Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 16 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 16. Photographs of Epimetopus species, including two specimens of questionable provenance (E–G). A – E. flavicaptus Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2011; B – E. deceptus Perkins, 2012; C – E. tridens Perkins, 2012; D – E. hintoni Balfour-Browne, 1949; E – Epimetopus sp. (ʻZambiaʼ); F–G – E. cf. burruyacu Oliva, 1986 (ʻSaudi Arabiaʼ) (F – dorsal view; G – aedeagus). Scale bars for A–F = 0.5 mm. A–D adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ (2012).

Fig. 13 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 13. Known distribution of Eupotemus species. A – species of E. limicola species group; B – species of E. carinaticollis species group.

Fig. 6 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 6. Male genitalia and associated structures of Epimetopidae. A–H – Eupotemus Ji & Jäch, 1998 (A–F – E. smithi sp. nov.; G – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; H – E. carinaticollis (Basilewsky, 1956)). I–R – Epimetopus Lacordaire, 1854 (I–N – E. mendeli Fikáček et al., 2011; O – E. cf. burruyacu Oliva, 1986; P – E. multiporus Perkins, 2012; Q – E. clandestinus Perkins, 2012; R – E. thermarum Schwarz & Barber, 1917). S–Z – Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949 (S–Y – E. acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; Z – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875)). A, I, S – sternite VIII; B, J, T – tergite VIII; C, K, U – sternite IX; D, L, V – aedeagus dorsally; E, M, W – aedeagus laterally; F, N, X – aedeagus ventrally (basal part omitted in X); Y – sperm pump. Color coding: green – ventral projections of the median lobe; red – median lobe; blue – paramere (pale blue – dorsal lobe; dark blue – ventral lobe). Not to scale.

Fig. 5 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 5. Morphology of Epimetopidae. A–B – ventral morphology: A – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; B – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Perkins & Barclay, 2011. C–F – hind wings: C – Eumetopus schulkei Jäch, 2002; D – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; E – Epimetopus mendeli, adopted from Fංκගඹൾκ et al. (2011); F – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. G – dorsal part of the metathorax. H – scutellum. I–K – abdominal ventrites (I – Eumetopus schuelkei; J – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; K – Epimetopus mendeli). L–M – ovipositor (L – Eumetopus schuelkei; M – Eupotemus smithi). O – elytral punctation, slide-mounted elytra of Epimetopus costaricensis. P – female of Eumetopus acutimontis in ventral view, with the egg cases carried under the abdomen. Not to scale.

Fig. 15 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 15. Elytral sculpture and male genitalia of Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949. A–H – elytral sculpture, same specimens as in Fig. 14: A – E. acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; B – E. asperatus (Champion, 1919); C – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875); D – E. flavidulus (Sharp, 1890); E – E. maindroni (Régimbart, 1903); F – E. schuelkei Jäch, 2002; G – E. tibialis Ji & Jäch, 1998; H – E. weigeli Skale & Jäch, 2003. I–L – male genitalia of examined specimens, large basal portion of the phallobase omitted (dorsal and lateral view): I – E. acutimontis from Vietnam; J – E. flavidulus from India: Andhra Pradesh; K – E. maindroni from India: Gujarat; L – E. weigeli from India: Uttarakhand.

Fig. 3 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 3. Thoracic morphology of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–B, J, Q – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; C–D, L–O – Eumetopus schuelkei Jäch, 2002; E–F – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2012; G–I, P – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. A–I – prothorax in ventral view (B, D, F, H – detail of ventral sculpture of the pronotal hood; I – detail of closed procoxal cavity. J–L – meso- and metathorax in ventral view. M–N – elytron in ventral view (M – general view; N – detail of the ventral ridge, notice the spiny surface on inner face of the ridge (in) and on the elytral plectrum posteriorly of it (pl)). O – mesotrochanter. P–Q – details of pretarsus with the leaf-like empodial seta. Not to scale.

Fig. 9 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 9. Habitus photographs of the species of the Eupotemus limicola species group, holotypes: A–C – E. bilobatus sp. nov.; D–F – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; G–I – E. limicola (Delève, 1967).

