Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1. Neofoleyellides steyni n in Two new species of Neofoleyellides (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) parasitising anuran amphibians in South Africa

Fig. 1. Neofoleyellides steyni n. sp. from Amietia delalandii (Dum´eril et Bibron, 1841), line drawings. A – fragment of body at anterior end, female, lateral view; B – fragment of body at anterior end, male, lateral view; C – anterior extremity, female, lateral view; D–G – anterior extremity, female, apical view, optical sections at different depth of focus; H – microfilaria; I – posterior end of body, female, lateral view.

Fig. 5. Neofoleyellides martini n in Two new species of Neofoleyellides (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) parasitising anuran amphibians in South Africa

Fig. 5. Neofoleyellides martini n. sp. from Leptopelis natalensis (Smith, 1849), line drawings. A–D – posterior end of body, male, ventral view, variations of the arrangements of caudal papillae.

Fig. 3. Neofoleyellides steyni n in Two new species of Neofoleyellides (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) parasitising anuran amphibians in South Africa

Fig. 3. Neofoleyellides steyni n. sp. from Amietia delalandii (Dumeril´et Bibron, 1841), photomicrographs. A–C – lateral alae, male: A – anterior end, B – midbody level, C – transverse section at level of posterior end, la – left ala, ra – right ala; D – area rugosa.

Fig. 2. Neofoleyellides steyni n in Two new species of Neofoleyellides (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) parasitising anuran amphibians in South Africa

Fig. 2. Neofoleyellides steyni n. sp. from Amietia delalandii (Dum´eril et Bibron, 1841), line drawings. A – posterior end of body, male, lateral view; B – right spicule, lateral view; C – distal end of the left spicule, lateral view; D–I – posterior end of body, male, ventral view, variations of the arrangements of caudal papillae.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2016View details →

Fig. 5 in A new mid-Permian burnetiamorph therapsid from the Main Karoo Basin of South Africa and a phylogenetic review of Burnetiamorpha

Fig. 5. Burnetiamorpha gen. et sp. indet. (BP/1/7098) from Springfontein, Beaufort West district, South Africa; upper Poortjie Member, Pristerognathus AZ, latest Capitanian. A. Anterior palate in ventral view, black arrow shows direction of view in B; white arrows show lateral displacement of interchoanal portion of the vomers. B. Interchoanal portion of vomers in right ventral view (B), showing the continuation of the downturned edges of the vomer extending anteriorly onto the premaxilla; pmr, ventral ridge of premaxilla at anterior margin of choana; vrl, ventral ridge of vomer laterally flared; vrm, ventral ridge of vomer medially folded. C. Specimen in posterior view. Photographs (A1, C1) and explanatory drawings (A2, C2).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2016View details →

Fig. 3 in A new mid-Permian burnetiamorph therapsid from the Main Karoo Basin of South Africa and a phylogenetic review of Burnetiamorpha

Fig. 3. Burnetiamorpha gen. et sp. indet. (BP/1/7098) from Springfontein, Beaufort West district, South Africa; upper Poortjie Member, Pristerognathus AZ, latest Capitanian; in dorsal (A) and left lateral (B) views. Photographs (A1, B1) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in A new triadotypid insect from the Late Triassic of South Africa

Fig. 1. Triadotypid insect Reisia rieki sp. nov. from Carnian (Triassic) of Kapokkraal (A, B, D) and Aasvoëlberg (C) localities, Molteno Formation, Karoo Basin, South Africa. A. PRE/F/17569, right wing. B. PRE/F/16442, left wing. C. PRE/F/10616, right wing. D. PRE/F/17499, right wing.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in A new triadotypid insect from the Late Triassic of South Africa

Fig. 3. Triadotypid insect Reisia rieki sp. nov. from Carnian (Triassic) of Kapokkraal locality, Molteno Formation, Karoo Basin, South Africa, PRE/ F/17569a, detail of the oblique crossvein between RA and RP1 (opposite the first fork of RP4, indicated by an asterisk), as indicated on Fig. 2A (light-mirrored, flipped horizontally).

Fig. 9 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 9. Schematic representation of hypothetical ecomorphotype groupings and population dynamics of the sauropodomorph fauna of the Elliot Formation.

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PC1 (29.8% of total variance) Fig. 8. Morphospace plot of the first two PCO axes generated in the R statistical environment (Claddis package). Branches are superimposed from a single representative topology selected from amongst the 48 MPTs. in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PC1 (29.8% of total variance) Fig. 8. Morphospace plot of the first two PCO axes generated in the R statistical environment (Claddis package). Branches are superimposed from a single representative topology selected from amongst the 48 MPTs.

