 (4)</td><td>12.1–21.6 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>EYEN</th><td>1.9–14.3 (62)</td><td>2.1–13.5 (71)</td><td>2.8–11.5 (5)</td><td>5.2–9.9 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>NOD</th><td>1.2–7.3 (61)</td><td>1.0–6.9 (71)</td><td>5.8–9.5 (4)</td><td>3.1–6.4 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>ROSL</th><td>3.1–19.9 (61)</td><td>3.2–18.7 (71)</td><td>12.0–16.6 (4)</td><td>8.6–15.6 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>ROSW</th><td>1.7–9.7 (60)</td><td>2.0–8.8 (71)</td><td>6.1–8.0 (4)</td><td>4.8–7.6 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>IORB</th><td>5.9–34.2 (61)</td><td>7.5–12.3 (71)</td><td>23.4–31.8 (4)</td><td>14.8–25.9 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>OCCL</th><td>2.7–24.0 (61)</td><td>3.4–19.9 (71)</td><td>3.8–18.3 (5)</td><td>9.6–21.3 (5)</td></tr><tr><th>FL</th><td>0.10–10.10 (48)</td><td>0.13–13.60 (50)</td><td>7.10–8.50 (4)</td><td>4.50–12.00 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>FW</th><td>0.04–4.80 (45)</td><td>0.01–4.50 (50)</td><td>1.90–2.40 (4)</td><td>1.10–3.30 (4)</td></tr></tbody></table>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →

Table 1 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species

<p><b>Table 1.</b> Summary of morphological characters associated with species of <i>Ophiophagus</i> Günther, 1864 recognised in this study. See ‘Terminology for character analysis’ for details. Note: pale dorsal bands are sometimes absent in adult <i>O. bungarus</i> (Schlegel, 1837) comb. nov. (in images of live specimens examined), and consistently absent in adult <i>O. salvatana</i> Gowri Shankar, Das & Wüster sp. nov. Further, juveniles of the latter show pale bands (in images of three live specimens examined; no voucher specimens of juvenile <i>O. salvatana</i> were available for study).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Characters</b></th><th><b>Statistics</b></th><th><i>O. hannah</i> s. str.</th><th><i>O. bungarus</i> comb. nov.</th><th><i>O. kaalinga</i> sp. nov.</th><th><i>O. salvatana</i> sp. nov.</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Anterior dorsal scale rows (DSR1)</th><td>Mean</td><td>18.0</td><td>18.9</td><td>19.5</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>17–19</td><td>17–21</td><td>19–21</td><td>17–19</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>15</td><td>46</td><td>4</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>Median dorsal scale rows (DSR2)</th><td>Mean</td><td>15.0</td><td>15.0</td><td>15.0</td><td>15.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>15–15</td><td>15–15</td><td>15–15</td><td>15–15</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>15</td><td>12</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>Posterior dorsal scale rows (DSR3)</th><td>Mean</td><td>13.8</td><td>14.0</td><td>15.0</td><td>15.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>11–15</td><td>13–15</td><td>15–15</td><td>15–15</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>13</td><td>12</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>Ventrals</th><td>Mean</td><td>244.0</td><td>250.12</td><td>247.8</td><td>251.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>226–267</td><td>253–268</td><td>241–251</td><td>247–256</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>49</td><td>58</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>Subcaudals</th><td>Mean</td><td>89.0</td><td>106.8</td><td>88.0</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>80–112</td><td>71–125</td><td>86–90</td><td>74–112</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>49</td><td>57</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>Precloacal</th><td>Mean</td><td>1.0</td><td>1.0</td><td>1.0</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>1–1</td><td>1–1</td><td>1–1</td><td>1–1</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>49</td><td>63</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>Supralabials</th><td>Mean</td><td>6.9</td><td>7.0</td><td>7.4</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>6–7</td><td>7–7</td><td>7–8</td><td>7–7</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>15</td><td>68</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>Infralabials</th><td>Mean</td><td>8.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>7–9</td><td>8–8</td><td>8–8</td><td>8–8</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>15</td><td>68</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>Pale body bands</th><td>Mean</td><td>39.6</td><td>72.0</td><td>35.0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>27–48</td><td>57–87</td><td>28–48</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>41</td><td>51</td><td>3</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>Pterygoid teeth</th><td>Mean</td><td>19.3</td><td>11</td><td>12</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>18–21</td><td>11–11</td><td>12–12</td><td>11–11</td></tr><tr><td>(n)</td><td>12</td><td>9</td><td>4</td><td>6</td></tr></tbody></table>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