Fig. 12 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 12. Habitus photographs of the species of the Eupotemus carinaticollis species group, holotypes: A–C – E. carinaticollis (Basilewsky, 1956); D–F – E. uluguru sp. nov.; G–I – E. taianus sp. nov.

Fig. 1 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 1. Distribution and phylogenetic relationships of Epimetopidae genera. A – summary of all known records of Epimetopidae, mapped by genera. Records for American Epimetopus adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ (2012). B–E – phylogenetic relationship among genera based on morphological characters (B–C) and DNA data (D–E): B–C – strict consensus tree of the morphology-based maximum parsimony analysis (B – complete tree with bootstrap supports; C – Georissidae + Epimetopidae subtree with characters mapped). D – Bayesian maximum credibility tree based on cox1, 16S, 18S and 28S sequences, with posterior probability of particular clades. E – morphological characters mapped on the molecular topology of Epimetopidae constrained as sister to all other hydrophilid families following the topology by Lඳ et al. (2020).

Fig. 2 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 2. Morphology of mouthparts and head appendages of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–I – Eupotemus Ji & Jäch, 1998: A, C, E, F, H – E. smithi sp. nov., B, D, G – E. limicola (Delève, 1967), I – E. cameroonensis sp. nov. J–Q – Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949: J, L, M, N, P – E. schuelkei Jäch, 2002, Q – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875), K, L*, O – E. sp. from Sri Lanka. R–Z, a–l – Epimetopus Lacordaire, 1854: R–W – E. mendeli Fikáček et al., 2011, X–Z, a–c – E. costaricensis Perkins, 1979, g, j – E. thermarum Schwarz & Barber, 1917, e, k – E. trogoides (Sharp, 1874), h – E. costatus group, f, i, l – E. punctipennis Perkins, 1979. Body parts: A–B, J–K, R, X, g–i – labrum; C, L, S, Y – mandibles; D, L*, e–f – mandibular apex; E, M, T, Z – maxilla; U – detail of basal part of ultimate palpomere; F–G, N–O, V, a–b, j–l – mentum and prementum; H–I, P–Q, W, c – antenna. Not to scale.

Fig. 8 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 8. Male genitalia of the species of the Eupotemus limicola species group, holotypes. A–C, R–S – E. bilobatus sp. nov.; D–F, T–U – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; G–I, V–W – E. ophioglossus sp. nov.; J–L, X–Y – E. smithi sp. nov.; M–Q – E. limicola (Delève, 1967). A, D, G, J, M – dorsal view; B, E, H, K, N – lateral view; C, F, I, L – ventral view; O – apex of the median lobe, dorsal view; P, R, T, V, X – fork of the median lobe; Q, S, U, W, Y – apex of parameres in lateral view.

Fig. 4 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus

Fig. 4. Head and leg morphology of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–B, H, L – Eumetopus acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; D, M – Eumetopus schuelkei Jäch, 2002; C, K–L, Q – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; F–G – Epimetopus punctipennis Perkins, 1979 (adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ 2012); E, I–J, R – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2011; N–O – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. A – head in dorsolateral view (can – clypeal canthus causing the eye emargination); B–C – head in dorsal view (arrow – the ridge dividing anterior declined part of clypeus); D – mentum and maxilla; E – head in ventral view; F–G – occipital part of the head with median raised tubercle, dorsolateral view (arrows: parallel impressions corresponding to ventral ridges of pronotal hood); H–I – antenna, scapus largely omitted; J – labial palp; K – apical tibial armature, ventral view, mesothoracic leg; L – apical tibial armature and tarsus, ventral view, metathoracic leg; M – mesotibia; N–O – tarsus (N – posterior; O – anterior); P–R – metatibia, dorsal view. Not to scale.

Figures 8–11 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 8–11. Eunota togata described subspecies females based on types and/or type locality specimens. 8) E. t. togata, type locality, Cameron County, Texas. 9) E. t. latilabris, type locality, Kackley, Kansas. 10) E. t. globicollis, paralectotype, Clark County, Kansas. 11) E. t. fascinans, type locality, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Scale line = 2 mm.

