Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,453
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,453 results for “Outcome research”
Figure 5 from: Martone M, Murray-Rust P, Molloy J, Arrow T, MacGillivray M, Kittel C, Kasberger S, Steel G, Oppenheim C, Ranganathan A, Tennant J, Udell J (2016) ContentMine/Hypothes.is Proposal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8424. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8424
Figure 5 - A demo of Hypothes.is marking up a Wolbachia paper.
Figure 4 from: Martone M, Murray-Rust P, Molloy J, Arrow T, MacGillivray M, Kittel C, Kasberger S, Steel G, Oppenheim C, Ranganathan A, Tennant J, Udell J (2016) ContentMine/Hypothes.is Proposal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8424. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8424
Figure 4 - Zika in Scientific Literature
Figure 4 from: Wojnarski M, Hanken Kurtz D (2016) Paperity Central: An Open Catalog of All Scholarly Literature. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8462. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8462
Figure 4 - An introductory video presenting our Open Science Prize project.
Figure 1 from: Ito K, Anglin J, Kim H, Liew S (2017) Semi-automated Robust Quantification of Lesions (SRQL) Toolbox. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e13395. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13395
Figure 1 - White Matter Correction Pipeline; WM = white matter; SD= standard deviation
Figure 7 from: Rose DC, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O'Donnell SAL, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland WJ, Robertson RJ (2017) Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21074. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21074
Figure 7 - Sustainability scoring exercise (photo credit: UNEP-WCMC).
Figure 1 from: Neylon C (2017) Building a Culture of Data Sharing: Policy Design and Implementation for Research Data Management in Development Research. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21773. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21773
Figure 1 - The Institutional Analysis and Design framework adapted from (Ostrom 2005).
Figure 1 from: Ek K, Goytia S, Lundmark C, Nysten-Haarala S, Pettersson M, Sandström A, Söderasp J, Stage J (2017) Challenges in Swedish hydropower – politics, economics and rights. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21305. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21305
Figure 1 - The challenges of two parallel water management systems.
Figure 1 from: Ichim M, Crisan G, Tebrencu C, de Boer H (2017) PhytoAuthent: Molecular authentication of complex herbal food supplements for safety and efficacy. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21710. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21710
Figure 1 - Value chains of herbal food supplements studied by the PhytoAuthent project.
Figure 2 from: Lahti L, da Silva F, Laine M, Lähteenoja V, Tolonen M (2017) Alchemy & algorithms: perspectives on the philosophy and history of open science. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e13593. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13593
Figure 2 PHOS16 Conference Programme.
Figure 6 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 6 Rating criteria for the analysis of the evaluated tools.
Figure 11 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 11 Result of the assessment for the task overview changes.
Figure 8 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 8 Result of the assessment for the task identify splits.
Figure 3 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 3 An abstract representation of TaxVis´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 4 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 4 An abstract representation of TTT´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 10 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 10 Result of the assessment for the task identify moves.
Figure 13 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 13 Summary of the assessment, contrasting tasks and tools.
Figure 1 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 1 Components of the process for the comparison of biological taxonomies.
Figure 9 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 9 Result of the assessment for the task identify merges.
Figure 5 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 5 An abstract representation of ProvenanceMatrix´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 2 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 2 An abstract representation of TreeJuxtaposer´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.