Fig. 3 in A taxonomic revision of Lemna sect. Uninerves (Lemnaceae)

Fig. 3. Maximum clade credibility tree based on the concatenated cpDNA psbK-psbI + atpF-atpH dataset as inferred by the programme BEAST v.1.8. Numbers on the branches are posterior probability (PP) from the Bayesian inference and bootstrap support (BS) values from the maximum likelihood analysis (PP/BS). A dash means that the node is absent from the respective analysis. Lemna aequinoctialis 6746 and L. tenera 9020 were used as outgroups.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in A taxonomic revision of Lemna sect. Uninerves (Lemnaceae)

Fig. 1. Ventral view of the investigated duckweed species. A, Lemna minuta clone 9581; B, L. yungensis clone 9208; C, L. valdiviana clone 8685; D, Overview of the measured characters for the morphological analysis. Fronds were prepared using a methanolic carmin staining method. L = length from base to apex, W = width at the widest part of the fronds, LN = length of nerve from node onwards, A = distance between node and end of aerenchyma, N-A = distance from node to apex. Scale bar represents 1 mm.

Fig. 11 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 11. Aedeagus of Stenothemus laticornis Y. Yang & H. Liu sp. nov., holotype (MHBU HBU(E) 410045). A. Ventral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Lateral view. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 8. Female reproductive system, ventral view. A. Stenothemus grahami Wittmer, 1974 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 8. Female reproductive system, ventral view. A. Stenothemus grahami Wittmer, 1974 (IZAS, Gansu). B. S. jindrai Švihla, 2004 (IZAS, Sichuan). C. S. minutissimus (Pic, 1933) comb. nov. (IZAS, Sichuan). D. S. tryznai Švihla, 2004 (IZAS, Sichuan). Abbreviations: see Material and methods. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 10 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 10. Aedeagus (A, D, G = ventral view; B, E, H = dorsal view; C, F, I = lateral view).A‒C. Stenothemus chongqingensis Y. Yang & H. Liu sp. nov., holotype (MHBU HBU(E) 410028). D‒F. S. flavicollis Y. Yang & S. Ge sp. nov., holotype (MHBU HBU(E) 410029). G‒I. S. jindraimimus Y. Yang & X. Yang sp. nov., holotype (IZAS IOZ(E) 1389239). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 6. Aedeagus (A, D, G = ventral view; B, E, H = dorsal view; C, F, I = lateral view). A‒C. Stenothemus grahami Wittmer, 1974 (MHBU, Henan). D‒F. S. minutissimus (Pic, 1933) comb. nov. (IZAS, Sichuan). G‒I. S. gracilis Y. Yang & X. Yang sp. nov. (MHBU HBU(E) 410022). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 5. Habitus, dorsal view.A in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 5. Habitus, dorsal view.A. Stenothemus jindrai Švihla, 2004, holotype, ♂ (NMPC).B. S. minutissimus (Pic, 1933) comb. nov., holotype, ♂ (MNHN). C. S. tryznai Švihla, 2004, holotype, ♂ (NMPC). D. S. singularicollis (Pic, 1933) comb. nov., holotype, ♀ (NHMH). E. S. melleus Švihla, 2005 syn. nov., holotype, ♂ (= S. singularicollis) (NMPC). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 4. Female reproductive system, ventral view. A in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 4. Female reproductive system, ventral view. A. Stenothemus shaanxiensis Švihla, 2004 stat. nov. (IZAS, Shaanxi). B. S. davidi (Pic, 1926) comb. nov. (IZAS, Shaanxi). C. S. diffusus Wittmer, 1974 (MHBU, Sichuan). D. S. dundai Švihla, 2004 (MHBU, Sichuan). Abbreviations: see Material and methods. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 3. Abdominal sternite VIII of female, ventral view. A. Stenothemus shaanxiensis Švihla, 2004 stat. nov. (IZAS, Shaanxi). B. S. davidi (Pic, 1926) comb. nov. (IZAS, Shaanxi). C. S. diffusus Wittmer, 1974 (MHBU, Sichuan). D. S. dundai Švihla, 2004 (MHBU, Sichuan). E. S. grahami Wittmer, 1974 (IZAS, Gansu). F. S. jindrai Švihla, 2004 (IZAS, Sichuan). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 9. Habitus, dorsal view. A. Stenothemus gracilis Y. Yang & X in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 9. Habitus, dorsal view. A. Stenothemus gracilis Y. Yang & X. Yang sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (MHBU HBU(E) 410022).B. S. chongqingensis Y. Yang & H. Liusp. nov., holotype, ♂ (MHBU HBU(E) 410028). C. S. flavicollis Y. Yang & S. Ge sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (MHBU HBU(E) 410029). D. S. jindraimimus Y. Yang & X. Yang sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (IZAS IOZ(E) 1389239). E. S. laticornis Y. Yang & H. Liu sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (MHBU HBU(E) 410045). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 2. Aedeagus(A, D, G = ventral view; B, E, H = dorsal view; C, F, I = lateral view). A‒C. Stenothemus shaanxiensis Švihla, 2004 stat. nov. (CQNU, Chongqing). D‒F. S. davidi (Pic, 1926) comb. nov. (IZAS, Sichuan). G‒I. S. diffusus Wittmer, 1974 (MHBU, Sichuan). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 1. Habitus, dorsal view.A in Taxonomic revision of the species of Stenothemus from Southwest China (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the descriptions of five new species