Fig. 7 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 7. Histograms indicating the level of stratigraphic fit of the 48 input trees (A, B) versus the randomly generated topologies (C, D). Only the results for the Gap Excess Ratio (C) and the modified Manhattan Stratigraphic Measure (D) are shown here. The vertical dashed line represents the critical value at which 95% of trees fail the randomization test. Thus, all 48 MPTs trees show a significantly better fit to stratigraphy than expected at random.

Fig. 5 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 5. Lithostratigraphic details of the erosional gully (donga) located on Damplaats Farm. Abbreviations: Fl, horizontal laminated mudstone; Fm, massive mudstone; Gcm, clast-supported conglomerate; Gmm, matrix-supported conglomerate; P, paleosol; Sl, low-angle cross-bedded sandstone; Sm, massive or faintly laminated sandstone; Sp, cross-bedded sandstone; Sr, ripple cross-laminated sandstone.

Fig. 3 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 3. Schematic sections of the sauropodomorph specimen localities discussed in the text. For each locality, the stratigraphic positon of (i) the fossil specimens, (ii) the lower and upper ranges of the Elliot Formation, and (iii) the LEF–UEF contact are shown. See text and Table 1 for details, and Figs. 1 and 2 for the geological maps of the locations. The composite stratigraphic section of the Elliot Formation is modified from Bordy and Eriksson (2015).

Fig. 4 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 4. Stratigraphic relationships at the type locality of Plateosauravus cullingworthi, Kromme Spruit, ~6 km ESE of Sterkspruit, Eastern Cape Province (3027CB). The key stratigraphic contacts have been mapped using the lithological characters of the various stratigraphic units. See Table 1 and text for details. Base image provided by Google Earth.

Fig. 2 in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Fig. 2. Geological maps of the key sauropodomorph specimen localities discussed in the text. See Table 1 and Fig. 3 for GPS coordinates and details on stratigraphic positions, respectively. A. Kromme Spruit, ~6 km ESE of Sterkspruit, Eastern Cape Province (3027CB); the type locality of Plateosauravus cullingworthi. B. Zonderhout 291 Farm, ~108 km NE of Ladybrand, eastern Free State Province (2828AC); the type locality of Eucnemesaurus fortis. C. Cannon Rock (270) Farm, ~60 km SE of Sterkspruit, Eastern Cape Province (3127AA); the type locality of Eucnemesaurus entaxonis. D. Thaba 'Nyama, →

Figure 8. Hydrodroma reinhardi, paratype male. A in The water mites of the genus Hydrodroma (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrodromidae) in Europe and Africa

Figure 8. Hydrodroma reinhardi, paratype male. A. Cx-I+II; B. genital field; C. folded integument area; D. integument in top view.

Figure 7. A-B in The water mites of the genus Hydrodroma (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrodromidae) in Europe and Africa

Figure 7. A-B. Hydrodroma liberiensis, integument papillae in tangential and top view. A. holotype male; B. paratype female. C.-H. H. rheophila, female from Lesbos (photographs and drawings: Vladimir Pešić). C. integument in tangential view; D. integument in top view (magnification as in C.); E. palp; F. II-L-4-5; G. III-L-4-6; H. IV-L-4-6.

Figure 5. A-E in The water mites of the genus Hydrodroma (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrodromidae) in Europe and Africa

Figure 5. A-E. Hydrodroma capensis, male, SMF 43882. A. anterior coxal plate; B. integument papillae in tangential view; C. integument papillae in top view (magnification as in B.); D. ejaculatory complex, anterior view; E. chelicera; F-G; H. trigonometrica; F. Male from Algeria, integument tangential; G. female holotype, genital field.

Figure 3 in The water mites of the genus Hydrodroma (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrodromidae) in Europe and Africa

Figure 3. Hydrodroma torrenticola, Germany, Heiligenrode. A-C. male, integument papillae; A, C, in top view, B in tangential view; D. male, anterior coxal plate.

Figure 2. A-D in The water mites of the genus Hydrodroma (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrodromidae) in Europe and Africa

Figure 2. A-D: Hydrodroma despiciens, neotypes, Denmark. A. male, integument papillae near lateral eye in tangential view; B. male, integument in top view; C. male, anterior coxal plate with medial setal tubercles on Cx-I; D. female, genital field; E. female, integument in tangential view; F. male, chelicera.