Figures 4–7 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 4–7. Eunota togata described subspecies males based on types and/or type locality specimens. 4) E. t. togata, type locality, Cameron County, Texas. 5) E. t. latilabris, type locality, Kackley, Kansas. 6) E. t. globicollis, lectotype, Clark County, Kansas. 7) E. t. fascinans, holotype, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Scale line = 2 mm.

Figures 24–29 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 24–29. Eunota togata leucophasma, new subspecies, and intergrade adults from New Mexico and western Texas. E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies, non-types. 24) Male from Laguna del Perro, Torrance County, New Mexico. 25) Female from Laguna del Perro, Torrance County, New Mexico. Intergrade populations E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies X E. t. globicollis. 26) Male from Laguna Plata, Lea County, New Mexico. 27) Female from Laguna Plata, Lea County, New Mexico. 28) Male from Shafter Lake, Andrews County, Texas. 29) Male from Shafter Lake, Andrews County, Texas. Scale lines = 2 mm.

Figures 46–49 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 46–49. Eunota togata leucophasma, new subspecies, type locality (TL), paratype locality (PTL), ancillary locality (AL), intergrade locality (IL). 46) E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies, TL: Salt Flat, Hudspeth Co., Texas; expansive salt flats in Salt Basin. 47) E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies, PTL: Alamogordo, Otero Co., New Mexico; salt ponds east of US 70 in Tularosa Basin. 48) E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies, AL: Willard, Torrance Co., New Mexico; alkali lake complex of Laguna del Perro, Estancia Basin, Willard, New Mexico. 49) E. t. globicollis X E. t. leucophasma, new subspecies, intergrade: IL: O'Donnell and Tahoka, Lynn Co., Texas: alkali lakes on Llano Estacado (Staked Plains) in High Plains of western Texas.

Figures 18–23 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 18–23. Eunota togata leucophasma, new subspecies, allotype, female, Salt Basin, Hudspeth County, Texas. 18) Habitus, dorsal view. 19) Habitus, lateral view. 20) Head, pronotum, dorsal view. 21) Head, dorsal-anterior view. 22) Paratype, female, head, anterior view. 23) Allotype labels. Scale lines = 2 mm.

Figures 12–17 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 12–17. Eunota togata leucophasma, new subspecies, holotype, male, Salt Basin, Hudspeth County, Texas. 12) Habitus, dorsal view. 13) Habitus, lateral view. 14) Head, pronotum, dorsal view. 15) Head, dorsal-anterior view. 16) Paratype, male, head, anterior view. 17) Holotype labels. Scale lines = 2 mm.

Figures 42–45. Eunota togata described taxa type localities. 42 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 42–45. Eunota togata described taxa type localities. 42) E. t. togata, TL: Port Isabel, Cameron Co., Texas; coastal saltwater estuaries. 43) E. t. latilabris, TL: Kackley, Republic Co., Kansas; salt marsh and brine pond on Saint John's Creek. 44) E. t. globicollis, TL: Englewood, Clark Co., Kansas; saline banks of Cimarron River. 45) E. t. fascinans, TL: Santa Rosa, Guadalupe Co., New Mexico; saline soils from freshwater ponds above Pecos River.

Figures 36–41 in Taxonomic revision of Eunota togata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1841) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in North America with a new subspecies from western Texas and New Mexico, United States

Figures 36–41. Eunota togata subspecies male elytral maculation patterns from coastal Texas, southeast Nebraska, and northcentral Kansas. E. t. togata from Cameron Co., Texas. 36) Adult dorsal habitus. 37) Adult elytra. E. t. latilabris from Lancaster Co., Nebraska. 38) Adult dorsal habitus. 39) Adult elytra. E. t. globicollis from Stafford Co., Kansas. 40) Adult dorsal habitus. 41) Adult elytra. Scale lines = 2 mm.