Fig. 1. Habitus, dorsal view.A. Stenothemus benesi Švihla, 2004, holotype, ♂ (NMPC). B. S. shaanxiensis Švihla, 2004 stat. nov., holotype, ♂ (NMPC). C. S. davidi (Pic, 1926) comb. nov., holotype, ♀ (MNHN). D. S. diffusus Wittmer, 1974, paratype, ♂ (NHMB CANTH00003518). E. S. dundai Švihla, 2004. holotype, ♂ (NMPC). F. S. grahami Wittmer, 1974, paratype, ♂ (NHMB CANTH00003898). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Figs 140-143 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 140-143. Habitus. Priocera klugi (140), P. lateralis (141), P. laticincta nov.sp. (142), P. longula (143).

Figs 136-139 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 136-139. Habitus. Priocera hadrosa nov.sp. (136), P. hovorei nov.sp. (137), P. ipeti nov.sp. (138), P. katarubella nov.sp. (139).

Figs 156-159 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 156-159. Habitus. Priocera penna nov.sp. (156), P. petalosa nov.sp. (157), P. pustulata (158), Stengyrahistrio SERVILLE (159).

Figs 116-119 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 116-119. Habitus. Priocera championi nov.sp. (116), P. catalinae (117), P. chilotaxis nov.sp. (118), P. chiricahuae (119).

Figs 104-107 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 104-107. Habitus. Priocera ardis nov.sp. (104), P. aperturosa nov.sp. (105), P. aspera nov.sp. (106), P. aurosignata (107).

Figs 152-155 in Taxonomic revision of the Western Hemisphere checkered beetle genus Priocera KIRBY (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Clerinae)

Figs 152-155. Habitus. Priocera turnbowi nov.sp. (152), P. nubes nov.sp. (153), P. odegaardi nov.sp. (154), P. pallens (155).